The Ashes 2005

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Seems like a good time to start the thread, after the 20/20 match yesterday, which doesn't say very much about either side. the news reports of it were truncated by Jackson rubbish so I have even less to say about it. However we have some one dayers coming up and then the main event which is a little diminished by not being a seven match series.

England have the best team, and indeed the best squad they've had in ages. Australia are still the best team in Cricket.

Let the countdown begin.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 07:11 (twenty years ago)

Ha, I knew this was you...

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 07:15 (twenty years ago)

Sports reporter on Today this morning: "We know Australia are going to win the series - but by how much?"

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 07:21 (twenty years ago)

i think australia are going to 'win' 1-2

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 07:22 (twenty years ago)

You're probably right - I wouldn't be *too* surprised if it was a draw.

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 07:24 (twenty years ago)

(that would make more sense if I hadn't accidentally deleted the "but" before the second clause)

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)

True the 20-20 doesn't tell us an enormous amount, but the Aussies lowing by THAT much (all out for 79? WTF?) must knock their confidence?

Come Back Johnny B (Johnney B), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 10:03 (twenty years ago)

It was hilarious

Bifidus Digestivum (Dada), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 10:05 (twenty years ago)

Good start, but not proper cricket. Anyway, it's going to be a cracker - the best home ashes series since 1981, I should think. We have a chance if all of our top bowlers can find form and stay fit for the series. I worry about Hoggard against really imposing batsmen like Hayden and Ponting - he could get clattered if they decide to target him, and I think they will. S.Jones will probably not stay fit for the whole series, and the back-up seamers are unproven. This worries me.

There has been some speculation that if Giles isn't fit for the first test, they'll play Peterson as an extra batsman and go in with four bowlers. A risk, but worth some thought. They'll need Giles later in the series though, especially at Old Trafford.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

Yes. I'm looking forward to this. I still think we'll lose the series, but a win in a live match would be an improvement - and then... who knows?

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:01 (twenty years ago)

For the first time ever, I think, last night I saw an Aussie team looking ill-prepared. Their fielding was dodgy, bowling uneven, and batting execrable. England, on the other hand, were keen as mustard. That, at least, should give us some hope. Still think they'll batter us in the proper stuff, though.

Adam Faithless (Adam Faithless), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:01 (twenty years ago)

I thought it might be a cunning Aussie ploy to lull the Poms into a false sense of optimism but, having heard various Australian pundits on the subject, I think they were surprised at how ropey they were and how good England were

Bifidus Digestivum (Dada), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:03 (twenty years ago)

2-1 to England.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 14 June 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

God i'm so psyched for this series, I keep visualising the little battles and confrontations and getting shivers.

Strauss v McGrath
Flintoff v Warne
Harmison v Hayden

It's going to be fascinating.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 08:24 (twenty years ago)

I've got ticket to the Edgbaston test and am really rather looking forward to seeing the Aussies knocked about a bit. I hope it is really close (well I hope we win a whitewash but that's pretty unlikely). The Channel 4 ads a re really quite scary though.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)

If they'd got Flintoff to burst out of that grave they'd be perfect.

On one hand I've got myself to blame (Lynskey), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)

What's pissing me off is that there is no test at Headingly.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

i saw the second half of the 20/20 match when i got in from work on monday, i larfed and larfed.

i hope the tests are good but i do think england are going to lose the series, hopefully not by too much though...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)

four weeks pass...
Pietersen in Thorpe out!

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Thursday, 14 July 2005 10:34 (twenty years ago)

Ha, I was just looking for this thread, damn your connection speed.

It makes our middle order look worryingly flimsy, imo.

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 14 July 2005 10:38 (twenty years ago)

I am now hoping that Strauss, Tresco, Bell and Vaughan all get centuries while Pietersen gets out in the low teens in both innings to dolly catches off mistimed leg side slashes. Or even better, bowled round his legs by Warne.

You may deduce from this that I really don't like Pietersen.

