I resent the assumption that I am excited about "Fitzmas"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
for fucks sake

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

cf NRO, sullivan, etc... is this how republicans feel when dems insinuate they cant stand homos and coloreds???

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)

I think it's probably the only way the GOP types *can* react now. About the only other note I saw was a desperate peep (quickly quashed) that Wilson might go down as well. But maybe there won't be any indictments at all! And fuck a 'Fitzmas' as a term.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, it's not very inclusive to talk about Fitzmas without also mentioned Fitzhanukkah and Fitzkwanzaa.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

God, "Fitzmas." Grr. The blogosphere has a lot to answer for. (Including the word "blogosphere," for that matter.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)

cmon yall lets sing FITZMAS CAROLS!!!!! did the (non-hippie/gonzo) left behave this shamefully during watergate?

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

What exactly is wrong with 'Fitzmas'?

Somebody posted a long explanation about how it is a celebration of government corruption, which is of course wrong.

But that's not what Fitzmas is. Fitzmas is a celebration of justice being done against all odds.

And what is wrong with that?

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

Er, I should mention that the "long explanation" was posted on DailyKos, not here.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

well clinton perjured himself & was impeached for it, how do you feel about republicans throwing starramadan/lewinskwanzaa parties for that? its shamelessly vindictive, uncivil and partisan

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

ethan, do you even know what "perjury" is?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)

oh yes, a few liberal/democratic blogs tossing around an admittedly silly term is EXACTLY equal to an out-of-control prosecutor's multi-million panty-sniffing raid.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

tad youre an idiot. i was comparing the right's reaction to clintons prosecution vs left's reaction to bush admin prosecution, not the left's reaction vs clinton's prosecution. and yeah i was 14 at the time so i vaguely remember some unfair punditry from the right, limbaugh was nuts & its where coulter made her name after all, but this 'fitzmas' bullshit is just sad.

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)

I hate the Fitzmas stuff for the same reason I hate dippy words like Rethugnicant and Dumbya -- it's juvenile and reduces the whole thing to playground nyah-nyahs. Not that I mind a little schadenfreude, but do we have to talk about it like 11-year-olds?

Also, whatever comes out of all this is only going to be a pale, watery version of "justice." The only important thing about the whole case -- and the reason I'm glad it's come this far -- is the re-evaluation and reconstruction of all the deceptions in the lead-up to the war. So I'm happy for that. But it's not like Don Rumsfeld's going to lose his job or anything.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)

i am ****shocked**** that tad would defend something you associate with words like rethugnicant and dumbya

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

gypsa mothra, you're right, it won't be real capital-J 'Justice'. Do we ever get that in our legal system though? I'd venture to say it doesn't happen. Certainly in my personal experiences with courts, I'd say it hasn't been Just. But hey, you take what you can get. A step in the right direction is still the right direction. Even if it's only a step.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

I don't buy the critique of Fitzmas being "shamelessly vindictive, uncivil and partisan." Well, I suppose those things are true, but they are completely appropriate.

Let's look at what Fitzmas is in the eyes of those using the term: a bringing of justice to an administration who...
- Used lies to launch an unjust war
- Cover up those lies with treason
and on top of THAT...
- Clinton-esque perjury and obstruction of justice

In other words, Fitzmas, although juvenile as gypsa mothra pointed out, is a celebration of the bringing to justice of VERY SERIOUS matters. So, what is wrong with being vindictive, uncivil, and partisan?

Were people who celebrated the capture of Saddam Hussein vindictive, uncivil, and partisan? The downfall of Hitler?

What is the appropriate response to this?

"Ho hum, it appears there have been some indictments in the government. This will be a good time to indulge myself in some green tea and perhaps listen to some Michael Bolton."

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

[DISCLAIMER: I in no way intend to equate George Bush to Saddam Hussein or Hitler. My point is simply that in the eyes of those who talk about "Fitzmas" this is a very serious matter involving thousands upon thousands of deaths. Matters like that warrant a strong response. The response thus far has been rage for the past five years. Now, a little bit of celebration, and there ain't a damn problem with that.]

