― another visitor, Friday, 15 July 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
"ok FINE, i'll stop drinking so much coffee beforehand and start eating more pineapple"
― kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)
― Scream! Scrovula, Scream! (noodle vague), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)
― matlewis (matlewis), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)
― kelsey (kelstarry), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)
― carbon (carbon), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)
― oooh, Monday, 5 December 2005 02:58 (twenty years ago)
the answer is to go for it.
― kingfish crab trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:02 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:03 (twenty years ago)
― jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:04 (twenty years ago)
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:06 (twenty years ago)
― oooh, Monday, 5 December 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)
too much of either is a bad thing. but the right amount of both is just perfect!
― The Great Pagoda of Funn (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:08 (twenty years ago)
― The Great Pagoda of Funn (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:07 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:12 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:16 (twenty years ago)
the answer = depends whether they're hotttttttttttt?
this question is "would you consider going out" though, i mean, by thinking about this question alone, you're considering it, by considering whether or not to consider, even if the answer is no, you would have done the deed of making some considerations at some point in your life to say no to anybody who is "a tad bitterer" than you.
Also, some consideration must certainly have been spent to in considering whether this person was 'quite a tad bitterer', or merely 'a little bitterer' as part of the general whether-to-go-out-with assessment. so no matter how you look at this the answer to the question will be 'yes', and thus the question is void.
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:16 (twenty years ago)
I'd be wary of going out with them with the intention of changing them or trying to make them happy.
― Bob Six (bobbysix), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:49 (twenty years ago)