WAR OF WORLDS MOVIE.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
pretty good!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)

scary

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)

http://www.antibet.ukonline.co.uk/cruivamp.jpg

Gear! (Ill Cajun Gunsmith) (Gear!), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 00:57 (twenty years ago)

im looking forward to it! even tom cruise can't ruin my love of malevolent extraterrestrials!

Mr. Vas Djifrens (byzantum), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 00:57 (twenty years ago)

i hope only the aliens win of course, if they be sons of the void.

Mr. Vas Djifrens (byzantum), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 00:58 (twenty years ago)

pretty good!

*looks askance*

So how much does it clone Signs anyway?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 00:59 (twenty years ago)

it was like signs if signs was good.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)

i mean there were DEFINITELY a lot of problems, especially in the last act when the movie is stuck in a cellar for like 30 hours. but the opening invasion + terrified fleeing + mini-titanic style is scary and exciting!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)

i liked that it copped signs' ant's-eye-view thing. no president, no scientist, very few "news reports"

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:02 (twenty years ago)

Deus ex machina? Or is it faithful to the book this time?

Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:03 (twenty years ago)

xxx-post

how can it be a clone of signs if signs itself was a war of the worlds rip-off?

i really liked signs in its own cheesy way.

no doubt it will be better than independence day, but that's not difficult.

still i am anticipating this movie.

im looking forward to it! even tom cruise can't ruin my love of malevolent extraterrestrials!

-- Mr. Vas Djifrens (THEWARLOCK8...), June 28th, 2005.

what he said.

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:04 (twenty years ago)

crankypants your question doesn't make sense.

and actually i thought signs DID have some stuff going for it (though it was, as pointed out, a war of the worlds ripoff--AND an owen meany ripoff!)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:05 (twenty years ago)

cruise is used well here. he's actually pretty dece.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:06 (twenty years ago)

crankypants your question doesn't make sense.

How so?

Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:08 (twenty years ago)

cuz the original's ending is total deus ex machina! (in a good way)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:09 (twenty years ago)

The original's ending is well clever though. The original Hollywood film ended in some wacky agenda-driven divine providence.

Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)

slocki do the aliens look cool?

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

I was gonna say, Adam, when is the sudden onset of a vulnerability to earth's micro-organisms not a deus ex machina?

It's all like

TRIPOD: "BAM, BAM, TAKE THIS MOTHAFUCKAS, AIN'T NO PARTY LIKE A MARTIAN PARTY!"

*blasts of heat ray, destruction of London*

TRIPOD 2: "THIS IS HOW WE MOTHERFUCKING RO...HEY, XBALU'AHNTH, I DON'T FEEL SO GOOD. I'M A LIE DOWN."

* tripod 2 crashes to the ground*

TRIPOD 1: "WHAT THE...*SNEEZE*...AW HELL NAW!"

*tripod 1 crashes to the ground*

NARRATOR: "Ahah, DO YOU SEE, the tiny micro-organisms destroyed the GIGANTIC WAR MACHINES, DO YOU SEE?

FIN.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:19 (twenty years ago)

latebloomer: the tripods look AWESOME, the aliens themselves... well... they kinda suck.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)

it's like enough with the humanoid, two-eyes-and-a-mouth overly CGIish aliens already!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:21 (twenty years ago)

Aren't they like three legged vag-mouthed things?

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

you're thinking of the tripods!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

awww:-/ well obviously these things are subjective, so hopefully i'll disagree when i see it, but i wouldnt'be surprised if you were right.

so they aren't reminiscent of the critters in Wells' novel (basically giant octopi)?

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)

No, from what I've heard I thought they were mini-tripods themselves? Don't tell me they've got arms and legs and such? Daaamn.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)

when you first see them they seem like mini-tripods but then you quickly realize they're kind of boring movie aliens. i don't think he should've shown them at all actually.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

Anyhoo, does the film live up to the 'American Holocaust' talk bandied about? Like, is it more a film about survival and a huge diaspora, rather than action and saving the world?

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

x-post

well i guess the poster gives part of it away:

http://www.cinemasavvy.com/w/images/waroftheworlds.jpg

but the 1953 War of the Worlds had humanoid martians:

http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/wp-uploaded/WOTW-4.jpg

slocki are they similar to the 1953 critters?

