US police handcuff five-year-old Girl. Has The World Gone Mad?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4475513.stm

A lawyer has threatened to sue police officers who handcuffed an allegedly uncontrollable five-year-old after she acted up at a Florida kindergarten.

The officers were called by the school after a teacher and assistant principal failed to calm down the little girl.

The incident was caught on a video camera which was rolling in the classroom as part of a self-improvement exercise at the St Petersburg school.

A lawyer for the girl's mother said the episode was "incomprehensible".

The video, made public by the lawyer this week, shows the unfolding of the violent tantrum, which started when the little girl refused to take part in a maths lesson.

She then ripped some papers off a bulletin board and started punching whoever tried to calm her down.

After calling her mother and learning she would not be able to pick up the child for at least one more hour, the teachers resorted to calling the police.

Three officers rushed to the scene, and apparently oblivious to the fact they were dealing with a child, handcuffed the screaming girl by pinning her arms behind her back.

They finally drove her to her mother in the back of a police cruiser.

The St Petersburg Police Department declined to comment on the incident and said an investigation was under way.

Federico, Saturday, 23 April 2005 03:51 (twenty years ago)

The video, made public by the lawyer this week, shows the unfolding of the violent tantrum, which started when the little girl refused to take part in a maths lesson.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

Oh wait, it's UK. Is that the standard UK way of saying it?

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 03:54 (twenty years ago)

Britons be adding letters all over the place. "I was waetching ae prougramme on bioulougy..."

I DESIRE...MACARONI NECKLACES AND SOAP SCULPTURES (Matt Chesnut), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:01 (twenty years ago)

shoulda just tazed that shit, yo.

less spittle to clean up in the squad car afterward.

kingfish maximum overdrunk (Kingfish), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:06 (twenty years ago)

i had no idea what handcuffs looked like

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

If anyone at all got to look at the video, they would realize that the police had every right to restrain that little demon spawn. She was acting like a royal brat, punching at adults, tearing at things off the walls, and being a little uncontrollable terror. If the mother had any sense at all in her little litigious peabrain, she wouldn't have raised holy hell over what the police had to do but, instead, immediately punished this little bratling.

Goodbye Indian Summer (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:19 (twenty years ago)

I mean -- I wouldn't have even DARED think about doing ANY of the things this little terror was doing. Why? Because I knew that my parents, once they caught wind of what I had done, would have punished me. I knew my actions had severe consequences if I was misbehaving. I think certain parents should return to being parents instead of people who pass the buck and blame everyone but themselves/their children.

Goodbye Indian Summer (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:21 (twenty years ago)

Plus, little children can wriggle their little bodies to where it's nearly impossible to restrain them as a singular adult. Sometimes you need two. I'm just guessing the third police officer was there just so the three of them could handle this child gingerly while also gaining control of the bratling. Which would be totally understandable; I mean, you don't need to break bones or leave bruises. But -- just making sure that the kid is being prevented from wreaking more havoc is totally okay.

Goodbye Indian Summer (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:24 (twenty years ago)

http://www.sptimesphotos.com/video/office.html

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:28 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I honestly can't say I see anything particularly cruel about handcuffs in this case, so much as just an available form of restraint which was very necessary.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:28 (twenty years ago)

I gotta say that the kids was pretty much being a terror but the physical abuse didn't really require the use of handcuffs. It seemed pretty clear from the video that while the teacher was respectfully trying to contain the situation, the kid was never too much of a threat. Unfortunately, the teacher was in no position to handle the child's behavior and the police were brought in. I really think that the police could've at least tried harder to get the girl out of the room without the use of handcuffs. It was pretty obvious that she was scared shitless once the cops showed up.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:30 (twenty years ago)

Now I've seen the video. I don't know, I'm pretty torn.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:35 (twenty years ago)

It does look like she calms down once they're in the room. But the officer also says "remember me?" right? Maybe the girl has a history. The problem is, if they physically carry her out and she's kicking and punching, they could end up injuring her.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:36 (twenty years ago)

I gotta say that the kids was pretty much being a terror but the physical abuse didn't really require the use of handcuffs. It seemed pretty clear from the video that while the teacher was respectfully trying to contain the situation, the kid was never too much of a threat. Unfortunately, the teacher was in no position to handle the child's behavior and the police were brought in. I really think that the police could've at least tried harder to get the girl out of the room without the use of handcuffs. It was pretty obvious that she was scared shitless once the cops showed up.

