Due to a pricing cock-up, I just bought five 80-inch widescreen digital TVs on A Certain UK Retailer's website for 49p each!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
They're worth £300 each usually - do they have to supply them all at the published price, or will they just laugh at me and tell me to bugger off?

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:15 (twenty years ago)

haha, and when I say "80-inch" i do of course actually mean "28-inch"!!!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:16 (twenty years ago)

They will probably try and hide behind an E&OE statement, however if you threaten to kick up a fuss, especially in the media they may just suck it up and give it to you.

Ed (dali), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:20 (twenty years ago)

If you get all 5, I'll give you 50p for one. A whole penny profit on the deal.

Ed (dali), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:21 (twenty years ago)

nb, i found out about this cock-up from my gf's brother, who bought 10 for himself; between about 7 of us, I think 30 in total were bought. My thinking (ok, my forlorn hope) is that we'll end up with one each and they'll cancel the remainder, since we're all clearly trying to blag it.

(nb. they've removed the offending listing now unsurprisingly - I think the news spread pretty quickly!)

what does e&oe stand for?

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)

i mean, if i actually took them to court, surely there's not a judge in the country who wouldn't look me squarely in the eye and say "you dopey twat, there's no way you'll ever convince me or the jury that you honestly thought that was the genuine price - now piss off"?

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)

errors and omissions excepted. Standard get-out clause from mail order adverts. It basically means that they don't have to stand by the published price. However if payment has been accepted and therefore a contract exists the situation is a little different I think. They should still be able to wriggle out though.

Ed (dali), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:29 (twenty years ago)

DIdnt this happen a while back with some Amazon (or somewhere) CD list for free/megacheap albums we all waded in to try and buy, remainders or sommat, that never worked out cos they cottoned onto it?

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:47 (twenty years ago)

There is a section of their terms and conditions which basically says "we can completely change our minds whenever we like" but a lawyer mate reckons it'd be hard for them to make it hold any legal water if it came to the crunch - but again, i'm pretty sure our case wouldn't be heard if we chose to be so bloody-minded as to push it.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:49 (twenty years ago)

To be honest, my biggest worry is where to put the damn things if they actually honour ther order - they're frickin' massive!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:56 (twenty years ago)

They'll probably charge you the 300 pounds as postage if they can't wiggle their way out of it. ;-)

nathalie's pocket revolution (stevie nixed), Monday, 29 August 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)

well, here's the confirmation email they sent me (which, technically, is a legally binding contract in itself). They've stated the price and the delivery charge explicitly:

Thank you for using A Certain UK Retailer's website

Your order number for the following item(s) is ******

Please keep a note of this number for future reference. This email is
only an acknowledgement of receipt of your order which has been passed
to our team to be processed and has been charged to your card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cat No Product Name Qty Price

******* Bush 28in Integrated Digital TV, DVD 5 £2.45
Recorder and Stand

Delivery usually within 21 days.

Delivery Charge. 1 £4.95

SubTotal £7.40

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

If a delivery date isn't shown above, a member of our customer service team will contact you to arrange a suitable delivery day as soon as your goods are ready to be dispatched.

We hope you enjoyed shopping with us. If you'd like to revisit our
website, why not add us to your favourites? Click the link below

Be one of the first to hear about all the latest offers, promotions,
competitions plus more by registering your details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Contacting us: Please DO NOT reply to this email


If you would like to contact us about an order or anything else to do
with A Certain UK Retailer's website, please use our customer enquiry template by clicking the link below for us to provide you with the quickest response possible.

or call us:

Tel: 0870 ********

Under the Distance Selling Regulations, you have a right to cancel your order for any item purchased on this website, for a full refund.

This does not apply to items personalised or made to your specification; audio/video recordings or software that you have unsealed; items such as earrings and cosmetics that cannot be returned for hygiene reasons; perishable goods (such as food or flowers) and periodicals/magazines.

