So! Who has the GTA: San Andreas "Hot Coffee" mod?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
(NSFW) http://www.fleshbot.com/sex/cgi/gta-sex-scene-video-112491.php (NSFW)

This was rumored for weeks, but somebody finally hacked enough of the code together to make it work. Warm it up, Kane! Warm it up, CJ!

"Grand Theft" maker blames hackers for sex scenes
Wed Jul 13, 2005 08:09 PM ET
By Lisa Baertlein

SAN FRANCISCO, July 13 (Reuters) - Hackers are responsible for a downloadable modification that enables sexually explicit minigames to be played in the blockbuster criminal adventure video game "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas," the game's maker said on Wednesday.

The modification, which allows simulated sex in the personal computer version of one of the most popular and controversial video games in history, has led to an investigation by the industry ratings board. It also has intensified criticism of the industry that pulled in $7.3 billion in U.S.software sales in 2004.

Some critics are calling for the game's rating to be changed from from "M" (Mature 17+) to the rare "AO" (Adult Only), which would threaten to crimp sales at large retail outlets.

Gaming enthusiasts have been buzzing about the modification, dubbed "hot coffee" for weeks. Video clips identified as representing the modified minigame can be found on some gaming enthusiast Web sites.

"We have learned that the 'hot coffee' modification is the work of a determined group of hackers who have gone to significant trouble to alter scenes in the official version of the game," Rockstar Games, a subsidiary of Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. (TTWO.O: Quote, Profile, Research) , said in a statement.

The Entertainment Software Rating Board last week launched a probe into whether the sexual minigames were deliberately hidden in the game code and unlocked by the "hot coffee" modification -- or if they are solely the result of the modification.

"Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" got its "M" rating for blood and gore, intense violence, strong language, strong sexual content and drug use...

Again, as many, many people have said, this is a game that allows you to casually blast off the heads of other people. I can't wait 'til they hold mass burnings of the game.

The fun bit is how they talk about this could hurt sales. Which I don't, since the vast bulk of the units were shipped in the first 6 months of release. And remember, there's no such thing as bad publicity, even with all thses groups and politicians going attacking a game rated for 17-year-olds or older as "hurting children."

oh yeah, and two of the most outspoken politicos are Joe Lieb(no surprise) and Hillary Clinton, who want the game submitted " to independent analysts to determine how the content was put in."

"The disturbing material in 'Grand Theft Auto' and other games like it is stealing the innocence of our children, and it's making the difficult job of being a parent even harder," Clinton said...

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:03 (twenty years ago)

http://www.gtagarage.com/mods/show.php?id=28

for those who want to check out the mod for themselves.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

The Entertainment Software Rating Board last week launched a probe into whether the sexual minigames were deliberately hidden in the game code and unlocked by the "hot coffee" modification -- or if they are solely the result of the modification.

I'd be wanting to know this too because obv it makes all the difference. I mean if some dork just wrote a mod himself, that isnt Rockstar's fault and doesnt mean the game rating should be changed.

That said, even tho I think its a great series, I gotta admit sometimes when I watch Nick play it I think "man this game's brutal."

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:17 (twenty years ago)

Watching my children walk up to random members of the public and kick them to death = fine.

Nudity = OH NO THEY'VE GONE TOO FAR NOW!?!?!?!?!?!

Taste the Blood of Scrovula (noodle vague), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:19 (twenty years ago)

and they're working on getting it banned down there,too.

hee hee. and it was a Dutch guy who coded it, tho he's not helping any:

The mod's author - Patrick Wildenborg, 36, of Deventer, Netherlands - said his code merely unlocked content that was already included in the code of each off-the-shelf game.

"If Rockstar Games denies that, then they're lying and I will be able to prove that," Mr Wildenborg wrote in an email. "My mod does not introduce anything to the game. All the content that is shown was already present on the DVD."

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:20 (twenty years ago)

http://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/board.pl?action=viewthread&threadid=58535

they're coming out of the woodwork, of course:

http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/top/thompson-calls-for-esa-pres-resignation-112565.php

...As a lifelong Republican who ran against Janet Reno, I can note that whereas the largest chapter of the National Organization for Women, located in New York, has had me address them regarding the misogyny and violence against women depicted in the Grand Theft Auto games, the supposedly “family values” Republican President of the United States, George W. Bush, has consistently turned away from parents who have asked him to speak out against the entertainment industry’s assault on our children.