I didn't see an example of the last sentence you posted herein, but the rest of your post has a lot of merit to it. Yeah. I suppose the police could've carried the child out, but what if they thought the girl's mother would've sued them for improper handling of her "precious" child? What if the officers felt the best way to handle the situation without causing the child physical harm (which wouldn't have been okay -- again, bruising or fractures or both are NEVER acceptable) would have been to slip on the handcuffs.

I'm actually more angry at the mother than at the child, BTW. I mean, if the child was acting up THAT badly with even the PRINCIPAL of the school, what kind of message is that sending about the child's lack of discipline at home? Maybe what she did at that school has been tolerated for quite a long time at home as being something "cute". I've seen lots of examples of children acting incredibly rudely who get nothing but positive feedback from their parents, e.g. "Oh, look, he/she's being cute," or "Oh, he/she's just acting like a little kid -- let him/her be." And that ruins the child.

Goodbye Indian Summer (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:38 (twenty years ago)

(Ha. xposting. I see that Hurting has also raised the "Yeah. I suppose the police could've carried the child out, but what if they thought the girl's mother would've sued them for improper handling of her "precious" child?" question and sorta answered it.)

Anyway. Yeah. Anything to keep that child from being injured, y'know? She just needed to be restrained.

Goodbye Indian Summer (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)

xpost: Last couple sentences totally OTM.

Anyway, I doubt that she'll be scarred for life by the experience -- I think the imagery is probably more disturbing than the reality here.

A much bigger problem is that this child has some serious issues and needs help.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:40 (twenty years ago)

I'm disappointed in the mom too - if the kid's got behavioural probs and the school is calling saying "hey she's lost it", for her to say "sorry I cant turn up for an hour, deal with it" is a bit weird. But eh. I think there might have been better ways for the school to deal with it than the cops, they should have policy for this kind of thing.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:40 (twenty years ago)

deploy a bola!

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)

I didn't see an example of the last sentence you posted herein, but the rest of your post has a lot of merit to it.

As soon as the cops show up, she's very aware of their presence as well as that of the camera. She immediately drops her head once the cops arrive. It's all there in the video.

Anyhow, kudos to that teacher.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:42 (twenty years ago)

The poor helpless teacher -- she's thinking "I'm not risking my job over this little snot."

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:43 (twenty years ago)

Maybe we should like one solid punch? Only one though.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:44 (twenty years ago)

In a school I *know* , students were occasionally taken by police / social-service workers if the parents catagorically refused to help w. their discipline to the great detraction of the other childrens' education.

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)

Also, the bulletin board.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:47 (twenty years ago)

i can't really blame the cops here, either.

after being on a ferry across the irish sea w/ a bunch of screaming german brats sitting not too far from me, i can definitely understand the need for a little discipline sometimes.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:47 (twenty years ago)

The kid was clearly not a physical thread to THREE ADULT POLICE OFFICERS at the time of her restraint.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:49 (twenty years ago)

what they maybe could've done was evacuate the teachers and classmates from the class to the auditorium or library or even outside if feasible (nice weather, chalk board not needed for lesson) and then have the police alert the mother to retrieve her daughter from the school and if she refused play the dfacs card.

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:52 (twenty years ago)

Yes... I can't view the movie now, so I really should just shut my trap.

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:53 (twenty years ago)

Social service workers I can understand Jer but its a bit of a sad state of affairs if cops have to be involved in the behavioural problems of kids at a school, when we're not talking a teen with a gun or something.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:53 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps they should've shot her with a tranquiliser dart then dropped a big net over her and hoisted her up with a crane.

JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE!!!

Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:57 (twenty years ago)

Classroom video:

http://www.sptimesphotos.com/video/classroom.html

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:58 (twenty years ago)

that is part of a police officer's job- to deal with disturbances. handcuffs are used to keep people from harming themselves, too. I see nothing wrong with the use of handcuffs.

h0t h0t h0rsey (Carey), Saturday, 23 April 2005 04:59 (twenty years ago)

Most children sitting in chairs need to be handcuffed, it's true.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:02 (twenty years ago)

http://www.livetrap.com/shop/product_shots/cat_shots/tipper3.jpg

CAUGHT ME A FE-ROCIOUS DAWG

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:02 (twenty years ago)

Nooo... it's an unfortunate situation, but in a school I *know* (this being almost as loaded as you want it to be) there were occasionally situations in which children had been SO routinely behaviorally difficult for 3 or 4 years without the cooperation of their respective parents/guardians, and following more than few worthless interventions w. social-service workers that the only way (legally) to get the state involved was for the teachers to 'criminalize' the behavior by calling in the police. I didn't perosonally advocate this behavior, but I can't condone it as completely evil, either. Again - in THIS particular school the children were 10-12, and had problems worse than temper tantrums, including gang-affiliations and psychotically violent acts against each other.