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)

I'd only think about slightly celebrating *after* you knew whether there were actual indictments or not.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 October 2005 01:37 (twenty years ago)

Ned, at this point I can't imagine there won't be indictments. All clues point to that conclusion.

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 10:19 (twenty years ago)

What does Fitzmas mean?

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 October 2005 10:55 (twenty years ago)

Fitzgerald is the name of the prosecutor in the case investigating whether any crimes were committed by people in the government who leaked the name of Valerie Plame, an undercover CIA operative, to Bob Novak and other journalists several years ago.

The miracle of Fitzmas (Christmas...) is the day, probably today, that Fitzgerald will bring indictments against people in the administration.

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 11:02 (twenty years ago)

see, wasnt that humiliating?

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)

There's a joke about Cracker in here somewhere, isn't there?

Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 27 October 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

There is nothing humiliating about the miracle of Fitzmas! If I wasn't so sick right now and skipping class, I would go frolic in the grass for pure ecstatic catharsis!

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)

its like the liberation of auschwitz x10000!!!

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)

did the (non-hippie/gonzo) left behave this shamefully during watergate?

to be honest i'm still not sure what you're talking about... examples? (not from this thread please... and not from blogs either if possible)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)

For a second I'm all 'I don't think you need to worry about providing blog examples from the Watergate era.'

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)

i'm waiting for this generation's bloggergate

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)

i dont mean shameful like on the political dishonor tip im just annoyed by corny, nerdy, unfunny "fitzmas carols" bullshit representing the left's reaction to what seems to be an worthwhile, scrupulous & notably unpartisan investigation

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:45 (twenty years ago)

s1ocki, there are no examples because _ is really overreacting. I don't believe the term "Fitzmas" has been mentioned a single time in mainstream media, but I may be wrong.

Here is pretty much a summary of what Fitzmas is, all of it exclusively limited to a few popular liberal blogs:

- Somebody photoshopped a Santa hat onto a picture of Fitz writing and captioned it "he's writing a list of who's been naughty and who's been nice" (I lol'd)

- A couple parodies of Christmas carols

- The word used as a synonym for indictments in conversation ("Think Fitzmas will be tomorrow?")

How shameful! Vindictive! Partisan! Uncivil! Completely unprecedented!

Why does political discourse have to be so serious all the time? I am loving this.

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

and yeah i was 14 at the time so i vaguely remember some unfair punditry from the right, limbaugh was nuts & its where coulter made her name after all, but this 'fitzmas' bullshit is just sad

Your general point about Fitzmas being stupid is totally OTM, but if you think this schadenfreude is more shameful than what was going on during the Lewinsky thing you're just flat-out wrong. I remember tut-tutting about oral sex from a bunch of wacked out nutjobs. I remember talking heads, pols, and average joes alike screaming bullshit about the rule of law. I remember my republican co-workers CHEERING when the articles of impeachment were return because they had "finally nabbed that draft-dodging bastard." The coverage of the whole *thing* was unfair.

(dammit xpost that shoots my whole point since ethan was talking about something else I guess but I'm posting this anyway)

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:49 (twenty years ago)

avoiding corniness and nerdiness is the first step to justice. David Banner for Senate.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

also, the under-25 know-littles of DailyKos = the American left

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:53 (twenty years ago)

remember the public reaction to republican's lip-smacking delight at clinton's impeachment was to sympathize with him! maybe the dems shouldnt cheapen their only gain of political capital in 5 years for the sake of a dumb unfunny joke!

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)

the fitzmas thing was picked up by national review, which is what ive been referring to

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:55 (twenty years ago)

Screw Fitzmas; when is Yom Kimpeachment happening?

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

J, OTM.

Fitzmas is nothing but a nerdy little joke by politically obsessed people who live and breathe politics about a very, very serious matter. And what's wrong with that?

