Ortho Evra ("The Patch") May Cause Blood Clots

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I actually reported this myself, though I did not write the story. Potentially a 6-times-higher risk of blood clots than the pill, according to the suit.

http://www.courthousenews.com/Jump.Aug.3.htm#Patch

10 Women Claim 'The Patch' Causes Blood Clots
NEW JERSEY (CN) – Johnson & Johnson’s Ortho Evra contraceptive patch causes disabling blood clots, 10 women claim in Hudson County Court. The complaint claims defendants, which include Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Ortho-McNeil, introduced and “heavily marketed” the patch beginning in April 2002 “to offset the timing of Ortho-McNeil’s best-selling oral contraceptive, Ortho Tri-Cyclen, going off patent and being subject to competition from generic contraceptive pills.” The company’s own testing showed the patch caused “at least six times more serious blood clots than a widely used class of oral contraceptives,” the complaint states.
The FDA approved the patch, “with express misgivings … about the drug causing venous thromboembolisms,” the complaint states, quoting from an FDA report. Despite the FDA’s concern, defendants spent millions of dollars marketing the patch directly to consumers and to doctors and “downplayed the safety risks of the drug,” the complaint states. “Those Defendants have elected to imply on the package-insert warning that the clotting risk of the Patch is equivalent to that of oral contraceptives,” it states, yet in another place on the same warning, defendants state, “it is unknown if the risk of venous thromboembolism with Ortho Evra is different than with use of combination oral contraceptives.”
That statement is contradicted by defendants’ own research, the complaint states. Furthermore, the number of adverse reactions to the patch has been “staggering,” the plaintiffs say: 9,166 reports of adverse reactions in the first 17 months of the patch’s entry into commerce. In comparison, “the leading oral contraceptive, Ortho Tri-Cyclen, which during 2003 was used by almost six times as many women as the Patch, only generate 1,237 adverse event reports to the FDA over a six-year period from November 1997 through September 2003,” it states.
Citing reports of serious injuries and deaths, the complaint states, “These numbers translate into an indication that Ortho Evra is causing serious blood clot injuries at a rate approximately 1,500% higher than the leading oral contraceptive.”
Plaintiffs claim defendants are deceiving consumers by failing to warn them. It also claims that defendants’ spokesman for its ad campaign, “Dr. Andrew Friedman, Ortho-McNeil’s Director of Research for Women’s Health … lost his privileges to practice medicine (in 1996) and was suspended from practicing before any agency of the United States Government, including the FDA. These disciplinary actions were taken against him for admitting to fabricating clinical trial results for another drug manufacturer whose product caused scores of injuries to women.”
Plaintiffs, represented by Lite DePalma Greenberg & Rivas of Newark, N.J., seek compensatory and punitive damages.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

Fucking crap.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

Fucking crap is right. I can't wait to tell my gf.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

it's a right-wing conspiracy to keep everyone knocked up

stockholm cindy (from norway) (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 4 August 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)

birth control with nasty side effects and drug companies still selling it anyway non-shocker

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Thursday, 4 August 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)

Right, total non-shocker to get a blood clot from birth-control ...

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:18 (twenty years ago)

well, playing with hormanal levels having some serious side-effects non-shockah. I'm all for plenty of non-baby-causing lovin', but imaginiing that messing with the way hormones behave could possibly be anything other than very stressful to the body is wishful thinking at its worst.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

Um, that's a plainly stated risk on every single method of hormonal birth control. So yeah.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

hormonal birth control has always had that as a potential side effect (especially in the early days of the pill when it had higher doses of hormones)

also, hello Dalkon Shield

oh, xpost

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:35 (twenty years ago)

I know I was being slightly flippant, but looking at the past 40 - 50 years of birth control history, situations like this one are depressingly unsuprising.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)

Right, but you guys are missing the fact that the patch is six times more likely than the pill to cause the problem.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

I know a girl who got blood clots in her lungs from taking BC PILLS -- she nearly died. Went to the hospital with sharp pains and they said she was "this close", etc.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)

Well, of course, the patch being more risky than the pill is lousy! But I think the bigger issue is that Ortho-McNeil knew there were high risks and still put it out on the market.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

not to ignite a huge flamewar but if there were any men instead of women at risk here there'd be Congressional fucking hearings about it

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:53 (twenty years ago)

Why is it six times higher? Are there more hormones in the patch because of the delivery method? Is it the type of hormones used?

pullapartgirl (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)

The patch is actually six pills stuck to some duct tape.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 4 August 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

HAHAHAHA

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 4 August 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

hahaha

the goulash archipelago (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 4 August 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

The patch doesn't have a higher level of hormones than the Pill, and it's the same hormones... they think the risk might be higher (and the estimate is 3times higher, not 6) because with the Pill, the hormones get absorbed in the stomach and broken down in the liver. But with the Patch, the hormones go through the bloodstream and several major organs before hitting the liver and getting broken down.

And yes, it sucks. But keep in mind that for the "normal, healthy, otherwise low-risk" young women the report talks about, the risk on the Pill is something like 0.3% ... so 3 or even 6 times that is not huge.

As for drug companies putting out drugs with "high" risk of clots or other side effects... ALL drugs have side effects. You can't change anything in your body without some risk. There's just no such thing as a NO-RISK drug. Even condoms have a risk of severe latex allergies or allergies to the spermicide or lubricant on them or whatever. If you want no-risk birth control... don't have sex.

~ no i don't work for a drug company, i just know how to do my research

swingitten, Friday, 12 August 2005 03:01 (twenty years ago)

I know a girl who got blood clots in her lungs from taking BC PILLS -- she nearly died. Went to the hospital with sharp pains and they said she was "this close", etc.

Woah Roxy, me too! Exact same thing. Was yr friend a smoker? Mine was, and after a brief scared off hiatus, still is :( I fear for her life, I do.

I agree with what Banana said above as well - I cant help but feel women have been given very short shrift with the safety of BC, and of HRT as well. Wheras if men had to take it and it made them this sick it would never get released.

This is apparently why male BC hasnt really appeared - I recall reading an article (I'd cite it if I could remember where it was) that claimed a male pill kept getting delayed because of "untenable side effects".

WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK WE PUT UP WITH ALREADY YOU BASTARD PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)

And yes, it sucks. But keep in mind that for the "normal, healthy, otherwise low-risk" young women the report talks about, the risk on the Pill is something like 0.3% ... so 3 or even 6 times that is not huge.

I disagree, if that's really the number. It's not an acceptable risk anymore if 18 out of every thousand people will get blood clots from using the patch.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:09 (twenty years ago)

i thought the "untenable side effects" were mostly impotence but i'm just guessing

jimmy glass (electricsound), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)

well, that's one way to avoid getting pregnant

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:15 (twenty years ago)

Jim: that, and I think loss of libido as well (the pill does this too!) and maybe weight gain (again, the pill... etc).

I dont take birth control pills anymore, I dont much like the idea of them, also I smoke so I dont think it is wise. I had depo-provera several times and each time triggered a pretty severe attack of depression and anxiety. Never again.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)

The sponge is back! Yippee!It's only available online right now.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.