TS: Conversations about mobile phones vs Conversations about house prices

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
either way, people find these VERY INTERESTING INDEED.

N_RQ, Monday, 5 September 2005 10:07 (twenty years ago)

not all people

gem (trisk), Monday, 5 September 2005 10:10 (twenty years ago)

people here = everyone i've ever met, ever, the tossers.

N_RQ, Monday, 5 September 2005 10:12 (twenty years ago)

As I don’t have enough pennies to purchase a house, I find house conversations dull.

As I’ve just purchased a new phone, I’d be more likely to talk about that. But after 15 minutes, that gets a little dull.

not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Monday, 5 September 2005 10:13 (twenty years ago)

I'm not the slightest bit interested in conversations about mobile phones.

However, conversations about house prices and mortgages and interest rates and fixed and base rate trackers and pacers and tranche funds and crap is ALL EVERYONE AT MY JOB EVER TALKS ABOUT ALL DAY LONG so I can't really help it if it slips into my normal everyday conversations occasionally.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 10:13 (twenty years ago)

Both seem rather dull. Maybe because i know jackshit about'em. I do like to read/page through catalogues of houses and mobile phones.

nathalie's pocket revolution (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 September 2005 10:14 (twenty years ago)

I cannot stop reading the Property Pr0n that is Country Life. Not that I could ever afford one of those houses in a million years, but it's still nice to know exactly what people are buying with those £2million mortgages we have to do every now and then.

At the other end of the scale, I'm obsessed with trying to bargain hunt in various scab ends of Southern London. "Come on, living in West Norwood wouldn't be so bad... would it? Thornton Heath? I could learn to commute. Croydon?!?!? F*ck off, that's not even London!"

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 10:19 (twenty years ago)

talking about your mobile phone is acceptable enough, as long as you don't wang on about it to the exclusion of everything else. mobile phones are a bit of fun, after all.

talking about how much your fucking house is worth/how much money you're making for doing absolutely fuck all/how clever you were to buy in so-and-so place at so-and-so time MAKES YOU A WANK. there is nothing more dull and offensive.

i have one very simple rule in life: if anybody uses the phrase "property ladder" within my hearing, i walk away.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:20 (twenty years ago)

Property ladder.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)

[tap tap tap tap tap tap]

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)

Did it ever dawn on you that some people who are having these conversations are not automatically "WANKS" who don't pass under your class filter, but are actually people who are interested in sharing information and tips about a very expensive and often confusing procedure?

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)

[tap tap tap ... comes back into earshot]

did it dawn on you that my tongue might have been ever so slightly in my cheek there? jesus christ, i'm a homeowner: i have, at some point, had to talk about this!

however, if they want to share information and tips, they can do it without standing at the bar of a pub in the west end of glasgow, braying at the top of their smug fucking voices. that's what i'm talking about: the one-upmanship that comes with house-buying. "oh yes, and we bought this super little flat off byres road where little quentin can stay when he's at uni; i mean, he's only three months old right now but just think of how much it'll be worth." GAAAH I HATE THEM ALL.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:31 (twenty years ago)

(Hey, me too. Don't go.)

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:35 (twenty years ago)

the newspaper i work for produces a "house price guide" once a month. on production day, the designer unfailingly comes in wearing a T-shirt saying: "i don't give a fuck what your house is worth." the section editor appears, so far, not to have noticed.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

Hey, you know what's worse than that? The time when I found a flat in central reading, brand new, £18,000 back in the day, got my dad to have a look at it, and five years later hear him say to someone at some drinky party "You know, I really regret not finding the extra cash to help him get it"...... (yeah cheers)

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

What I don’t like is when someone (close friend) who only just managed to get on the property ladder by getting a flat for 60k (three years ago) which was the most he could lend due to his wage, goes on all the time about how he’s a home owner, thinks renting is for mugs and keeps you updated monthly on how much it’s increased in value.
mark, that's go to hurt.

not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

opps, got not go

not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

well, house price convos are interesting because all sorts of prejudices are likely to come out. moby conversations are teh boring, though i suppose it's amazing people will pay upwards of thirty quid a month for no reason.