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)

Anyhoo, does the film live up to the 'American Holocaust' talk bandied about? Like, is it more a film about survival and a huge diaspora, rather than action and saving the world?

-- Mike Stuchbery (michael.stuchber...), June 28th, 2005.

yeah i'm interested in that angle too! is it done well?

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)

i should just shut and ee it shouldn't i?

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)

shut and ee!!

it's definitely more about survival and alien-avoidance than alien-fighting. which is pretty cool although it definitely has its own dramatic disadvantages.

but fuck!! there's some seriously dark, scary stuff. spielberg definitely impressed me on that count.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:33 (twenty years ago)

(would not go so far as to say "american holocaust," though!!)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)

arrgh "shut up and see it" i meant. lol.

but damn i cant wait. i love me science fiction movies.

latebloomer: now with 20% less cetacean content (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)

me too!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)

it's pretty awesome that he went the saving private ryan camerawork route for this. well, almost. i wish he'd committed to that more actually.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:38 (twenty years ago)

s1ocki, I know we don't always agree on everything, but I want you to know that I had NO intention of seeing this until you said it was good. I AM TRUSTING YOU NOW.

I'm bad and dirty and going to hell (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)

you mean the jittery strobe effects and so on? the hyperreal stuff?

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)

NO intention?!?! i always thought it looked pretty good, cruise notwithstanding

ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:55 (twenty years ago)

To be honest, I was planning an out and out BOYCOTT! Like in the good old days!

I'm bad and dirty and going to hell (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm so glad Tom Cruise hasn't turned Dakota Fanning into a scientologist.

Ian Riese-Moraine has been xeroxed into a conduit! (Eastern Mantra), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:56 (twenty years ago)

She narrated the Henry Darger movie!

I'm bad and dirty and going to hell (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:58 (twenty years ago)

i have no interest in seeing this because i'm sure it will give me nightmares

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:58 (twenty years ago)

xpost

ew

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:58 (twenty years ago)

I'm so glad Tom Cruise hasn't turned Dakota Fanning into a scientologist.

Bet she's got the xenu playing cards though.

Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 01:59 (twenty years ago)

ew

Depends on your perspective!

I'm bad and dirty and going to hell (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:01 (twenty years ago)

http://www.abcd-artbrut.org/IMG/doc-741.jpg

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

you mean the jittery strobe effects and so on? the hyperreal stuff?

yeah, kinda. not as intense, not as strobey though. but it's very subjective camerawork, shakey, not a lot of nice shots of the aliens.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:08 (twenty years ago)

the aliens were a bit pointless

jones (actual), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)

i loved it but its major flaws are very weird ones

jones (actual), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:19 (twenty years ago)

TRIPOD 2: "THIS IS HOW WE MOTHERFUCKING RO...HEY, XBALU'AHNTH, I DON'T FEEL SO GOOD. I'M A LIE DOWN."

bahahaha. "Yo, CH'UXTHANLGSE, let's go blastin' on some fools!"

kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:23 (twenty years ago)

i don't trust anyone to judge spielberg films but me but this is encouraging news!

ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 28 June 2005 02:23 (twenty years ago)

"how come we don't have touchscreen tech??"

am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:38 (thirteen years ago)

they might grow lots of animals on different planets and just wait until there is a ripe harvest.

scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:39 (thirteen years ago)

they were waiting for us to build up a civilization so they could knock it down, for fun

lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:39 (thirteen years ago)

and then they have their ships there ready to go. what they didn't count on was...earth gumption!

scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:40 (thirteen years ago)

and deadly bacteria...

scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:40 (thirteen years ago)

and tome cruises lameo son

lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:40 (thirteen years ago)

they came looking for Earth gumbo; the found Earth gumption

^^^ copyrighted by me

I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:40 (thirteen years ago)

and 9/11

am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:41 (thirteen years ago)

i'm still trying to figure out last episode of battlestar logic...i should stop trying.

scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:41 (thirteen years ago)

aliens found out america was no lay-down sally

am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:42 (thirteen years ago)

of course in those SAME stories its always the earthling who saves the day/tricks the aliens and they're all like HUH??? how that savage backwater dude do that? with his primitive earth mind? and on that day the Q'euebgjea learned about...earth courage.

