the ECONOMIC aftermath of Katrina

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Because the other threads are getting too unwieldy, and because I know there are at least a few ILXors out there who could school us in these matters.

First, a piece on Katrina and the oil industry and what may be rigged prices:

http://villagevoice.com/news/0536,ridgewaycolu,67514,2.html

Mondo Washington
Pumping Us Dry
Katrina tragedy is an absolutely perfect storm for oil companies
by James Ridgeway
September 2nd, 2005 9:06 PM

The very first thing George W. Bush did in response to Hurricane Katrina was to offer a helping hand—not to the people stranded on rooftops in New Orleans, but to his friends in the oil industry. These were the same people who gave him $52 million in his last campaign. The president released millions of barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve so the oil companies would have enough fuel to make gas and keep the country going. But the companies don't need this oil. They're already swimming in it.

Pouring more oil into the marketplace didn't reduce gasoline prices, which kept on going up, hitting $4 a gallon in some places.

While crude oil production doubtless was curtailed by the storm, the companies face a surplus, not a shortage, of crude oil. So why dump more on the market?

“Despite growing inventories, U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excluding the Strategic Petroleum Reserve) increased by nearly 5 million barrels over the past 3 weeks,” wrote the federal Energy Information Administration. Continuing in the clipped industry jargon, the agency added, “While this may not appear to be a substantial build, it comes at a time when crude oil inventories typically decline, as refiners use more crude to make gasoline needed for current demand and heating oil as they stock up for the winter.”

Thus, any crude oil inventory increase during the month of August, much less one of five million barrels over a three-week period, might lead one to expect prices to drop. Yet the price for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil has risen by $5 per barrel! If prices don't fall under these conditions, what will make them fall?

All over the world this summer, oilmen raced to dump surplus into the U.S. market, where the rigged prices made them a killing. Oil traders in China, the second biggest world market next to the U.S., were shoving oil into the high-priced U.S. market to make more money. (The U.S. consumes 25 percent of the world market; China 7 percent.)

Fort Worth Star-Telegram columnist Ed Wallace wrote last week that “there's actually weakening demand in Asia over the past two months, so oil is being diverted to the U.S., where it'll bring higher profits.” He quoted Reuters as noting that “Chinese oil trader Unipec resold at least 3 million barrels of August-arriving crude due to reduced refinery demand and was offering more, traders said last week.” Mary Rose Brown, a spokeswoman for Valero in San Antonio, was quoted by The Wall Street Journal as saying, “There is no reason for crude oil to be at $65 a barrel other than hype in the market.”

To be sure, some oil companies face shortages because of the storm, but the release of oil from the strategic reserve may not help them much. “The Capline, a major crude oil pipeline that feeds many Midwest refineries with crude oil from the Gulf of Mexico, is currently shut down due to lack of electricity at many of its pumping stations,” the EIA reported Wednesday. “As a result, one refinery in the Midwest has already reported that it has reduced its production due to a loss in crude oil supply. With the recent Government decision that crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) will be made available to those affected by the hurricane, there may be some relief for refiners that have reduced their production due to loss of crude supply,” the government service dryly continues. “However, they will need to find a way to get the crude oil from the SPR to their refineries.”

What is going on here? The story goes like this: Refineries are increasing their stocks of crude, yet not increasing production of gasoline. This may help explain the high prices. It is an odd situation, since usually, in the summer, refineries are operating full tilt to lay in supplies of gasoline and home heating oil.

The slowing of gasoline production might be due to some unrecognized problems within the refineries. But the industry says it's because of market conditions, with officials noting that while today's crude prices are over $70, in 1999 crude oil was selling at around $12 a barrel. “Refineries lost a lot of money. In fact they lost money for most of the 1990s,” Jeff Morris, president of Alon USA, owner of the Big Spring Refinery, told The Wall Street Journal last week. “People chose not to spend on refineries. So what's affecting us now is that we're behind the investment curve and it will take us five to 10 years to catch up.”

If the companies can't increase their refined products, they could end up turning not to the petroleum reserve but to the European Union. While the U.S. keeps a supply of crude oil in its strategic reserve, the Europeans maintain a stock of gasoline as well as crude. There has been speculation that in a really tight situation, the EU might be called on to export some of that supply to the U.S.