N_RQ, Monday, 5 September 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)

conversations about mobile phones are generally rubbish because all the "fancy" things on mobile phones are usually dated technology that's been on "proper" computers for ages (e.g. oh my god i can send emails from my phone wtfwtf and take pictures?!??!!?)

buying houses.. more interesting if it's genuine info sharing like esp since i'm thinking about (UH OH) JOINING THE PROPERTY LADDER myself in the near future and since i know FUCK ALL about it, i'd like to known a bit about it e.g. by asking someone.

although you know... my ancient phone is now breaking apart as well it is really time i get a new one. OH NO WHICH PHONE TO GET??!?!? SOMEBODY HELP.

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)

haha actually if i have had a mobile phone conversation like 8 months ago i would probably be paying 20 quid a month for my phone usage rather than 100 quid a month. mmmm. talk is good

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:45 (twenty years ago)

talking about it all the time is rubbish though.

i don't understand why you would either, especially at the office, when there are important things like TV, the weather and holiday plans to talk about!?!?!??!

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:47 (twenty years ago)

Like I said, I work for an independent financial advisor. These kinds of conversations are not just urgent, but also key. I am not a home-owner, but I would like to be. So hearing any kinds of tips - both of the kind that the folks upstairs routinely produce for "house price guides" in various papers, and of the smug "I paid £40k for my flat back in the day" variety are actually becoming extremely interesting to me, and not just for work-related reasons.

(My current bugbear is not people who buy flats for their kids - but the buy-to-let "I think I'll be a landlord" crowd who have made the studio/one-bed starter market almost impossible to crack. You can rent a studio or one bed for next to nothing, but buying? It's only £20k less than a freaking starter home! Mental!)

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

x-post(s)

see, i have a three- (four?) year-old nokia 7650 and the only conversations i ever have about it are when people go: "shit, you've brought your TV remote control to the pub."

i can't find a phone i want more, though, so: end of story.

and ken, my advice would be to take almost everything everyone tells you about house-buying with a pinch of salt. i bought my flat in unusual (and unusually tedious) circumstances; 95 per cent of the advice i was given by everyone was unhelpful, dubious and in some cases downright insane. in the end i muddled through myself, losing four grand along the way (but then getting it back from a very contrite royal bank of scotland, huzzah).

the best advice i can give is to speak to a reputable mortgage advisor, pay attention to everything they say, make careful notes, weigh up all your options carefully, and don't do anything rash.

o god, i'm talking about houses.

wanky fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

kate please tell me where i can rent a studio flat for next to nothing, because i'm moving there!!!

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

the buy-to-let "I think I'll be a landlord" crowd who have made the studio/one-bed starter market almost impossible to crack

yes, abso-fucking-lutely. i loathe all these self-satisfied "professional couples" who've suddenly decided they want to be landlords too. they have, as you say, buggered things right up.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

my coworkers talk about phones, and sometimes the death penalty.

N_RQ, Monday, 5 September 2005 12:53 (twenty years ago)

suggest the death penalty for people who talk about phones.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)

Phones? What's to talk about? You ring people on them. That's it.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)

oh that is good advice simon - and i am planning to do that but i'm really just dipping my feet in the water at the moment. it's going to involve doing a lot of maths :(


ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

the best advice i can give is to speak to a reputable mortgage advisor, pay attention to everything they say, make careful notes,

I've got a gang of them upstairs just waiting for your call! in fact, go and look at our website (email me privately and I'll tell you how to get in without paying the registration fee)!

kate please tell me where i can rent a studio flat for next to nothing, because i'm moving there!!!

Streatham, dude! And you could bowl as much as you liked, too!

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)

oh my god i can send emails from my phone wtfwtf

This is why I don't talk about it: I can't seem to set the functions!

nathalie's pocket revolution (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)

grimly is on the property ladder.

stet (stet), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

OK, if you just want to play with the maths, you can do most of it here.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

kate please tell me where i can rent a studio flat for next to nothing, because i'm moving there!!!

Streatham, dude! And you could bowl as much as you liked, too!

oh but i want to live in london!

;)

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

wow i am allowed to borrow an awful lot of money on my tiny wage.

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

grimly is on the property ladder.

no he isn't. he's on the express travelator to your butt, with his kicking foot extended.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

You do have to pay it back, Ken!

(Actually, I don't care if you pay it back or not, we get paid regardless. In fact, come in and take out a million pound loan, get me the commission, and then default on it!)

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

Right, that calculator means I can't afford the house I own.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 September 2005 13:06 (twenty years ago)

I can afford a really good garage and still have change! yay!

jel -- (jel), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

You guys didn't input a bunch of phony credit cards on my website, did you, grrrr? I see a bunch of "jack t. ripper" and "i am a looker" type applicants!

