And the performances? Has there ever been a self-deluded asshole as well played as Sydney Pollack's Jack? Or a neurotic as sexy as Judy Davis (possibly the best performance in a Woody Allen film, ever)? Her acting is the stuff that inspires cults.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 16 July 2005 01:59 (twenty years ago)
― sunny successor (he hates my guts, we had a fight) (katharine), Saturday, 16 July 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Saturday, 16 July 2005 02:36 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 16 July 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)
― jedidiah (jedidiah), Monday, 18 July 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
Celebrity is where Woody really jumped the shark, IMO.
― Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Monday, 18 July 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)
A caveat re the Juliette Lewis plot -- isn't Woody sposed to be a Columbia prof, yet refers to his students as 'PUPILS'?? As long as you're raking Welles over the coals for the "If I hadn't been rich" Kane line...
I wouldn't classify either this, Hannah or Crimes & Misdemeanors solely as "dramas." (Nobody dies in Annie Hall, but it's pretty damn 'serious' too.)
Deconstructing Harry was solid, if more like Philip Roth.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 18 July 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
I went thru a major Judy Davis binge after watchign this and "Naked Lunch" back to back. It helped that every other foreign and indie film seemed to star Judy Davis (a good thing).
It's something of an achievement for Allen to get both Davis' best performance ever and her worst (in Celebrity; I really hated him for it).
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 18 July 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― stevie (stevie), Monday, 18 July 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:50 (nineteen years ago)
― and what (ooo), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Baaderonixx in the year of the locusts (baaderonixx), Thursday, 5 October 2006 07:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 5 October 2006 13:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 5 October 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 5 October 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Kudos, spaz-boy (Pareene), Saturday, 21 October 2006 06:01 (nineteen years ago)
― and what (ooo), Saturday, 21 October 2006 12:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 21 October 2006 12:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Kudos, spaz-boy (Pareene), Saturday, 21 October 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)
caught this on "Netflix on demand" while snowed in and having some drinks with the girlfriend. kind of an intense experience. some of it was uncomfortably close to the bone. plenty of uhh... inebriated relationship discussion afterwards. don't regret it though.
really an exceptional, brutal film. top-tier Allen imo.
― circa1916, Monday, 8 February 2010 22:36 (sixteen years ago)
home sick yesterday, this was on cable
so much drinking in this! I think every single scene involves at least one character pouring themselves a drink
I still have mixed feelings about it - it's pretty good but it seems like a bit of a lesser work to me, a lot of rehashing of previous stuff. Woody's last line ("can I go now?") is hilarious tho
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
A rehash of what work? Having sat through enough of the overrated earlier dramas, I can argue that his writing and direction were never sharper than in HAW (the camera work is still dud, though, even in a form-matches-content way).
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)
is this the one thats got mia farrow in it where the camera jerks like mental everywhere?
― plax (ico), Monday, 16 August 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)
yep that's the one
re: rehashing - the trials and tribulations of wealthy New Yorkers who run around switching partners and ruining marriages while dropping upper class cultural references were dealt with better in Hannah and Her Sisters, Manhattan, and Annie Hall
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
Aren't most all Woody Allen films in some capacity a rehash of sorts? So much of his oeuvre (which, after all, is kind of a constant repetition compulsion of his life and neuroses) is probably best thought of as a serial repetitions on a theme. Of course in H&V Woody doesn't play himself or some sort of parody of himself, which in itself makes it a bit different from Annie, Manhattan, and Hannah.
This film, though, is definitely classic. Even as turbulence was kicking in and the plane started to go down, he still pulled out a career highlight.
― I'm banishing you to a time warp from which you will never return (EDB), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
His last great film perhaps?
― I'm banishing you to a time warp from which you will never return (EDB), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
Crimes and Misdemeanors is not a rehash of Sleeper or Radio Days or Zelig
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
he definitely made great films after this one imho
I'm not getting into this discussion again, but in the two earlier movies he hasn't written enough sides to the men and/or given them enough direction to make them compelling to me. I don't give a shit about Michael Caine's dilemma: he plays a boring character boringly. Ditto Michael Murphy and Woody himself. With Sydney Pollack he really nailed this self-deluded fiftysomething; he's vivid, foolish, and scary.
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
"So she's not Simone de Beauvoir! Big deal -- she's not Simone de Beauvoir."
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
oh I think Michael Caine is hilarious in Hannah but yeah we're basically arguing over execution, not content
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
(also agree that Pollack and Davis are both really good in this. Lewis is okay but kinda distracting in her usual thumb-sucking way)
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
This is one of his last 'very good' films. btw it was released days after the Soon-Yi 'scandal' broke and I was questioned by a radio reporter on my way in AND out of the theater.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
curious what you rate after this... Sweet & Lowdown? Bullets Over Broadway? Curse of the Jade Scorpion?
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
D'g Harry. A few other diverting creampuffs. (I've skipped Jason Biggs and a bunch of the ScarJos.)