To cancel, email Customer Services by clicking on the link below or
write to us (see address at bottom of page) within seven days of delivery of your item(s) quoting your order number. You must take reasonable care of the item(s) and must not use them.

Item(s) may be returned to a store, or we can arrange collection
free of charge. You may cancel an order for services in the same way,
within seven days of the date of purchase, unless the services begin
sooner. You may not however cancel accommodation, transport or leisure services which occur on a specific date. The Distance Selling Regulations do not apply to Financial and Insurance Services.

All our products are guaranteed against manufacturing defects for a
minimum of 12 months. Our After Sales Care and Repair Services will offer you even more peace of mind and these, along with the 16-day money back guarantee will complement your statutory rights which together with your rights under any separate manufacturer's guarantee provided with the goods, remain unaffected.

ORDERS ARE ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS & CONDITIONS.

PLEASE SEE THE CUSTOMER SERVICES SECTION ON OUR WEBSITE FOR DETAILS.
- --------------------------------------------------------------

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 08:13 (twenty years ago)

Hmm curious. I was about to say "oh they just wont ever send you the stuff" but with a confirmation email/receipt? All I can say is GOOD LUCK :D

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 29 August 2005 08:20 (twenty years ago)

Hey thanks! It's not some tinpot outfit either - it's a bloody huge high street chain with hundreds of stores and a hard-fought bottom-end-and-proud-of-it reputation to uphold.

So, anyone want to buy a telly? We're saving to go to NYC!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)

If it's where I think it is (ARGUUS), then it's been removed. I'd be gobsmacked if you got one of the telly's never mind five.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 29 August 2005 08:28 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, as i said upthread they've removed the original listing entirely - or at least, changed the code so you can no longer search for it by that method. The telly's still on sale though, at full price, with a different code.

Man, I'd love it if this worked!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 08:39 (twenty years ago)

It won't though. Read the small print.

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 29 August 2005 08:51 (twenty years ago)

Ever since the Kodak digital camera cock up a few years ago online retailers have tightened up their act to prevent slip ups like this happening. I'd say at best you'll probably get an email apologising for the mistake and a code for 10% off any future purchases. Still, you've got to give it a go, you may just be lucky.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:03 (twenty years ago)

are you selling them on?

: )

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:15 (twenty years ago)

I'll buy a telly!

how much?

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)

£300 obv!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:41 (twenty years ago)

no

RJG (RJG), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:48 (twenty years ago)

I already have a telly thanks

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:49 (twenty years ago)

I have three

RJG (RJG), Monday, 29 August 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)

If you found the listing in question on their website, I doubt there's any way to make this hold: there'll almost surely be something in the site's terms and conditions that exempts them from honoring errors and mistaken listings. The only way this sort of thing ever really works is when the ad's in print, and someone's forgotten to throw a fine-print disclaimer at the bottom of the panel -- don't know how it is in the UK, but in the US that entitles you to the price as advertised. (Doesn't even matter if you're taking advantage, since "taking advantage" is the whole point of a sale price to begin with.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 29 August 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

Yes, but as Ed says, if Charlie No. 4 has paid for it, things might be a little different. Transaction is completed, deal is done.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 29 August 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

I still have my list of 99¢ records from the Amazon sale that wasn't, and weep bitterly over it occasionally. $7000 in merch for $235!

Rock Hardy (Rock Hardy), Monday, 29 August 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

It's a Bush widescreen telly? You wuz robbed, mate.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 29 August 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

This just in, from a friand who also took part in our buying spree:

So it turns out that my brother's firm acted for Argos on their last mis-pricing case. He says that the test for contractual mistake in this situation is whether you could have reasonably expected the stated price to be correct. We'd have more chance if the price had been £49, not 49 pence. Argos refused to cough up last time, although other sellers have paid up in these situations.