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

well obv not. if it was anyone here it'd have been jack t rippx0r and i'm a loox0r innit

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

Nope I just used the calculator thingie! They gave me £80,000! No questions asked!

jel -- (jel), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

OK, cool, I was not looking forward to explaining to my boss why we'd had a sudden rash of mortgage applications for H0ME PWNER!!!

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:42 (twenty years ago)

(I should suggest that we do a special tranche mortgage deal for H0ME PWNERS, though. Wonder if I can sell the HalifuX0rs on it.)

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

i can't buy shit!!!! wow. i wish my parents had sold out, so i don't have to. or sold out successfully.

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Monday, 5 September 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

All anyone here evertalks about is mobile phones, luckily mine is so shit and old even my Mum mocked it last month when she visited. But as long as I have the thing, I get an extra fiver in my wage packet every month.

Paul Kelly (kelly), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 03:54 (twenty years ago)

We just sold our house today. It's a pretty hot topic for me right now.

Bombed Out and Depleted / Kate (papa november), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)

You know, come to think of it, I don't think I've ever actually had a conversation about a mobile phone. Or, indeed, ever overheard anyone talking about theirs. Computers/laptops, perhaps - but mobiles? No. I wonder if this is an age thing.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 07:03 (twenty years ago)

For all the people worrying about not being able tto afford to buy, don't worry, in a few years they will have come down to reasonable levels again:

http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/

At least according to these guys, and I'm inclined to believe them.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 10:44 (twenty years ago)

See also here:

http://www.firsttimebuyerhelp.co.uk/articles/article.aspx?id=3

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 10:51 (twenty years ago)

Study Islamic banking practices for a moment, Henry, and you'll realise that the charging mechanisms they use IN PLACE of usury actually cost the mortgage borrower more.
-- Markelby (boyincorduro...), September 6th, 2005.

study internet schtick for a moment and you might see a hint of irony in my post.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, £30k gives you a take home pay of around £1800 a month. Knock another £120 or thereabouts off that if you're planning on paying council tax and then pay your £1326.59 mortgage payment and you're left with £353.31 per month before you've thought about utility bills and food. You'll find your belt tightens really easily after a few months.

Oh, and a wee black Wednesday type hike in rates will see what's left disappear in an instant.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

Also, AFAIK, you can shorten the term of your mortgage later on if you're a bit flush (or, in my case, Ava starts winning those junior tournaments), but you can't lengthen it. Is that right? So you're a bit stuffed if interest rates do go up.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

£353.31 per month

I've lived on less. Wouldn't want to do it for ten years, but could do it.

Anyway, it is an extreme example, but I was making the point about interest being the killer.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)

x-post, with regards to lengthening, there is always remortgaging.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)

ARRRGGGHHH, anyway, I am going to stop talking about this because it's disturbing me that I am essentially talking about work stuff with a bunch of non-work people.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

Remortgaging, yes. Good point.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

even if it does fall in a few years if i buy a house now i'll still have lost less money than if i keep renting for the next 5 years right?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

i dunno this for sure.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

no-one knows, but possibly... NOT. i can't believe how abstract this is for me. people i know earn over 30k, i guess.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

Well... I look at it like this. Negative equity aside, if I buy a house that is valued at £120k and pay a mortgage on it for five years, only for the house prices to fall, at the end of the day I still have a house and I still essentially have assets of £100k.

If I pay rent for five years, I am essentially throwing my money into a big black hole, and whether house prices rise or fall, I have assets of zilch.

I wouldn't buy a property for investment, but as somewhere to live, yes, I am going to be doing this within the next year. (If I can stop buying Liberty shirts and gold frock coats long enough to save my deposit up.)

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

i have a friend, he uses his mobile to receive pix of naked people he's met.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

I have a phone. It's blue and kind of clunky and I've had it for three years and it doesn't take photos or play MP3s but you know what? It rings people and it messages people and that's all I need.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

You should meet more naked people.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)

i have a friend, he uses his mobile to receive pix of naked people he's met.
-- N_RQ (bl0cke...), September 6th, 2005 3:26 PM. (later) (link)

? it has an xray camera on it?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

or is he just really charming?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

no, they take pix of themselves wanking off or what have you and send them to him. perhaps i could do a feature for the observer about it.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

So if I get one of these fancy phones, does that mean I'll get laid more.

And all along, I listened to Calum and thought all I needed was loads of money. Sigh.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

duder gets laid a lot, but i dunno if it'd be your scene, kate (i mean that in a good way).