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:05 (twenty years ago)

(that's to trayce)

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://www.mandiapple.com/snowblood/images/battleroyale/classb.jpg

h0t h0t h0rsey (Carey), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)

my spelling errors attributed to alcohol, natch.

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:13 (twenty years ago)

Wow that video was just a little girl having a small tanty! I thought she got violent! I didnt see a scrap of violence in that clip whatsoever, I thought she was screaming and hitting people but I didnt see it.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:14 (twenty years ago)

Jer: yeah look I agree with you for such situations, I dont see it here tho. As much as I hate to say this, I think the total "hands off, do nothing" approach schools are now forced to have is really hindering discipline. I never thought I'd say that, but really a teacher just sayin "that is not acceptable" over and over is useless - a kid that age wont even know what that means for starters.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:16 (twenty years ago)

Had that happened when I was a kid, the kid would have got a botty spank and been sent home. Wow I sound like an old person saying that, how terrible :/

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:16 (twenty years ago)

Sounds like you should've sued.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:27 (twenty years ago)

As much as I hate to say this, I think the total "hands off, do nothing" approach schools are now forced to have is really hindering discipline. I never thought I'd say that, but really a teacher just sayin "that is not acceptable" over and over is useless - a kid that age wont even know what that means for starters.

OTM Trayce. The teachers following a little kid around the room doing a vague "no don't do that" and then calling the cops? WTF? What kind of school is that where they don't see the million of options in between? How about putting her in the corner for a time out...or sending her to the principal's office until her mom came. They were stupid and they're probably going to get the shit sued out of them.

Candicissima (candicissima), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:57 (twenty years ago)

Also what was with the walkie talkies? What the hell? America must be so very different to the school environment I grew up in I clearly have no idea what the deal is. How depressing.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 05:59 (twenty years ago)

How about putting her in the corner for a time out...or sending her to the principal's office until her mom came.

I thought that was the principal's office.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)

Okay, Assistant Principal's office. BUT STILL.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)

I thought that was the principal's office.

Where she was running around? In the video that looked like the regular classroom.

Candicissima (candicissima), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)

It was, AFAIK.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:16 (twenty years ago)

There were two videos. One was the larger classroom where she was more subdued and the second was the smaller Assistant Principal's office where she was eventually handcuffed.

efil4zelffor (deangulberry), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:18 (twenty years ago)

Ah yes. See that one now. Maybe the one with the camera should have put it down and helped. The cops are just overkill. Talk about traumatizing a kid.

Candicissima (candicissima), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:25 (twenty years ago)

while we are far off from the days of when nuns would make my mother kneel in dry rice on a marble floor as punishment, there's something to be said about students needing discipline. these kids are in their charge for about 8 hours a day and due to the fear of legal repercussions, teachers are too afraid to discipline students. i mean, look at that video -- the teacher is fumbling around like a goddamn idiot, probably because she's too worried that stepping up to the challenge of dealing with a *mildly* unruly child and losing her job over something so stupid.

the US education system is already fills the void left by absentee parenting, it comes as no surprise its gotten so out of control that they need to call the cops to administer discipline. its weak logic to place the blame on the parent, even though they are *part* of the problem. absentee parentism is a part of american culture; the way in which we've decided to handle it has failed.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 24 April 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

It seemed from the video that the presence of a feared authority figure was all it took to calm her down. Calling the cops itself wasn't a bad idea but as she was seated and not in mid-fit when they handcuffed her I think that the act was unwarranted. Situation is fucked enough that I'm disappointed they're being sued over it. Can't imagine what parent would see that tape and think their kid was treated poorly to the point that they should get money.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 24 April 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)

It was hard to hear all the adults were saying but I didn't notice any mention of potential punishment or consequence to the child herself. She was just told she had to clean up and this was unacceptable. Where's the "you do this, we do that"? I didn't hear them tell the girl she was gonna have the cops called on her, but they may have.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 24 April 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

i'm just curious, are you guys that say stuff like this, are you parents or do you work with kids these ages?

