― alex thomson, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
a) adopting unconvincing slick corporate type lingo to 'sell yourself', promise vast sales to imaginary constituency of readers, etc.
b) readers' reports: people paid to say nasty things about you. One makes damning comments about chapter 3, other says Ch 3 is great but ch 5 is terrible. I find them physically hard to open / lift / read. Awful comment last year said I couldn't write and quoted sentences out of context - almost made ME feel I couldn't write.
c) guessing who readers (anonymous) are. One very critical goofball typed a sheet saying 'Be sure to cut my name off when this is sent on to the author': it wasn't: he looked bad. Etc.
d) Did actually succeed with one proposal. Problem now = writing the darned book.
― the pinefox, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
a) Depressing stuff; as a child of the 90s I seem to have an innate ability to churn out the requisite buzz-words; I've met enough publishers to know they fall for it -- the readers may well be another story.
b) I can well imagine. This sounds like my examiners -- 'I thought your material on X was dull, but Derek likes X, so he thought it was OK.' Me: 'And?...'
c) One of my friends had both his phd and his book proposal scuppered by one particular academic with a grudge, not against him, but against the subject matter of his work, despite it being such a small field that anonymity is virtually impossible. Having a particularly vituperative style, his 'anonymous' comments were entirely transparent.
d)Congratulations. RAE-tastic!
― Andrew L, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
My first publisher is now London's finest and HE was brilliant for me, but there are a lot of people working in publishing companies in other non-editorial departments who are there to say no, not yes. They are a lot more likely to be patronising about Who Reads than actual readers (or us lot). Even if you've been previously published to acclaim, it can be hard. Basically, you've got to look objectively at what you're writing as a piece of commerce, not as a piece of art and come up with lots of sales points. Use your writing skills to avoid a game of Bullshit Bingo. If the editor really wants to make it happen, they'll make it happen because after it gets round-tabled they're the one who makes the offer.
I'm not so sure about academia but if there's some eeejit trying to roger you sideways career-wise, pull rank, go upstairs, make friends with his/her worst rival, read the acerbic bits of Possession. And those petty academic spats make such fine tempest in a teapot scenarios for the media to watch, this might work in your favour: you know...LOOK! Read what's REALLY fucking off Tom Paulin!
My feeling is ALWAYS that if I actually spoke to the person writing the cheques, I'd have no problems selling to them. If the person dissing you isn't actually paying for anything or signing a cheque, fuck 'em. Alex, you're picnicking next weekend? I can be more specific then. Readers' reports are usually by overworked and therefore prematurely jaded editorial assistants with too much evening/weekend reading to do. Have an agent, who can do this for you and keep you away from the cringemaking process of talking cash.
And yeah, what Piney said about actually writing the fucking thing.
― suzy, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Pinefox - Literary Agents have slightly less coarse readers who take on unsolicited manuscripts. (I know - none of them would employ me, which is a good recommendation for them heh heh)
Lastly, publishers will only take your book if they're convinced it will sell shitloads. I always got extra photocopying fatigues at Bloomsbury whenever I suggested they should try and be less middlebrow, a bit more like Harvill or Atlas press.
Lastly, some of the nepotistically promoted, chinless, incompetent upper class fools who were in charge of commissioning at Bloomsbury were often convinced that some very odd, tangential stuff was going to sell, and threw barrels of money into it, so don't despair!
― Alasdair, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I was once advised that your proposal should begin as follows:
"Since time began, mankind has been interested in [slug pellets: or whatever]," and that you elaborate from there for LESS THAN A PAGE DOUBLE SPACE PLENTY PARA BREAKS. I put in a proposal which began EXACTLY like this, to the very person who advised me thus: he accepted — and ten years later I have not yet finished the book. (I have found details of slug life in Borneo hard to research adequately....)
― mark s, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― gareth, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Geoff, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I need to get an agent, but then i need to write something good and the two sort of collapse in a downward spiral. Oh woe is me for the fear of being discovered as the charlatan I really am.
― Pete, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
but how to write the fucker? literally, HOW?
'daerest editor
peep this: '
and then i'm stuck.
― Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― nabiscothingy, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― nabiscothingy, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:42 (nineteen years ago) link
like, line one: 'i would like to propose this book, my liege,..' i can't do it!! i did a semi-sucessful proposal one other time, but it was different then.
― Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:55 (nineteen years ago) link