OK I'm angry now

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
'I'm Not Going to Come Home': One Marine's Third Iraq Tour

Somebody repost that shit about the Young Republicans. I'm not even seeing red anymore, I'm welling up with sheer bile at this point. I am completely unable to describe my current state of mind. Seditious isn't it, because I work here. I just wish certain people would lose their jobs. And maybe other ones would be eaten by zombies, or roll their SUV, or get food poisoning.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

I haven't given this idea complete thought yet, but as much as I hate to suggest it, I think the time for the draft may be here.
-Fresh troops get sent in.
-People who are apathetic about the war may finally have to choose a side, which may pressure President Dumbfuck to finally take it seriously.

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

sentiment seconded, although I'm not "in it" the way you are Tom. i have conspiracy theories coming out my ears right now.

also, I have young children, and other people's children are going to die. so eff the draft idea.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

I have young children, and other people's children are going to die. so eff the draft idea
Exactly. People would make more noise about how fucked up everything is if it affected them directly.

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

One of my good friends just got back home after serving with the marines in Iraq, and luckily should be getting out soon. Not sure if he did two or three tours though.

Despite the fact that I'm of prime draft age, I agree, geyser. I think for a lot of people, Iraq feels like something so distant it doesn't register on their radar except for maybe reading the paper now and again. Public sentiment would be much diff if maybe they had something on the line.

Aramyr, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I've thrown my thirty three cents in on the conscription issue before but bring it on. This is well beyond the point of horseshit.

Let's play guess how many people in my office have either been deployed to the shit since I started here in December 03 or just came back from the shit before starting this job?

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

I haven't given this idea complete thought yet, but as much as I hate to suggest it, I think the time for the draft may be here.

I have always thought that, on the whole, the draft is more a good idea than a bad one even though I am not at all in favor of military conflict and do not want to serve in the armed forces. However, if everyone DID have to serve in the armed forces, you would probably go a long way towards investing real, honest civic pride in the citizens of this country through the magic of enforced shared experience.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

I can't even post to this thread without saying something that I'll regret. I'm just as mad as you are, Tom.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

Ever read All Quiet on the Western Front? You know when he goes back to his hometown on leave and is bewildered by all the older folks telling him that it's all for a good cause, when they have no idea what the fuck's going on out there? So he goes back out and pretty much just waits in anticipation to get hit?

That's the book that needs to on every tenth-grader's mandatory summer reading list.

I shouldn't want to ram my fucking truck into every tailgate I see with a yellow ribbon and a (W) sticker on the back.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

Yes you should.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

People would make more noise about how fucked up everything is if it affected them directly.

I think it was Slate that had a piece today about the draft and the Bush administration's alleged resistance to the idea, despite the troop shortages, precisely because (and I'm paraphrasing here) a draft would further make each and every mom and dad in the country exponentially more of a stakeholder in the White House's current foreign policy and a more-or-less guaranteed election-loser come 2008. I know, for one, I'm not raising my son to be cannon fodder for dubious political expeditioneering in oil-rich countries.

Floyd the Barber (Floyd), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

I actually have a lingering regret that I didn't join the military when I was younger; I'd probably be a lot more patriotic and invested in what happens to the United States than I am now.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

Good god. The draft is one of my worst fears. Being shipped off to Iraq just because Bush couldn't keep his fucking Saddam boner in his pants. Fuck it. Crohn's disease has classified me as "disabled," thank god. But knowing that people my age are the prime draftees for the next eight years scares the shit out of me.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

As a college drop-out, I've considered the "what-if" scenerio of if I had joined the military. I don't think that I could've cut it, and I rather enjoyed spending my twenties in a slacker-like nineties fog. Though who knows what excitement I could have found in Kosovo or El Paso.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

The draft isn't a bad idea and it doesn't only have to be for military projects. If every class, race, region, profession is affected by the draft, people will think twice about military adventures. I'm increasingly inclined to think that, draft or no draft, there wasn't much that twenty years of bad policies could have done to change the outcome in Vietnam, but the fact that a lot of middle class college kids could delay or avoid going to fight made people a lot less willing to put up with it, which is too bad. The will and organization required for winning really big conflicts is well served by a draft, even the corrupt conscription during the Civil War. OTOH, having a small, volunteer army may actually lessen the chance that the US will throw them around cavalierly, though in the case of the present chickenhawks, that was decidedely not the case.

