― huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)
― huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:18 (twenty years ago)
Therefore, it is undeniably the suck.
― John Justen (johnjusten), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:22 (twenty years ago)
― the happy smile patrol (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:23 (twenty years ago)
― huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:24 (twenty years ago)
Not conventionally winsome enough for you then, Chaki?
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)
― John Justen (johnjusten), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:51 (twenty years ago)
― huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:53 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:54 (twenty years ago)
― Penis Dresden, Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:55 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)
― huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)
Also, I actually have some reservations about this movie (and was certainly underwhelmed) which means that to most people it will be like Gigli!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)
― the happy smile patrol (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 22 September 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)
PS
SPENCER CHOW GETS PUSSY
SPENCER CHOW DIGS MOVIES
AND SO WOULD YOU
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Thursday, 22 September 2005 08:02 (twenty years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 22 September 2005 08:04 (twenty years ago)
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Thursday, 22 September 2005 08:07 (twenty years ago)
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Thursday, 22 September 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)
― sux2bu (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)
You wise, wise man.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)
WOW. That actually impresses me!
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)
Mills came out of the same Grand Royal/X-Large/skating loosely affiliated group as his contemporaries, right? I've seen some of his design stuff and that Air documentary-type thing.
― mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)
I saw a preview of this when I went to Constant Gardener last weekend - Brokeback Mountain I think it's called.
― Josh Love (screamapillar), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)
That's a very scary and disquieting thought. I will definitely go out of my way to avoid this movie.
― O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)
hell yeah. the banner ads all feature some topless chick in a come-hither repose on a bed.
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 September 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)
oh come on now! this just isn't true. it's not as sappy as garden state. if you were to say, it makes you long for the day when the worst that could happen was the director could put the shins on the sdtk, maybe, and while it's not mike leigh, it ain't maid in manhattan either.
This movie is going to make sooooo much money. I almost want to go opening night here so I can count the number of emo kids in line.
i doubt it. i would be very surprised if this movie didn't come and go very quick. even with the barrage of magazine covers, fawning press, pitchfork ads. the movie is just too modest to do too much business.
Is Vince Vaughn playing another variation of Double Down Trent in this?
no. and he does great! tilda swinton is great as usual. d'onofrio does great. ben bratt and keannu reaves both were funny. lou taylor pucci was good and shows promise. the girl was good and good looking too. that's what is so frustrating. how did this not work?!
i have a youthful attachment to mike mills. he made me want to go to cooper union. i was AAAAAANGRYYYYYYYYYY.
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 22 September 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)
but this is a mess! its sloppy and unfinished, full of weird tonal changes (is it a gossamer daydreamy coming of age film? a goofy slapstick teen comedy? a saccharine cameron crowe knockoff? an art movie? a gross out movie?) and bad acting (sorry but vaughn and reeves were terrible as usual). plus, i mean really, the story didn't even make all that much sense!
i adore mills' design and his videos, but after hearing him speak, its obvious he's got some pretty hardline thumbsucker tendencies (trans: he's a bit of a wuss) and so seeing thumbsucker dude (SPOILER ALERT) being put through the paces only to magically recover and find instant success in his chosen vocation set off a few alarm bells. less insipid wish fulfillment, more 'storytelling please!
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:53 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 September 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 September 2005 20:04 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 September 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)
mills is definitely tone deaf, but beautifully shot which has to count for something. i found it frustrating, but certain sequences were quite well handled - the return to depression, for instance.
keanu was the perfect choice for the role - his woodenness *added* to it. vaughan was also passable.
mediocre, but not that bad - i would say worth seeing if you like a good montage, if you've ever wanted to see Big Star's "Thirteen" in a coming of age film sex scene (and a good one, let's be honest), or if you grew up in the Pacific Northwest in the 90s and want to get all drunkenly nostalgic.
(mark p were you at the tiff screening too?)
― yuengling participle (rotten03), Thursday, 22 September 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)
and yeah dave, i was at the tiff screening! not the press one though, the one later in the week. did you see l'enfant or sympathy for lady vengeance? they were my favs.
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 September 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 September 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 23 September 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 23 September 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)
! Truly, I'm amazed.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 September 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 September 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 23 September 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 September 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)
Phew. Okay, I no longer feel bad about missing certain things these days, cause that's one hell of a delay!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 September 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)
if you dont 'like' a movie, stop wasting your time making a whole entire post on it. Aarogant bitches wont shut up and stop complaining. I'd much like to see what you could do.
o and by the way, loved it. and the actors :)
― brittany gorton, Monday, 1 May 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― i'm from hollywood, Monday, 1 May 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 1 May 2006 21:40 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Monday, 1 May 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 1 May 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)
― the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Tuesday, 2 May 2006 07:37 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 2 May 2006 15:18 (nineteen years ago)