Meanwhile, the high gas prices are adding to the profits of the big companies. Says the watchdog group Public Citizen: “Since George Bush became president in 2001, the top five oil companies [selling gas] in the United States have recorded profits of $254 billion: ExxonMobil: $89 billion, Shell: $60.7 billion, BP: $53 billion, ChevronTexaco: $31 billion, ConocoPhillips: $20 billion.” The group adds: “As Americans shell out more dollars at the pump, the profit margin by U.S. oil refiners has shot up 79% from 1999 (the year Exxon and Mobil merged) to 2004.”

Bush refuses to increase the energy efficiency standards for motor vehicles, which use 70 percent of total oil production, and he recently signed the energy bill that hands out billions in new subsidies to the industry. Even he seems to recognize what a shuck this is: In April, with prices moving ever higher and the Congress debating the energy bill, Bush said, “With $55 oil, we don't need incentives to oil and gas companies.”

But this summer, Congress, with the president's enthusiastic support, adopted a series of new subsidies for the oil and gas industry. “Officially, the energy bill's giveaways are supposed to cost $14.6 billion over the next 10 years, offset in part by $3.1 billion in higher gasoline taxes on consumers,” says Robert S. McIntyre of Citizens for Tax Justice. “But that doesn't include the bill's $70 billion in authorized but unfunded subsidies, for which cash will have to be appropriated later.”

Now they get another handout in the form of the strategic oil reserve. This is a complicated setup whereby rather than paying the federal government (i.e., the general public) for the right to drill oil on public lands, the industry puts some of this oil into the reserve. When times get bad, it then extracts some of the 750 million barrels stored in salt domes under the Texas and Louisiana coasts-with the promise to return it later on. It can therefore get cost-free oil, turn it into gasoline and sell it at high prices, hoping to buy back crude oil later on at lower prices and return it to the reserve.

In addition, the petroleum reserve will buy oil to fill its reservoirs on the market to jack up crude prices. So the industry makes a killing both ways. The public is left shelling out $4 a gallon at the pump.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 8 September 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

james ridgeway is an idiot.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 8 September 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

Clarify.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 8 September 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

this is the guy who last year said dubya would dump cheney for mccain. why anybody reads him is beyond me, he's never correct in anything he asserts, and his grade school look at the oil industry up there ("you'd think higher supply would send prices cheaper!" well no it's a bit more complicated, dude) is pretty pointless reading.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 8 September 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

The estimated insurance payout has gone up from $12bn to $25bn to $35bn, the last figure I saw in an interview printed this morning by the WP Express.

For comparison, the four Florida 'canes last summer ended up resulting in a total payout of about $22bn, Hurricane Andrew resulted in a payout of about $15.5bn, and the payouts in the wake of 9/11 totaled $32bn. So the effective cost of this purely in terms of insurance payouts is looking to top 9/11. That's certainly frightening when you consider the difference in dollar figures for what was likely to be insured in a WTC office space, including life insurance for the personnel, vice what's likely to be insured in NOLA and the surrounding area.

Here's a rundown of payouts from last October after the 4 hit FL:

http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2004/10/01/46438.htm

And I found another story saying that Risk Management Solutions (dorky!) sez the total economic disaster will be in the $100bn range. I think that's optimistic.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

Yeah reskimming that article Hurting posted has just reaffirmed my initial suspicion that duder doesn't understand a whole hell of a lot about the refinery bottleneck or the process by which unleaded gasoline gets to the consumer.

This guy has a much better handle on things:

http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2005/08/katrina-oil-and-gas.html

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

Some highlights from the Stratfor analysis:

A simple way to think about the New Orleans port complex is that it is where the bulk commodities of agriculture go out to the world and the bulk commodities of industrialism come in. The commodity chain of the global food industry starts here, as does that of American industrialism. If these facilities are gone, more than the price of goods shifts: The very physical structure of the global economy would have to be reshaped. Consider the impact to the U.S. auto industry if steel doesn't come up the river, or the effect on global food supplies if U.S. corn and soybeans don't get to the markets.

The problem is that there are no good shipping alternatives. River transport is cheap, and most of the commodities we are discussing have low value-to-weight ratios. The U.S. transport system was built on the assumption that these commodities would travel to and from New Orleans by barge, where they would be loaded on ships or offloaded. Apart from port capacity elsewhere in the United States, there aren't enough trucks or rail cars to handle the long-distance hauling of these enormous quantities -- assuming for the moment that the economics could be managed, which they can't be.