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)

Well, if you consider pregnant women whose babies have been ripped out and replaced with dogs "excitement in Kosovo"...

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

I actually have a lingering regret that I didn't join the military when I was younger; I'd probably be a lot more patriotic and invested in what happens to the United States than I am now.

Me too...I actually came very, very close to enlisting about two years ago (right after college). About 85% was out of post-college aimlessness, 10% out of misguided desire for adventure, 4.99% out of a desire to "learn some practical skills," 0.01% out of any sort of patriotism.

War sucks, tho, and I would never want to be in a position where I'd have to kill someone.

That being said: I can't help but think that the draft would be good for the country. And this is from someone who veers perilously close to Libertarianism at times.

giboyeux (skowly), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

I knew that would've come out sounding too cavalier, jocelyn. Thanks for the hamfisted heavy-handedness.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

I don't think I ever considered joining the military when I was younger -- not at the time for the more specific reasons I have now, it just didn't interest me. When I was a preteen I wanted to be an astronomer and later English lit and possibly teaching was my brief, and in both cases my Navy captain dad was fully supportive. Never felt any pressure to follow in his footsteps.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

if you consider pregnant women whose babies have been ripped out and replaced with dogs

...

...

...

...

Um. What? I mean, I don't at all claim to have any knowledge of what happened in Kosovo, but WHAT????? Holy fucking shit. What purpose did putting a dog in there serve?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

Was this one of the ethnic-cleansing atrocites? Was it widespread? Holy fucking shit.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

Ethnic humiliation.

xpost

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

I didn't hear about that before, but I'm not surprised.

That Slate piece, I guess.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

ETHNIC humiliation?! I mean, I get the "message," but that's just plain old sociopathic monstrousness! Ugh.

giboyeux (skowly), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

I haven't given this idea complete thought yet, but as much as I hate to suggest it, I think the time for the draft may be here.
-Fresh troops get sent in.
-People who are apathetic about the war may finally have to choose a side, which may pressure President Dumbfuck to finally take it seriously.

-- geyser muffler and a quarter (right.knewi...), July 5th, 2005 12:15 PM. (Dave225) (later)

Not to target Dave specifically here, just using his quote because it was the first of many similar ones to follow, but: Anyone who seriously believes this is just as much of a dumbfuck as our president. You're angry that he's sacrificing human lives to further his ideology, so to oppose that, you're willing to sacrifice more human lives (to further your own ideology?

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Because people do horrible things in war? I don't know, they were interviewing a soldier about it in a BBC1 documentary about lack of psychological aid to soldiers after term of service.
(apologies to PP, it's just that it's not very easy on the families of service people and I overreacted to your comment)

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

"I'm increasingly inclined to think that, draft or no draft, there wasn't much that twenty years of bad policies could have done to change the outcome in Vietnam, but the fact that a lot of middle class college kids could delay or avoid going to fight made people a lot less willing to put up with it, which is too bad."

Why is it too bad? The only too bad thing is that we didn't leave that country sooner.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

I am so egregiously upset right now. Holy FUCKING shit. That is fucking horrifying. Was this a government-sactioned, oft-repeated process or was this something that some sick ground troops thought up to exercise their sadism muscles? I am really fucking puzzled at the sheer magnitude of cavalier cruelty necessary to pull out a woman's unborn baby and REPLACE IT WITH A DOG. It's akin taking two people, pulling off their legs, and them beating them to death WITH EACH OTHERS' LEGS. Who felt that extra bit of viciousness was necessary?

Killing is too good for humanity. Holy shit.

(xpost: I am angry that the President doesn't appear to have thought very carefully about the ideology he is spending lives on, especially considering he has never had to put his own life in harm's way. Fuck you, Nick.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

("plain old socipathic monstrousness" sounds so....inadequate and flippant. I can't even wrap my brain around that.)


xpost n/a: Good point. For myself: I can rabbit on about the draft maybe not being a bad idea, but I'm still not enlisting unless someone makes me. Dishonest? Probably.

giboyeux (skowly), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Homo homini lupus

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

You're angry that he's sacrificing human lives to further his ideology, so to oppose that, you're willing to sacrifice more human lives (to further your own ideology?

