Taking Sides: Tradition vs. the Free Market

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Or the drive and definition of pre-1979 Conservatism versus what the party veered towards in the 80s.

I'm neither a rampant traditionalist nor a Thatcherite free marketeer, and I doubt whether many others on this forum are either of those things, but this is a straight question: which of these things are more important to your life? Do you place more importance on the way things have previously been done or on the influence that commercialism has on you today?

Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't think there's a good way to answer in those categories.

Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is one of those times when I wish I were Tom Frank.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

80s teen so t.fore Thatch was IMPORTANT -EVERYDAY SHE GAVE ME SOMETHING TO RAIL AGAINST - disliked tory trad. patricians too - but they would not have given us NEXT, budweiser, ben elton, heaven17, hairgel, retro-art deco, cappucino, ^shout to the top^, chinos

was thatcherism a better thing for brit culture than old-style tory would have been ?

im asking this as a north east working class ex-dole poll tax marching leftie/middly

, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"was thatcherism a better thing for brit culture than old-style tory would have been?"

Yes. The only elements of Thatcherism I think were good things are, without fail, the ones that pissed off High Tories. The elements of it High Tories liked, I hate.

Which is a roundabout way of saying that I'm more of a free marketeer than a traditionalist, however I may sometimes have come over in the past.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

IIRC about a third of Britain's manufacturing industry was wiped in the early '80s. Doubtless there were a few dinosaurs amongst them but by no means all. Other European countries also embraced a higher degree of 'market-orientated' economics at the time but none did it as wrecklessly, without consideration for the damage to the nation's social fabric. Britain was often regarded as something of an experimental zone. That is no commendation.

(Ian Gilmour's Conservative History 'Whatever Happened to the Tories' is good on this btw) Thatcherism involved class-conflict, emasculating the Trade Unions whose 'irresponsible' Winter of Discontent actions never came remotely close to the damage Thatcher's economic policies caused. And it didn't work. Britain's economic performance never came close to matching its competitors, whilst inflicting woe on its public services and inner-cities. The pre-79 Tories, for all their many faults, were not as callous or clumsy.

stevo, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To clarify, Stevo - I was referring to the *cultural* aftereffects of Britain's opening up to the unregulated free market being positive, not the economic element. I totally agree with everything you say here.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.