The evening in January 2000 that I appeared on NBC Nightly News to talk about the link between violent games and Columbine, Tom Brokaw asked then Governor Bush about that link and what he as President would do about it? George Bush simply said “Parents just have to be better parents.” He should trying telling that to my clients in Paducah whose three daughters were gunned down by 14-year-old video gamer Michael Carneal, who trained on Doom to become a more efficient killer. What did they, as parents, Mr. President, do wrong? Was sending their kids to school their mistake?

George Bush, as Governor of Texas, gave a state tax break to Id Software of Dallas, the makers of Doom, after Columbine, for Heaven’s sake, and it is his Department of Defense which has subsidized with taxpayer dollars the creation of violent video games for teen consumption at the Institute for Creative Technologies at the University of Southern California. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld has increased funding for this taxpayer rip-off since my appearance on ABC’s World News Tonight more than two years ago exposing this scandal. Don Rumsfeld is supposed to be catching terrorists, not training them....

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:31 (twenty years ago)

Oh, Sanford, what have you done...

MIS Information (kate), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:32 (twenty years ago)

more fun from that thompson guy here:

http://www.stopkill.com/

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:36 (twenty years ago)

What's all this "train yourself to kill people" shit? It crops up as a meme time and time again, spouted by people who presumably don't think toy guns and real life firing ranges are means of training yourself to kill people.

Somewhere, maybe, there's a debate to be had. But not with these sententious fucktards.

Taste the Blood of Scrovula (noodle vague), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:39 (twenty years ago)

What's all this "train yourself to kill people" shit?

an old line that's been around since Doom, if not earlier. Probably started with the Death Race 2000 arcade game from the late '70s.

None of this has anything to do with the actual facts, such as how kids can't buy M-rated games. But, as Lakoff notes, conceptual framings beat the facts every time. Our precious innocent infants are under attack by these predatory Scottish gamedev guys, so we must protect them at all costs.

to which the only valid response is

http://www.gtascraper.com/content/sanan/maccer.jpg
"I can't feel me legs! I wanked the use out of 'em!"

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

choking the gecko.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 15 July 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)

14-year-old video gamer Michael Carneal, who trained on Doom to become a more efficient killer

...

sleep (sleep), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:15 (twenty years ago)

What did he learn how to switch from his gun to his flashlight at the correct times?

On one hand I've got myself to blame (Lynskey), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:19 (twenty years ago)

I'm kinda disappointed this isn't like a now-you-can-throw-hot-coffee-on-people-and-melt-faces kinda mod.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:38 (twenty years ago)

if playing gta games trains you to be a better gunman/sniper fuck I'm in the wrong job!

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)

i'm not reading any of the links carefully, but i'm assuming there's no way we console types can join in the fun: eg no complex and confusing series of button-presses to unlock this stuff on the PS2?

bah.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:40 (twenty years ago)

That is correct. I don't think even the Xbox can do it.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

oh my god i wonder what kind of games you can play with that fetish girl!!! with that 3 foot long purple dildo!!!!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)

there's an Action Replay(?) code that unlocks the bits on the PS2.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

You can't "unlock" it on the PS2 or the Xbox because the code's not in the game. Assuming Rockstar's position is the truth, the Hot Coffee "mod" is a plugin, not an unlocker for easter egg content.

I still don't know whether I buy this or not, but I find it funny that politicians et al. still think they can garner support by spending time on censor detail. Does anybody remember Tipper?!? It's really bad marketing!

TOMBOT, Friday, 15 July 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

xpost ooh seriously kingfish? Haha that's fucked for them, then.

TOMBOT, Friday, 15 July 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

hang on, lemme find it. It was posted on SA yesterday.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)

okay, it's not there any more, so ps2 owners will have go a-googlin' for themselves to find out if its true or not.

altho a poster there did make the point that modifying executable code is the same as changing an art asset. I guess it all comes down to how buried the stuff is in the game, if at all.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)

and they're working on getting it banned down there,too.

