― Huk-L, Friday, 6 May 2005 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Friday, 6 May 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Friday, 6 May 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Friday, 6 May 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Friday, 6 May 2005 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/goldenyouth.jpg
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 12:00 (eighteen years ago)
'surprise is like waking to find your bed smeared with birthday cake and a church choir sitting in your living room'
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
seeing the trailer for Orphan made me sure it'd be a WTFfest, and this urged me to check it out. By 'it' I mean its wikipedia article. The last three paragraphs of the plot synopsis are beautiful.
When I watched the Burton Planet of the Apes I was reading at the same time, and just assumed I had missed something. Guess not!
― Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 21:33 (sixteen years ago)
The last three paragraphs of the plot synopsis are beautiful.
Good lord, you weren't kidding.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
I heard about the plot twist the other day and almost wished I'd somehow been forced/tricked into experiencing it for myself
― nabisco, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)
i, for one, really like the last line of that wikipedia synopsis
― fuck plies IMO (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)
The film's content of an adopted child causing trouble has not been well received by the adoption community.[3]
― http://tinyurl.com/ggggst (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
^^ I can feel that, actually -- there's that whole ongoing trope of the mysterious evil Other child, and it's a totally natural extension of the anxiety of taking in kids that aren't yours, but it's gotta really grate if you happen to care about adoption
― nabisco, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)
The Orphan twist should be really obvious, but most of the audience I saw it with was completely surprised.
― My vagina has a dress code. (milo z), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)
I'm surprised that 1.) there's an actress named CCH Pounder and 2.) I haven't heard of her til now
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)
image-search her: I guarantee you know who she is and will recognize her
― nabisco, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
I mean jeez, your honor, I hardly even knew her!
xp hahah I have seen her many times channel flipping
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)
Has anyone else actually seen Orphan? I guessed the twist from the trailer but there was plenty of other ridiculous shit in it to surprise me (like her ability to cover a room from ceiling to floor with black light markers despite being four feet tall).
― da croupier, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)
woops, missed that milo did! also, it's been awhile since I've seen child actors put through more fucked up shit than in this, and not just SPOILLEERRR casting a 12 year old to play a thirtysomething psycho killer.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:38 (sixteen years ago)
i mean couldn't they find an actual female andy milonakis for the role?
― da croupier, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:40 (sixteen years ago)
Later that night, Esther holds a box cutter to Daniel's neck and threatens to cut off his "hairless prick" if he tells anyone what he saw.
― omar little, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)
― da croupier, Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:38 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i was just talking abotu this with my friend last night... so fucked to make a kid do that
― natty threadlock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:55 (sixteen years ago)
I appreciated the girl four seats down yelling out "Esther got titties!"
― My vagina has a dress code. (milo z), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)
the cutter is actually at the 13 year old actor's crotch at that point. even if that was a cutaway, this isn't the kind of movie that can say "through the magic of editing our underage actors had no idea just what a fucked up scene they were in."
xpost right as the movie started a woman and like five children that must have ranged in ages 5 to 15 came in and sat in the row across from mine. they didn't shout out much (it was early in the afternoon), just kept getting up to get food/go to the bathroom.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:59 (sixteen years ago)
the story of how 7-year-old Aryana Engineer(?!) got the part of the crying deaf girl who has to fire a gun at her psychotic adopted sister.
http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/etoday/story.html?id=79f4ddc1-ae71-4044-a1ad-cc298aa73016
― da croupier, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:04 (sixteen years ago)
biggest shock of the movie was "produced by leonardo dicaprio," though. dude have too much money or something?
― da croupier, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:05 (sixteen years ago)
can't wait to see this tbqf
― omar little, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:12 (sixteen years ago)
12 years old is not some babe-in-the-woods shit, croup, esp. in this day and age.
― neden stacey (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 01:03 (sixteen years ago)
I'm sure a 12-year-old knows what a hairless prick is
― neden stacey (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 01:04 (sixteen years ago)
there was a girl in my second grade class who threatened to do something like that to me but I think she was actually fucked up
― straight 4 the juggular (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 02:31 (sixteen years ago)
thank you for the challop. have you seen the movie?
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)
lool thinkin this too
― Lamp, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:16 (sixteen years ago)
don't take my comments about the gratuitously fucked up scenes involving child actors as a sign I wasn't entertained, btw. this shit was definitely bananas, though I did prefer Vera Farmiga's previous "my kid is the bad seed and no one believes me!" movie, Joshua, as far as actual spookiness goes.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)
have you seen the movie?
fucks no
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:21 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.lovefilm.com/lovefilm/images/products/3/6853-large.jpg
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
i can name like a dozen things playing right now that I'd rather see. Why did you see this?
