Swaziland, the first country to die of AIDS?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Swaziland, the first country to die of AIDS?
June 5, 2005

The scale of Swaziland's epidemic is unique, writes David Blair in Matsanjeni.

A dirt floor and the stinging odour of wood smoke were Margaret Zwane's only companions when she died inside a tumbledown mud hut in rural Swaziland.

She did not ever leave her children to seek hospital treatment and, until a few days before AIDS dragged the life from her, this emaciated mother was struggling to work the fields with a hoe.

When Mrs Zwane succumbed, her daughter and two sons became orphans, for AIDS had already killed their father.

"My heart was painful when she died," said Khetsiwe, her 12-year-old daughter. "I wish she would come back because my mother loved me."

An AIDS epidemic on a scale unknown anywhere else in the world is devastating Swaziland. Figures released last week show that 42.6 per cent of the adult population is infected with either HIV or AIDS. For Swazis aged between 25 and 29, the figure is 56 per cent. With a population of just 1 million, the survival of the nation is at stake.

"If the situation persists, we will be extinct as a Swazi people," said Faith Dlamini, co-ordinator of AIDS prevention at the National Emergency Response Council.

Already, one Swazi in 15 is an AIDS orphan. In five years, people like Khetsiwe will form an eighth of the population.

Khetsiwe lives in Matsanjeni, an arid expanse of hills 160 kilometres from the capital, Mbabane. Of the 8000 who live here, 2000 are children who have lost at least one parent to the epidemic, according to the local MP, John Shiba.

Khetsiwe's family may soon add to this toll. For the little girl's aunt, Zodwa, is desperately ill.

Her family say only that she has a "disease". But Swazis rarely disclose that their relatives are victims of the epidemic and Zodwa is 25 in a country where most people her age are terminally ill. If she dies, her son and two daughters - aged one, three and five - will be orphaned. AIDS has already claimed their father. They will be left wholly reliant on their grandmother, Loster Zwane, 63.

But tuberculosis is crippling Mrs Zwane. An incessant cough has almost robbed her of the power of speech and she can barely stand. She is tormented by the thought of caring for six orphaned grandchildren.

"It is too difficult for me to carry these tasks," said Mrs Zwane. "These children are too small to cook for themselves. They cannot work in the fields. If I die, nobody, nobody can take care of them. I pray that when God takes me, he takes me when these children have grown up."

The children will at least have a place in primary school. The Government has found $9.6 million to pay the fees for every AIDS orphan. But they may not have anything to eat.

So far, no international donor has come forward with the $20.2 million needed to provide every child with one meal during their school day.

Moreover, Swazis worry about what sort of society will emerge from a nation of orphans.

"When these young orphans have matured, what kind of adults will they become?" Miss Dlamini asks. "It's a frightening prospect."

She was taken aback by the latest data on the epidemic. Three years ago, the adult infection rate was 34.2 per cent. "We were hopeful that we would be stabilising the situation," she said. "But when you see the figures rising again, you ask: what more can I do? It is dispiriting and sometimes devastating."

There are some glimmers of hope. The infection rate in the 15 to 19 age group has fallen to 24 per cent, suggesting that teenagers are heeding the message of safe sex and abstinence. The Government has belatedly started a concerted fight against the epidemic and the roads are festooned with billboards promoting the use of condoms and urging teenagers to "say no to sex until the time is right".

But tradition makes their society vulnerable. Polygamy is common and men are judged by the number of women they marry and children they sire.

This, to varying extents, is the challenge across Africa. Already, 25 million people are infected and 16 million Africans have died. The continent's tattered health systems are incapable of containing the epidemic, let alone reversing it, hence Britain's call on the G8 countries to double the flow of aid.

Yet for Khetsiwe, and millions like her, it is already too late.

- Telegraph

my God, 56 percent!!

