The main demand of the mostly indigenous protesters is for a share of Bolivia's vast natural gas reserves, the second largest in Latin America.
Many in the poor indigenous majority think an energy law approved by Congress two weeks ago falls short on state control and some want full nationalization of the sector now dominated by foreign firms.
There's a detailed account of the issues here.
Am I alone in thinking that there is a really significant battle going on here? If they win, hopefully it will serve as an example to people in other countries subject to the economic sanctions of the IMF, telling them that there is an alternative to letting their economies be pillaged.
― Gatinha (rwillmsen), Thursday, 2 June 2005 06:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ian Riese-Moraine's all but an ark-lark! (Eastern Mantra), Thursday, 2 June 2005 14:59 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gatinha (rwillmsen), Friday, 3 June 2005 00:29 (nineteen years ago) link
These peasants are basically ruining Bolivia. It's biggest natural resource is oil, but it lacks the infrastructure to exploit the oil. Thus it needs to attract foreign capital and foreign expertise. Without this they won't be able to take advantage of their oil and use the revenues for things like more schools, better roads, etc. The threat of nationalisation means that no one will invest in Bolivia, and so the protesters won't get anything at all.
What they really need to do is have a more transparent government. One that can work in partnership with foreign oil firms and use the windfalls to a just and equitable purpose.
― you better believe it (you better believe it), Friday, 3 June 2005 08:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 3 June 2005 08:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Friday, 3 June 2005 09:55 (nineteen years ago) link
A few years ago, a US senator (whose name escapes G) said, "send in the Navy." Bolivia were none too worried by this approach due to landlockyness.
Boring thread by the way.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Friday, 3 June 2005 10:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 3 June 2005 10:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 20 June 2005 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 June 2005 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link
Good. What's the point of a left-wing leader who doesn't scare the bastards?
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 12:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 4 May 2006 08:24 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 4 May 2006 08:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Thursday, 4 May 2006 08:32 (eighteen years ago) link
Forcible renationalisation of indistry won't pull them in though, however noble its intentions.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 4 May 2006 08:43 (eighteen years ago) link
Enrique - as a modern politcial visuionary and tactician of the left par excellence, what's your proposal? Carping from London hasn't been shown to improve the lot of the peasantry of Bolivia, or is there some sofa-revolutionary act that is being lept quiet?
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 4 May 2006 10:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Thursday, 4 May 2006 10:12 (eighteen years ago) link
Bolivian history is fascinating by the way. Unless you're Bolivian.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 4 May 2006 10:19 (eighteen years ago) link
― the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Thursday, 4 May 2006 10:20 (eighteen years ago) link