The focus in the media has been on the oil industry in Louisiana and Mississippi. This is not a trivial question, but in a certain sense, it is dwarfed by the shipping issue. First, Louisiana is the source of about 15 percent of U.S.-produced petroleum, much of it from the Gulf. The local refineries are critical to American infrastructure. Were all of these facilities to be lost, the effect on the price of oil worldwide would be extraordinarily painful. If the river itself became unnavigable or if the ports are no longer functioning, however, the impact to the wider economy would be significantly more severe. In a sense, there is more flexibility in oil than in the physical transport of these other commodities.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

Though the doomsday scenario seems to have been averted, don't ask me how. From "PRO FARMER" courtesy Agweb.com:

There are 10 export elevators in the surrounding New Orleans area and 3 "floating rigs" that do not have storage capacity but can load 30,000 to 60,000 bushels of grain per hour from river barges directly on to ocean-going vessels or oceangoing barges. In total, these elevators have a storage capacity of approximately 53 million bushels of grain with a capability of loading 970,000 bushels per hour when fully operational. The operational capacity of the elevators and floating rigs is estimated at 63% as of today, with vessel restrictions (arrivals and departures), slower barge movements and limited staffing minimizing full utilization of loading capacity.

Ships are again moving in the channel. The focus now is on restoring power to facilities, ensuring adequate staffing, and reinstalling navigational aids to ensure safe passage.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)

The Congressional Budget Office has downgraded its projection for growth by about .5%, but that's of course a load of hooey, since I think they're being a little optimistic about the real effect these oil prices are going to have. We're talking about prices that were forcing people to buy gas on credit BEFORE this, and now the floor for a full tank has hit somewhere around $40 for consumers. If people want to be able to buy presents for their kids come Xmas they're going to have to start carpooling. The national savings rate was already fucking ZERO, you can't save less money than ZERO, so in order for consumers to continue spending at the rates they have been they'll be required to go further into debt. Which I think fewer and fewer people are willing to do, since they've maxed out their credit cards and already have the two mortgages. There aren't a lot more borrowing options!

Forbes Newsletter:

...energy cost increases in themselves are thus far not nearly big enough to sink the whole American economy. But coming on top of a collapse in housing prices, they will make a bad situation much worse. Of course, a severe U.S. recession precipitated by a house-price decline will slash energy demand and prices. This will be especially true if accompanied by the likely hard landing in China, where the authorities' attempts to cool that white-hot economy could result in a very cold one.

Inflation-adjusted energy prices are closing in on their 1980s' peaks. Still, they're taking much smaller bites out of consumers due to income gains since then and the ongoing shift of purchases from goods to services. Nevertheless, the brunt of energy-cost leaps is being masked for home owners by rapid house-price appreciation. When the housing bubble breaks, high energy costs will make a bad situation worse.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

NO MORE GANJA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Gabe Tonkin, Thursday, 8 September 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)

now the floor for a full tank has hit somewhere around $40 for consumers.

I'm still well under $40. People be havin' some big ass gas tanks.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 8 September 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Don't forget all the classic blues, jazz and rnb vinyls that will have been destroyed.

noise dud, Thursday, 8 September 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

15 gal capacity for me. 15 gal x $2.70 = $40.50

xpost

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 September 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I was in a Scion xA this weekend which has like a 12 gallon tank, so I was under $40 too, but I figured that was a really, really, really tiny car. Most vehicles have 14 or 15 gallon tanks.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)

I've got a 10 gallon tank, but I filled up a big-ass rental pickup truck a few weeks ago (before Katrina!) and it was $55.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 8 September 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

Barry at the Big Picture has an excellent rundown. Can you tell where I've been getting a lot of my commentary? I only wish CalculatedRisk wasn't on vacation this week.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 8 September 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)

some of this stuff is just starting to come across my desk (I do energy engineering work) and it is not pretty. Some commercial building operators are already seeing 20-25% increases in their monthly energy bills. The energy costs are going to be astronomical for this - adding to an already volatile and unreliable oil market. This is effectively going to "raise the floor", as market analysts say, on all fossil fuel energy production (natural gas, coal, oil, etc.)

Ditch those fossil fuels, people.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 September 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.