This article pisses me off on so many levels, I can't begin to talk about it: BUSH SHIFTS FOCUS TO LATIN AMERICA

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Please talk about it for me. (Maybe I'll find the energy later. Really, I think this one deserves a letter to the editor.)


Bush shifts focus to Latin America With democracy slipping throughout the hemisphere, he will tout freedom and free trade as nations meet in Fla.

By Ron Hutcheson
Inquirer Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - President Bush shifts his attention to Latin America today amid growing concerns about democracy's future in the region.

After high hopes were generated by the fall of military dictatorships in Central and South America in the 1980s, some countries appear to be slipping backwards. Others are struggling to build democratic institutions in societies plagued by political instability, chronic poverty and rampant corruption.

The issue will be hanging over Bush's trip today to a meeting of the Organization of American States in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. The President's critics say Bush has overlooked problems in his own backyard while focusing on Iraq and the war against terrorism.

"Democracy, in the final analysis, has to deliver well-being and jobs and social progress for the population," said Carl Cira, director of the Summit of the Americas Center at Florida International University in Miami-Dade County. "To the extent that persistent misery is their lot, democracy is hollow."

"I think the outlook is pretty grim in most of the region," Cira said. "You have population growth. You have significant, persistent levels of poverty. And you have economies that are not producing jobs. All of those things together befuddle governments."

Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House, an organization that tracks civil liberties and press freedoms around the world, said Latin America was suffering "a steady erosion" of freedom after impressive gains following the demise of military dictatorships.

White House officials said Bush would use the visit with Latin American leaders to promote both democracy and free trade. His speech to the OAS comes as the Senate prepares to debate a proposed Central American Free Trade Agreement, a major step toward Bush's goal of a free-trade zone for the entire hemisphere.

But some analysts question whether that's enough.

"We really need to do some harder thinking with our Latin American democratic allies about how we can reduce poverty in the region," said Larry Diamond, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank at Stanford University. "It's not enough to say free trade is the answer."

In some South American countries, frustration with the slow pace of reform has encouraged a type of mob rule that seeks change through street protests rather than the ballot box.

In Bolivia last week, violent demonstrations shut down Congress and fed speculation that President Carlos Mesa would be forced to step down. Mesa himself moved up to the presidency in 2003 after protests forced Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada to resign.

In Ecuador, street protests in April prompted President Lucio Gutierrez to flee the country, following two other recent Ecuadoran leaders who were forced out.

In Central America, Guatemala and Honduras continue to suffer human-rights abuses and political violence nearly 20 years after they shifted power from military to civilian leaders.

In Venezuela, leftist President Hugo Chavez has consolidated power while exploiting political divisions and anti-American sentiment in his oil-producing nation. After leading an unsuccessful military coup in 1992, Chavez was elected president in 1998 and survived a coup attempt four years later.

Since then he has stacked the judicial system with his allies and taken steps to muzzle opposition journalists and human-rights advocates. Even so, Chavez seems to be hugely popular with impoverished Venezuelans who believe they finally have a defender in high office.

Venezuela is of particular concern at the White House because of Chavez's attempts to spread his socialistic ideas throughout the region. Venezuela's oil reserves give the mercurial leader added leverage.

"He is a meddler. The difference between him and [Cuba's Fidel] Castro is that he's got a load of cash behind him," said Cira of Florida International University. "He is an abuser of democracy, using his popularity and his ostensibly legitimate reelection to take over, in illegitimate ways, most of the organs of the state."

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Friday that Bush would urge Latin American leaders to strengthen democratic institutions.

"We cannot take democracy in our hemisphere for granted," McClellan said. "Elections and democratic rule is only the beginning. Successful democracies are built on free institutions that guarantee transparency and rule of law and accountability."

Bush would like for the OAS to rein in Chavez and other Latin leaders who stray from democracy, but that idea has little appeal in a region that traditionally is deeply suspicious of U.S. motives. Freedom House's Windsor said the love-hate relationship between the United States and its southern neighbors had taken a turn for the worse.

"Clearly there's a lot of hostility toward the Bush administration and President Bush himself," she said. "I think he's become the flash point for latent anti-Americanism."

RS (Catalino) LaRue (RSLaRue), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

Obviously the President has ADD. First we invaded Afghanistan, which was legitimate in my view but fraught with peril. Then, as if willing us to join the ranks of empires who have failed in Afghanistan, he changed the focus to Iraq. Now that that's not working, he's looking at Central and South America, surely with a focus on Chavez? Note to neo-cons: We could swallow your 'freedom' cant a lot easier, if you actually slowed down, concentrated, PLANNED, and did one thing right. Talk about running before you can walk!