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 14 July 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

what's with all the 20/20 hate?! its interesting, one day cricket has changed the approach to the 'proper', longer form of the game. also 5 matches is enough, wouldn't say the series is 'diminished' in anyway. I think its worse that they're all bunched together like this.

this does seem like the wrong decision but I'm not sure what thorpe was thinking of by saying he'd retire at the end of the summer - just doesn't look good - he had scored a 73 last week for surrey so again form and fitness don't come into this.

hope i'm proved wrong. xp

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:01 (twenty years ago)

I don't like him much, but I am pleased that they have chosen him. I think it signals that we are going to try and score quickly and take the attack to the Aussie bowlers if possible. But you're not wrong, Ricky, if we're 50-3 on the first morning at Lords I'd rather see Thorpe coming in. But if we're 200-1 mid afternoon, then Pietersen might be a good call.

Tremlett might be a dark horse later in the series.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

Tremlett needs to nasty up a bit

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)

Given the way that Lee and McGrath are bowling at the moment we look like needing Thorpes grit rather than Pietersens cultured slogging.

If we were playing West Indies or New Zealand then sure, but against the line of McGrath (4 maidens in a row in 50 over game) and a fired up Brett Lee...

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)

OTM

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm a touch worried that the Austraaaalian bowlers have Pietersen figured out now. Also a tad worried that our pool of youthful bowlers isn't quite where it should be by now (the Andersons etc.).

On the pro side Vaughan should actually start batting now, Tresco's eye is in and the mid-lower's look in ok touch. As ever I think Gilo's got as much to do with the bat as the ball.

Prediction - long and cool drinks, TV outside, Radio, TV and Cricinfo at the the same time, light snacks, heaven.

On one hand I've got myself to blame (Lynskey), Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)

I don't think they have seen enough of Pietersen to figure him out. In fact no-one knows how he'll do in a test match. They've certainly figured Tres out (as everyone has), but I don't think anyone's suggesting he shouldn't play. Let's just hope he gets that thin edge to first slip when he's got 150 on the board, not 15.

On Vaughan I agree, he needs consistent runs. I guess Bell is the gritty batsman now. I wonder if he'll bat 3 or 4. I think Vaughan may go in 3.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 14 July 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)

My worry is Strauss, he's not looked comfortable against Lee at all. We'll need to dent Lees confidence ASAP.

I feel if we can see off the opening spell we'll do great, if we lose early wickets I think we can recover to post a decent total given the depth of our batting.

And the big question is how well will Warne bowl.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Thursday, 14 July 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

I expect Warne to bowl well

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 14 July 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

Two years ago I said I was happy with the young bowlers we had coming through but the ageing batting line up was a cause for concern. Oh how things have changed. Wither Kirtley, Anderson, Ali?

McGrath's line is more of a concern for me in the one-dayers. 4 straight maidens in a test isn't too bad and promotes the best in TMS commentary so it has its upside. I get the feeling, like I do when anyone comes up against the Aussies these days, that it's Englands to lose rather than theirs to win. Their players are so machine-like consistent that its down to the resolve and concentration of their opponents. Hence why I'd like to see Thorpe instead of Pietersen.

On one hand I've got myself to blame (Lynskey), Thursday, 14 July 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

I think England have made a big mistake with leaving Thorpe out, we're so gonna need a grifter. Pietersen is okay, but I doubt if he save an innings, but there's no need to fast-track him in.

Anyway, I predict a 10 wicket haul for Hoggard at Lords.

I can't stand Simon Jones btw (though I liked him when he threw the ball at Hayden), so I hope Tremlett replaces him soon.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

Tremlett's name envokes a mental picture of a small 10 watt practice amp made by Fender.

On one hand I've got myself to blame (Lynskey), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)

**Wither Kirtley, Anderson, Ali?**

Kirtley - honest country pro but only ever a stop-gap. Hayden and Ponting would murder him.

Anderson - needs a season with Lancs. I wouldn't be surprised if he never gets back in actually. His action is terrible.

Kabir Ali - I liked the look of him when he played, but he probably isn't accurate enough for someone of his moderate pace. Could come again.