No. I'd like for the war/dying to stop immediately. I'm talking only strategy here. The army would do better with more, fresher troops, AND a draft and the pressure that follows may put and end to the war sooner or at least get leaders to put more effort into a strategy and proper resources... so FEWER people die. Dumbfuck.

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

You're angry that he's sacrificing human lives to further his ideology, so to oppose that, you're willing to sacrifice more human lives (to further your own ideology?

You're going to be more angry if the lives that are sacrificed are draftees rather than volunteers?

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

There's no magic bullet to prevent stupid wars. Democracy hasn't done it. Not even conscripting middle class kids will do the trick. All you can do personally is resist.

If there's a draft, there'll be resistors and non-resistors, and once again there'll be hot social scorn poured on those who resist and plenty of death, maiming and trauma for those who don't. When the root is rotten, all the fruit is bad.

Aimless (Aimless), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

It kind of doesn't matter if scorn is poured upon the people who resist the draft because most of them belong to America's untouchable demographic (white, rich, privileged) and, quite frankly, any time that demographic gets scorn is a time when I do a vengeful little come-uppance dance.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)

Why not just go out and bash a few each evening just to hear them whimper for mercy, Dan?

Aimless (Aimless), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)

i still hold that the longer the current level of shit goes on, the better likelihood of the initial stages of a draft begin in early 2007, right after the mid-term elections.

kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

(apologies to PP, it's just that it's not very easy on the families of service people and I overreacted to your comment)

I should've said "experience" instead of "excitement" in my original comment anyway. Maybe if more people knew first-hand about those atrocities, they wouldn't be in such a rush to repeat them later on.

For example, maybe if George W. Bush had gone to Vietnam, he wouldn't be all touchy-feely with the stumps of returning soldiers who are now amputees. I swear that he has a fetish with that.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

Why not just go out and bash a few each evening just to hear them whimper for mercy, Dan?

Have "NIGGER!" shouted at you a few times for no reason and see how you feel on the whole matter, asshole.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

I mean, given that your little racism thread shows that you have the brainpower of a dead mouse, I shouldn't be surprised that you write something that feeble and impotent but it would be nice if at least once someone WOULDN'T fulfill my presumption that they're a fucking idiot.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

also, a sorta-draft has been in place for a year now; the whole "stop-loss" policy.

kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

Oh, and to anyone who thinks that a draft would "even up the playing field a bit", remember this:
Of all enlisted men who died in Vietnam, blacks made up 14.1 percent of the total. This came at a time when blacks made up 11 percent of the male population nationwide. ...The combination of the selective service policies with the skills and aptitude testing of both volunteers and draftees (in which blacks scored noticeably lower) conspired to assign blacks in greater numbers to the combat units of the Army and Marine Corps. Early in the war (1965 and 1966) when blacks made up about 11 percent of our Vietnam force, black casualties soared to more than 20 percent of the total. Black leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., protested, and President Johnson ordered black participation in combat units cut back. As a result, the black casualty rate was reduced to 11.5 percent by 1969.
In other words, once again, "South Park" was right.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

YES THEY DESERVE TO DIE AND I HOPE THEY BURN IN HELL

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

For example, maybe if George W. Bush had gone to Vietnam, he wouldn't be all touchy-feely with the stumps of returning soldiers who are now amputees. I swear that he has a fetish with that.

(W touching people's heads)

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

Pleasant Plains, as I said above (but the fact that a lot of middle class college kids could delay or avoid going to fight made people a lot less willing to put up with it, which is too bad), one of the reason's we don't have a draft is because all the exemptions for kids in college massively favored middle class white kids. If there were no exemptions and all classes were called up, I do think that people would react differently. The war would seem more tangible to large numbers to whom, I think, it now seems like an abstraction.

I do also think that the draft generally served us well in the Civil War, WWI, and WWII, and those were wars where our present Iraq casualties were dwarfed in single days. There are very few justifiable wars, but if any war is justifiable it should be conducted with the full support of the informed American people and not just with 'volunteers' over-representing the ill-favored in our society and the most jingoistic.

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

There's this really awful thought that I have whenever I read another Iraq-related obituary. This really awful thought when I look at the formal portrait of the young man is "Well, bet I know who he voted for."

I know that reading into such things isn't helping the situation at all, and could possibly be making it worse, but I can't help it. War shouldn't ever be partisian, but check out how overwhelming those overseas ballots count for the Right-Wing side. Whenever some mourning father says, "My son died defending his country", this very awful part of me thinks Well, actually, Pops...

