― guyfawks, Monday, 20 June 2005 02:59 (twenty years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 20 June 2005 03:01 (twenty years ago)
― giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 20 June 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 20 June 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)
i don't do criminal law. i despised criminal law, and i took the bar over 3 years ago!
that said -- i think that orbit and aimless are correct. then again, there is such a thing as prosecutorial discretion -- e.g., if you catch someone 50 years after they murdered someone, they may not prosecute if for no other reason b/c there may be no surviving witnesses, admissible evidence, age of the defendant, etc.
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 20 June 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 20 June 2005 03:58 (twenty years ago)
I am glad that this exists.
― giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 20 June 2005 03:59 (twenty years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)
― C J (C J), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)
actually I'm not sure this happens very often or at all. I may be making it up. but it sounds like it could happen.
― C J (C J), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 20 June 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Monday, 20 June 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)