It looks thin, I agree, and the worry is that with pace bowlers injuries will happen. I think we might be alright in a couple of years with Bresnan (Yorks), Plunkett (Durham), Broad (Leics) and Tremlett as possibles. They have a lot of work to do though. I thought Steve Kirby might make it a couple of years ago, but that looks doubtful now.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)

Kirtley is also about to turn 31 (I know this as he's my cousin and I'm 6 months older than him. He's the only famous person in my family which is why I namedrop so often), so he's hardly "young". I suspect Doc C is right - his metronomic good length medium-fast balls just wouldn't be enough of a challenge. His reliability is a plus that shouldn't be underestimated, though.

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)

But all of the current crop of international bowlers are pretty young anyway - the Wheelie Bin aside

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

I might start my cricket career next year, I'll be 30. I could be the next Neil Mallender.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)

1st day, 1st test!

aus won the toss and are batting

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 21 July 2005 08:23 (twenty years ago)

And Langer's already been injured!

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 21 July 2005 08:34 (twenty years ago)

9-0, Harmison looking good, despite the runs.

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 21 July 2005 08:38 (twenty years ago)

bloody cricinfo is ballsing up

Ed (dali), Thursday, 21 July 2005 08:41 (twenty years ago)

beauty from hoggard 35-1

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:10 (twenty years ago)

Pietersen's just dropped Ponting.

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)

and he missed on running out langer - its already looking like a disastrous choice from the selectors.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:21 (twenty years ago)

Poor Ponting

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)

Calm your spurs Julio. The Ashes is about 35 minutes old; let's goive the lad a chance.

(Can i suggest you get a job with the Tabloid sports desks)

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:27 (twenty years ago)

ouch dave you guardian reader you

(guess their webpage is following this one over-by-over)

good hit from harminson!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:32 (twenty years ago)

Tony fvcking Greig is commentating. Telly off, radio on.

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:33 (twenty years ago)

volume off, telly on ricky cuz harminson is got ponting!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:38 (twenty years ago)

search and destroy: desktop cricket scoreboards. cricinfo, bbc or channel4?

Pete W (peterw), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:41 (twenty years ago)

sorry but this is bullshit from ppl who were praying for the weather to save eng at the last match.

ok I'll leave it at this -- so if ppl who back read are saying 'give him a good run' in the team to show that he can score runs I'll say the same for jones. Give him time to improve his keeping bcz this guy can bat, is a cool head and he has the temperament for test match cricket.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)

they should do the same for david james.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 10:27 (twenty years ago)

sorry but this is bullshit from ppl who were praying for the weather to save eng at the last match

Who exactly?

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 10:34 (twenty years ago)

I'm more inclined towards Julio's position on Jones, but I think we have to consider alternatives (not just Read). Remember that the Jones experiment WORKED - he made decent runs and his dropped catches didn't matter in the end. He was good ENOUGH, but we are probably right in thinking that he may cost us a match in the future.

I actually think that Harmison deserves some criticism. Since Lords he has been poor for much of the time. The odd decent over (e.g to Langer on Sat afternoon) isn't good enough for someone with his talent. And I still haven't forgiven him for that awful last over at Old Trafford.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)

otm re: harmison

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)

aw there's no harm in harmison

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)

There's no-one better than Harmison to come in otherwise we'd of picked him for S. Jones. He will come back and take wickets I have faith in him.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)

just been down to Trafalgar Square. fabulous scenes. took me back to when i was 9, standing in Coventry city centre watching our FA Cup heroes trundle slowly along. okay, there probably weren't 100,000 people on the street that day, but the result was similarly unlikely at the outset. it was hot and crowded and uncomfortbale, but it was great to be down there, literally two metres away from the trail of Veuve Clicquot that Freddie was happily pouring from his perch hanging over the front of the bus. they've clearly been up all night, and he in particular looked fucked. and best of all, the ceremony was just as confused and overlong as yesterday's! ENG-ER-LAND!

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)

oh, and i think that i'd rather stick with G.O. than bring in Read, because one of the commentators said it's easier to learn to improve with the gloves than with the bat, and that makes seense to me.

also, i think Bell should have at least a couple of less intense series before we should jettison him. that would also give time for some younger players to come through, particularly Alastair Cook, who's been in sparkling form for Essex this summer, with a double century against Australia under his belt already.

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

Alastair Cook

are scottish people eligible to play for england?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)

Yes, and several have and have even captained England. Don't forget that three of the current team aren't English

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

... which is one of the reasons it's no problem for me to support the England cricket team!