Maybe this has more to do with the Conservative Media that's presently controlling what we see of this war. I'm sure there are a lot more angry parents out there that we don't know about, Michael Moore movies notwithstanding.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

Anyway, I get angry at myself for thinking such callous thoughts.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

People who aren't eligible for the draft, yet are for it...C or D?

kevin says relax (daddy warbuxx), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

I've been in favor of reinstating the draft in one form or another since 1992, when I was 19. Try playing the hypocrite card somewhere else.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)

You don't know me, you don't know my life, please take your misdirected imperiousness and blow it out of your ass. Thanks.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)

It may be easier to think that your son/daughter died defending his country than in some ill-planned, neo-colonial, chicken hawk dick waving orgy, especially if that required you to admit you had been hoodwinked and sadly, through your own sense of patriotism.

Dam, take a break from the imperious self-righteousness and the bullying moral superiority, it can't be good for you

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

The draft that would be put in place by our leaders is not a draft that will even up the playing field. They're not going to send comfortable middle/upper-middle white kids to war - if they actually cared about the results of their actions they wouldn't have let Dubya start it up in the first place.

It's going to disproportionately impact minority and working-class/poor people, just like in Vietnam, just like the military already is. So now it'll just be that some kid who gets out of high school to go pump gas and get high for a couple of years will be thrown into combat. Yay.

I consider it inconceivably immoral to send someone to kill (and even more important, to die) against their will. You either do it or you go to jail and remain stigmatized for the rest of your life. Whatever message needs to be sent to bougie America about its apathy and the fucked-up situation in Iraq, sending more innocent people to die isn't the way.

At my most depressed and hopeless I've considered joining the military, but there's just no way I can reconcile my beliefs and attitudes with our military. There should be an outlet where someone in their late teens or early '20s can help out/serve humanity without the requirements of the Peace Corps (yo, motherfuckers if I could graduate from college I'd find a way to help without you!) or the civil volunteer force that Dubya's budget gutted.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

I do also think that the draft generally served us well in the Civil War, WWI, and WWII

um, maybe in the two world wars, but not in the civil war. draft riots, rich people buyng their way out of it, etc., etc.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

WWII's draft was a strange situation - it wasn't that they had run out of volunteers post-Pearl Harbor, IIRC, it was that they needed to funnel more people to less flashy/safe brances of service.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

YEAH I SAW STREETS OF NEW YORK

xpost

get to thA CHOPPA / A++++++ SELLER (ex machina), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

There should be an outlet where someone in their late teens or early '20s can help out/serve humanity without the requirements of the Peace Corps

Word. I have non-college graduate friends at home that are interested in the Peace Corps and can't do it. And I've heard from a friend of mine that's done a LOT of field work in Benin that the Peace Corps volunteers that are there are a bunch of small-minded idiots that think their stint should play more as a study abroad program rather than an actual humanitarian mission.

xpost: I consider it inconceivably immoral to send someone to kill (and even more important, to die) against their will. Me too. And yet I still can't help but think the draft isn't a wholly bad idea. I'm completely on the fence. As far as saying that people that are ineligible for the draft aren't entitled to an opinion: shut up. THere's a whole raft of reasons that's an inane thing to say, but whatever. Still: Dan, chill out.

giboyeux (skowly), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

did you see the gangs too?

xpost.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

OK the people at fault here are not just every single person who didn't vote for John Kerrey. The people who are at fault for this are Rumsfeld, Rove & Cheney, PowerAbuse EvilGlomerate LLC, and their spin machine, which we all judiciously avoided falling for by virtue of being educated, having some good sense, and being more suspicious of overbearing authority than we are of foreigners.

You wouldn't think of a rural grandmother HA HA, BUYER BEWARE, you IGNORANT FUCK!! when she loses her life savings to a charming con man. Just the same you'd be an asshole for thinking HO HO, WATCH OUT MR. CONSERVATIVE VOTER, BIBLETHUMPING RETARD!! when he loses his child to a war being dragged out with no end in sight by, well, some "charming" con men.

It's really doing yourself a disservice, as PP points out pretty well. The people to be angry with are in the cabinet. Don't get angry at your fellow voter, 51% or whatever, they're still all individuals and have no more power at the polls than you do. Can we please stop being so fond of pettiness and generalizations?

