http://wwics.si.edu/index.cfm?fuseaction=wq.essay&essay_id=135758
the long & the short of it is: america is turning into an sessile tribe of fat morlocks worshipping a hated pantheon of professionally good-looking people. kick in yr tv! take back yr culture and dress a little nice once in a while, fukkerz!! we are hardwired to hate the ugly and toss our family in a ditch if it'll get us some bed-time with anything with white teeth under the age of 23, but this is america, we gotta try!!
seriously, this article hits so many reliably raw ilx nerve endings, plz read.
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 07:58 (twenty years ago)
this is how nazi germany started
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:03 (twenty years ago)
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)
Dressing to manifest disregard for society—think of the loose, baggy hipsters in American high schools—broadcasts self-determination by flaunting the needlessness of having to impress anybody else...
...we as a culture have engaged in a kind of aesthetic outsourcing, transferring the job of looking good—of providing the desired supply of physical beauty—to the specialists known as “celebrities,� who can afford to devote much more time and energy to the task. Offloading the chore of looking great onto a small, gifted corps of professionals saves the rest of us a lot of trouble and expense, even if it has opened a yawning aesthetic gulf between the average person (who is fat) and the average model or movie star (who is lean and toned within an inch of his or her life).
...
But what’s needed is a much more radical democratization of physical beauty, a democratization we can achieve not by changing the definition of beauty but by changing ourselves. Looking nice is something we need to take back from the elites and make once again a broadly shared, everyday attribute, as it once was when people were much less likely to be fat and much more likely to dress decently in public. Good looks are not just an endowment, and the un-American attitude that looks are immune to self-improvement only breeds the kind of fatalism that is blessedly out of character in America.
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)
http://www.popcultmag.com/criticalmass/movies/2001/zoolander.jpg
― robster (robster), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:09 (twenty years ago)
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:11 (twenty years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)
― 3, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)
xpost no really i had the wilson center website bookmarked like in 02
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)
― matlewis (matlewis), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)
haha what??
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)
another geek wishing it was the old-timey days when men wore hard leather shoes and women wore them stockings with the seam up the back!!
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)
On the other hand, whoever wrote this is clinging to this traditional view of how people should look and dress, what gives?
― matlewis (matlewis), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)
The flip-side is that when you purposefully dress down -- esp. way WAY down -- for something, it feels kind of illicit and can be taken to express all kinds of flippancy, contempt, haste, whatever, depending on how it's done. Good times!
All that said, I am without a doubt guilty of going to the corner sto' in my PJs.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)
― Laurel, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)
Also: "dressing down" not to be confused with "dressing casually but with my own particular flair/style", which is at least evidence of intelligence and creativity, if not necessarily consistent taste!
― Laurel, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
You know what's nutty is where - in these glossy magazines, celebrities are ridiculed for going to the market in sweatpants. As if it is their job to never have any sort of personal life.
So, somebody saw someone in "pajamas" buying milk at the corner store. If anything, the fact that it troubles them so much is proof of their weakness. And underneath all of this is an obsession with morality. Morality, as opposed to ethics or conscience or any of those concepts. The underlying message is "you're NEVER trying hard enough," and what is that? It's Calvinism.
― Land Ho (dymaxia), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
I think this Daniel guy is trying to send a message to his significant other!
― Kittens Licking Cakes (coco), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)
― jermaine (jnoble), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)
― Land Ho (dymaxia), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)
Good thing (or is it a bad thing)? for you I survived the "accident".
― Land Ho (dymaxia), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)
And I have NO IDEA what the lauren/warmleatherette thing is about. Nothing to do with me, pal.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
this is very very funny to me. It makes me think of electropop album/song titles, like, "Sperm-retaining Orgasms for the Symmetically Enhanced"
k thnx.
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
it's kind of impressive! (in a paranoid schizophrenic sort of way)
― ringu, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)