Dan Beale, Sunday, 5 June 2005 06:13 (twenty years ago)

that's pretty disturbing. I wonder is there a percentage of infection above which it becomes impossible to run proper prevention programmes. I mean, someone isn't going to be too pushed about safe sex if the odds are they already have HIV or will definitely get it once they try to start a family.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 5 June 2005 08:29 (twenty years ago)

I would imagine that given the small size of the country and the prevalance of AIDS in the region, that Lesotho is almost as threatened, although of course I don't have the stats to confirm this.

I heard quite a while ago (a couple of years) that Botswana was having to close its schools because so many of the teachers had AIDS that there was no-one left to teach in them anymore.

MarkH (MarkH), Sunday, 5 June 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)

what is the difference b/w aids in NA/Europe and the rest of the world?

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 5 June 2005 09:20 (twenty years ago)

what do you mean "what's the difference"?

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 5 June 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)

Biologically - nothing.

Socially, economically and practically - everything.

MarkH (MarkH), Sunday, 5 June 2005 10:32 (twenty years ago)

i mean why does it kill half of swaziland, but contain itself into certain communities in america

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 5 June 2005 12:13 (twenty years ago)

Better avaibality of contraceptives, plus Westerners can afford the expensive medication which stop you from dying of the disease. The patents for these drugs are held by big medicine companies, which is why they're so expensive, and out of reach for almost all Africans. A couple of years ago the government of South Africa decided they can break the international patent laws and start producing the drugs themself for a cheaper price, because national emergency required so. South Africa can do this, because they're the richest and most influential country in Sub-Saharan Afica; many of the other countries, however, can't afford to.

One of the first things Bush did when he came to power was to cancel all the US funding for those development co-operation organizations which distribute contraceptives and teach about safe sex.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 5 June 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)

so this is not a question of different strains?

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 5 June 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)

Nope. It's purely a case of money, culture and education.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 5 June 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

Different strains are part of the issue, as are transmission patterns. (So many articles about AIDS in Africa talk about truck drivers hiring prostitutes, and refusing to use condoms.) And once the infection is acquired, other health issues (e.g., tuberculosis, malnutrition) accelerate the progression.

j.lu (j.lu), Sunday, 5 June 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)

what unbelievable horror.

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 5 June 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

what is the percentage of aids in the UK?

ken c (ken c), Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

less than 1% probably much less.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

http://www.avert.org/ukaids.htm

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)

one of my cousins in the military (but not Uncle Sam's military, thx god) was positioned in Botswana for a few years, a country I thought had the distinction of highest % of HIV infected individuals, somewhere above 40... I guess Swazi has more. He visited me a year and a half ago, and we talked about this for a while - he said that it's not just a matter of education... a lot of people have, of course heard of how the disease is spread but may of the tribal people don't want to change their lifestyle either. I know this might not be a popular opinion, but it should be a part of the discussion

Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

Nope. It's purely a case of money, culture and education.

-- caitlin (wpsal...), June 5th, 2005.

meaning, let's not ignore that "culture" part

Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

does anyone know how to make a contribution?

dj, Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

have unprotected sex with a bunch of folks

ken c (ken c), Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

rdrdr

dj, Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:28 (twenty years ago)

I absolutely adore how the subject of the article is phrased. It implies that a nation-state (the concept of which only exists in our heads) is literally being dissolved by a virus. Baudrillard would have a field day with this.

Ian Riese-Moraine forever! (Eastern Mantra), Sunday, 5 June 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

as would susan sontag!

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 5 June 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

Hehe, indeed!

I should make a clarification that it unwittingly implies that a nation-state is being dissolved, not literally, of course.

Ian Riese-Moraine forever! (Eastern Mantra), Sunday, 5 June 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)

does anyone know how to make a contribution?

i'd like to know too, the meals thing maybe?

//, Sunday, 5 June 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)

twelve years pass...

Reports of Swaziland's demise somewhat exaggerated, and now it's called eSwatini ...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-43821512

(Henry) Green container bin with face (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 April 2018 17:21 (eight years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.