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
Very good Woody films post-'92:
Manhattan Murder MysteryBullets Over BroadwayDeconstructing HarrySweet & Lowdown
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
those movies are slight, though. also i kind of hate Deconstructing Harry, even though i guess it's kind of good. agree with Dr. Morbz about Husbands and Wives being the last v good one.
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)
All Woody films are slight (I don't intend it as a dismissal).
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
agree with Dr. Morbz about Husbands and Wives being the last v good one.
not what I said, but I'd like to stop discussing him for at least 5 years.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
oh i see "v good" i don't know what that means!
i know they're all slight, but i don't know how to characterize the even-slighter feel of the 90s films. i stopped watching in the 2000s.
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
Pollack is so fucking good in this. The scene where he drags his girlfriend back to the car is A++++.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uhH3D0S1vM
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
i kinda rate vicky christina barcelona
― plax (ico), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
I would have loved VCB if they'd combined the two stories and cut out ScarJo.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)
agreed w/ those plus vicky cristina barcelona, which i can't justify but did enjoy (very attractive ppl, scenery, plus spanish guitar is a weakness for me - "deeper and deeper" maybe my fave madonna), although it's no barcelona (only my 3rd fave whit stillman). deconstructing harry i didn't care for at the time but it feels like a last gasp (sweet and lowdown is all about penn and morton), i should revisit it (is that the last cavalcade of stars woody? is it the best? better than shadows and fog at least and sorta similar in that they both seem to reach back to nyer whore of mensa style woody). manhattan murder mystery is all the old keaton-allen team back in action, why they those two haven't teamed up a few more times in the past decade is a mystery to me (seriously woody if you're reading: you, keaton, dianne wiest and elaine may as keaton's sisters, larry david and sam waterston as yr brothers, alan alda as antagonist, scarjo in a five minute scene as "nude girl w/ amar'e stoudemire"). bullets over broadway is superfun, always loved the anti-hannah dig at the end.
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
of the ones alfred listed bullets over broadway is my fave; don't really like sweet and lowdown tbh. deconstructing harry might be the best one in a way, but it's so mean-spirited without any of the good woody allen stuff. also it's been a million years since i've seen it.
also i like everyone says i love you i don't care what anyone says
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
oh yeah i like that movie!
― plax (ico), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
Agree with Kael re Manhattan Murder Mystery: a dud as a mystery but a lovely marital comedy. Huston and Alda very funnyt oo.
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
i liked everyone says i love you also, of all the 70s autuer makes his musical films it's definitely the slightest (allen slighter than coppola, scorsese shocker) and less of a failure though that probably means i'm alot less likely to want to see it again than ny, ny.
now that i think about it the last cavalcade of stars is celebrity right? i think i've forgotten more woody allen movies from the past 20 years than i've liked.
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
celebrity was a turd
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
I suppose it makes sense that Woody gets Judy Davis' best perf in H&W and forces her to give her most embarrassing in Celebrity.
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
ha, speaking of forgetting - i remember madonna in this, mostly for being pretty bad, but no recollection of malkovichhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muY0soGW4bA
― buzza, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
Is that Boy George?
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)
jesus i'm laffing at madonna's performance there before she even appears on screen
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)
now that i think about it the last cavalcade of stars
I dunno what yr talking about - EVERY Allen movie is basically a cavalcade of stars, up to his most recent ones
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
watching deconstructing harry on netflix right now...i didn't realize young woody allen was tobey maguire at the time.
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 August 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
his asian dial-a-whore is Sun-Yi
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i know he's always got loaded casts, i think i mean more the ones that are just overloaded w/ big name stars that have maybe one or two scenes and get mentioned in the trailer and they're like twenty names on the poster and just wanted to work w/ woody at least once but aren't gonna be hanging around and don't really do much while they're there maybe - demi moore, leonardo dicaprio, julia roberts, drew barrymore, madonna, winona ryder, jodie foster, etc.
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
Then there's the long suffering wife with no lines, played by a good actress: Joanna Gleason, Claire Bloom, Helena Bonham Carter.
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
joanna gleason was a pro at those! speaking of claire bloom, deconstructing harry is definitely "about" philip roth right?
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)
i'm 25 minutes into deconstructing harry and he's called two different women cunts
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 August 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
yeah the strongest memory i have of deconstructing harry is catching it at a matinee at some stadium seating place (which was new to me - i was just back in the states)(and seemed an esp weird place to see a woody allen movie), and that every other person in the theater except me was a little old lady, most of whom had cleared out by the third cunt.
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
i guess that means youve got at least one more to go!
― plax (ico), Monday, 16 August 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)
there are so many cunts in that movie
― balls, Monday, 16 August 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
have never made it through any Roth but thought Deconstructing Harry was a lot of fun
― glitter hands! glitter hands! razzle! dazzle! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 16 August 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
cheap shot at Robin Williams is great
cuz he's so fat?
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 August 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)
she's a fuckin' cocktail waitress
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 September 2015 03:12 (ten years ago)