Nah, but, you know, I have relatives, and friends with kids, and so on. "Kids" as Steven Wright put it in the Conan re-run I just saw "they're all over the place!"

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 24 April 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

They're so cute as long as you can walk away from them, eh? Listen, that kid's behavior was not vanilla. She was tearing up everything the teachers weren't blocking her from. If I had to guess, I'd say she has a miserable home life and needs an outlet for a lot of anger. I'm not going to go any farther with my guessing, but the images are not pretty.

Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 24 April 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

Eh, speculation is speculation. I've seen worse, is all I'm sayin', and from kids who don't have it all too bad, as far as family life is concerned. I also remember seeing worse when *I* was a kid.

They're so cute as long as you can walk away from them, eh?

I don't find children cute (not that that has anything to do with anything.)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 24 April 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)

I mean, I do realise that discipling a child - any child - is one hell of a task, but I just don't see how this kid could be seen as so extreme a case by so many ppl here.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 24 April 2005 16:59 (twenty years ago)

i would have tied her to the chair until moms showed up. i predict she will be a cop in 2025.

kephm, Sunday, 24 April 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

kephm, that's exactly what I would do in a less litigious world. Sit her down and put soft velcro restraints on her and hope she doesn't know how to spit. But can you imagine the lawsuit? "What if that building had caught on fire with that poor child tied to that chair?! Millions in damages, please!" I only say that because that exact scenario played out at the elementary school I went to in Garden Grove in '74 or early '75. The child was a distractable, distracting, blithering mess, and the teacher finally tied him to his chair, and got the holy hell reamed out of him for doing it.

Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 24 April 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

Screaming hell child or not, any education system that convinces itself that police and handcuffs are ever an acceptable option for dealing with a troubled 5-year-old is completely fucked (barring, like, kids with guns or something).

OK, it's because of fear of lawsuits, it's because of this, it's because of that, I don't care. It is wrong to criminalize children for childish behavior. It reminds me of some of those insane "zero tolerance" cases. Serial killers need "zero tolerance"; kids need help.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 24 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

OK, so what exactly should the school have done? Restrain the child themselves? Let the child run amok? Lock the child in a bare room?

Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 24 April 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)

I've got kids, I worked for years with pre-school kids, some with "behavioural difficulties". I didn't see that child endanger anybody, not even herself. She tore some papers off the wall. Woohoo! She kicked and punched out. Errrm, ever been kicked in the nuts by a hysterical toddler? I've never held a grudge at one, even if I've sworn a few times.

The original point was normal-ish 5 year-old behaviour results in Police action = Insanity. That doesn't look like exceptional behaviour from an upset child that age to me. I wouldn't dream of drawing further conclusions about her family life from one video. Any professional who works with children who can't deal with a situation like that needs to go back to school themselves, pronto. You talk calmly, you give space, you make sure the child don't hurt themselves (badly) and you understand that the tantrum will burn itself out. And you recognise that this is developmentally normal behaviour so you don't have a shit-fit about it. I'd be way more worried about a pre-school kid that never threw a wobbly.

Children are not small adults. The rules are just a bit different. Maybe if the US or the UK paid its early years workers enough and gave them enough respect, we'd have workers better able to deal with everyday situations like this one.

Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Sunday, 24 April 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Any professional who works with children who can't deal with a situation like that needs to go back to school themselves, pronto.


OTM

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Sunday, 24 April 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

A white kid would have had time-outs like a motherfucker

Morley Timmons (Donna Brown), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

MT OTM.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

I reiterate that OTM.

Watching the video makes this all the more frustrating. What the fuck kind of adults don't even attempt to employ proven effective child-control techniques like Full Name Spoken With Voluminous Force or Take Away Favorite Priveleges? Not the kind of adults that need to be teaching/assistant principling.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

And now it has gone there. Good job folks. I thought it would've taken longer!

shit think, shit think, shit quick (deangulberry), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

Fuck off.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

The more I watch this video, the more pissed off I am that someone somewhere put these people in charge of any children whatsoever.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

The images are a lot prettier than I'd have imagined from reading this thread! I dunno, I had to keep the sound down, but what was striking is that she didn't seem totally violent fit-like out-of-control -- she looked more like she was just knowingly misbehaving, in a pretty in-control "what are you going to do about it" kind of way.

