"The Anti-Chomsky Reader is a polemical broadside intended to slam Chomsky into oblivion. Reviewing his career and ideas, the discussion reaches back to the 1960s and his anti-war activism, then moves to the Cold War, the media, Israel, the Holocaust, 9/11, and, finally, Chomsky’s linguistics. The editors, Peter Collier and David Horowitz, are active intellectuals in the Republican Party: Collier is the publisher of Encounter Books, a conservative press in San Francisco, and Horowitz, the editor of FrontPageMag.com, is a prolific writer who courts confrontation with the left. Other contributors also are experienced culture warriors. They include Ronald Radosh, a former Communist and SDS member who steered rightward after he researched the Rosenberg case and found evidence of guilt; Eli Lehrer, a former editor at American Enterprise magazine; and Stephen Morris, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Institute and long-serving anti-communist scholar.
"Their aim is to topple Chomsky’s standing—-a task easier to conceive than to complete. Chomsky’s unyielding anticapitalism tempts many critics into an equally strident anti-Chomskyism. The temptation is particularly strong for Collier and Horowitz, who have complex personal histories dating back to their days editing Ramparts, a leading leftist magazine in the 1960s and early ’70s. Now staunch conservatives, they have renounced their former comrades, especially icons such as Chomsky."
No one ever says why he became such a dick; I'm always seeing this vague "complex personal history" business. I'm curious, in case anybody knows.
― Mayor Maynot, Thursday, 21 April 2005 01:05 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Thursday, 21 April 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer: But when the monkey die, people gonna cry. (latebloomer), Thursday, 21 April 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)
― g e o f f (gcannon), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)
It's amusing how his transformation mirrors the neo-cons, except he started from his parents Stalinism rather than Trotsky.
BTW, he only claims that the Black Panthers murdered a friend of his - the crime is actually unsolved and there's no hard evidence that she was whacked.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:27 (twenty years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:38 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 21 April 2005 05:16 (twenty years ago)
can someone deconstruct the logic used here???
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― adam (adam), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
This complaint applies to the discriminating nature of grading of my English teacher. She knows I'm an advancer of conservative ideas b/c I where a 'W' t-shirt to class on sometimes. Ever since the 1st day of class when I wore my 'W' shirt she has treated me cold and been discriminating in grading my essays. On the last one, I wrote about how family values in the books weve read aren't good. I know the paper was pretty much great because I spell checked it and proofred it twice. I got an D- just because the professor hates families and thinks its okay to be gay.
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)
for even more fun bits, remember all the anti-university legislation he tried to get Republicans to push thru the Ohio state gov't? About how students didn't have to discuss "controversial" topics about their "indoctrinaire" professors? i think i posted a thread about it here...
xpost: exactly!
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
big thing he was behind
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)
Dr. Colburn attacked my beliefs in Jesus for a third time, citing Karl Marx as the "one true truth-bearer." He disallowed me from praying before class and often ate cheese-puffs instead of lecturing us on Military Histories. He quoted many writings of the Chinese like Sun Tzu and Mao Zse Dung. I was graded unfairly for my beliefs when I wrote a paper on King David and his military prowess. Dr. Colburn attacked my sources, claiming the bible was "not an accurate historical document"
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― Thea (Thea), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
Oh come on, you have to spell check a paper at least three times before it's great.
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, that's always been my feeling about him. Like, he was a left-wing asshole, and then he turned right-wing and said, "Hey, I was a real asshole when I was a left-winger," not realizing that his assholishness existed a priori, or at least was extraneous to, his ideology. Anyway, the man has some serious persecution complex going. His whole thing about how oppressed conservative students are by the acadmic politburo is just completely bizarre.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)
Of all the nerve!
― O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:20 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:20 (twenty years ago)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
I was hoping someone would post this.
I don't think so, Spencer. :)
― donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
I think this is what changed him:http://www.fightback.com/images/photos/gunman.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
I just remember when "Fight Back" was just part of a segment of the local news, then it became this TV show, with this fully produced muzaky intro that I can't get out of my head. I can still hear the divas going "FIGHT... BACK!" in my head. Horowitz would run out onto the platform, and make his excitedly moribund delivery about his mission to NOT LET CONSUMERS BE RIPPED OFF BY BAD PRODUCTS! I loved this David Horowitz.
― donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
On the first day of class, Dr. Kulbicki informed us he would not be teaching Karl Marx because Marx is "becoming increasingly irrelevant." Dr. Kulbicki proceeded to teach Straussian interpretations of every philosopher, and exam questions were designed so as to make students argue these points. Additionally, Dr. Kulbicki has expressed on a repeated basis his disregard for international law (in a Political Theory class?) and has made such comments as "the UN is irrelevant."
― mike h. (mike h.), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:46 (twenty years ago)
― O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)
Description of Complaint (please be as detailed as possible, including quotes from your professor where applicable):
Dr. Bullock was extremely vocal about his political views. He constantly ridiculed the President. He actually brought in a Congressman into our large class of approximately 300 students, and he allowed the Congressman to spend the ENTIRE class bashing the President and promoting his radical ideology. It was basically a chance for the Congressman to campaign, and Dr. Bullock never allowed someone from the opposing party to have the same platform. Did I mention that this happened in 1996? The President was Bill Clinton, and the Congressman was Representative Norwood from Georgia, a Republican? Action Taken:
None. Unlike most of the whiney halfwits who piss and moan on this site, I actually respected this professor's right to express his political views. Sure, I found his views to be repugnant, but I recognized the fact that I was a student in a UNIVERSITY, where (gasp!) I might be exposed to points of view with which I disagreed. I doubt you'll post this on your little McCarthyist site, but hopefully I'm wrong.
― _, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)
― C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)
well this bit certainly sounds familiar.
xpost: ok, so like the entire PNAC crew.
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)