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
this shit was definitely bananas, though I did prefer Vera Farmiga's previous "my kid is the bad seed and no one believes me!" movie, Joshua, as far as actual spookiness goes
this was creepy as fuck def ~~~ altho "home movie" has that trumped in terms of movies about creepy, evil kids maybe because josh ended up being just lame-o sociopath whiner and not like ~evil~
― Lamp, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:28 (sixteen years ago)
I enjoy thrillers and shit that looks bananas. Plus I see a lot of movies - saw The Hurt Locker later the same day. I can't name a dozen movies I'd rather have seen in the theaters, though. I mean Summer Hours can wait for DVD.
xpost haven't seen "home movie"! will check it out.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:30 (sixteen years ago)
Did you see Up? Up was awesome!
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:32 (sixteen years ago)
whiney the kid in that wasnt really "evil" um just fyi?
― Lamp, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)
There were some gratuitous murders in it, though! Or at least references to them.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:36 (sixteen years ago)
I was just saying when there's rad pixar and guinea pig movies in 3D, why would you watch the movie the internet is intent on spoiling because it's so dum
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:38 (sixteen years ago)
maybe because I'm not some 12 year old babe in the woods
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:39 (sixteen years ago)
you are a hairless prick, tho
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:40 (sixteen years ago)
lol figured this wasn't actually about a desire to defend the treatment of child actors in Orphan
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 04:41 (sixteen years ago)
movie was awesome. People brought there 4 year olds to the theater of course.
Is that really a synopsis?
I didn't guess the twist, I mean, I thought about it, but by that point I thought it was as likely as several other twists. A key piece of evidence is this old looking bible, so at some point I thought it was as good a chance that she was like 200 years old and never aged. To be honest, while I enjoyed the twist and the events that take place immediately after, I left wondering if the movie would've been better if she really was 10 or whatever years old and just that fucked up.
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 05:00 (sixteen years ago)
sorry if those are spoilers, but it seems like everybody here has read that "synopsis" which doesn't leave much to the imagination?
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 05:02 (sixteen years ago)
lolz at that wikipedia article; do all contemporary movies get group written spoilerific descriptions on there now?
― im a fucking unicorn you douchebags (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 05:48 (sixteen years ago)
it's the weirdly passive present tense that cracks me up
― im a fucking unicorn you douchebags (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 05:49 (sixteen years ago)
i dont believe anyone who says they guessed the twist from the trailers... it's so obscenely stupid how could anyone think of it
― a narwhal done gored my sister nell (cankles), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
Just past breaking the first girl's leg she could have been an evil child, but I thought the twist was pretty obvious after that.
I was guessing that she'd be older though - 50-60 or something.
― My vagina has a dress code. (milo z), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)
Well they made a big deal about how she had a "secret," that there was no record of her at the hospital and there was a suggestion of carnality with the dad, it was either that or some Omen shit and they already made the Omen.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)
I missed the "carnality with the dad" trailer, ick.
― Four-TEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
wait'll ya see the movie!
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
actually the twist would have been cooler if it turned out she was a Small Wonder robot someone accidentally switched to "evil."
― da croupier, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)
taking sides: this movie versus the Law & Order about the woman who moved from place to place changing her identity and then repeating high school
― nabisco, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)
oh that L&O was awesome
also I was kind of hoping she was a "Small Wonder" robot
― Four-TEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)
Vera Farmiga is v. v. pretty, BTW.
― My vagina has a dress code. (milo z), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
that episode, a tiny bit, and this movie, even less, relate to a true story of a young looking woman who travelled around pretending to be a high school student for many, many years.
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/scams/treva_throneberry/index.html
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/08/11/080811fa_fact_grann
^^^ made me think of this dude
― Lamp, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)
theres also that svu about the 25 yr old girl who looks 16 and shes dating some 30 yr old dude and stabler is VERY judgmental about it
― max, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
oh yeah, that New Yorker article was one of the best I've ever read.
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
vera farmiga's best child exploitation flick is 'running scared', that shit is madness
― omar little, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
― My vagina has a dress code. (milo z), Tuesday, July 28, 2009 5:08 PM Bookmark
I was thinking that it was the stillborn baby come back to life somehow.
― http://tinyurl.com/bbsshh (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
heres also that svu about the 25 yr old girl who looks 16 and shes dating some 30 yr old dude and stabler is VERY judgmental about it
That episode was so weird.
― Detroit Metal City (Nicole), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
those stories abt bourdin and throneberry are extraordinary reads - this ny times one on the throneberry case is good too http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/10/magazine/forever-young.html?sec=health
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
speaking of Bourdin, anybody seen the documentary about him and his impersonation of the lost child Nicholas Barclay in The Imposter?
I just Netflixed it and enjoyed it, though felt the speculation around the family's awareness of the real child's disappearance was given too much credibility in its framing by the filmmakers. It's entirely possible, but all circumstantial evidence based largely on the suggestions of a con man, and the P.I. doesn't consider the other reason they could have believed a stranger was their brother (a desire to believe). a theory used to amplify the tension of the documentary that probably could have been handled better in the film.
still icky as all hell though - such a bizarre case.
― Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:25 (ten years ago)