N_RQ, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

For some reason, I doubt that Regency Captains would have mobile phones. maybe I should invest in a SEXTANT to get the Regency Sexxing.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

(I may be a Homeowner, but I've got the cheapest phone with the least features on the market. I'd still have my Motorola [that worked by putting coins in the top and winding a little handle] if the battery hadn't packed in).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

not sure what the thread is about - conversations about phone PLAN PRICES vs housing prices, or the phones themselves vs housing prices.

if the former, I take phone plans because i'm looking for one right now. if the later, I take housing prices because I dont care what stupid features my phone has.

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)

not sure what the thread is about - conversations about phone PLAN PRICES vs housing prices, or the phones themselves vs housing prices.

well, i started the thread, and you know what? -- i'm gonna be liberal about this one.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

I don't have a plan, unless PayAsYouGo is a plan. I suppose it is. I once went two and a half years without topping up.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

> if I buy a house that is valued at £120k

i am interested in where kate is going to find these 120k houses 8)

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:31 (twenty years ago)

Hull, apparently. Actually, I could buy two houses in Hull for that!

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

Well... I look at it like this. Negative equity aside, if I buy a house that is valued at £120k and pay a mortgage on it for five years, only for the house prices to fall, at the end of the day I still have a house and I still essentially have assets of £100k.

If I pay rent for five years, I am essentially throwing my money into a big black hole, and whether house prices rise or fall, I have assets of zilch.

The second bit is true, but if you are stuck with negative equity uo are left with minus assets. If you save the money you have left over while you are renting, you are able to save for a larger deposit which will then mean a smaller mortgage, and therefore paying less interest in the future.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

so wait in the UK is every mortgage variable rate? you can't lock in and pay the same interest rate over the course of the whole mortgage?

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

AFAIK, fixed interest rates over the whole mortgage term is very unusual in the UK - almost unheard of. Fixed for 2-5 years, yes, but not 25. Capped, tracker, discount, etc - all more common.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

We have mortgage rates that are fixed for ten years. It's not very common, but you can get them. It's much more common to get ones that roll over after 2 to 5 years. Producing a whole new level of programming hell for me... sigh.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

what exactly is negative equity? is the whole not-fixed-for-25 years thing what caused people so much trouble when interest rates last rocketed?

also, i want to hear more about nrq's friend.

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

Negative equity is when the value of the remainder of the loan on your house is greater than the value of the house.

If you buy a house that is valued at £150k and take out a £125k mortgage on it - then there is a housing price crash and your house is revalued at £100k, then you have negative equity of -£25k.

I think... I mean, really it's an accounting fiction because you still have the house - so long as you don't default on the loan, I assume - though it's skyrocketing interest rates which can add several hundred pounds to your monthly repayment that cause the defaulting and the reposession.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

Wait, I think I did those sums wrong. The concept is right, but the numbers are wrong. I haven't had my coffee yet.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

No, that's right, I think. A house worth £150k with a mortgage of £125k has equity of £25k.

A house worth £100k with a mortgage of £125k has negative equity of -£25k.

God, my brain hurts. Does someone else want to do the Risk and Fee for me today?

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 07:10 (twenty years ago)

also, i want to hear more about nrq's friend.

-- toby (toby_insertmysurnameher...), September 7th, 2005.

hmm, well. archetypal "lefty" yuppie, lept from weirdly bourgeois co-habiting episode into bizarre world of sex-texts and mid-afternoon gym pick-ups.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 7 September 2005 07:43 (twenty years ago)

Of course, the capital you owe on the mortgage is going down with each monthly payment (if it's not interest-only), but very slowly in the early years. So, in the time it takes for your £150k house to devalue to £100k, you've (hopefully) paid off a few grand and don't have quite as much -ve equity.

It's cost us about £40k over five years to reduce the amount of capital we owe by £14k. It's a laff, innit?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

so where does the problem come with negative equity? when you want to move house? sorry, i'm being slow this morning...

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 08:01 (twenty years ago)

when you want to move, if you're still in negative equity, or if you can't keep up with the mortgage repayments.....

Vicky (Vicky), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 08:02 (twenty years ago)

I guess it means that you can't remortgage either, so you can't look around for a better deal

Vicky (Vicky), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 08:03 (twenty years ago)

If you want to move house you need to pay off your existing mortgage. So if you own a £100k house and owe £125k on it then it's £25k more you need to borrow to move, or £25k less to spend on a new house (depending on how you look at it). For many people this means taking a >95% mortgage, and that's when the big interest rates kick in.