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b339/dahling007/dot%20to%20dot/e5f61296.jpg

alistair cook, in sparkling form, yesterday...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:53 (twenty years ago)

when he gets his turn to be shit-faced on an open-top bus, i reckon the lad will do just fine.

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:29 (twenty years ago)

i hope he does the dance

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

Yes!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)

whilst keeping wicket

he can be the new bruce grobbelaar

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)

(although quite why you'd want to put off your own bowlers i don't know)

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:42 (twenty years ago)

**because one of the commentators said it's easier to learn to improve with the gloves than with the bat, and that makes seense to me.**

That's funny because Rod Marsh said just the opposite on Radio 4. Which makes sense to me. The example he gave was McGrath who could basically not bat at all when he came into the Aus team. Now he can at least defend reasonably and has a test 50. But he said 'try teaching him to keep wicket and you'd get nowhere'. A similar example from England would be Hoggard.

But maybe that's beside the point, as we're really talking about people who are already keeping to a high standard anyway. I'd say that Jones has some coachable faults, like going for the ball one handed, also possibly his feet position. Slightly more worrying is his keeping to the spinners - maybe his reflexes are just not up to it, which no amount of coaching will ever fix. Certainly he looks like he'll never be up to standard of Russell, Knott or even Stewart, who turned out to be a very good keeper in the end. I can remember Russell taking some stumpings off the likes of Tuffnell that were so bloody fast, that you couldn't see what had happened until the slow motion came up. I don't think Jones will ever be able to do that. Russell also used to stand up for the fast-medium bowlers at times, which is pretty amazing. It stops batsmen taking guard outside the crease, which some the Aussies like to do. You wouldn't stand up for Harmison, but you might for Hoggard if the ball's not swinging much.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

... and Russell used to get stick for his batting too. Ridiculous.

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

aw, and he is named after a breed of dogs

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

i guess i was thinking along the lines of there being fewer principles to master to be an effective WK, and less natural talent than required to be a quality batsman.

wow, isn't it funny how much less convincing certain thoughts are when you put them in black and white...

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

i guess i was thinking along the lines of there being fewer principles to master to be an effective WK, and less natural talent than required to be a quality batsman.

I hope you never meet Rodney Marsh on a dark night

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

g.jones really needs a battered old hat :(

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

I hope you never meet Rodney Marsh on a dark night

you think this face was an accident? my nose used to be in the middle. all i said was that i thought he was great on Sky Sports Centre with Jeff Stelling.

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

I'm a Chris Read fan to be honest. It always helps if your wicket-keeper can actually keep wicket. Jones is great at the occasional eye-catching take but drops the bread and butter stuff too often. I've lost count of the amount of times he's failed to cleanly take the simplest of deliveries (don't tell me Gilo turns it that much Geraint, and stop looking around with that innocent "wow, did you see that? what a ripper!" look on your face). If Ashley Giles wants to improve his average he could do worse than "accidentally" feed Jones a dodgy curry or two this winter.

Re spinners, Panesar's been turning it square all summer, but can't bat. Ian Blackwell is an improving bowler who hits the ball harder than Flintoff and would be a good option for the winter's tests (particularly as his batting prowess means you could easily play Read and bat him at eight, the same applies to Gareth Batty, but he's an inferior batsman to Blackwell).

Harmison's been out of form since Lords, and yet still hasn't been collared. This tells me he's a bloody good bowler, and when he gets his length back, watch out.

Matt (Matt), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

I think relexes and v.fast hands are not coachable. I once kept wkt at Univ for about 3 games as we had no-one else. If you've never done it, you be surprised how difficult it is to hang on when the batsman gets an edge. Batting is simpler to improve- you can learn a forward defensive and a backward defensive and you have the basics of defending your wicket. All the shots are played from those platforms. To score runs the forward defensive can become a drive, the short ball can be pulled away on the leg side and the short ball outside off can be chopped square (cut). Basically to learn to bat better you have to get your feet in the right place.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

Dr. C, can you provide illustrations to go with your batting tips, please? I can almost see an Eagle style weekly comic strip but not quite.