NO MORE GTA: CROTCH

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

So the choking sounds of death when you slice someone's throat from behind, and then they realistically fall down and bleed all over the floor--that's OK?

richardk (Richard K), Friday, 15 July 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

kids can't buy M-rated games

Give me a fuckin break.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 15 July 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)

once again in America, unbelievably disturbing violence = a-okay. Sex = NO FUCKING WAY.

I have no interest in this game. It seems completely devoid of imagination.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 July 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

I have no interest in this game. It seems completely devoid of imagination.

The opposite is true! I wish I played video games.

deej.., Friday, 15 July 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)

It seems completely devoid of imagination.

!!!

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 15 July 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)

I have no time for games whose entire appeal is based on how "realistic" they are. Videogame versimilitude = yawnsville. I mentioned this on some other videogame thread but the fact that designers spend so much time trying to recreate the real world in increasingly greater detail when they're working in a medium that is potentially limitless is ... I don't know what to call it... aesthetically offensive.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 July 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

I don't think the appeal of GTA has anything to do with realism.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 15 July 2005 22:49 (twenty years ago)

Haha again Shakey, The OPPOSITE is true.

deej.., Friday, 15 July 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

kids can't buy M-rated games

Give me a fuckin break.

well, of course, htat's how the rules/rating systems are set up n shit.

But there seems to be this problem with any sort of media that is connected with kids getting MASSIVE amounts of flack whenever producers of said media want to do someting for an older audience.
games, comix, anime/cartoons, television, etc.

You still need a way to be able to filter the shit so that it can actually get out to an adult audience even tho we live in a culture where most parents don't give much of a shit if their kids play the game, yet legislation is enacted when the few overly-vocal conservative elements complain. Yeah, two Senate democrats are leading the charge on this, but this is still a conservative impulse; both in the idea that media can infect children with harmful thoughts and that media identified with children can never change or evolve.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

"I don't think the appeal of GTA has anything to do with realism. "

hence the lovingly detailed gore, the meticulous attention to recreating the actual locale as accurately as possible, the endless emphasis on doing "real life" things (getting coffee, playing video games, carjackings, etc.), the gratuitous inclusion of "real" people, etc. gimme a break. the entire point of this game is to create the most faithful version of reality possible in which people can do anything they want without the consequences that would otherwise follow. I don't care about that. There's no idea there. Its a pathologically limited imagination that, given a potentially limitless pallete of tools, cannot think of anything to do besides recreate what they see around them sans ethics. fuck that.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 July 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

so you were a big toejam and earl fun, huh?

oops (Oops), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)

fun=fan

oops (Oops), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)

YOU KNOW IT.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 July 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

hence the lovingly detailed gore

actually, aside from blood, there's ain't any. This isn't Postal 2, a game designed to guilty of just about every charge ever levelled at the GTA series.


the entire point of this game is to create the most faithful version of reality possible in which people can do anything they want without the consequences that would otherwise follow.

actually, it's not. the game is far more about putting the player into the media from which the games base their design. there's far too much effort put into satire and a stylized experience than just going for realism.

xpost: BIIIIIIG Earl!

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)

"actually, it's not. the game is far more about putting the player into the media from which the games base their design."

I don't understand this point. the media from which the games base their design is the real world - specifically various urban environments.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 July 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)

If I ever catch you Shakey, I'm going to beat you with a baseball bat until you spit teeth then I'm going to repeatedly run you over with a RV, you little bastard.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)

Oh shit!

* * * * *

Quick, must find a large body on water - cops drown in water!

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

Kingfish completely OTM: it's not about NJ/Florida/California, it's about the movies/TV/games set there.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

Exactly, I'm not thinking 'Gawdam, this is a startlingly accurate recreation of California in which to act out my most bloodthirsty fantasies and thus poke a sharpened stick in the promise of what video games could beeeee', I'm thinking 'Dude, that was just like Boyz 'N' The Hood' oh and shit, it's getting all Terminator 2 with the truck chasing me down a culvert'.

It's all a loving homage to what the nineties thought about itself.
'

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)

no, i meant the crime & gangsta/er flicks. Each game liberally takes from a series of flicks set in various urban environments. Many thinly-disguised locations from the real places make it into the game, but they function as an exterior establishing shot. GTA3 took from mobster flicks, most of which were based in NYC; Godfather, Goodfellas, Scarface(the retro channel played all the pop tunes from that movie's soundtrack). Vice City was Scarface, Carlito's Way, Miami Vice, Airwolf, etc.