Which, dudes, in terms of scaring and/or traumatizing her: has it occurred to anyone that this may originally have been the idea? A little bit of first-grade Scared Straight, executed by people oblivious enough not to realize that handcuffing a five-year-old would likely come under some scrutiny later?

And for the record, sad of a comment as this is about the American educational system, everyone who's surprised that the police became involved has got a bit of a rose-tinted screen. Low teacher pay plus litigious public (plus student/teacher race/culture difference) = not particularly surprising that the teacher didn't want to lay a hand on the girl beyond what was absolutely necessary. Yeah, a better authoritarian wouldn't have let things get nearly to that point, but a lot of public-school teachers in this country don't get nearly enough support to bother. I mean, here we are having our thread: "Should police have handcuffed little girl? Why is teacher so ineffective?" That's a much better turnout for her than the alternate-reality thread that goes "Should ineffective authority-lacking teacher have physically restrained little girl?"

xpost: This isn't solely a black/white thing, but I'm kind of with Dan -- I'd be very surprised if the girl's probable background didn't play into the teacher's blase hands-off "let somebody else deal with this" attitude. That has nothing to do with "racism" and everything to do with a teacher's sense of how she can or can't relate to children and their families.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

And just for the record: if a five-year-old girl started tearing shit up in my presence and my authority-voice and/or attempted distractions weren't successful, I have absolutely no fucking clue what I'd do. This is probably part of why I don't aim to be an elementary-school teacher, but still.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco's second comment is what scares me about teaching in public school.

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

That has nothing to do with "racism" and everything to do with a teacher's sense of how she can or can't relate to children and their families.

Now, this is OTM.

shit think, shit think, shit quick (deangulberry), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

Maybe I need to turn the sound up on my computer or something, but nowhere in either video did I hear/see anything more than the barest minimum in attempts towards "authority-voice and/or attempted distractions".

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

I don't really blame the cops for using handcuffs. They're trying to impart the reality that we live in societies where the bottom line is coercive force and that while tantrums may work with Mom and your teacher, there are consequences. What irks me most is the dithering ineffectuality of the asst. principal. The second she (or whomever) calls the cops, they've admitted that the carrots and sticks available to the school aren't enough. The girl's anti-social behavior is reinforced, the root causes aren't dealt with, and the teacher (and school) now have a reputation for being pushovers and over-reacting.

My school would have a padded cell for 'alone time'.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

But Dean, I do think they're kind of just as bad as one another, at least when it comes to results! If a teacher decides she simply doesn't know where she's coming from with (let's say) black kids from low-income families -- if she goes completely hands-off with them doesn't even begin to make efforts at discipline, let alone education -- and if she winds up pushing them to the margins of her classroom and dumping every one of their issues off on police and child welfare services and special education programs and Anyone But Her -- well, the outcome is the same as if she ignored them out of her own biases, you know?

xpost -- I know, Nick, those were just my two theoretical examples. She might actually be trying an authority voice and just failing miserably, but it seems more like she'd long given up and was just containing the girl till police arrived. I feel vaguely proud of myself having thought up "attempted distractions," which is probably a step further than this teacher got.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)

Not to defend this (because, yes, based on the videotape, the teachers involved here aren't exactly being very authoritarian with their "demands" for her to behave), but, nickalicious et al A) what nabisco et al have already said about way-too-much-risk-involved-esp-with-VIDEOTAPE-GOING-RIGHT-THERE as to why teacher might not even bother B) has anyone seen any kind of information about what the hell the cop who apparently knows this little girl is talking about? Because if this girl has some kind of lengthy backstory of behavioral problems and a completely blase mother, I really wouldn't be fucking bothered to try to deal with the girl either. IE this might be the 100,000th time this has happened, or the 2nd time--we don't really know.

That doesn't defend the cops swooping in and handcuffing her immediately instead of other options they could've pursued but I really think you people are being way too hard on the teacher and the principal in this situation.

xpost basically the second thing that nabisco just said right now, that I think it's a lot more likely that the school has just seriously given up on this situation. That's not right but I mean they're human beings--if this girl needs special help than she should get it. Average school teachers are not really the people for that.

