The London Eye

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Plans are afoot to make the London eye a permanent feature. Is it one of the finest examples of civil engineering and public art in the UK, or a blight on the London skyline?

Billy Dods, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And will the queues ever go down?

Billy Dods, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think it should be moved to coney island.

Benjamin, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

it R looking like a bloody big wheel to me!

I R no architect!, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's great! It should be preserved if only to act as a permanent visible reminder to the government that the millennium dome was a bloody silly idea, and that their grand plans were trounced by a bit of meccano and some left over escape pods.

I were taken round it twice last week with complimentary champers. Tis very high, innit.

ogden, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think they should keep it but also build more things like it. A giant funfair in central London. Massive dodgems! An enormous ghost train! It'd be ace!

jamesmichaelward, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, they should definitely build more things like it and if possible more things around it. The fact that the Dome was such a failure and the London Eye is the only tangible survivor of the millennium celebrations echoes what happened in the aftermath of 1951's Festival of Britain, where the exhibits were either taken down (e.g. the Skylon), or left to go to rack and ruin (funfair in Battersea Park). I haven't been on the London Eye yet, though I'd quite like to and if there were more features around it I would have greater incentive. I think it's great that the Millennium Eye and to some extent the Tate Modern have done a great job of shifting emphasis to the south bank of the river, as the world-famous sights of London tend to be (i) north of the river and (ii) old.

MarkH, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

sorry should've been London Eye.

MarkH, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I thought they had already decided that last year. Keep it I say, its a fantastic landmark, functional and jolly.

Pete, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's all right. I went on it and got a bit bored after a while.

WHO WILL UNJADE ME?

Nick, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Have they put Christmas lights on it? That would be good.

MarkH, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Will's favourite comedy drama star turned it blue for Christmas apparently

chris, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I recall a friend of mine thought that the London Eye would actually dip into the river, allowing passengers a view of the Thames underwater. Now, I laughed rudely at him because there are obviously countless practical reasons why it would be a bad idea. But what a good idea!

Tim, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It is a bit of an eyesore, but they should keep it. I enjoyed my 'flight' on it.

Whoever said it's the only reminder left of the Millennium is forgetting the wobbly bridge!

Jeff W, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Is it one of the finest examples of civil engineering and public art "

this one is true.

eyesore nothing.

the london eye is fucking wicked.

lets have a party on it. one pod = 225 quid to hire.

ambrose, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ambrose, meeting this eve at tom's not will's, call me

another james, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

eyesore nothing: LE = futurama now

(st pauls = eyesore, bogus design, squat goblin-spoor nightmare oppressing the brains of the living blah blah)

mark s, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

MS = OTM, JW = OC, obv.

RickyT, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

OC = on crack?

Jeff, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

OBV

mark s, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Undoubtedly lovely, esp. when seen from that bridge in St James Park. Most days, you can also see it from my sitting room window, here in distant SE19, although today there's a haze over central London.

Mark Morris, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The so-called London so-called Eye is all very well, but ours has been a city without organs for too long! When are we going to get other sensual tourist attractions, VIZ:

THE LONDON NOSE - would have to be situated in Billingsgate or somewhere whiffy. Enjoy the full odorama of our beloved city!

THE LONDON TONGUE - poss. in Soho. Or Mark C's house. I'm a bit sketchy on the details of this one.

THE LONDON EAR - MI5 building, obv. - eavesdrop on people on the other side of town!

etc etc etc etc

Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A city without organs? How Deleuzian (shudder). (Though surely there must be many candidates for the armpit of London, har har.)

I will go on the Eye this week, I think.

rosemary, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

here's a cool thing also: when you see the LE peeking out from behind (forget) from my fab roof, it is too far to see that it is moving, EXCEPT THAT the sun glints off it from afar in moire patterns hurrah (provided there is sun).

mark s, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

five years pass...

> THE LONDON NOSE

this does actually exist, on admiralty arch. was touched for good luck by soldiers leaving for war.

oddly, flickr seems to think there's another london nose in traf square.

parents have sprung surprise two day visit on me so am scouring old threads for ideas. not helped by dad's inability to walk for more than 10 minutes. panic!

koogs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

The London Eye is great. Especially fun if you have a vertigo sufferer with you. Apart from Neil clinging onto the bench and refusing to look down for most of it, I thoroughly enjoyed it. We went up during the marathon and watched lots of people running round the corner at Big Ben and were level with all the helicopters, which was good. I want to go back up in the twilight when it's still light enough to see but there are lights on everywhere.

ailsa, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)

> Big Ben

classic tourist mistake 8)

but one i plan on capitalising on. have figured their first sight of the middle of london (and not w6 / w12 which they saw last night) will be tower of westminster as seen from exit of westminster tube station, which always impresses me. then up to traf square past downing street, the mall as far as ica (they can see buck house from there without having to walk all the way down). up to pic circus (it's a road junction. and a coke advert. still...). tube to holborn. will try and get terracota army tickets (it's the one thing my mum has mentioned wanting to see, am guessing she saw it on tv last week). what to do after 2 o'clock, or tomorrow, still a bit of a mystery...

if you see me at poptimism with two old(er) people, that'll be them.

oh, minus points to the hoody last night who announced to his 3 hoody friends that he needed a piss and went there and then, in the street, just as we were walking past.

koogs, Friday, 5 October 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)

> Big Ben

classic tourist mistake 8)

You trying to tell me Big Ben isn't on that corner too? It is, you know, housed right in that clock tower at the end of the Palace of Westminster. Don't you try and out-pedant me :-)

ailsa, Friday, 5 October 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)

ah, but you were talking about watching people and you can't *see* big ben. 8)

BM at 14:45 ish, sign on board saying they were selling tickets for entry at 18:30. oh um. still, saved us £36 quid.

mum used tube ticket upside down, barrier didn't open. dad following straight behind used his without waiting for her to fix things. barrier opened. she got through with her ticket in hand but gates closed on him. couldn't use his ticket again because it'd already been used once. confusion.

the people doing toy demonstrations at hamleys are all twunts.

koogs, Friday, 5 October 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

barrier opened. she got through with her ticket in hand but gates closed on him. couldn't use his ticket again because it'd already been used once. confusion.

Classic tourist mistake! :)

I intend to take a 2 year old on the london eye next week. I hope he doesn't turn out to be a vertigo sufferer, or else there could be trouble for everyone.

JimD, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

the people doing toy demonstrations at hamleys are all twunts.

Aye, some goon tried to smack me on the head with a model airplane TWICE, the wee clown.

ailsa, Saturday, 6 October 2007 12:32 (eighteen years ago)

so beautiful

W4LTER, Saturday, 6 October 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)

stood waiting patiently for mother to make up her mind in hamleys. 'have you seen these?' said bloke pointing at the things i was stood in front of 'i'm ok thanks' i said, politely expressing my complete lack of interest. 'i know but have you seen these?'. i'm ok thanks'. 'i can see you're ok but have you seen these?'.

anyway, today dad gave up at lunchtime so took mum for walk in hyde park. only we went down exhibition row first and got sucked into science museum, natural history museum and v&a. then the spirally thing by the serpentine art centre. then the pond.

parents currently on 9th floor of hotel and dad doesn't like lifts... he also seems most taken of all by heathrow flightpath...

koogs, Saturday, 6 October 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)

heard talk on radio the other day that greenwich had applied for a wheel of its own. get one new idea.

koogs, Saturday, 6 October 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

We walked under the eye and pushed our way through 80 million people forming an orderly queue. It looked nice. We saw a newsreader whose last name is Snow.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 8 October 2007 07:19 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.