There's a difference between GTA3, set in Liberty City, and True Crime: Streets of NY. The game settings are a particular abstraction & rendering of certain traits of real places, yes, but they are still fictional settings. Similarly to how Gotham & Metropolis are both stylized abstractions of NYC, but both with a different slant.

What's clouding this is that there ARE several different games where the same mistake was made; the GTA clones thought that the strenght of the series was the verisimilitude, so you get stuff like True Crime NY/L.A. or the Getaway which make a big deal out of how they're "modeled" on real places, when that's missing the point entirely.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:33 (twenty years ago)

the thing that makes GTA special is the singular experience; a very dense experience among which is the vicarious thrill of being there in the movie.

that's why Tony Montana's mansion is there(CCTV monitors in the office & all). that's why VC had the chainsaw. that's why the motel is there.

same thing with San Andreas. you are put into a very singular place; not early 90's South Central L.A., but into Los Santos, a place based on the cinematic representations of early 90's South Central L.A.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:40 (twenty years ago)

"I have no interest in this game. It seems completely devoid of imagination."

you seem stupid.

She's built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a bistro! (Adrian Langston), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

Actually, with GTA4, it'll be interesting to see what direction they go in.

do they set it at a particular point in the past, and thus base the culture of the game(pop & all) around satirizing the touchstones of that particular era & place? or do they keep it in 2005 and just concentrate more on poking fun at the particular culture of wherever its set? (my bet: London)

oh yeah, and a bunch of xposts to my last few.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

(i thought metropolis was based on toronto!)

She's built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a bistro! (Adrian Langston), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

i'd love GTA: Albion City!

I wouldn't mind one set a few years hence, with nods to sci-fi films, comics and literature.

Wasn't Sin City posited as a possible location a few years back?

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:51 (twenty years ago)

What time periods are left? A seventies GTA would have its moments.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Friday, 15 July 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)

Indeed, I dont imagine it'd be much of a game if after one shootout you spent the next 5 gameplay hours being in prison.

2) since the Sin City movie was a hit(with a sequel on the way), there's NO WAY that the license hasn't already been snapped up by some big time gamedev like EA or Activision or whomever. the game will probably come out in 2006-2007, will be a GTA clone, and will suck tremendous ass.

Heh. Nick's company somehow originally snagged a crack at the rights for this , via I think Activision. This was wayyy back afore the film came out. Ive seen his working sketches and 3d roughs of Marv and everything. And yes, much to all of their chagrin it was being requested to be done like a GTA style game.

They didn't end up going ahead with it but you can bet yr arse someone wil if the film's done well. Thank god not them tho, it wouldve been embarrasing I think (imagine the fanbase outrage).

Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 17 July 2005 03:28 (twenty years ago)

Having seen the film, I actually believe it could have worked in a free-form, GTA style environment.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Sunday, 17 July 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)

And yes, much to all of their chagrin it was being requested to be done like a GTA style game.

HA! called it! one of the thinks i've been continually reminded of is that the game industry is like any other; hits spawn legions of imitators.

i mean, shit, the new fucking JAWS game has missions & stuff, and so will the upcoming Final Fight game.

http://www.failmath.com/#051705

kingfish (Kingfish), Sunday, 17 July 2005 05:47 (twenty years ago)

two of the most outspoken politicos are Joe Lieb(no surprise) and Hillary Clinton

Fucking liberals.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 17 July 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

I got into trouble for mentioning what I did :( Whoops.

Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 17 July 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

nah, don't worry about it. it would have come out in other venues, like when it finally got announced and IGN did a thing on it.

which i would then immediately post on here for us all to mock.

kingfish (Kingfish), Sunday, 17 July 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

in today's shocka, religious american ultraconservatives want the game pulled due to the hidden humpin'

note that the Parents Television Council is the group responsible for more than 99% of the complaints against Janet Jackson/CBS last year, and also got Saving Private Ryan pulled from several ABC affliates on Veterans Day.

they also want to go after the Who for doing "Who Are You?" at their Live8 show.

kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

Rockstar adjusts rating to Adults Only

Not only that, but they also admit that Hot Coffee is on XBox and PS2 versions of the game as well.