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Pleasant Plains, your gut feeling is right, those are pretty terrible thoughts. Don't forget how many Republicans thought that war in Iraq was never a good idea in the first place, and even if Dead Kid 1,412 did think it was a good idea, it doesn't mean he deserves to die. At the very least, he died so you wouldn't have to, pragmatically speaking. That's the one thing that tugs me when I think about this stuff. I think this is one of the wrongest wars in a long string of wrong US wars, so any desire of mine to participate in its execution is deeply fucked, but then I think about all those poor fuckers biting the dust over there, and read stories like the one Tom linked to above, and I think, why them, and not me?

xposts

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

A little something I just linked in one spot, a little something else.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

even if Dead Kid 1,412 did think it was a good idea, it doesn't mean he deserves to die.

That pretty much sums it up right there.

I guess I'm not so much angry at the driver of that ribbon-clad pick-up with the (W) sticker. I'm angry at how he's been manipulated by the people in charge of this war.

Then again, last November I voted for a man who voted FOR this war as well. Maybe that Red-Stater ahead of me ain't the only one being manipulated.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)

er, i don't think rumsfeld or the pentagon are too interested in a draft. remember when he tried to allay americans' draft fears by insulting the previous generation's conscripts?

and i have to say, i have even had dark daydreams of enlisting, but it's the same impulse that made me think of being a cop when i was a teenager ("at least there'd be ONE person who knew something in there") (pretty arrogant position, no?) however nightmarish the iraq adventure is, the larger WoT IS vital, too important to be left to people who don't seem to like the degenerate lazy secular west they say they are defending.

g e o f f (gcannon), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

here's an amateur pundit's idea: why does this all hinge on american, or at one remove, a few european, soldiers? why haven't we demanded something for our lavish support of a few SW asian states? i think a few thousand egyptian, saudi, or turkish troops isn't too much to ask. (ok the turks would be dicey) let alone...th rest of the world. if we truly opened up the development $$ to any state that wanted to help out, who knows who would send troops, esp. from the developing world. call me naive.

g e o f f (gcannon), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)

ok and saudi troops are needed at home to keep the populace from stringing up every last royal son (over 30,000 you know) by his beard. but the egyptians! go egypt!

g e o f f (gcannon), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

"I am so egregiously upset right now. Holy FUCKING shit. That is fucking horrifying. Was this a government-sactioned, oft-repeated process or was this something that some sick ground troops thought up to exercise their sadism muscles? I am really fucking puzzled at the sheer magnitude of cavalier cruelty necessary to pull out a woman's unborn baby and REPLACE IT WITH A DOG. It's akin taking two people, pulling off their legs, and them beating them to death WITH EACH OTHERS' LEGS. Who felt that extra bit of viciousness was necessary?

Killing is too good for humanity. Holy shit."

It's what happens when you dehumanise the enemy as happens in all the worst ethnic wars, The horrors inflicted on Ugandan children are of such a level of evil it transcends wrongness and I was almost physically sick when I read what these people were forced to do to each other. Your mind recoils and you want to believe it doesn't happen, yet it's happening right now, all across Africa.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

stuff i have read in the economist about specific events in africa have made it hard for me to sleep at night. just absolutely brutal stuff.

t0dd swiss (immobilisme), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)


as much of an asshole as this may make me sound, im never really suprised by this type of shit (african brutalities, etc) anymore. this might be a bleak world view, but hey, if youre into compassion, truth, and beauty; maybe human beings arent for you...

cuNISS, Tuesday, 5 July 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)

It's 2005, not 1992, so that arguement is pretty much crap.
*Slaps you across the face with hypocrite card*

kevin says relax (daddy warbuxx), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)

Phew. I'm glad the government's only prosecuted 21 people since 1980 for not having signed up for Selective Service.

They can't trace me into a conduit! (Eastern Mantra), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

A real asshole might point out that 1992 would be more than a year after the end of Desert Storm, when a 19-year old didn't really have much to fear in regard to a draft.

And Kevin has a point - it's easier to cheer for a draft when you're not going to be the one dying. You haven't signed up, but you have no qualms sending someone else to die.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)

"A real asshole might point out that 1992 would be more than a year after the end of Desert Storm"

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 22:45 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.