― Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dr. C, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― katie, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gareth, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― RickyT, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― chris, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Pete, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
It also makes it much harder to fire 'em if you, like, know them.
― Andrew L, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mark C, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nude Spock, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Batting an eyelid is a bad idea. You may end up batting the eye = squidgy mush of whats left of eye and blindness.
― Sean, Wednesday, 19 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
on friday (sent about 5 minutes after i'd left for the weekend) the boss sent a couple of us an email:
Looking at your progress report including past progress I am very disappointed that you have made very slow progress in relation to other team members who are making satisfactory progress...
My estimate of the work assigned to you was 15 man days...
I have indicated several times the need for efficiency and this issue is no longer a project management issue for me so unless the situation improves I will be compelled to refer your case to our HR.
which i thought was a bit off. we've never been given a deadline or project plan for this work which we're doing speculatively - we haven't been contracted to do it yet so, consequently, we've been taking it easy and, yes, i admit, slacking somewhat. and to use email rather than just talking to us is k-weasely.
anyway, today i sat down and did some sums. we got assigned the new piece of work at the start of the year. the snotty email came on valentines day, 6 weeks later, 30 working days. i've had 6 days holiday during that time and one day off for the doctor. also there was (at least) a two week period where we were unable to work because the database was down. 30 - 6 - 1 - 10 = 13. he's complaining that the work he'd given me 15 days to do wasn't finished 13 working days later and because of this he was going to sic HR onto me (effectively threatening us with being fired).
pah!
k
― no.one, Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― piscesboy, Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 20 February 2003 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)
Yet when he sends out departmental announcements there are misspellings, even though he is so arrogant about his own intelligence, which he overrates. The people on the bottom, the assistants, usually have a better idea of what is going on than the people above. I mean, they know all of the procedures and the systems and stuff. For example, I'm the only one who watches the budget here, even though I'm not paid to, and so I'm very aware of how the kingpin is wasting student's money and overexpending. Then he tries to blame it on people beneath him. But the stats don't lie.
He's always bitching about how many "backlogs" I have, so I did a stats report on my work. It turns out that I am doing nearly twice as much as the guy next to me, who is supposed to have the same responsibilities. So I printed out the stats that show how much work I've done and how much he has done. I've left them on my desk in case they want to go snooping.
― Like, Yeah, Thursday, 20 February 2003 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:00 (twenty-three years ago)