Hillary & Joe should start an organization called PVRC and try to look even more ridiculous.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

How do you add the code? How does it work? WHAT actually happens?

Am I missing something or are you all talking around the things that really matter?

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

scan upward

kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)

http://www.mediafamily.org/mediawise/gta_facts.shtml

How did the pornography get into the game?
We don’t know the answer to this question yet. Either the game publisher, Rockstar, programmed the code onto the disk which was then discovered by avid gamers OR what is know as a “mod” was created by “modders” and downloaded over the Internet to be played with the game. Our computer experts are at work now to answer this question.

kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)

are 18 year olds not classed as adults in the US then? serious question btw.

Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)

dumbest thing i ever heard.

g-kit (g-kit), Thursday, 21 July 2005 09:56 (twenty years ago)

like i said, video games are still considered by many to be a toy, a children's thing.

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 21 July 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

Ste, 18 year olds are classed as adults in the U.S (except when it comes to alcohol.)

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 21 July 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)

yup. adults as in "rent porn, vote, and get drafted & die"

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 21 July 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)

Rockstar's brand of pop nihilism is the equivalent of suburban ghetto rap, so extremely calculated that the final product turns out to be comically overdone. (Not to mention hugely overpriced.) Can you just imagine the production meetings for the sex scenes?

"Should we have the guy shoot his load on her face or on her ass?"

"Let's get Marketing's opinion on this, so we can find out how that tested with the 15-to-18-year-olds."

"Word."

OLD SPICE® CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (ex machina), Thursday, 21 July 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

note that i keep confusing "Hot Coffee" with "Hot Lunch", which would result in an ENTIRELY different game.

tho i wonder what the reaction would be.

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 21 July 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

so what is the difference between the two ratings:

M (17+)
Adults Only

?

Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 21 July 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

Walmart & Best Buy do not stock the later. Walmart Online is another story, of course.

Right now, at least. if GTA4 hits with the AO rating, you'll see them quietly change that policy, even if they have to do the "locked cabinet behind the sales desk" thing that they do for shot guns.

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 21 July 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

For a fuzzy comparison, Rated M = Rated R while Rated AO = Rated X.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 21 July 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

or NC-17, as the times have changed...

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 21 July 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

http://www.failmath.com/#072005

the new ratings rubric

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)

Simulated sex with a virtual prostitute has got to be the single least offensive thing that appears in that game.

My god this whole this is so incredibly stupid. If I was in the USA I'd go out and kill someone RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!! GARGHH!!

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 22 July 2005 06:55 (twenty years ago)

AT LEAST IT ISNT A HOT CARL MOD

OLD SPICE® CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (ex machina), Friday, 22 July 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)

So, does anybody know of any stores that still sell this game? I really want to play it, but I don't want to bid on a copy on Ebay and spend $65.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 22 July 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

hit up the craigslist in your town.

or check places thru Yahoo Shopping...

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

"craigslist"? What's that?

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 22 July 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

Never mind. I found it!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 22 July 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

Simulated sex with a virtual prostitute has got to be the single least offensive thing that appears in that game.

It isn't even a prostitute! It's a girlfriend you have to woo all old-fashioned like before the fucking starts. I guess the morally questionable thing is the whole premarital part, maybe.

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

So when CJ parks with a prostitute, am I the only one who tries to position the camera so that I can see through the windshield?

All they do is sit there. What a rip.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

I guess the morally questionable thing is the whole premarital part, maybe.

actually, they don't like that there anything referring to coitus at all in the game.

remember, most of those who complain about these games don't like the fact that they have anything resembling sexual content at all. The "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" is only their method of trying to advance their position.

as for the other folks, just sheer opportunism.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

funniness: ""Where'd my soul-numbing ultraviolent racism go?"

http://sfgate.com/columnists/morford/

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 July 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://www.codenamesa.co.uk/sanandreas/screenshots/96/fullsize/

How exactly is that "blatantly racist"?

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 22 July 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

yeah, how IS that racist? what exactly about the iconography of that particular shot or the game itself? the latino religious imagery on the wall of a store set in a poor urban neighborhood populated by latinos? the fact that your character can have tatts, work out at the gym, and wear clothy considered quite hep in 1991?

or does he just not like the fact that you now have a black character blowing people up, instead of an Anglo or Italian white guy? does he opt for the simplistic/reductivist "any racial stereotype in any media is racist" mindset?