Oh and FWIW if I was a teacher, the second the kid slaps me, I'm belting her right back. Which is why I am not a teacher. I don't really think this behavior is normal, either, because I don't really remember that many fits when I was a kid from other kids in public. I don't remember ever getting in trouble myself in public, or my sisters doing so. Kids that I do know that behave in a really obnoxious fashion, loads of temper tantrums and belligerence in public (which is different from in private, at home, where I think that's more normal), are not viewed as normal by anyone I know! DO I LIVE IN A PROPERLY BEHAVED UTOPIA?

Allyzay do not obtain to make download of yours MP3 (allyzay), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

nabisco has stolen my mind and used to it to articulate what I could not.

Ian Riese-Moraine has a grenade, that pineapple's not just a toy! (Eastern Mantr, Monday, 25 April 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

A couple things, I think the officer says something like "I told your mother before I was going to handcuff you next time" which would seem to imply a teaching-a-lesson kind of thing.

Also, I believe I heard the teacher saying they were calling the "campus police" meaning, these are not regular beat cops, but people who are specifically trained in handling campus disturbances.

Finally, Dee, I found your strong reaction very interesting. Do you deal with children a lot?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

FWIW, I have no problem with anything that happened on those tapes. The teacher did her job and the "police" were clearly trying to teach the child a lesson. The significance to her is not "children in chains" or some other hysterical interpretation.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

Oh and FWIW if I was a teacher, the second the kid slaps me, I'm belting her right back. Which is why I am not a teacher.

Holler.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Monday, 25 April 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, when it comes to the question of whether gently handcuffing a little girl could work as a good extreme-circumstances authority reminder, well ... it's plausible enough that I'm not surprised they tried it. It kind of depends on the girl's background and how much of a concept she has of police authority (private or otherwise) -- and if there's enough of a history there for her to understand how it's working, consequence-wise, it's not hugely unreasonable. (It'd be nice if five-year-olds learned about other forms of authority, though, rather than having to skip right to uniformed officials!)

Dee's law-and-order reaction was totally upstaged by the guy who called a five year old girl a bitch!

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

It worries and unnerves me that the child is five years old but seems pre-verbal. I don't think she said any actual words other than "No!".

Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

I worked in a very violent school with adolescents and the only time I ever saw kids handcuffed (by campus police who would then drive them downtown to the city jail) was when they were found with drugs or weapons. and yes sometimes these kids hit adults.

that being said I also saw plenty of adults "putting hands on" the kids: throwing them up against lockers, paddling them, jerking them around. I never did this nor did any other non-black faculty but the faculty and staff was about 85% black.

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

that's not true, I did shove some around sometimes but never really hurting any. they were all bigger than me.

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

It worries and unnerves me that the child is five years old but seems pre-verbal. I don't think she said any actual words other than "No!".

I'm not certain that being in a petulant and recalictrant frame of mind would lead the average five-year-old to bounds of erudition. Also, my scary-genius sister-in-law was so quiet as a child that they thought she was retarded when in fact she was just bored.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

If this thread were about a member of any other minority than children, some of you people wouldn't dare to justify her treatment. And yeah, the race thing is an important part of this, but otherwise-rational people's attitude to children is pretty shocking too.

Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

If a 28-year-old woman was stomping around a classroom shouting "NO!" and tearing paper cutouts off of the walls in these videos, I would be hard-pressed to keep from utterly losing my shit.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

Today I was sitting in a little cafe, and granted, it did serve ice cream, making it "kid-friendly," but there were three moms there with their three boys -- they must have been AT LEAST 8 or 9 years old -- and the boys were running around the cafe and screaming. The moms did nothing -- not even a "settle down now." I felt like a 25-year-old geezer. If those were my kids I'd say "YOU DO NOT RUN AROUND AND SCREAM IN RESTAURANTS! SIT DOWN OR WE ARE LEAVING!" And I *like* kids. They just need to be told to sit down and shut the fuck up once in a while.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 25 April 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

This whole thing makes me so angry. I brought it up at work today (work, by the way, is a bakery in an affluent neighborhood where I see children having tantrums ten times worse than this on a daily basis) and it seemed I was, in believing cops handcuffing a five-year-old under any circumstances to be both unusual and cruel, in the minority.
I simply do not understand why anyone would feel that the best way to teach a child is to teach a child fear. And I know this has been said several times before on this thread, but I truly would be interested to see what the public reaction would be if a [likely] snotty, offspring-of-rich-white-people child had been restrained in this way.

kirsten (kirsten), Monday, 25 April 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

If this thread were about a member of any other minority than children, some of you people wouldn't dare to justify her treatment.