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

Not to mention we've got a lot of fucking nerve lecturing Latin America on "democracy." We have a long record of promoting a lot of things in Latin America, but democracy is demonstrably not one of them.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

We have a mixed record at best, but that's not a reason not to start, Gypsy M. Though the impolite and unproductive support that the Bush admin. gave to the anti-Chavez people wasn't exactly a plus for us in the region. (Not that I love Chavez either, but some people apparently haven't learned anything from diplomatic history.)

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

I think the article's actually alright, relatively speaking.

It's funny how Brazil never gets mentioned in articles like this. From what tiny amt I know about it, the current Brazilian govt. fuckin rocks.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

I'm all in favor of promoting democracy, but right, the Bush view of it pretty friggin' selective. Chavez has some thuggish tendencies, but it's pretty clear the people of his country prefer him to the alternatives they've been presented with. And a lot of Ecuador's problems have to do with the historic exploitation of the country's resources by outside interests, plus the grievances of the indigenous population there. It's funny how street mobs are engines of reform in Ukraine but "anti-democratic" in countries where big energy companies have lucrative contracts. Plus we've also neglected a lot of the places where we've ostensibly promoted democracy in the past. We chased the Sandinistas out of power in Nicaragua (a dubious goal to start with, since they were also democratically elected), and then what? When's the last time any U.S. official said anything at all about Nicaragua, even though the country still has most of the same economic problems it had 15 years ago.

So yeah, a foreign policy based on promoting democracy would be great. I'd like to see one. I keep hoping the Bush administration is somehow going to find itself trapped by its own rhetoric into actually doing some of these things. But we're mostly selling the same old bullshit -- if you vote for people we like, we'll call you democratic; if you don't, we'll make big frowny faces.

xpost: Yeah, Brazil's a really interesting case. Lula may be the smartest and most pragmatic leader in the region. We'll see how he looks in a few years...

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Lulu is totally the man.

louie louie, Monday, 6 June 2005 20:50 (twenty years ago)

It's funny how street mobs are engines of reform in Ukraine but "anti-democratic" in countries where big energy companies have lucrative contracts.

I tend to agree but generally find this simplistic. I worry about countries like France where the street has taken on a legitimacy almost equivalent to the ballot box.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

Well, to me it's not so much about endorsing mob rule as recognizing that street protests can be a valid expression of public will -- and then finding ways to move from that toward something more structured. Ecuador, as a case in point, has obviously so far failed to do that. The whole sense in a lot of these countries that the neoliberal model has failed them -- has even set them back -- is a serious issue that is going to have to be addressed more seriously than the Bush administration seems inclined or able to do.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Yes, but no amount of street protests are going to stop globalization or provide your country with resources or enhance its reputation for trade. I agree gypsy m., I just worry how realistic people's expectations are.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

Yeah. That's a big problem. Being "anti-globalization" isn't going to help anyone, and a lot of the rhetoric that comes out of Latin America and elsewhere is simplistic and tribalistic. It's going to take real leadership all the way around to address those things constructively, find ways not to fight globalization but to equalize it in various ways, mitigate its worst effects, etc. (That's an issue for the U.S. as much as anyone else, for that matter, and we're getting just as uselessly simplistic rhetoric from both Dems and Republicans -- viz, the whole "punish China" movement in Congress.)

Which really gets to the whole issue of a lack of effective leadership anywhere in the world, at a time when we could really use it. One reason Lula stands out is that he seems like he might not be either stupid, corrupt or an ideologue -- and how many democratically elected leaders can you say that about these days?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

I like his "fuck it" attitude. Sponsoring the creation of generic AIDS drugs, for instance, despite being told by 3,022,155,080,513 Heavy Hitting global organizations that it's illegal. "Fuck it." Automatically fingerprinting anyone with a US passport when they enter the country, because that's what the US does to them: "fuck it." That's fucking sovereignty, baby.

Everyone interesting in this thread topic, and I think we've only scratched the surface here, ought to read this, even though it doesn't mention Latin America --> http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1499923,00.html

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

Yeah this whole approach is fucking rediculous because alot of folks in Latin America are VOTING for people like Chavez and that dude in Bolivia because theyre fucking sick of globalization and getting shafted by the first world. But like gypsy points out, this might not be the best way to go about it. Unfortunately having bushco come over and stomp around in order to make things better for the corporations and the rich is only going to make it worse, not better.

Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.