Southwest boots WA state woman off airplane for wearing Bush admin "Meet The F*ckers" t-shirt

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index.htm?cnn=yes

Southwest boots woman for shirt
Lorrie Heasley to sue for being asked to leave a flight because of her politically charged T-shirt.
October 6, 2005: 5:05 PM EDT

A woman's flight home was stopped short because of the message on the T-shirt she was wearing. KRNV's Colin Hackman reports (October 6)

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Southwest Airlines kicked a woman off one of its flights over a political message on her T-shirt, the airline confirmed Thursday, and published reports say the passenger will sue.

Lorrie Heasley, of Woodland, Wash., was asked to leave her flight from Los Angeles to Portland, Ore., Tuesday for wearing a T-shirt with pictures of President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and a phrase similar to the popular film title "Meet the Fockers."

A spokesman for Southwest Airlines told CNN that the airline used the "common sense" approach when they decided to escort Heasley from the plane in Reno, Nevada, during a stopover between Los Angeles and Portland, Ore.

The airline felt that the T-shirt was offensive and that other passengers would be outraged by it, the spokeswoman said, adding that the incident is about "decency."

"I have cousins in Iraq and other relatives going to war," Heasley told the Reno Gazette-Journal. "Here we are trying to free another country and I have to get off an airplane in midflight over a T-shirt. That's not freedom."

According to the airline spokeswoman, Heasley was asked to leave after she refused to cover up her T-shirt, an account that conflicts with Heasley's version in the Gazette-Journal.

Heasley told the newspaper that she agreed to cover her shirt with a sweatshirt, but it slipped as she slept. After she was ordered to wear her T-shirt inside-out or leave, she and her husband chose to leave, the paper said.

The 32-year-old lumber saleswoman said in the report that no one from Southwest said anything about the shirt while she waited near the gate at Los Angeles International Airport, nor did anyone mention the shirt as she boarded the aircraft.

Southwest Airlines spokeswoman Marilee McInnis told the Gazette-Journal that the airline's contract with the Federal Aviation Administration contains rules that say the airline will deny boarding to any customer whose conduct is offensive, abusive, disorderly or violent or for clothing that is "lewd, obscene, or patently offensive."

FAA spokesman Donn Walker told the newspaper that no federal rules exist on the subject.

"It's up to the airlines who they want to take and by what rules," he was quoted as saying. "The government just doesn't get into the business of what people wear on an aircraft."

Heasley wants Southwest to reimburse her and her husband for the last leg of their trip and pay for her gasoline, a $68 rental car from Avis and a $70 hotel bill, according to reports.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Thursday, 6 October 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)

I don't really see what's so offensive about the phrase "Meet The Fickers", though!

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Thursday, 6 October 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)

I don't get it.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 6 October 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

from Southwest's website:

E-mail Policy - Why We Don't Accept E-mail

Call us traditional, but we elect to steer clear of the chat-style, respond-on-demand, quick casual format and focus on meaningful Customer dialogue. This is not because we don't care. It's because that style counters our commitment to Customer Service.

Our Customers deserve accurate, specific, personal, and professionally written answers, and it takes time to research, investigate, and compose a real business letter. We answer every letter we receive in the order it arrives, and we streamline in order to keep our costs low, our People productive, our operating efficiency high, and our responses warm and personal.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:05 (twenty years ago)

Ironically, this happened in Reno, the only city were two separate people showed me his/her genitals on the street while I was driving out of town.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:10 (twenty years ago)

"...I have to get off an airplane in midflight over a T-shirt..."

That is cruel and unusual.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

wait, did it actually say "f*ckers" or did it say "fuckers"?

it was a different shark (wetmink2), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)

This is the same airline who is currently being sued by an overweight woman who was pulled off a flight by the flight attendants and tell her she had to purchase another ticket, even though she fit into the seat and could buckle her seat belt and never had to purchase an extra seat on any other airline.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

My grandma runs Southwest! Whodathought?

(My grandmother is a life long Republican who has a prejudice against anyone who looks heavier than slim.)

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

As much as I disagree with Southwest for kicking her off the plane on account of her wardrobe, I agree that the airline had a right to do it. What if her shirt had said "Fuck Southwest Airlines"? What if she had complied by simply taking off her shirt and falling asleep wearing only her bra? Again, I support all of that, but I also see Southwest's point-of-view.

Furthermore, what little humor that was derived from the title of Meet the Fockers is completely vanquished by that shirt. It's the liberal equivalent of a "Mallard Fillmore" cartoon. For that alone, I would've kicked her ass off.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:57 (twenty years ago)

There was a guy at work today with a "Fuck Cars" t-shirt. He didn't get fired. That's the difference between M_____ft and Southwest, I guess.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Thursday, 6 October 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)

I'm much more sympathetic with SWA if the shirt said "fuckers". If it actually had the star and said "f*ckers", then they kicked her off for purely political reasons and it had nothing to do with obscenity. At first I read this thread like it said "f*ckers", but rereading it I get the impression it said "fuckers".

it was a different shark (wetmink2), Friday, 7 October 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)

If it was "Fuck The Cars" then he'd have some explaining to do.

it was a different shark (wetmink2), Friday, 7 October 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)

I used "*" because I can't PROVE it said "fuckers", technically.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Friday, 7 October 2005 00:13 (twenty years ago)

Heather Armstrong can (or doesn't care).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 7 October 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)

If they don't have a stated policy about this, I believe they have opened a major can of worms. She could have turned the shirt inside out, if they were that offended.

Jaq (Jaq), Friday, 7 October 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)

As if anyone needed another reason not to fly Southwest. . .and BTW, I don't have my Skyguide handy, but there have to be at least two other airlines not named 'Southwest' flying direct LAX-PDX. Why are we stopping in Reno?

Jeff Wright (JeffW1858), Friday, 7 October 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)

And somewhere in America a lawyer is slobbering over a bone...

Earl Nash (earlnash), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

All I saw was the report from CNN which suggested that the shirt basically said Fockers except "with one very important vowel replaced by another one."

So, I guess the shirt might've read "Fockurs".

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)

Like Tupac Fockur?

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

xpost The article says they told her she could turn it inside out.

She will, and should, lose this case. I agree with her shirt, but not with her.

Whatever.

giboyeux (skowly), Friday, 7 October 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.