The Cronenberg Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Because there is not yet a thread with the general purpose of discussing Cronenberg, in general. Or of Picking Only Five. Or anything of the sort.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:09 (twenty years ago)

Let's begin with The Fly, shall we? Cronenberg says it's his meditation on aging and the strange decay of the human body, though "meditation" may be laying it on a bit thick. Still, there are so many good things about this movie. Goldblum is as good as he's ever been, nerdy and nervous at first, then scary but cracking wise to the bitter appendage-sprouting end. Geena Davis is serviceable enough -- I wonder if they cast her because she was a good match in height? The big effects date badly -- the emergence from the skin at the end looks like rubber, and the vomit-on-the-hand thing is the same cheese effect used for face-melting in Indiana Jones. But it's the details that get you. The hair coming out of the wound. The oozing fingertips. The vomiting. You're thanking the heavens they don't actually show him "eating." It's all the little stuff that adds up to one of the most genuinely icky movies I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot of other Cronenberg, so that's saying something.

His best? I dunno. Discuss.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:13 (twenty years ago)

nah, it is pretty great though. i thought i'd heard he said the fly was about how in a love affair one person always turns into a monster. and of course the reading at the time was 'it's about aids'.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)

I haven't seen enough to really determine. But Spider and eXistenZ = duddy McDudDud. Videorome has some great moments but does have some problems aging.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to shock everyone by saying that Existenz is probably the one I enjoy the most.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)

i thought i'd heard he said the fly was about how in a love affair one person always turns into a monster.

I bet he did say that. I love the romance angle of The Fly as well.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)

POV CRONENBERG!!!

shivers
videodrome
scanners
fast company
dead ringers

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)

In order:

Existenz
Naked Lunch
The Fly
Scanners/Brood (tied)
Spider
Dead Zone
Rabid
Shivers
Dead Ringers
Crash

Never seen Fast Company so that's excluded. Crash is the only actual real bad movie of the lot, but he's also never made a truly great film either.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

Totally forgot Videodrome. That's after Naked Lunch, but before the Fly.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

I haven't seen Shivers! Netflix ahoy.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:27 (twenty years ago)

eXistenZ = duddy McDudDud

Thank you. Not to mention the storyline is just a re-hash of Videodrome.

Scanners is his best, and Crash is underrated. Okay, so it's not a great film, but I can't think of any better way for the translation from the book.

Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

That's damning with faint praise.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:30 (twenty years ago)

Well then why translate the book? The book was a pretty pointless exercise to begin with, if you ask me. Which you didn't.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:31 (twenty years ago)

It's definitely one of my least favorite Ballard books from that era. I'm kind of surprise no one has tried to do Concrete Island or High Rise which both strike me as much more cinematic (and obv miles better to boot.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

haha i really didn't care for his naked lunch so never bothered with crash. i prefer his earlier, funnier films.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

I think the film actually is... enjoyable. I've watched it a couple of times and will probably watch it again. James Spader is great in it.

Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:37 (twenty years ago)

My five, which may change as I read this thread and see more of them:

Dead Ringers -- has its probnlems, sure, but also has Jeremy Irons.
Naked Lunch -- it's a rare horror/sci-fi director that gets the kind of performances from his actors that he gets out of Peter Weller in this. Spot-on, funny, and... just fuckin' great.
The Fly -- See above.
The Dead Zone -- Walken!
Spider -- I loved this movie. Also had the pleasure of seeing it in a theater with a fussy five-year-old, upon which others in the theater started shouting at the mother. "This is not a movie for kids!" Beautiful.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:37 (twenty years ago)

It's definitely one of my least favorite Ballard books from that era.

Agreed. You know what would make a great movie? War Fever.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:38 (twenty years ago)

Oh, man, that ending. Just picks up the gun. Nothing to do but go kill. Would anyone make this movie?

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:40 (twenty years ago)

i hear spider was pretty great - should i definitely see it?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:41 (twenty years ago)

Definitely.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:42 (twenty years ago)

A lot of his short stories would translate well into films. As would probably his last three novels. Cocaine Nights and Super Cannes expecially, seeing as they paint such a good visual image throughout.

Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:42 (twenty years ago)

And I reckon Cronenberg would be the best director for his stuff.

Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

i like him so much i will be a bit upset if someone says he sucks. 'rabid' was kind of shit tho

franken-vader, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:51 (twenty years ago)

i think that crash is brilliant--a conflation of machine and flesh that continues and expands his themes (which are the themes of all of us--it takes the la of five ecologies and turns it on), that is isolating, slick, beautiful, erotic, well versed and morally complicated.

i think it is the best film formally he has made

anthony, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)

Ugh Cocaine Nights is terrible. No one should direct that.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 03:59 (twenty years ago)

xpost
Did you really find it erotic, though?

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)

Formally, yes. Sexually, no.

Just Kidding (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:01 (twenty years ago)

actually thats a perfect answer

anthony, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)

I don't know what "formally erotic" means, but I do understand why it's the perfect answer. May also explain my disconnect from the movie.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:08 (twenty years ago)

Ebart: "Cronenberg has made a movie that is pornographic in form, but not in result. Take out the cars, the scars, the crutches and scabs and wounds, and substitute the usual props of sex films, and you'd have a porno movie."

So, yes. Ebert liked it way more than I did, though.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:12 (twenty years ago)

I thought Spider was a total z. At least Crash was unintentionally funny. I find the stuff really entertaining but I think the 80s were his peak - charismatic leads help make his style a little less starchy.

POV:
Dead Ringers
Dead Zone
Scanners
Videodrome
The Fly

I really want to see Shivers.

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:54 (twenty years ago)

That should be I find the early stuff

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:54 (twenty years ago)

shivers is great, like if romero directed an orgy flick

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:58 (twenty years ago)

Oh, and Howard Shore music scores for Videodrome, Crash & Scanners... FUCKING CLASSIC.

Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:03 (twenty years ago)

yeah I saw a lot of clips of Shivers on an IFC documentary about horror films back in 2000 (I turned 21 that October, freaked out and spent every weekend eating pizza and watching tons of Craven, Romero and Cronenberg films on the station - all hosted by Tom Savini!) and it looked terrific.

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)

charismatic leads help make his style a little less starchy

Not that I find his style starchy -- more like gooey (ha) -- but as the Star Wars threads (and esp. movies) have reminded me, it doesn't just take a good actor to be a good actor. It takes a relatively decent filmmaker as well. Th fact that Cronenberg consistently gets such good actors and such good stuff out of them is a testament to his ability to work with actors, and that's a laudable talent. Makes the movies better for all of us. A round of applause, please, for Goldblum in The Fly and Irons in Dead Ringers and even Jude Law in eXistenZ. Cronenberg doesn't always give these guys top-shelf material to work with, I won't argue that, but he apparently gives them the room to actually *act* in movies that are not perfect, and that's good direction.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)

apparently cronenberg's gonna make a movie out of london fields - i'm quite curious about this!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)

You're kidding. I need a link.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:15 (twenty years ago)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0404207/ - admittedly just 'announced', with no status update for over a year so, hmmm, maybe not so likely to happen. i'd see that movie for sure though.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:29 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I could have looked that up myself. I was hoping for an article.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:31 (twenty years ago)

Holy shit a DC London Fields would be NICE.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:37 (twenty years ago)

Yes. Yes it would.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

I can't tell if its a shame or not that he never got to do Basic Instinct 2. It almost happened!

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

If he'd done the first one, it would have been a great movie. It almost was anyway, but it lacked any subtext whatsoever.

slightly more subdued (kenan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)

TS: verhoeven vs. cronenberg

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:47 (twenty years ago)

Holy shit a DC London Fields would be NICE.

It COULD be, depending on many, many things. At least the very thought doesn't make me want to die like pretty much any other director on this shit would.

box of socks, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

I love every Cronenberg movie I've seen but The Brood is my favorite. I made my girlfriend watch it and not only was she totally creeped out and disturbed but shortly after that she became pregnant. We have a good laugh about that now and then.

I always feel compelled to compare Cronenberg to David Lynch and as much as I admire Lynch, I think Cronenberg is much more successful at doing the same types of things Lynch attempts. For example while Lynch flirts with bad acting, camp, b-movie conventions, and general awkwardness, Cronenberg seems to operate in that territory quite naturally. He kind of skirts a thin line between the arthouse and schlocky failure that I find very exciting. Where other directors working in a similar vein might come across as too clever and knowing, Cronenberg manages to make movies that can be truly confounding and get the most intense reactions out of people.