Scuse me, but how the fuck do you know?
I have only seen a few seconds of the video, but, from what Spencer said, I think the cuffing was meant to a) restrain her with the minimum amount of physical contact and b) show her that they ain't playin around. None of us know the full backstory, so who can say what methods were tried or not tried previously to get through to this girl. She wasn't hurt and the message got across to her --- the way the situation was handled wasn't ideal but I don't think it warrants any brouhaha (or, y'know, noodle vague being a cock)

()ops (()()ps), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

Dropping the race card is probably more of a knee jerk reaction than the handcuffing was.

shit think, shit think, shit quick (deangulberry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)

This has now run on German tv, complete with interviews from German parents, teachers, psychologists, and police officers. For them, there was no controversy about this incident at all; the consensus is that the teachers were stupidly and inconceivably ineffective, and that the only lesson this kid will learn from being handcuffed is to hate and fear cops. There was also some agreement that Americans are crazy and stupid.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)


Has anyone here been mistreated by cops as a kid?

You can forget about that kid ever having any trust in "authority" ever again. Of course, given the kid's behavioral problems, they probably already respond poorly to authority.

You Work For Irene (dymaxia), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 10:58 (twenty years ago)

Send 'er to the chair! Boo hiss! String 'er up!

Rumpie, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
An update. Justice is served! (Well, with some face saved for the moran who sent out three squad cars and a chopper.) Oh, and do read all the way down, as the quote from Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer is priceless.

This posted yesterday:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050803/ap_on_re_us/girl_charged

Calif. Girl, 11, Avoids Felony Trial

By LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer
Wed Aug 3, 7:07 PM ET


FRESNO, Calif. - An 11-year-old girl who threw a rock at a boy during a water balloon fight escaped jail time Wednesday on a felony assault with a deadly weapon charge after lawyers worked out a deal in the emotionally charged case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Maribel Cuevas was ordered to meet with her young victim and talk about the fight under the deal — reached on the same day the girl was to stand trial in juvenile court. She did not have to plead guilty, and the charges will be dismissed if she stays in school and keeps out of trouble.

Maribel spent five days in juvenile hall and a month under house arrest after throwing a 2-pound rock at 8-year-old Elijah Vang, cutting his forehead after he pelted her with a water balloon in April. The gash required Elijah to receive stitches.

Police responded with three cars while a helicopter hovered overhead, and said they arrested Maribel for resisting arrest and scratching an officer's arm. Police described the rock as "jagged" and measuring 5.5 inches by 3.75 inches.

Top brass on the force defended the response, but others took up Maribel's cause, saying it was no way to treat a childish crime. Supporters gathered outside the court, chanting "Free Maribel," and singing "We Shall Overcome."

As she awaited her hearing, the girl dressed in pink sweat pants, a white sweat shirt and pink flip-flops was handed a bouquet of flowers.

Maribel's father, Martin Cuevas, said in Spanish after the proceeding that his daughter was not a criminal and had acted in self-defense.

"I think everything will be fine," Martin Cuevas said in Spanish. "This way she'll be able to stay with my wife and me and go to school normally."

As part of the agreement, the two children, with their parents present, will talk about what happened. The girl's lawyer said his main goal was to prevent her from pleading guilty to a crime.

"They did not require any admission of wrongdoing, and once that obstacle was removed, the case was settled appropriately," said defense lawyer Richard Beshwate Jr.

Elijah's family, which has since moved away, declined to press charges, but were prepared to testify for the prosecution.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Michelle Griggs said her office decided to proceed without a trial because of the girl's age and because the Vang family wanted the matter resolved so they can return to their neighborhood "in a way that is safe so all these children can coexist together."

Kimberly Nystrom-Geist, a court commissioner who presided over the hearing, said the order requiring Maribel and Elijah to talk about what happened "would be the most appropriate resolution to this matter. It allows Maribel to go back to the neighborhood and make amends."

In an interview Wednesday, Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer stood by the actions of his officers.

"It has always been our intention to ensure that the right thing is done. The right thing is not always the popular thing," he said, adding the department has nearly completed its internal review.

"If we truly love our children we need to hold them accountable," he said.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 4 August 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

wrong thread

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 4 August 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

don't I know it - mod request in

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 4 August 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

but same issue.

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 4 August 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)

yeah, shitty mothers.

Outsider Enter Port City (sexyDancer), Thursday, 4 August 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.