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)

Hark at yonder kimpeachment.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)

did the (non-hippie/gonzo) left behave this shamefully during watergate?

the left delighted in watergate, if that's what you mean. but i suppose we should concern ourselves with that shamefulness, and not the attorney general threatening (vaguely sexual) violence against the publisher of the major newspaper on the story. or, you know, the lawbreaking for political ends.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 October 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)

remember the public reaction to republican's lip-smacking delight at clinton's impeachment was to sympathize with him

Um, no. They wanted him beat up, but still President. Which is what happened. They didn't sympathize with him as much as do what they always do with celebrities in scandals--they shamed him and forgave him while feeling all superior and good about themselves for doing so.

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

gabbneb, exactly.

This thread reminds me of the right wing talking point, constantly used by National Review:

"Yeah, we said something that is pretty much explicitly racist, this is true. BUT, look at how the left is shamelessly launching a character attack against us using said quote! That is the true story here. The real bigots are the intolerant left and how they squelch all dissent. My mom is making me go clean my room, but when I get back look forward to an enlightening essay on how the left are neo-Trotskyite fascists."

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/20/impeachment.poll/

In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.

That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had.

At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP.

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

approval =/ sympathy

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

so what motivated america's approval of a man impached for perjury & obstruction who blatantly lied to the american people in a clip that played endlessly on every tv channel for 18 months? it had nothing to do with bloodthirsty, unprofessional behavior from the right?

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

Actually, the more I think about it, the more that poll supports what I was saying above, and the more it argues that this situation is totally different. That article quotes all a bunch of newspapers basically shaming Clinton but saying that impeachment over something that stupid wasn't god for the country--which is in line with what I was saying. The people wanted him beat up but the right overreached in impeaching him. I don't think that's sympathy, it's common sense.

Whereas prosecuting officials for outing a CIA noc for political revenge against somebody who pointed out evidence that the goverment had lied to the public about the necessity for a war . . . well, seems like a different kettle of fish, wouldn't you say?

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

my point was just that stupid, selfish glee over failures in the american system will always blow up in the faces of the attackers, this is how the right gets away with smearing the left as america-haters who throw a brie & champagne party with every new bush fuck-up or soldier killed in iraq

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

which would be a moot point if the "fitzmas" crap was actually FUNNY but it aint

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

I know. But I think you might be painting with too broad a brush. As I said, "Fitzmas" is stupid, but I'm not sure that taken comfort in the fact that a few of these bastards might actually be called on the carpet and as a result that we might have another opportunity to persuade the media to actually directly state the truth about WMD and the war -- well, that puts a smile on my face. It excites me a little bit. It gives energy to the dems in the base who've been getting kicked in the teeth for the past six years and have had to watch these self-rightous assholes without any morals do horrible things while acting like saintly victims. I don't think the left needs to feel sorry about that. It's not a sin to point out that they are evil and wrong and have killed 2,002 Americans unnecessarily just because the y're going to spin it against us when we do. They're going to spin it against us whether we do or not!

(xpost - true dat!)

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

but they aren't celebrating the fuckup, they're celebrating the possible prosection of the fuckup. why can you not see this?

and no, 'fitzmas' is not funny. its a pun. they rarely are.

foxy boxer (stevie), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

_, do you really think the Fitzmas phenomena is anywhere near along the same levels as the Clinton/Republican analogy you're drawing?

You're acting as if Harry Reid is posing on the steps of Congress with a "FITZMAS ACCOMPLISHED" banner and drafting legislation to make Fitzmas an official holiday.

Can I remind you that it's nothing but a joke on a few blogs? Hell, some of the people who clicked on this thread and decided to post here didn't even know what "Fitzmas" is. Look at how many people are even posting on this thread. Only a tiny handful of the people who post on ILE even care enough about Fitzmas to open up the conversation. Will you even remember this a few years down the road? Have some reason, man.

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

It's like Men in Black but not.