(nb, I am not taking the piss!)

Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:58 (twenty years ago)

"This tells me he's a bloody good bowler, and when he gets his length back, watch out."

Gotta be more agressive too.

I reckon marsh is really going for jones' throat here.

jones didn't go to his academy did he? I remember him talking about how when wktkeeping standards are really good the whole side will field better etc and yet BOTH SIDES have dropped a lot of catches and a lot of no balls were bowled.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Gilchrist dropped a few but still on a different planet, wicketkeeping-wise, to Jones

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't say a different planet.

Top-class : Russell, Knott, Bob Taylor, late-period Ian Healy, Wasim Bari
Very good : Gilchrist, Boucher, Read, Kartik or P.Patel (India), Sangakara (SL), Rod Marsh, Adam Parore. Late-period Stewart
OK : Jones, McCullum (NZ), Dujon (WI) Jacobs (WI)

x-post : Mooro - if I could draw I would. Maybe if we cross paths at a FAP, I'll demonstrate!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

Agreed, diff. planet bit strong

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

no doubt that Gilchrist has been better but despite that both sides dropped catches which goes against marsh's point.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

I don't suppose Tatenda Taibu's got an English granny, has he?

Matt (Matt), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

Posing with Tony Blair has taken the gloss of a bit. ick.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, and talk about OTM:

2-1 to England.

-- jel -- (freeduni...) (webmail), June 14th, 2005 8:38 PM.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

Haha, great picture Steve!

Well done, England. As much I I enjoyed watching KP falling all over the place at the crease, the sight of Andrew Flintoff falling all over the place today was just as pleasant. Also, the trophy had a dent in it! Perhaps they gave it to Shane Warne to hold.

Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)

i love you in bating you and michel vaghn are my favourite players in the england team I enjoy you hiting sixes its my dream to meet you

taleb khar, Wednesday, 14 September 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)

hmmm, wonder what search brought us up...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 09:37 (twenty years ago)

Googly

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 09:38 (twenty years ago)

**i love you in bating you and michel vaghn are my favourite players in the england team I enjoy you hiting sixes its my dream to meet you **

How long has anthony been into cricket?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 09:43 (twenty years ago)

Every time I look at this thread I see the first page of answers whilst the rest loads and think "ooh, I'm glad they're all wrong"

I liked the pic of Flintoff on the front page of today's Guardian.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 09:46 (twenty years ago)

I love how all the tabs really care about is that the team have been on a long drinking binge. Cor! Booze! Now here's a picture of Flintoff's missus!

Matt (Matt), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 10:06 (twenty years ago)

the pic on the guardian needs the caption "I drank THIS MUCH bouze!"

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 10:18 (twenty years ago)

I love how all the tabs really care about is that the team have been on a long drinking binge. Cor! Booze! Now here's a picture of Flintoff's missus!

erm what else would you talk about?!?!?!?!


what i like it how it's all reported as "awww, silly freddie all drunk bless him"

had it been say an england football player, it'd have been "OMG WTF WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WTF"

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

although if they win the world cup (haha lol rofl etc) they would probably be excused.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)

erm what else would you talk about?!?!?!?!

"Victorious sports team go drinking: nothing else has ever happened"

Matt (Matt), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)

squad for pakistan announced

udal (!) is going, read loses out to prior, and that is a shame. Fletcher must have no confidence in him whatsoever.

Hopefully we can put the ashes out of our minds, put out the defence of it in 15 months time and just concentrate on beating pakistan. two more wins and vaughan beats peter may's record for most eng wins.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 September 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)

Udal was on the Ashes tour in 1994! I think he could play a test this time around. Loudon is a good call - sounds like a much improved player in 2005. Prior for Read is a disappointment. I'm sorry not to see Shah or Key, but I guess Collingwood has moved ahead of them now.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 19 September 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

Concurrence ahoy. A specialist wicketkeeper is v necessary in the subcontinent, no? Read not going is a mistake. Loudon is a good idea though, possibly Udal is there in a mentoring capacity? Tremlett better buy a tray and start practising, he'd get murdered on those pitches.

Matt (Matt), Monday, 19 September 2005 14:53 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.