Genoa

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Jus been down to the station, (only place to buy milk on sunday), and people are arriving for the big barney down in Genoa next week. I am not going because I am far too much of a wuss and don't want to get stomped by some viscios carabineiro. A lot of people seem to be coming here and then seeting off by bike, despite caring quite passionately about some of the issues.

Howver I do think it is going to be carnage, 100s of thousands of protesters, 15000, police and army, with two battalions of marines on ships in the bay, guns, with live and rubber bullets, teargas, water cannon, clubs, smoke bombs, a carrier group in the bay outside, and I'm not joking about this one, Surface to air missiles at the airport. People are going to die despite the best effort of the Italian protest movement which is probably the best organised in the world.

This protest has the makings of a watershed like (scans limited knowledge of US protest movement in 60s) Kent state? Birmingham?

Anyway my question is what are your feelings on the globalisation/anti-globalisation debate?

Also its worth noting that all of the world leaders and there advisors are staying on a cruise ship that will probably just steam out into the med at the first wiff of the zona rossa being breached. Howver I'm sure that a number of small boats will appear if they try that.

Ed, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I do not belive in the WTO. I think it is evil . I am pretty radical. I think these people care about the issues deeply. The italian police have bought 200 body bags. The Teach ins have been teaching how to "surrive alive". Something they did not do for quebec or seattle. Someone is getting ready to riot. I used to think that these were Tourists travelling around the world to smash . Now i think these people realize the damage beign done, are feeling powerless and are ready to do something stupid. I expect blood.

anthony, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I believe in incramentalism, violence will not help at all.

james e l, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Governments not even trying anymore to push the big lie that global free markets are a 'natural' and thus inevitable progression (i.e., not involving state intervention on behalf of 'interests'). When gov'ts drop the 'spin', mask slips, velvet gloves come off, things get ugly. Riot on.

tarden, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I believe in love, money, drugs, monet, television, death and allen ginsberg

Geoff, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I think globalisation protests are deeply mistaken. Intent on destroy in capitalism than reforming it - what a wasteful, self-fulfilling pastime! As if a few of the unwashed can possibly transforma global infrastructure! What can be done, on the other hand, is to organise a peaceful, responsible, balanced and well-thought out global movement intent on reforming the worse affects of the corporate golbalisers; organising trade unions, minimum wages, etc. Thouh this wil be interpreted as pushing in western culture by the back door, effectively destroying those we're meant to be caring for's cuture, it hink it's the only responsible way. The globalisers will have it their way; the best anyone else can do is to try ensure people aren't stamped all over.

matthew james, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Governments are such HOES to the corporations: every time I see the news, I see Blair or whoever trying to promise everything to companies because they're extorting him (well, us really) over where they're going to drop a factory, it makes me want to hurl. And of course, as any King's Cross hooker knows, punters will always look for new snatch when their regulars become tired, flabby, or uncompliant. And I really love how military and police are roped in to defend corporate interests rather than those of the general TAXPAYING public.

suzy, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

The governments are poor liars and the protesters are riddled with wannabes who want to destroy things more than anything else. In combination, a classic example of wanting to say 'a pox on both your houses.' Though I'm glad to see the governments actually starting to act more paranoid, as it means they're realizing the poor lies are just that!

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I sympathize with the (non-violent) protestors at these events. I think it should be pointed out that the people who stand the most to lose from the so-called "free-trade" regimes -- namely, labor unionists and low-wage workers -- have not been the ones engaging in violence. A lot of the other protesters -- students, environmentalist groups, etc. -- have also been largely non- violent. I don't believe that there's any need for violence at this time and that it's counterproductive.

It's also a shame that a lot of viable alternatives aren't being explored or seriously discussed, at least not in the mainstream media. I guess that's not surprising, but still it doesn't have to be come down to the laissez-faire über-alles sorts on one side vs. rioters on the other. I don't oppose international trade per se, it's possible to construct trade regimes that respect labor, environmental and human rights concerns. It's even possible to reform the international bodies regulating trade to make them more open and democratic, and so that they respect member nations' sovereignty. It's a shame that such a course of action isn't being discussed on either side, because I know I'm not alone in thinking so.

That said, I'm not confident that the Texas Chimp, his handlers and the corporations who paid him off give a flying fuck about any of this.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Spot on, Suzy: the current UK government cares more for corporate interests than public ones. The only thing that stops me criticising it more is the certain knowledge that a Tory govt would be far worse.

I think Matthew's argument reveals a terrible amount of aspirational snobbery: the "unwashed" line suggests the sort of person who thinks that anyone who shares these concerns would automatically prefer the Levellers to Destiny's Child. Personally, I sympathise utterly with the non-violent protesters. The group of people I dislike most is the violent minority who create the misleading impression that this fundamentally decent cause is held only by "extremists".