Perhaps not an x-post.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

Dan it's pretty good:

1) It makes utterly no sense
2) black guy/gimpy guy arch being the only means of communication through 99% of the film
3) Salma Hayek's ass
4) Yeah mechanical spiders, wtf?

It's somewhat better than Around the World in 80 Days but that film had Jackie Chan.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

NEW GOAL IN LIFE

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

but what does dr. morbius think?

_, Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

john ford made at least 10 better westerns than wild wild west, not that undermedicated ILX would care

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

Is Wild Wild West actually a western?

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

john ford made wild wild west?!

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)


Robert Conrad roolz

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

Guys, when I said "arch" I meant "arc" and I just didn't wanna mislead anyone into seeing this movie if it was based off use of the word "arch".

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

Dan's crazy about the theme song already, IIRC

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

Wild wild wuss.

So so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

Gah the search is f#cked but I swear I remember Dan crowing about that song. I tried searching Google, turning up this, which I THINK NEEDS EXPLAINING.

"I m doind a projest on the Black widow spider and Tarentula Hispanica Could anyone help me with good pictures of these spiders and or information in there feeding habitat mating etc many thanks DJPERRY" http://www.atshq.org/search/searchindex.dat

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Surely you projest.

So so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

nicole you are reaching haiku-like levels here

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)

As long as it's not custos-ian.

So so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 27 October 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

nah, paste??

ok, found it. This was posted on the Tuesday after Kanye's appearance.

...The big question will be how the Grammys receive "Late Registration," an album that's landed him on the cover of Time magazine. How will the awards judges handle all the samples and guest appearances?

West's big hit single, "Diamonds From Sierra Leone," is completely based on Shirley Bassey singing "Diamonds Are Forever." The song was written by James Bond composer John Barry.

The rest of "Late Registration," while very entertaining, contains almost no original compositions.

[...]

Will all these people be listed as Grammy nominees when the time comes? If there are winners, will they all be included? That's something I'd like to see.

"Late Registration" is fun to listen to, but in many ways it's a con job. It's a clip job, too.

Try to imagine Marvin Gaye not composing all of "What's Going On?" but splicing together other people's music and recordings over which he'd chant his musings. He would have been laughed out of the business.

But times have changed. We have Alicia Keys, Anthony Hamilton, Legend and just a few R&B performers who can actually create music. The rest has to be a clever construction....

kingfish neopolitan sundae (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

HORSESHIT

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

My sources are relaying to me information that may be very good news re: the Plame Case.
Although I cannot substantiate this info 100%, I am receiving this from sources very close to the investigation and grand jury:


No indictments for Rove, Libby or any member of the administration.

Pobable indictments for Vallerie Plame, Joseph Wilson and one as yet unknown high ranking Congressional Democrat.

No wrong doing or misuse of intelligence on the part of the administration.

Possible criminal conduct in an attempt to smear the White House on the part of Congressional Democrats, Plame and Wilson.

(Again, take this with a grain of salt but this is what I am hearing from my sources and the D.C. grape vine)


http://dc-insider.redstate.org/story/2005/10/26/14141/332

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)

Grain of salt, huh?

kingfish neopolitan sundae (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)

What's hilarious is how some of the RedStaters believe it. Right-wing political nerds truly live in a different world from the rest of us.

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 27 October 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

It's not just the rightwing political nerds, tho. It seems like every group has a subsection with folks who're just a little too sheltered/isolated/insular/incestuous for their own good. It's kinda like that marxist chick you would pass by on campus every once in a while, the one who only hang out with her MIM Notes friends and no one else.

But yeah, some of 'em are REALLY out there. Another example, google the folks who rant on about "deliberate childlessness."

kingfish neopolitan sundae (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 27 October 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

http://americablog.blogspot.com/treasons_greetingscard2blog.jpg

Mickey (modestmickey), Friday, 28 October 2005 01:11 (twenty years ago)

times reporting rove will avoid indictment. libby, however, will not.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Friday, 28 October 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)

What a difference a week makes! Last week, liberals were expecting big things. They were counting on special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and the White House to do their work for them.