I think the fact that many of us purchased in multiples may count against us :-(

Which very much echoes what I said upthread, that no court would ever believe that we honestly thought they were that cheap.

Ah well. It was a fun speculative ride!

Also, just found out one of "us" ordered 100 of the things! Hee.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)

At first, I thought "Oh, are A Certain Ratio selling tellys now?"

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 09:18 (twenty years ago)

And this just in, from today's Sun: "Stampede for 49p telly"!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 10:14 (twenty years ago)

and finally: they've actually debited my credit card! they're fucked now, surely? they've agreed to the terms, it's a binding contract, end of story, no?

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

they've just sent me an email telling me they're going to refund my account. bugger that. here's my response:

Dear Sir/Madam.

I do not accept your offer of a refund. By both sending me an email to confirm the purchase, and accepting full payment for the goods, Argos has agreed, legally, to the terms of sale. Argos made a mistake - a mistake which it has made more than once in the past, and thus is in no position to defend - and Argos should be held accountable for that mistake.

I would like to know what Argos intends to do to compensate the customers whose goods will apparently not be delivered. I think it not unreasonable to request that all customers who ordered multiple units - as accidental a slip of the keyboard, no doubt, as Argos's original mispricing - should be compensated with one unit, as a gesture of goodwill. The press has already had a field day, and Argos will both save public face and retain thousands of satisfied customers by honouring at least part of the otherwise breached contract.

Thanks for taking the time to read this email. I look forward to hearing from you very soon.

Best wishes...

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

superb! beautifully done. you must now keep us posted ...

FWIW i've had one run-in with arsegos customer service, and they capitulated pretty easily ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)

Please tell me you signed it with your spamblocked email address!

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

i'd like to think that the "...as accidental a slip of the keyboard, no doubt, as Argos's original mispricing..." bit might swing it for me...

sadly i doubt they'll capitulate over what is quite obviously flagrant opportunism on my part - to the tune of 350 quid - but who knows, we'll see!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

"it might interest you to know that i also post regularly to an internet message board packed with idling journalists, who wield no real power at all but might be able to persuade their equally idle newsdesks that a comical story about a bloke looking miserable with 49p in his hand was worth filling a downpage slot on page 94."

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't have put that "slip of the keyboard" bit in there -- now you've advanced a story, and you have to stick to it!

nabiscothingy, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

But that's the good bit! Arsegos claimed it was a slip of the keyboard that typed 49p instead of £350. So they've admitted unlikely typos do happen. They can't then claim it just happens to them.

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

you rock charlieno4!

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

Oddly, I got in on a similar situation about 3 years ago. While searching for airfares, some mistake caused Delta to have RT fares, NYC/London, to be around $330. US. In the middle of summer. I bought mine the day it appeared, and within a week, they were gone. Basically, you have to go for more than 20 days, and I was looking for 22 days.

I also know of a whole group that saw, astonishingly, NYC/Reykjavik, for $150US last year. They bought nearly the entire plane, and spent the trip as a sort of FAP for the group.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

http://www.courttv.com/archive/legaldocs/business/pepsi.html

Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't have put that "slip of the keyboard" bit in there -- now you've advanced a story, and you have to stick to it!

I know! The plan was to use sarcasm as a way to second-guess any excuse they might come up with. So if they say "we didn't mean to put them up at 49p", i'll say "i didn't mean to order five, and my friend didn't mean to order 100 either", and they'll have to concede that yes, these accidents do happen on occasion.

With no way of proving that I *didn't* only want one, they'll cave in to the central argument that I could arguably have only wanted one anyway, and thus wasn't *knowingly* trying to take advantage of their cock-up, and I will thus get a telly!

Hmmm. Hi Argos folks, hope you're reading!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

interestingly, if you do a google image search for 49p, you get this:

http://osta.delfi.ee/i/upload/y05/w09/509456.jpg

more evidence!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

one pound more and you can buy eight ace.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

Oddly, I got in on a similar situation about 3 years ago. While searching for airfares, some mistake caused Delta to have RT fares, NYC/London, to be around $330. US. In the middle of summer. I bought mine the day it appeared, and within a week, they were gone. Basically, you have to go for more than 20 days, and I was looking for 22 days.