Reminds me of the Niven/Pournelle book Footfall, where we beat the alien invasion because the bad guys couldn't get their heads around the concept of lying. When some people said "we surrender" it didn't occur to them that we'd unsurrender when we saw an opening.

Neil Jung (WmC), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:43 (thirteen years ago)

they got jealous of our apps

― am0n, Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:38 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

planet of the apps

funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:43 (thirteen years ago)

i'm still trying to figure out last episode of battlestar logic...i should stop trying.

― scott seward, Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:41 AM

pls don't. not here. too painful

am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:48 (thirteen years ago)

i know.

scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:52 (thirteen years ago)

Did I really come back from a 15-minute walk to find more than 100 new messages wtf is wrong with all of you?

earthlings always gotta get involved. would kill for a space wars movie or show set far far FAR away from earth. somewhere where they've never even heard of earth!

― scott seward, Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:32 AM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://www.border7.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/starwars-a_long_time_ago.jpg

what abt in a place where they have heard of earth but are totally dismissive of earth like 'ew earth w/e who would ever want to go there'

― lag∞n, Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:33 AM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This movie is called Alien: Resurrection. "Earth? That shithole?!"

Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:54 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe the aliens had the ships buried as some sort of failsafe, for when they needed to conquer a new planet. And maybe they had to wait for their "crop" to mature to a population of, say, 6 billions before it was worth their while to wake up. And maybe the aliens were too dumb to realize that such a huge number of people meant previously minimal levels of bacteria were suddenly lethal. Regardless, still smarter than having the aliens in "Signs" susceptible to fucking water.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:13 (thirteen years ago)

BTW, the staring at scary stuff is what I retroactively term the Harry Potter Effect. That is, if you're a fucking wizard and you're surrounded by fucking wizards and you go to fucking wizard school, there should be nothing on this earth that makes your jaw drop as you stare in awe. Like, once you see giant alien attack ships emerge from the ground and start vaporizing people, really nothing after that should be beyond the pale.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:14 (thirteen years ago)

(Harry Potter in the movies, at least)

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

Worst Belle and Sebastian song.

Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

harry potter was in this?

funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

Man, I hate the kids in this movie, but I concede they act pretty kid-like.

If you pause the film around the 88 minute mark, you can clearly see Harry Potter vaporized in the background. A predator, too.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)

Regardless, still smarter than having the aliens in "Signs" susceptible to fucking water.

we should have a poll on who the dumbest aliens are

The aliens from independance day failing to secure their wifi network (or whatever happened there) should be up there

aspiring barkitect (silverfish), Thursday, 5 July 2012 20:12 (thirteen years ago)

Keanu in "Day the Earth Stood Still" = easily swayed from his mission by lady and kid, and John Cleese (who leaves his TV on standby despite being environmentalist type professor). Aliens shoulda done better psychometrics before sending him on blow up the earth mission.

I remember seeing War of the Worlds, it was okay.

jel --, Thursday, 5 July 2012 21:36 (thirteen years ago)

keanu's mission is to observe though, he was observing the lady and kid and john cleese

the aliens buried their ships on earth via time machine and descended via lightning bolts as a simple shock-and-awe tactic

the late great, Thursday, 5 July 2012 21:38 (thirteen years ago)

I remember seeing War of the Worlds, it was okay.

wrong thread. this one's for WAR OF WORLDS MOVIE.

contenderizer, Thursday, 5 July 2012 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

five months pass...

Technically a marvel but utterly embarrassing from Tim Robbins appearance on, and you have to put up with Cruise for the duration

Number None, Saturday, 8 December 2012 01:16 (thirteen years ago)

how hated is Janusz Kaminski generally? cos most of his work with Spielberg makes me feel ill

Number None, Saturday, 8 December 2012 01:21 (thirteen years ago)

cruise is the man, jankam is the man

turds (Hungry4Ass), Saturday, 8 December 2012 01:51 (thirteen years ago)

three years pass...

There are at least five threads for this movie. Hope this is the one to use.

I watched this for a second time this weekend and it just edified my feelings from the first time I saw it. The first half is very strong and I would put it up there with Spielberg's best work. The moment when Robbins welcomes Cruise and Fanning into his basement is when Spielberg welcomes the audience into a much lesser movie where the creators don't try as hard and where the unstoppable and ruthless aliens become decreasingly ruthless and increasingly stoppable for reasons that aren't made at all clear within the world of the movie and everything is wrapped up with an INCREDIBLY lazy 'tell, don't show' Morgan Freeman voiceover (which is the only blemish on the first hour). It's a real shame.