So anyway, I think he's very underrated. Crash and Naked Lunch in particular are quite underrated. Total classic.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:53 (twenty years ago)

I forgot to mention: search his appearance in the film Last Night.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:56 (twenty years ago)

At least Crash was unintentionally funny.

Really? Unintentionally?

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 05:57 (twenty years ago)

Watched CRIMES OF THE FUTURE last night (it's on Hulu). It's pretty much a note-perfect parody of a David Cronenberg movie. If only it was funny. (OK, the guy with ears all over his body dancing to shitty techno was a little funny.) But the more I think about it this morning, the more it feels like an empty, hollow rehash. So many things are lifted from previous Cronenberg movies, from Mortensen's character being an undercover cop (EASTERN PROMISES) to the insectile surgical instruments (DEAD RINGERS) to Lea Seydoux having Judy Davis's haircut from NAKED LUNCH. And every line of dialogue sounded like the characters were reading it off a sign on an art gallery wall. Really disappointing. I'm having a REPO MAN-ish "I can't believe I used to like this guy" moment.

but also fuck you (unperson), Sunday, 6 November 2022 14:20 (three years ago)

That was my feeling when I saw Existenz.

“Hey Cronenberg, you need to make a Cronenberg movie.”

“But all of my movies are Cronenberg movies?”

“No no, you need to make more movies with the gross weird stuff.”

“Fine, let’s do it.”

Cow_Art, Sunday, 6 November 2022 14:27 (three years ago)

I thought Existenz was pretty self-aware, almost to the point of parody, but as I remember it it paid off. Crimes of the Future (which I enjoyed) was almost like a Cronenberg stage production. I suppose a lot of whatever enjoyment one gets out of it boils down to whether one feels it is funny/ridiculous on purpose or funny/ridiculous inadvertently. It's so ridiculous (and sometimes funny) that I lean the former.

Coincidence re: Existenz, I believe Crimes is the first of his films to feature an original screenplay by Cronenberg that was not an adaptation since Existenz.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 November 2022 14:46 (three years ago)

it's a synthesis of ideas he's been turning over for his whole career but doesn't feel exactly like any of them. and it is hilarious

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Sunday, 6 November 2022 14:48 (three years ago)

We watched Crimes of the Future last night too, but we all basically liked it and/or were fascinated by it. It was the kids' first Cronenberg so they were just kind of amazed that this existed as a movie. And the philosophical explorations were broken up frequently enough by weird gross stuff that they didn't get bored. I also thought it was funny on purpose at several moments. I wouldn't call it so much a rehash as kind of a summing up of a lot of his core obsessions. (That he recycled the title from his first film adds to that impression.)

I also had the thought that if you showed this at a Qanon movie night (if Qanon people have movie nights) as a Hollywood insider's knowing nod to child mutilation rituals, it go over big.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 6 November 2022 14:52 (three years ago)

I'll get right on that.

Malevolent Arugula (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 November 2022 14:57 (three years ago)

I also thought it was funny on purpose at several moments.

The scene with Kristen Stewart chasing Viggo around the office was the funniest thing I'd seen in a long time.

DPRK in Cincinnati (WmC), Sunday, 6 November 2022 15:11 (three years ago)

yes

Malevolent Arugula (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 November 2022 15:13 (three years ago)

The scene with Kristen Stewart chasing Viggo around the office was the funniest thing I'd seen in a long time.

Yes, that was really good, and Viggo's "Sorry; I'm not very good at the old sex" after the world's most off-putting kiss was a great punch line.

but also fuck you (unperson), Sunday, 6 November 2022 15:18 (three years ago)

I think Cosmopolis has become my favorite of his movies

ex-McKinsey wonk who looks like a human version of a rat (Eric H.), Sunday, 6 November 2022 19:42 (three years ago)

Or Crash ... one of those two, for sure

ex-McKinsey wonk who looks like a human version of a rat (Eric H.), Sunday, 6 November 2022 19:45 (three years ago)

don't think I'm alone in missing films because I don't know if or when it's coming around here. There's never enough films I want to see to keep up with the weekly local cinema listings.