On Friday, Fitzgerald was supposed to indict Karl Rove. Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were going to be named unindicted co-conspirators. Maybe Condoleezza Rice, too. Who knew – maybe even Clarence Thomas. There was even talk of a posthumous indictment for Nixon.

It was going to be Fitzmas Day! (Which is much like Christmas except instead of having her baby in a manger, the woman has a late-term abortion.) Oh, it was hard to fall asleep on Fitzmas Eve!

But Friday came, and only Irve Lewis Libby was accused of committing any crimes. They were all crimes like perjury and obstruction of justice, personal to Libby, unrelated to the administration.

Fitzmas sucked. Instead of GI Joe and Mr. Machine, all Democrats got was a lousy cardigan sweater.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47194

_, Tuesday, 8 November 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

Oh Ann -- still stubborn as a mule, and half as smart.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

Ethan, really? All the liberal commentary I read was pretty positive. For me it was certainly a positive Fitzmas. I sure was happy with it, as was everyone else I know.

And what makes you think it's over? That was only the first day of Fitzmas. Rove is still under investigation, and that's a fact. Plamegate isn't over, not by a long shot.

Mickey (modestmickey), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

do you want me to ask those questions to ann coulter? are you implying we're the same person?

_, Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

"For me it was certainly a positive Fitzmas. I sure was happy with it, as was everyone else I know."

A+++ FAST SHIPPING GREAT SELLER WOULD BUY FROM AGAIN

_, Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

What's a "Mr. Machine"? Is that like a Steve Austin Six Million Dollar Man action figure?

kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
lmao

$#@!!!, Wednesday, 28 December 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

?

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

there's still 3 and a half days left for a new year's fitz!

dali madison's nut (donut), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)


of course a bunch of mob guys got busted in the meantime.....

patrick bateman (mickeygraft), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)

who says Fitzmas is over? Fitz is still looking into Karl Rove with a whole new grand jury. this isn't over, people. Fitzmas comes more than once a year, bitches!

Mickey (modestmickey), Thursday, 29 December 2005 06:30 (twenty years ago)

don't front, Mickey. you and i both know that everyone using 'Fitzmas' back around Halloween was expecting 22 indictments on December 25. just admit you were sonned by a famous rapper over usenet beef.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:51 (twenty years ago)

this thread only got good when the wild wild west talk started

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 29 December 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

tho ethan sonning tad was enjoyable in its own right

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 29 December 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

Fitzmas is all about the joy of the miracle of sonning

Mickey (modestmickey), Friday, 30 December 2005 04:37 (twenty years ago)

Never drum on a white lady's boobies at a redneck dance, jess.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 30 December 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

too late :-(

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

Capt. James West: [Whistles] I'd like to have everyone's attention for a moment. It seems we have had series of major misunderstandings here tonight. First of all, the whole "drummin' on the boobies" thing. Now in my native land...
Someone in crowd: Georgia?
Capt. James West: Africa. We use drums to communicate between villages. And as you can see by this gal, we could communicate all the way to Baton Rouge. Hell, on a clear night, we might even get Galveston. All I was saying to the gal was, "Hi, how ya doing? My name's Jim. How's your momma?" Then there was the whole "Redneck" comment. And I'm sensing that you took that negatively. But let's break down that word "Redneck". First word red, color of power, fire, passion. Second word neck... neck... hey I can't think of nothing for neck right now, but without that you still got red and that's something to be proud of.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

i resent the assumption that i am excited about "drummin' on the boobies"

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

You're not even from Georgia.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:13 (twenty years ago)

no but i am from africa

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

http://hitparade.ch/cdimg/toto-africa_s.jpg

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:15 (twenty years ago)

when vests walked the earth

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

Hurry boy, she's waiting there for you.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

ok, if i'm honest, i'll drum on just about anything

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)

"he's a tapper." - my mom

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 December 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

Is that a riddle? "If I'm honest, I'll drum on just about anything. If I'm a liar, I won't."

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 30 December 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.