Haha, wifey and I got TWO return tickets from london to Chicago over Xmas/New Year's...and our card was never debited for them. This was almost three years ago, about $1300 worth of flights!


Good luck, Charlie!

Yes, I have heard of pizza (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

This thread has made me laugh so much. A brilliant jape, which I hope has a wonderful outcome.

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)


With no way of proving that I *didn't* only want one, they'll cave in to the central argument that I could arguably have only wanted one anyway, and thus wasn't *knowingly* trying to take advantage of their cock-up, and I will thus get a telly!

More likely response: "So we've both made some mistakes. Let's call it a draw. Thank you for your patronage."

Gitty Gitty GoGo Guff, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

Yes, but they've made more (debiting card, issuing confirmation of payment etc). I'm no expert, but I'm on Charlie's side, and I would totally have put the typo bit in too, had this happened to me and had I been smart enough to have thought of it

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

If your card actually got charged for 49p, and they try to refund you, I'd refuse it back until you've got a telly out of them.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

or their floccinaucinihilipilification of the importance of the integrity of my credit card balance

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:06 (twenty years ago)

We could do with a pool of ILX form letters.

can i try to pwn you all with FOUR GRAND from the royal bank of scotland, plus flowers, plus wine?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

The guy who wrote the big barrister email surely had a lot more fun doing that than he ever could with a few TVs.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

my favourite one ever, though, was B&Q. after they made a cock of our kitchen by losing the cooker hood/denying the cooker hood ever existed/denying cooker hoods in general had ever been invented/etc, i managed to get a (measly) 150 quid compensation out of them.

they sent the cheque payable to "mr simon [my partner's surname]".

so i sent it back, and demanded they sent me a correctly-made-out cheque ... for £150.26, to cover the cost of the stamp.

fair play to them, they did.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

apparent resignation

(gobsmacked)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

The guy who wrote the big barrister email surely had a lot more fun doing that than he ever could with a few TVs.

Have you ever seen him juggle?

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

My kingdom for a picture of young Mr. Burns!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

The guy who wrote the big barrister email surely had a lot more fun doing that than he ever could with a few TVs.

to be honest, that may well be the point. But he really does know his onions, and it does sound kinda cool.

apparent resignation

(gobsmacked)

Allow me to explain. I don't honestly think our protracted postal wranglings resulted in the member of staff throwing in the towel, but I do recall the naive 13 year-old me being flushed with triumph that the final letter we received from the bank on the issue, complete with apology and full compensation, came from a completely different person - who happened to have the same job title as the person, with whom I'd been corresponding up to that point.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)

I could've used that bureau of snotty letters back in February, when Croydon Council towed our car away (the meter had expired by about 30min) while my 41-weeks pregnant wife was waylaid inside Mayday Hospital, waiting to see a consultant who was running two hours late. £200 that cost us. Of course, my boiling anger was never successfully channeled into a letter and then Ava arrived and it didn't seem so pressing.

Similarly, I never gave Comet what-for for their astonishing incompetence regarding our fridge in 2003. The full refund (and John Lewis doing inside 48 hours what they couldn't inside 8 weeks) blunted my ire.

But, y'know, good luck getting your cheap tellies. Hopefully the person who maintains their website won't get the loss docked from their wages if you're successful.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)

top thread o' the day.

I once tried to get Motorola to admit in writing that their iTap predictive text is a) woeful and b) doesn't work right. I came very close, but after an exchange five letters in the end I had to settle for a phonecall from some engineer who did admit both points, but said they weren't ever going to pay up for T9.