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Amen, Robin. Especially the part about the violent protesters. I don't know how the British media has portrayed the protests, but over here the American media has gone to great lengths to tar all the protestors at Seattle, Washington and Prague as violent, thuggish anarchists. That, or they manage to find every Che T-shirt-wearing moron who doesn't know shit from shinola and then uses this as "evidence" that the protesters (even the non-violent ones) are all know-nothings. It's quite sickening.

That said, there are some bad apples among the protesters. Folks like Pat Buchanan and every nativist know-nothing who'd just as soon rant about Mexican truck-drivers and the like. I also don't trust the involvement of Ralph Nader, who is just a grandstanding has-been, though that might be some residual bitterness over the Presidential election and Ralphie's role in getting Chimp Boy into the Oval Office :-)

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'm not actually all that anti-free trade myself. I'm just against its implementation at all costs and the resultant competition for the worst labour standards, laxest regulations and lowest taxes between governments which screws over pretty much everyone in favour of the multinational corporations. The only solution to this whilst keeping a free trade agenda seems to be some sort of world government, like the UN or (shock horror!) the WTO to enforce reasonable supranational standards. Of course, in reality the UN is powerless and the WTO is in hock to multinationals, but the why this is seems to be largely unanalysed.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Bugger. I forgot my main point: globalisation of capital is intellectually bankrupt without globalisation of labour.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Having actually been on one of those protests on May 1 this year, I can say that when protestor-types whinge about violent minorities etc, they are actually telling the truth. It's a bit of a giveaway when the blokes smashing stuff look like football hooligans and are wearing Nike clothes.
As for the actual issues, WTO etc, I honestly don't know that much about them apart from typical protestor rhetoric, and I never take anyone's word in circumstances such as these. I really need to do some proper research about this business, which possibly will be my little project for this summer. One thing I do know IS WRONG - police on the side of money not the populace. I think all public servants (esp. politicians) should be reminded THEY SERVE US, not the other way around.

DG, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Wel, in Britain it's a dodgy technicality, but they can say that officially they serve the Queen, not her subjects. This is the difference between citizen and subject. NOW do you feel like going on a demo?

suzy, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Or we can get the Queen to come on a demo...

mark s, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Rats! I thought this thread would be about salami...

Joe, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I honestly belive - no matter how much I agree with thei sentiments and their beliefs - that protesters do more harm than good for their cause. Even if it is a tiny minority actually committing the violence and the looting, that is the image that is fed about to the world, by the (controlled) press and governments and everything. There has to be another way to make their point. Because instead of thinking about the issues at hand - whether globaliasation is evil or neccessary, and thinking about who the government and police protect, citizens or corporations - people see a violent, dirty, anarchic MOB.

There HAS to be another way to get the message across.

masonic boom, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'm pissed off with the gaurdian today for its pass notes column getting Ya Basta!, the Tute Bianchi, the wombles and awhole lot of other people mixed up. Confusing these good organisations with violent thugs in a very glib way. It doesn't help to be making jokes like this mixing up non violent protesters, and violent ones.

The news from Italy is not good. The Bike convoy that left Turin yesterday got stopped in Chiavasso, not a days ride from here. Berlusconi's media outlets are trying to whip up hysteria, its getting nasty.

Ed, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Some of the Wombles are very good friends of mine and they have (in the past nosey secret police officers) used my common room to get ready. they rocked up a bit too late for the Oxford Circus shenanigans. Some of them do very good jobs.

I think the anti-globalisation debate has really gone off track over the last couple of years to reduce it to buzzword politics that anyone can understand. Also it fuels the protest for protest sake lobby as it has no clear manifesto on the way out of the perceived current malaise.

Pete, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Agreed too much debate on what is wrong, not enough on how to make things better. Those with an environmental bent and ALL MDs/CEOs should read Natural Capitalism (can't put who its by cos its in a box). Don't be put off by the Bill Clinton quote on the front, he obviously never read it.

Much better to offer constructive solutions to problems, than to winge about the dire state of things. Although it has to be said that some times you have to tell people hat something is wrong, but that stage has now past, now is the time to start finding solutions. (I apear to have just turned into tony blair)

Ed, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I got a day off on May Day. Whoo.

Why has noone made the Genoa joke, along the lines of 'My wife went to Italy recently' 'Genoa?' 'Of course I bloody well know her, we've been married for 20 years'.

Ha ha ha.....

Emma, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

My wife's gone to the carribean

Jamaica?

No she went of her own accord.

(you can't get away with doing the Genoa joke if I can't do the Jamaica joke)

Ed, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

This is the second thread to have turned into placename jokes (the Platonic ideal form of the joke) - one more and they get their own thread by secret ILE laws I believe. Together we can make it happen!

Ontopic: yes, it's probably going to be nasty. The 'security race' surrounding these events is one of the most frightening aspects for me - each new venue promises harderfastermore response to the protestors, so if Genoa doesn't turn very ugly the russian-roulette rules of response suggest that wherever-is-next will.

Tom, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

eleven years pass...

is genoa a good place to visit

zero dark (s1ocki), Thursday, 4 April 2013 21:19 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.