If you're not moving it doesn't really matter, apart from preventing you from taking out any secured loans.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 08:03 (twenty years ago)

So, to step back a minute, I think we can safely assume that most people on this thread prefer conversations about house prices than talking about mobile phones...

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 08:25 (twenty years ago)

Or, if you don't actually have any savings after being a homeowner for a few years, you rely entirely on your equity to act as a deposit on your new home (and, upon exchange of contracts, you request that your buyer's deposit act as your deposit) so, with negative equity, you can't possibly move. This was the problem in the early '90s - homeowners unable to meet their rising monthly repayments couldn't simply "cash in" their home and move to a cheaper part of the country cos they had nothing to fund the move.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 09:00 (twenty years ago)

Buying real estate right now is the stupidest thing anyone could possibly do, UNLESS:

1. You are able to get fixed rate or cap the rate fairly low
2. You are able to afford a sizable down payment, to keep your monthly closer to a livable sum, and get equity in a hurry
3 AND MOST CRUCIAL. You are in love with the place and can imagine spending the next 10-20 years living in and maintaining it.

There's not just going to be a recession. There's going to be a fucking crash. Where do you think it leaves the rest of the world if the American Consumer stops spending the next five years of their income on giant toys at 10% APR?

People who buy now may well end up with negative equity, totally house poor, and possibly bankrupt with nothing save the shirts on their backs if or when (whatever you prefer) the world's financial markets realize they've completely fucked up by allowing so many marginal borrowers to take them for 6% and no down for loans capable of procuring a Bell helicopter.

The other option is that when the bell tolls the taxpayers of 2025 will wind up paying for it, when our governments go further into debt themselves to bail out failing lenders. Either way, property values normalize, meaning they tune in with rent prices. I don't think the reverse is going to occur, with rent prices going up to match house prices, because that would actually lead to an even worse depression. As in nobody actually has any disposable income anywhere. It would be a little like socialism actually, except with some people owning private property and being poor, and other people owning no property, and also being poor. In which case bloody revolution would break out and then Kurt Russell is going to have 24 hours to do something or other.

Inasmuch as cell phones are concerned, my workplace has taken on a "no camera phones" policy, which is completely insipid, because I see fuckers walking around with their RAZRs all the time in this bitch. Also, we have blackberries out the wazoo in this building, which is more than a little irritating at times when you're trying to talk to someone and they decide the e-mail they just received is more interesting than you and your problems.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 7 September 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

1. You are able to get fixed rate or cap the rate fairly low

Check (for 2-5 years anyway and then we'll jump to someone else).

2. You are able to afford a sizable down payment, to keep your monthly closer to a livable sum, and get equity in a hurry

Check (31%), sort of check and, er, check.

3 AND MOST CRUCIAL. You are in love with the place and can imagine spending the next 10-20 years living in and maintaining it

Check! Just get the asbestos out of the outhouse roof and we'll be laughing. Current occupants have been there since 1965 and raised four kids. If they can...

Cheers, TOMBOT.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

I don't want to say I told you so...

Actually I do.

Chewshabadoo, Monday, 29 September 2008 11:24 (seventeen years ago)

My wife & I bought our first house 2 weeks ago, we're moving in at the end of October. At 36 years of age I've finally got a whole house to do whatever the hell I like in. 4 bedrooms, a cellar, and a 5 minute walk to the city centre. CAN'T FUCKING WAIT.

nate woolls, Monday, 29 September 2008 12:27 (seventeen years ago)

"house are expensive, I can't afford one"

"mobile phones are pretty boring really"

it's a draw!

Autobot Lover (jel --), Monday, 29 September 2008 16:48 (seventeen years ago)

Either conversation is better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. Marginally.

Aimless, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

i know that on most levels these conversations are way boring but the thing is they tend to actually be really useful when youre shopping around for a phone/mortgage--you get to see what other people are doing and paying; what mistakes they made; what theyd recommend... sucks to have to do it i guess but better to have these conversations than to not have them and get fucked on yr payment plan or whatever

Barack HUSSEIN Obama (max), Monday, 29 September 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

The other option is that when the bell tolls the taxpayers of 2025 will wind up paying for it, when our governments go further into debt themselves to bail out failing lenders.

loool

Barack HUSSEIN Obama (max), Monday, 29 September 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.