I don't know why I did this, except to make me feel better after yet another hasty and wrong buying decision that led me owning the Worst Phone in The World. (It was hasty because the battery on my C5 was goin and I had to get home to watch my new Laserdisc)

stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)

Motorola do make the worst phone in the world. Is this the one that had a big button which would ring your voicemail at any time, flinging into the depths of hades any text that you were trying to send?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:57 (twenty years ago)

i used to work for index, and it was bought by argos, and so i worked for argos, then i quit because the managers are the most anal people this side of the atlantic. this news is fantastic, good luck charlie!

Thomas J, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)

That's the one Andrew! It also: wouldn't learn new words, do punctuation properly, work even if plugged in when the battery was a bit flat, creaked like it was going to fall to bits, crashed in the middle of calls ... oh god, I'm not even starting, or I'll get cross again.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:07 (twenty years ago)

then i quit because the managers are the most anal people this side of the atlantic

i hate to say this but their managers don't seem anal enough?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)

oh £350 or 49p? let's be pragmatic on this one shall we!!??

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)

i remember that phone, stet. it was indeed teh utter bag of wank. still, it looked sleek.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

indeed. other things that looked sleek: My Atari Lynx. My Sega Dreamcast. teh old two-seater. Will I ever learn?

stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

no, and that's one of the things that makes you such a big, lovable chumper.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

SAY NOT A BAD WORD ABOUT THE DREAMCAST LEST YOU BE SMITED BY IRATE NERDS

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

My broadband ISP initially tried to overcharge me four times what I should've paid.

After my protest e-mails they have relented and are now overcharging me by only £12 this month.

Take that The Mang!

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

one and a half cheers for stevem!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)

I bought a V3 RAZR thinking it looked cool, but as a phone it kind of sucks.

See also previous phone purchases of Sonys P800, Z7 and J5 (working chronologically backwards). And way too much other shit I have bought.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

I'm close to buy a Sony P910, aldo ... are they really that shit? I know there's a new one coming out soon, but mine's knackered and dammit, they're sleek (and cheap now)

stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

My P800 needed a firmware upgrade from about 2 weeks after I got it (which I never got around to and only caused minor address book problems) and was prone to crashes and delting data. But then I did have one when it was expensive and new. I always thought it was too quiet in use, and the microphone seemed to be in the wrong place (judging by the number of times I had to repeat things for people at the other end). Maybe these were improved on the P900/P910, I don't know.

In the end, I was looking at a P910 to replace it but realised I didn't use half the functions on it and didn't need to replace them - so decided on something which was much smaller and looked cooler, and the saving paid for half of my 60GB Zen Xtra.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:21 (twenty years ago)

I am happy with my V3 except that I dropped it

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4204002.stm

toby (tsg20), Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)

You've been Phantomed!

Rock Hardy (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 1 September 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

i don't get it...

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 2 September 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)

Allow me to explain. I don't honestly think our protracted postal wranglings resulted in the member of staff throwing in the towel, but I do recall the naive 13 year-old me being flushed with triumph that the final letter we received from the bank on the issue, complete with apology and full compensation, came from a completely different person - who happened to have the same job title as the person, with whom I'd been corresponding up to that point.

heheh! a naive 13 year old indeed. a far more likely "bank" scenario is that said staff member was promoted.

Kim (Kim), Friday, 2 September 2005 07:18 (twenty years ago)

charlieNo4: were you the kind of precocious kid who wrote letters of complaint all the time? 'cos i was, and i thought i was the only one :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 2 September 2005 09:06 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i was the kid at primary school whose english teacher castigated his parents for "allowing" him to read books containing semi-colons, colons and so forth - and then proceed to use them in school! - when "we haven't taught the comma yet"!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 2 September 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

But like many here it might just be a part of your basic pattern in life which is getting to things one or two years before your 'peers'. In my case I kept getting shouted into the corner for caning reading textbooks in 20 minutes of class time, the sort with a year's worth of exercises in them. I happened to be one of those strange kids who took in information at HIGH SPEED and did my work so quickly I had half a class period to get bored in. So then I would start writing a novel and get yelled at for THAT.

