Can we just clear something up about the word "America?"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Brent DiCrescenzo says: "America" is technically not a country. You hear this complaint a lot, actually -- that calling the nation I live in "America" is somehow stealing the word from the other nations of North, South, and central "America," who are just as much Americans in the continental sense. But can we please establish that this is a really, really stupid complaint? Here's why:

The full proper name of this nation is "The United States of America." It is the only nation in the two American continents to have the word "America" in its name, and there is a wide enough cultural gap between the U.S., Canada, and Latin America that no one has much need for "America" as a blanket term for all of us. Calling this country "The United States" is basically the same thing as constantly referring to China as "The People's Republic" -- it includes the governmental adjectives but omits the prime signifying name of the place itself. Does Brent call China "The People's Republic?" Does he tell people he's going on vacation to "The Federal Union of" or the "Islamic Confederation of?"

Feel free to argue that America named itself badly and unspecifically. Feel free to argue about American imperialism and ignorance of / disdain for / inattention to the people with whom we share this hemisphere -- you have plenty of ammunition on all counts. But can we all just admit that the name is perfectly viable?

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Thus I conclude that "US" (and consequently UK) is probably the more hegemonic of the options, in that it assumes you must be talking about those States or that Kingdom, just because they're important.

(The only workable international example Brent's viewpoint has is the United Arab Emirates, and they have the complications of (a) Saudi Arabia, another nation using the "Arab" signifier in their title, (b) not being able to call the country "Arab," which refers to a people and not a land -- if it was "United Emirates of Arabia" and there were no Saudi Arabia, it might be different -- and (c) the "Arab" or "Arab nations" designation actually being needed to refer to several nations in the region. But if the entire Arabian peninsula united and called their nation "Arabia," would you sit around complaining that that was rude to the unincluded Syrians?)

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Where is the context for this Nitsuh?

Tom, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"I conclude that "US" (and consequently UK) is probably the more hegemonic of the options, in that it assumes you must be talking about those States or that Kingdom"

Yes. Using by US or UK as an ABBREVIATION, I let people know that I'm referring to those UNITED states or that UNITED Kingdom - that's what the U. stands for. What are you getting at here, man?

fritz, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"there is a wide enough cultural gap between the U.S., Canada, and Latin America that no one has much need for 'America' as a blanket term for all of us."

It's a geographic term - by your logic "Europe" and "Asia" are useless blanket terms too.

fritz, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Where is the context for this Nitsuh?

Well, it's almost Christmas and people are getting tetchy. :)

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

but of course the name is totally viable, yes and brent whatsisface is on about nothing.

fritz, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm really starting to like the word 'Eurozone'. It sounds properly futuristic.

Tom, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Even while rural Ireland is in it but Stockholm isn't :) ?

Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Don't believe the hype - they're all bunjo cockfarmers in Sweden.

DV, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

We can collect our first euro-coins on Friday (everyone's getting free samples). Not legal tender yet.

stevo, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't care if everyone in the Eurozone is a lowly swineherd Robin, putting "-zone" on the end of something is cool. I like the way it sounds like something you should enter with vague trepidation.

Tom, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I want to cause consternation when the euro comes in and tell people I won't accept that fake money.

I also want to act like a fool in shops and complain about how expensive stuff is.

I was in TK Max today and the intercom said "All our prices are displayed in pounds and euros, but at TK Max you always pay the lower price" or something stupid.

Ronan, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

AMERICA REFERS TO nEW yORK sTATE AND FLORIDA. ALL ELSE IS "UPPER MEXICO"

Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If you're talking about NOrth and South America you don't say America, you say "the Americas."

Maria, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Fritz -- sorry, that "cultural gap" thing should have been about the word "Americans". I mean, I can't imagine many valid statements that could be made about "Americans" if you mean all people on both continents. Geographically, I'm agreeing with Maria: we got on fine saying "the Americas" or "North and South America" or just "the western hemisphere," really.

The context is something Brent D. wrote for something or other about Eve's "I never knew there were black people outside of America" comment, linked to in a recently-revived ILE thread with a really long title that boils down to "Things pop stars do that they think are cool but actually make them look like twunts." (Just do a find for "twunts" on the New Answers page.) That plus the fact that this has always really annoyed me, from the time my 9th-grade civics teacher tried it to the present day.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

To clarify: I don't like that the argument sort of perverts our reasonable and agreed-upon rules of syntax merely to make a cultural point which can be made in other, much more damning ways.

Re: Eve -- note how really dumb it is of Brent to pick on that statement based on this completely common use of "America" issue, when surely what was newsworthy was the greater thought being expressed.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ack -- I meant semantics, just now. Let's just kill this thread now.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

LETS TALK ABOUT DUCKYS!

Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, one last:

By using US or UK as an ABBREVIATION, I let people know that I'm referring to those UNITED states or that UNITED Kingdom - that's what the U. stands for. What are you getting at here, man?

But other states or kingdoms might unite, mightn't they? The operative parts of each are that I'm in the United States of America and Tom's in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. For the same of consistency, I think we should go with the regional specification as opposed to the governmental one, just like we don't call China the PR and just like we referred to the old USSR as "Soviet."

Actually, I suppose I would be okay with pushing for full-title abbreviations, which would make USA or UKGBNI okay (just like USSR or DDR fifteen years ago, or UAE today). But in order to say "America" was outright wrong, we'd also have to start specifying with every nation, which we're obviously not going to do.

Are you thinking, "screw consistency, why can't we just call them what people agree to call them?" Well, then: "America" seems more common than "United States" outside.

And also note that people making Brent's argument never pick on people for calling Yanks and Canadians "North Americans," but not including Mexico, which is just as much geographically North American as the other two.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I so apologize for all of this.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with Nitsuh. Nitpickers need a wooden plank shoved up their ass. USA is America. God bless America and all that, right? America is synonymous for USA. It's not a geographic term. Nobody refers to the whole of North and South America as "America". It is common knowledge, which makes the decision to complain about this common knowledge ridiculous. Ask a Mexican or a Canadian where they live. Ask an American. Compare and contrast, you stupid assholes. Thank you. :)

Nude spock, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

As a busy sub-editor i have observed that "US" = less lengthy on the page than "USA", "America", "the States", "the United States", "the United States of America", "the United States of America incorporating EuroDisney" etc etc. So "US" it is.

By similar reasoning, "UK".

mark s, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, let me further clarify that I don't really have a problem with US or UK as they're both clearly understood by all. It's just that I hate people indicting "America" and "American" when, if you want to get picky about it, they're probably more semantically reasonable. I think I actually use US, most of the time, and UK since no one uses GB and I'm never sure about whether certain cities are in England or Wales.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

LETS TALK ABOUT DUCKYS!

duck s + 10 years = Danny DeVito in The Virgin Suicides (and he already is a thriteen year old girl)

I also, so apologise for this.

Graham, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.