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)

i also question his assertion that Rockstar will lose millions due to this.

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

I have no answers on that specific count, I don't bother with hyperlinks. I suppose you could make a fairly strong argument that its a negative stereotype of a threatening black male (or it latino? I can't tell from that shot) blah blah blah.

I just thought the column was well-written, and it encapsulates how tiresome and depressing I find this game (and the way it fits into larger American culture).

(if anything Rockstar is going to make MORE money, I agree with you there)

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 July 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

he hyphenates "gun-happy" but not "sexually frigid".

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

also, from the Realistic Expectations Dept:

an article on the possibility of blocking mods

kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 22 July 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

I don't bother with hyperlinks.

You must get really tired of typing URL's into your address bar.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 22 July 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)

I generally go to two websites: yahoo and here. no typing necessary.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 July 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

he hyphenates "gun-happy" but not "sexually frigid".

adverbs ending -ly don't take a hyphen. weird but true.

[coo ur, a thread that combines grammatical pedantry with sex and GTA. it's my ILX dream come through.]

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 23 July 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

er, true.

jesus.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 23 July 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)

haha!

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 23 July 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Flaw Allows Children To Unlock X-Rated Material In New Harry Potter Book

...Children as young as eight have reported finding sexually explicit sequences just like that spread throughout the book thanks to a flaw in the publication process officials are calling the "hot cauldron" mod. Understandably, parents around the world are furious over the matter and have called on Congress and Parliament to have the defective books removed from store shelves.

In its defense Rowling's publisher Scholastic claims that the objectionable material was never intended for young eyes or even public release. The production staff carefully hid the material between chapters through a special printing process, but the millions of counterfeit copies on the market carry a flaw which allows readers to "unlock" Chapter 18 5/8, aka the Slytherin orgy sequence...

kingfish (Kingfish), Sunday, 24 July 2005 05:42 (twenty years ago)

Yes, its called LJ slashfiction =)

Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 24 July 2005 05:47 (twenty years ago)

http://gamespot.com/news/2005/07/22/news_6129609.html

Sims 2 content "worse than Hot Coffee"
[UPDATE] Miami attorney Jack Thompson claims cheat codes make EA's life sim a pedophile's paradise by showing genitalia; calls for ban on T-rated game.

[...]

In a manifesto sent today to press outlets, Thompson focuses on dismantling the Entertainment Software Ratings Board and exposing what he calls the industry's "latest dirty little secret." The secret's out now, and it involves nude sims.

In the statement, Thompson says, "Sims 2, the latest version of the Sims video game franchise ... contains, according to video game news sites, full frontal nudity, including nipples, penises, labia, and pubic hair..."

kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

Ha, he's so wrong! If you turn off the blur they look like barbie dolls!

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 05:59 (twenty years ago)

yes, but notice that he doesn't care or even verify the feature for himself. as long as "video game news sites" say so, it's good enough for his righteous crusade.

also, from later in the article:

Jeff Brown, vice president of corporate communications at EA, in response to the accusations, told GameSpot, "This is nonsense. We've reviewed 100 percent of the content. There is no content inappropriate for a teen audience. Players never see a nude sim. If someone with an extreme amount of expertise and time were to remove the pixels, they would see that the sims have no genitals. They appear like Ken and Barbie."

Thompson doesn't buy it. "The sex and the nudity are in the game. That's the point. The blur is an admission that even the 'Ken and Barbie' features should not be displayed. The blur can be disarmed. This is no different than what is in San Andreas, although worse."

[UPDATE] Thompson this afternoon updated his earlier statement, saying he is aware certain mods only remove "the blur," but adds that "Electronic Arts has done nothing about this." Thompson's new conclusion: EA is "cooperating, gleefully, with the mod community to turn Sims 2 into a porn offering."

media-lusting-rabid-conservatives-in-cognitive-dissonnance shocker.

note that he hasn't go after things like The Singles, which actually WAS a shitty porny Sims, if memory serves.

yeah, here 'tis: http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=1197

kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)

GTA:SA is now banned in australia

kingfish (Kingfish), Sunday, 31 July 2005 11:53 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.