My mother would probably have floor-kicked any teacher who yelled at her for letting me read at my own rate. That half of them were her former teachers might have been something to do with it.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 2 September 2005 09:18 (twenty years ago)

I used to get told off for getting too far ahead in Maths at primary school. Also for refusing to revise spelling for spelling tests and then getting full marks on the test.

Sometime during secondary school half of my brain fell out of my ear I think.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Friday, 2 September 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)

i think my favourite was having to share books in english (i guess my school's budget didn't extend to a copy per student) with pupils who read at about a quater of my speed, and getting told off for staring around the room most of the time.

toby (tsg20), Friday, 2 September 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)

I used to get told off for getting too far ahead in Maths at primary school.

did you write a letter to complain?

i was pretty good at school too and yes picked up stuff quickly but by the time i finished uni everyone caught up and now i'm at some crappy job! yay!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 2 September 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

When I was in primary school, one of the maths teachers from the local secondary came over to give me extra lessons, because I was too far ahead of everyone else.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 2 September 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)

I ended up stuffing envelopes for an upcoming PTA because I'd finished the book before everyone else and my teacher wouldn't let me go to the library to get something else.

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Friday, 2 September 2005 11:47 (twenty years ago)

I WUZ VRY CLIVUR 2 GIV ME A TELY

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 2 September 2005 12:01 (twenty years ago)

i used to be so clever that i spotted errors in exams and corrected them and answered both the incorrect and correct questions. go me.

although it's kind of easy to be ahead of class when i go to my first maths lesson in the UK aged 12 and our class were doing fucking SUMS. jesus back in my country we do sums at.. 5?

ken c (ken c), Friday, 2 September 2005 12:06 (twenty years ago)

Back in MY country, we do them NOW.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 2 September 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

wow that's pretty early! we'd never dream of doing it at 11:30 am

ken c (ken c), Friday, 2 September 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

actually now we go get a curry.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 2 September 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

I WUZ VRY CLIVUR 2 GIV ME A TELY

haha END OF THREDD. You fuckers.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 2 September 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

I had to go look this up and almost wet mysaelf when I read the definition:

1. gobsmack

To be completely dumbfounded or shocked. That I know of, its origins are Irish.

I have know idea what a "gob" is or why it is common practice to smack somebody with one when they are shocked.

It seems like a rude thing to do, though."Well, I'll be gobsmacked!" exclaimed the taxi driver, as he watched two sworn enemies hug.
Source: Yogi!!, Apr 18, 2005

Wiggy (Wiggy), Sunday, 4 September 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

Gob is Brit slang for "mouth", so "gobsmacked" is basically "punched in the face".

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 5 September 2005 01:02 (twenty years ago)

If accepted onto the action committee of the Bureau of Snotty Letters, I will endeavor to assist any sneer-challenged victim of bureaucratic incompetence or tomfoolery in their correspondence with the offending parties. Bigstyle.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 5 September 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

so...was the barrister a real barrister? if not a) he sounded very convincing and b) why did he think he'd get away with pretending to be one if he wasn't?

piscesboy, Thursday, 8 September 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

yes he is a real barrister.

update: Argos followed the email I posted above with an identically-worded letter; and yesterday, they credited my credit card with the amount they'd debited before.

to be honest, i kinda lost enthusiasm for the whole project - or at least i must have done, since i never even got around to replying to the letter with a "don't you dare give me my money back" tirade.

pity. could really have done with a new TV for nil cash!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 9 September 2005 06:08 (twenty years ago)

the barrister's letter would be a lovely revision letter for anyone studying a unit in contract law, very impressive. however i think the law was on argos' side the entire time. still, 10/10 for effort!

gem (trisk), Friday, 9 September 2005 06:12 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.