Howver I do think it is going to be carnage, 100s of thousands of protesters, 15000, police and army, with two battalions of marines on ships in the bay, guns, with live and rubber bullets, teargas, water cannon, clubs, smoke bombs, a carrier group in the bay outside, and I'm not joking about this one, Surface to air missiles at the airport. People are going to die despite the best effort of the Italian protest movement which is probably the best organised in the world.
This protest has the makings of a watershed like (scans limited knowledge of US protest movement in 60s) Kent state? Birmingham?
Anyway my question is what are your feelings on the globalisation/anti-globalisation debate?
Also its worth noting that all of the world leaders and there advisors are staying on a cruise ship that will probably just steam out into the med at the first wiff of the zona rossa being breached. Howver I'm sure that a number of small boats will appear if they try that.
― Ed, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― anthony, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― james e l, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― tarden, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Geoff, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― matthew james, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― suzy, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
It's also a shame that a lot of viable alternatives aren't being explored or seriously discussed, at least not in the mainstream media. I guess that's not surprising, but still it doesn't have to be come down to the laissez-faire über-alles sorts on one side vs. rioters on the other. I don't oppose international trade per se, it's possible to construct trade regimes that respect labor, environmental and human rights concerns. It's even possible to reform the international bodies regulating trade to make them more open and democratic, and so that they respect member nations' sovereignty. It's a shame that such a course of action isn't being discussed on either side, because I know I'm not alone in thinking so.
That said, I'm not confident that the Texas Chimp, his handlers and the corporations who paid him off give a flying fuck about any of this.
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I think Matthew's argument reveals a terrible amount of aspirational snobbery: the "unwashed" line suggests the sort of person who thinks that anyone who shares these concerns would automatically prefer the Levellers to Destiny's Child. Personally, I sympathise utterly with the non-violent protesters. The group of people I dislike most is the violent minority who create the misleading impression that this fundamentally decent cause is held only by "extremists".
― Robin Carmody, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
That said, there are some bad apples among the protesters. Folks like Pat Buchanan and every nativist know-nothing who'd just as soon rant about Mexican truck-drivers and the like. I also don't trust the involvement of Ralph Nader, who is just a grandstanding has-been, though that might be some residual bitterness over the Presidential election and Ralphie's role in getting Chimp Boy into the Oval Office :-)
― Richard Tunnicliffe, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― DG, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― mark s, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Joe, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
There HAS to be another way to get the message across.
― masonic boom, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
The news from Italy is not good. The Bike convoy that left Turin yesterday got stopped in Chiavasso, not a days ride from here. Berlusconi's media outlets are trying to whip up hysteria, its getting nasty.
― Ed, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I think the anti-globalisation debate has really gone off track over the last couple of years to reduce it to buzzword politics that anyone can understand. Also it fuels the protest for protest sake lobby as it has no clear manifesto on the way out of the perceived current malaise.
― Pete, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Much better to offer constructive solutions to problems, than to winge about the dire state of things. Although it has to be said that some times you have to tell people hat something is wrong, but that stage has now past, now is the time to start finding solutions. (I apear to have just turned into tony blair)
Why has noone made the Genoa joke, along the lines of 'My wife went to Italy recently' 'Genoa?' 'Of course I bloody well know her, we've been married for 20 years'.
Ha ha ha.....
― Emma, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Jamaica?
No she went of her own accord.
(you can't get away with doing the Genoa joke if I can't do the Jamaica joke)
Ontopic: yes, it's probably going to be nasty. The 'security race' surrounding these events is one of the most frightening aspects for me - each new venue promises harderfastermore response to the protestors, so if Genoa doesn't turn very ugly the russian-roulette rules of response suggest that wherever-is-next will.
― Tom, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
is genoa a good place to visit
― zero dark (s1ocki), Thursday, 4 April 2013 21:19 (eleven years ago) link