🤔

Vance Vance Devolution (sic), Monday, 7 November 2022 07:58 (three years ago)

huh, Crimes is on hulu now. hope that there are some fun online “what the hell was that?” responses

mh, Tuesday, 8 November 2022 00:34 (three years ago)

I still convulse & uncontrollably shudder to myself when remembering Keira Knightley's performance in A Dangerous Method

Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 8 November 2022 00:41 (three years ago)

just feel lucky it was her and not ornaldo bloomps

mh, Tuesday, 8 November 2022 00:58 (three years ago)

I really like the dialogue in Crimes, I wish more taken this approach

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 12 November 2022 20:48 (three years ago)

Just saw that Caitlin (daughter of David) Cronenberg has her debut on its way.

“'Humane' takes place over a single day months after a global environmental collapse has forced world leaders to take extreme measures to reduce the earth’s population. In a wealthy enclave, a recently retired newsman invites his four grown children to dinner to announce his intentions to enlist in the nation’s new euthanasia program. But when the father’s plan goes horribly awry, tensions flare and chaos erupts among his children.”

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2022 17:53 (three years ago)

I liked his son Brandon's recent one. Sure, give me more Cronenbergs!

mh, Tuesday, 22 November 2022 18:49 (three years ago)

long live the new flesh indeed

Vance Vance Devolution (sic), Tuesday, 22 November 2022 18:53 (three years ago)

Crimes was good and I enjoyed it well enough, but the final shot is what stuck with me. I love a movie that ends at the climax.

reggae mike love (polyphonic), Tuesday, 22 November 2022 19:09 (three years ago)

I finished processing the plot about five minutes after the end of Crimes

at which point I was thinking "ooh, that was good"

mh, Tuesday, 22 November 2022 19:16 (three years ago)

two months pass...

I missed the news that Amazon is making a tv series of Dead Ringers starring Rachel Weisz as Beverly and Elliot:

https://cdn.theplaylist.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/14130930/DDRG_S1_FG_106_00505514_Still001.jpg

ArchCarrier, Wednesday, 15 February 2023 18:38 (three years ago)

More pictures here

ArchCarrier, Wednesday, 15 February 2023 18:41 (three years ago)

three months pass...

Every David Cronenberg film summarised by dril

— ☭ Daydream of Hell 🏳️‍⚧️ (@hellsdaydream) May 21, 2023

fair but so uncool beliefs here (Eric H.), Sunday, 21 May 2023 19:18 (two years ago)

they're on private, looks like :(

mh, Tuesday, 23 May 2023 20:01 (two years ago)

ten months pass...

Saw a preview announcement last night for Humane: "From the mind of Caitlin Cronenberg." That seems very premature for her first feature film--you have to make at least three or four ponderous vanity films before you've earned a "from the mind of." Must be genetic.

clemenza, Tuesday, 9 April 2024 16:26 (two years ago)

I think that's too judgy, and that the last name is enough of a CV.

Ippei's on a bummer now (WmC), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 16:42 (two years ago)

Shows sufficient humility by not characterising said mind as twisted imo.

Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 9 April 2024 16:50 (two years ago)

going to provisionally allow it based on her family's name

Brandon's gotten pretty good at this movie thing. I'm willing to check it out

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 17:03 (two years ago)

I think that's too judgy, and that the last name is enough of a CV.

"From the nepo baby of David Cronenberg"

bae (sic), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 17:23 (two years ago)

nepo brood

subpost master (wins), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 17:25 (two years ago)

From the bowels of

CEO Greedwagon (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 17:25 (two years ago)

"From the nepo baby of David Cronenberg"

absolutely, I'll see that movie (when it hits streaming)

Ippei's on a bummer now (WmC), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 18:54 (two years ago)

Looking forward to the new Cronenberg…mind you really looked forward to his last one and that was a major disappointment

X-Prince Protégé (sonnyboy), Tuesday, 9 April 2024 19:38 (two years ago)

eleven months pass...

Some late style clunkiness aside, The Shrouds is a typically excellent and thought provoking Cronenberg movie.