Beef Wets (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 January 2016 20:59 (nine years ago)

three years pass...

THE MAN IS RIGHT

A troll opinion I’m thinking of developing is that The Steven Spielberg war of the worlds is better than children of men

— Max Read (@max_read) November 4, 2019

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 02:11 (six years ago)

this is so wrong, and I like the speilberg WOTW

Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 02:20 (six years ago)

CoM went down a couple notches on second viewing

too much of a videogame aesthetic

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 02:24 (six years ago)

max is 100% right that it’s a troll opinion

non-euclidean lenin (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 06:46 (six years ago)

I have to admit that I agree with the hot take that war of worlds movie is better than children men movie imho

“Hakuna Matata,” a nihilist philosophy (One Eye Open), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 13:47 (six years ago)

Per my previous post, I might be willing to concede that hour one of WotW is on equal footing with CoM.

Feed Me Wheat Thins (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 13:52 (six years ago)

Thought his revive would be about this... coming soon...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-yas0yPbLU

Michael Oliver of Penge Wins £5 (Tom D.), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 13:57 (six years ago)

enh, it's no tripods

non-euclidean lenin (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 13:59 (six years ago)

That's what I thought when I first saw the trailer, why are they setting Tripods in the Edwardian era?

Michael Oliver of Penge Wins £5 (Tom D.), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 14:00 (six years ago)

Cool, it's about time someone adapted the H.G. Wells novel The War of the Worlds. The wait is over!

Hey, you know what's actually really good? The '50s adaptation. I think it tends to get overlooked in the midst of the '50s sci-fi shuffle but it's solid.

Feed Me Wheat Thins (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 14:02 (six years ago)

Both great movies, would date them both simultaneously.

Pauline Male (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 14:17 (six years ago)

(re: Morbs-bait)

Pauline Male (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 14:17 (six years ago)

Cool, it's about time someone adapted the H.G. Wells novel The War of the Worlds. The wait is over!

Actually, the Peter Harness version has been waiting so long to TX that a) both Canada and New Zealand have been able to air it already despite presumable BBC holdback provisions, and b) a Howard Overman version has since been written, shot, post-produced & released in full in France, and started airing in other European countries & Africa, with TX in the US and fifty Fox territories to come.

now let's play big lunch take little lunch (sic), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 16:46 (six years ago)

OL you should watch alternating episodes of each & threadblog ‘em

now let's play big lunch take little lunch (sic), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 16:56 (six years ago)

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71WO69YKeiL._SY445_.jpg

lol, anyone remember this shite?

calzino, Tuesday, 5 November 2019 16:58 (six years ago)

Hey, you know what's actually really good? The '50s adaptation. I think it tends to get overlooked in the midst of the '50s sci-fi shuffle but it's solid.

― Feed Me Wheat Thins (Old Lunch), Tuesday, November 5, 2019 2:02 PM (three hours ago)

yeah i agree w/ this, it's excellent

the actual novel is good too, fwiw

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 17:40 (six years ago)

I kid, but as adapted properties go, WotW has had an surprisingly-high hit rate. Although I need to revisit the late-'80s series and see how much it drags down the average.

I'm scared my but won't fit in it. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 18:00 (six years ago)

the 1950s movie is a fav of mine, was very young when i saw it and had nightmares for years about alien camera eyes chasing me through my house. the scene where the priest gets vaporized was an early "i didnt know you could do that in a movie" moment for me.

“Hakuna Matata,” a nihilist philosophy (One Eye Open), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 20:10 (six years ago)

Yeah, that movie is shockingly untimid about reducing its bit players to ash.

I'm scared my but won't fit in it. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 20:18 (six years ago)

trailer for the Overman version fwiw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYeqzI-EZe0

now let's play big lunch take little lunch (sic), Tuesday, 5 November 2019 21:09 (six years ago)

Liked that the new BBC version actually went with the early-20th-Century setting, disliked that it fucked up almost everything else

Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Wednesday, 6 November 2019 00:32 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.