They could sell GRIT!
― andy --, Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)
I want to read about BUM FIGHTS... hear about local homeless people gossip..
― donut ferry (donut), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)
― donut ferry (donut), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)
― donut ferry (donut), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)
― Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
HOMELESS BLOGS FUNDED BY PAYPAL.
― donut ferry (donut), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)
― Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)
That said, I think it's hard to justify "FUN STUFF" for Homeless papers if they are being funded by the cities in question. Reps want to hear about how these papers will have "proper" content and will foster "hope", "growth", and other positive words that make reps nod their heads.
Andy does have a point in that I think, for lack of a better term, political correctness is dictating that these papers can't be somewhat fun... perhaps there are statutes that limit what type of content cities can fund and what cities can't fund for non-profit papers.. if homeless papers were fun activity books, then that means anyone who writes an activity book could fake "homelessness" and get the city to publish their stuff... once content crosses into "entertainment", there may be an issue..
I'm just brainstorming, though. Andy, why don't you write a letter (or e-mail if they have an address) and ask them this?
― donut ferry (donut), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 19 July 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)
― crown victoria (dymaxia), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)
i feel like initially streetwise was only being peddled by a few homeless guys, and now it seems every other peddler in the loop--including some really obviously nutty/aggressive ones-- is hawking streetwise.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)
― carbon (carbon), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)
― C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 19 July 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)
― lyra (lyra), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)
I get it because they have good articles on housing from time to time.
― crown victoria (dymaxia), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 01:19 (twenty years ago)
Some "regular" homeless people that I see disappear after a while - I hope it's because things got better for them.
― crown victoria (dymaxia), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 02:01 (twenty years ago)
i remember when the stone roses gave an exclusive interview to a manchester (i think) homeless paper when they decided to reform. from here: http://www.stoneroses.net/media/bigissue.html
"Somebody's going to make money off us coming back, so it was the best thing to do," says lead singer Ian Brown. "The last time the NME had us on the cover it was one of the biggest selling issues of the year. We'd rather the money went to helping the homeless than into the coffers of a big organisation like IPC. We thought let's put something back. If somebody gets a house just by the four of us talking then it's got to be worth it. It works better for us as well because it's away from the music press.
also, i always thought mcsweeney's should put out an issue sold only through streetwise vendors.
― teh Nü and Impröved john n chicago (frankE), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 02:38 (twenty years ago)
― teh Nü and Impröved john n chicago (frankE), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 02:39 (twenty years ago)
I bought my copy of the famous Stone Roses issue in London's famous Belsize Park.
And I don't even like The Stone Roses!
― Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 02:45 (twenty years ago)
― C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)
― Super Cub (Debito), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 03:01 (twenty years ago)
oh my god the anti-corny-indie-fuq/NPR vanguard on ILX would have a field day!!!!! (as would i, maybe.)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 04:57 (twenty years ago)
― Momusateurist (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 04:57 (twenty years ago)
― Super Cub (Debito), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 06:36 (twenty years ago)
yeah, maybe. i dunno. i like corn sometimes.
also, back when stephen king stopped his online serialized book ($1/chapter, downloaded) cuz no one was buying it, i thought he could just donate it to one of these papers. or maybe some other "name" author could do the same.
whatever, just give people a decent reason to buy these papers other than pity. cuz that shit don't fly very far.
― teh Nü and Impröved john n chicago (frankE), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)
― Sasha (sgh), Thursday, 21 July 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)
Well if they only publish the winning numbers there, then someone who read it would have won. But it's a grand idea.
― Super Cub (Debito), Thursday, 21 July 2005 01:57 (twenty years ago)