Saxophone Of Futility (Michael B), Tuesday, 11 March 2025 03:11 (one year ago)

It was possibly my favorite film last year that wasn't a documentary. Not perfect and it may not be among his very best, but it was wonderful all the same.

birdistheword, Tuesday, 11 March 2025 03:31 (one year ago)

Should add, I saw it at a festival. It opens in mid-April in NY and LA then expands the following week.

birdistheword, Tuesday, 11 March 2025 03:32 (one year ago)

all the real cronenberg heads who haven't made it to a festival are in envy right now

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Tuesday, 11 March 2025 19:44 (one year ago)

one month passes...

Gonna watch it in an hour.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 May 2025 15:44 (one year ago)

three weeks pass...

this is ilxor so no doubt everyone but me DID in fact already know this but here goes: is it widely known that "help me", the themetune for THE FLY (1986), is sung by bryan ferry? i was startled to learn this (it's right there in the end credits)

no it's not used in the film (or i think it is, but only briefly in the background, on the jukebox during the arm-wrestling bar scene): it was commissioned, BF recorded it, cronenberg didn't hate it per se but didn't think it fitted the mood, they tried a cut with it over the end credits but everyone agreed it didn't work, so it was relegated to right at the back of the cupboard

it's really not ferry's best work lol (= he doesn't do the voice when he says "help me") (i mean he does his own normal voice, not a little human fly's voice: missed opportunity all round)

mark s, Wednesday, 28 May 2025 10:05 (eleven months ago)

He's in love with his bangs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg-Yte9X1go

hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 May 2025 10:07 (eleven months ago)

Can see Scott Walker having a go at the 'help me' voice.

Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 28 May 2025 10:38 (eleven months ago)

one month passes...

Main thing that really stuck with me from Shrouds was wondering if conspiracy theories are a real fetish, can't find anything about it, would be really something if some of the famous conspiracy theorists were like this. I used to assume car crashes was not a real turn-on but it actually seems to be and I recently read accounts about Ballard that suggested he was genuinely into vehicle crashes.

Found these fascinating paragraphs! Won't link it but I'm sure anyone can find it if they want
"Edward Smith told his story in The Telegraph over ten years ago, shocking the world by proclaiming his promiscuity: he admitted to sex with over 1000 cars. He felt attracted to them for as long as he could recall, had sex with a car the first time at age fifteen, and didn’t feel sexual attraction at all to women or to men.

Men who love cars the way Ed loves cars have relationships with them as well as flings, and feel specific attractions to certain cars—the cars are not interchangeable. It’s mostly guys who report this strange kind of love, but a similar attractions to bridges, walls, and towers is often reported by women."

"Object Sexuality, or: the humans who fall in love with buildings" By Nicholas Korody has an interview with such a woman.

Back to the film: I thought it was very interesting but wasn't happy with the avatar character, just looked so much like something from a 3d animated family film. The very end scene totally whooshed over my head.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 8 July 2025 01:00 (nine months ago)

two weeks pass...

fucking looooved the shrouds. it had so much on its mind

ivy., Friday, 25 July 2025 17:32 (nine months ago)

but not in its body.

This one slipped completely from memory.

hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 July 2025 17:53 (nine months ago)

idk that the dream sequences with his wife will slip from my memory. leaving the room only to return eaten-away-at. such a stirring meditation on the howling unknown beyond death and trying/failing to reincarnate what you've lost to it in the here and now through imagination, technology, and conspiracy

ivy., Friday, 25 July 2025 17:57 (nine months ago)

also: really ugly. also: hilarious

ivy., Friday, 25 July 2025 17:58 (nine months ago)

so many shots of decaying bodies/skeletons and the most haunting image remains the memoji AI chatbot version of his wife in her koala skin

ivy., Friday, 25 July 2025 17:58 (nine months ago)

I liked it. But, completely contradictory to my Cronenberg love, I fell asleep in the theater during it! It was the day after my birthday and I was mildly hungover, but I’d popped an allergy pill and then had exactly one beer at the theater.

Oddly, the only other people in the theater were two in an extended friend group. I know I fell asleep because the guy loudly said my name at me, imagine “EMMM HAITCH” being intoned loudly during the quiet end of the second third. I was snoring!

I’ll watch it again, probably multiple times since it’s my lane. But I think it was the car auto driving bit.

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Sunday, 27 July 2025 04:40 (nine months ago)

two months pass...

Boy, does "Videodrome" get more prophetic by the year.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 25 October 2025 21:17 (six months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.