Ginger Snaps: CoD (For all you Yanks out there)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So it would appear that a number (for which read at least two) people around here have seen the film Ginger Snaps. Did you find its take on the werewolf myth and the onset of menstruation clever, amusing and not a bit scary - or was just like a Canadian episode of Buffy with Goths?

Apologies to American viewers. The film ain't out there yet. Ho ho - since this is one of the few occasions that happens (apart from arthouse flicks and - for some reason - Memento and O Brother).

Pete, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Well, I gotta say it's a good film up until the last half hour which I would say is more tedious than terrifying. There are some good jokes in there, but I feel it needed a little more humour. The characters are cool, death obsessed sisters, and their death photos are pretty gruesome! So, overall I would give it a 6 out of ten.

james e l, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

saw this last night actually and pretty much agree with the previous posting. Engaging, witty and intelligent for the most part - well acted too. No real moments of terror though.

Disco Dave, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Apart from Bridgette's hair which was terrfying. It was like she had a wolf up there. I liked it a lot and it wasn't too scary. Not as scary as the episode of Buffy I watched last night with the ventriliquist's dummy. Man, that creeped me.

Jonnie, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I enjoyed it a lot. I think it's interesting that two of the films I've enjoyed most this year (Ginger Snaps and Series 7: The Contenders) are basically very good B-movies: cheaply made, plot- driven genre pieces with various odd subtexts... no indie-auteurism or ponderous indulgence.

stevie t, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I didn't see Series 7, despite attempts I always got sidetracked. It looked very interesting, and it also looked like fun. Yep, the point you make about Ginger Snaps being basically a genre B-movie is something which is starting to intrigue me more and more. I am an unashamed fan of genre fiction - both in the cinema and novels - and am getting more and more impressed how sophisticated some of it is getting. Not sophisticated at the expense of telling a rollicking story, but fleshing out characters and throwing honest to god ideas at the screen. I wonder how this plays into the current view of literature and that most despicable of forms "the literary novel". Is it a response to anything in particular (I think we agree that the death of the naval gaving Indie flick is a good thing). Just thinking aloud here folks.

Another question. Are werwolf movies intrinsically difficult to do, considering the beast within subtext pushes audience identification away.

Pete, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

INferior to Paul Naschy in Curse of the Werewolf

Mike Hanle y, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Gingersnaps + milk = yummy!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Not this Ginger Snaps baby. This Ginger Snaps + Milk = head bitten off + milk.

Pete, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Mmmm, they make good pie crust too.

Josh, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

THey are inferior to Italian fudgey centre cookies!

Mike Hanle y, Monday, 16 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

one year passes...
I loved Series 7 too, JtN.

As for Ginger Snaps phenomenal confluence of menstruation mythology, lycanthropy and b-movie schlock. Extremely intelligent and heartbreaking, I thought, about growing into someone you don't want to, who you shouldn't want to, and then eventually the personality-graft takes and whammo!, there's no longer any inside and outside, no Ginger and werewolf, just werewolf.

I have fallen in full love with Emily Perkins (the little sister) too and can we keep saying her name so we can maybe summon her.

Possibly half an hour too long. It has this weird sub-Hollywood look to it too. Like a TV movie look - which, I suppose, would also bring on the B-movie refs.

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 13 April 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

...the beast within subtext pushes audience identification away...

I think, just to pick up on what I said a moment ago, that Ginger Snaps overrides this 'beast within' subtext by placing the beast as the endpoint of the transmogrification: the final iteration: thus when we are at beast stage we've already lost Ginger. So there's no resolve where the moon normally subsides - the only resolve is in the final mutation or the final antidoting of Ginger. There are two characters fighting for the one space which isn't the same as most werewolf movies where normally we do eventually get the human back.

This is why I thought it was a heartbreaking movie about inexorable change. And not necessarily about growing up either, but about growing out.

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 13 April 2003 19:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

The early scenes, the suicide scenes, reminded me a lot of Harold & Maude (obviously) but not so goddamned cloyingly naive, a sort of post-Gen Y version of Harold.

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 13 April 2003 23:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

I mean, it sorta sidesteps that whole issue.

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 14 April 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

ten months pass...
uh.

nawt whawt he said.

the opening credits sequence is brilliant.

I'm watching this again. what watch? it's 2 watch.

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 23 February 2004 02:02 (twenty years ago) link

emily perkins does this little flex, all eyes and attitude, that reminds me of my ex. : /

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 23 February 2004 02:05 (twenty years ago) link

ginger snaps 3: "set in 19th century canada, brigette and her sister ginger take refuge in a traders' fort which later becomes under siege by some savage werewolves..." wtf?

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 23 February 2004 02:46 (twenty years ago) link

i'm trying to remember my favorite line... something like "i had this urge and i thought it was to fuck but now i realize it's to tear things apart."
also, "i can't grow hair, b! that's fucked!"

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 23 February 2004 02:53 (twenty years ago) link

haha! yeah that last line's brilliant. the delivery.

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 23 February 2004 03:14 (twenty years ago) link

*spoilers*

the bit near the end where the good guy has been mauled by ginger and he sits w. his back to the hardboard wall panting heavily, running out of life, is a v. obvious references to a famous scene but I can't remember from what film. the scene has a man, with his back to a wall, panting heavily and slowly running... oh actually it's just come to me, it's a ref. to the scene in terminator 2 where the guy who invented cyberdine is left in the building holding the pin for the explosives and he's slowly running out of breath and when he stops breathing KABLOOEY.

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 23 February 2004 03:34 (twenty years ago) link

unfortunately, the stupid new video by the stupid cooper temple clause features a guy turning into a goat at the end much in the manner of ginger's wolf transformation at the end of the movie. i'm sorry that these two things are now linked in my mind.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 23 February 2004 03:36 (twenty years ago) link

I loved it, I thought the lycanthropy as puberty things was brilliantly done. But wtf is up w/ the prequels?

Sym (shmuel), Monday, 23 February 2004 07:15 (twenty years ago) link

one month passes...
So far, Ginger Snaps 2 is very, very, very bad. Not bad in the way the original was bad during its bad moments. Just crap bad.

Still have no idea how Ginger Snaps 3 manages to be a prequel set in the 19th century starring the sisters.

Tep (ktepi), Saturday, 17 April 2004 21:54 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.