Do you know why guys are all complaining? You see a picture on the news or the Internet and they see someone who is shackled and blindfolded and walking with two armed guards behind razor wire. You think this picture tells you they are treated unfairly.
Here is what I see...
I see a thin, sickly looking person who was cleaned up, given a haircut to prevent infestation of parasites, and given new clothes and shoes to wear. I see a person who is given three nutritious meals per day and a bed to sleep in a tropical climate, not the cold desert floor of Iraq, eating worms, bugs, and goat. I see a person who will be able to get relief from their pains and illnesses without paying a dime for medical expenses. They will get rest, educated, and their mental stress levels will have dropped tremendously because they were taken out of a combat area and will not be shot at again.
I see these people blindfolded and shackled behind razor wire. I have the intellectual ability to understand why they are this way. For those that do not have this ability, let me explain it to you. They are blindfolded to protect OUR U.S. SOLDIERS from further harm. These people can not plan to destroy something if they can not see it. They are shackled because these same people have proven they will easily give up their lives to kill just ONE AMERICAN. We are protecting their life as well as our own. The razor wire is a mental deterrent, just like the little alarm company warning signs most of you out there have on your home, but don't have the actual alarm system. You would think many times over before actually trying to cross that razor wire. For all of you people out there thinking how bad these poor detainees have it under such strict guard, you need to do a lot more thinking about other things in your life.
I was born on September 11th, 1957, and every birthday I have from now on will never be a happy one. Why, you ask? Because as I am out somewhere trying to have a nice dinner, someone will have a candle or a ribbon or something, crying about the anniversary of a national tragedy. And then I will think, about how insignificant my one little birthday actually is compared to everything else that had happened on that one day.
It baffles my mind that there are actually people out there in this world, on internet websites, in leadership positions, head of companies that actually think that we are doing something wrong when it comes to protecting our nation and our people. These same people will be the first ones to complain about something that happens to them when they are vacationing outside this country. They will ask why the U.S. does not do anything about their misfortune. These are the same people that complain about taxes and how bad their lives actually are. What do you all think of that?
― Michael Thomas, Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:44 (nineteen years ago)
It doesn't matter if one person or a million people died on the same say as your birthday.
There will always be at least one person who regards your happy birthday as insignificant. Someone they knew died. Or left for their secretary. Or did something shitty to them.
If you're lucky, you mght have at least one person who wants to make it a happy occasion.
Grief is private. These people remembering have no need for you to join in.
You go off to your restaurant. They won't be there.
Right, someone else do the "Guantanamo Bay" perspective.
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
The argument is not whether there are people who wish to kill Americans. The argument is whether we truly live up to the higher standard we claim in comparison.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in Novosibirsk (ex machina), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:53 (nineteen years ago)
Pardon us, Sir, for we are but simple goatherders
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:53 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:53 (nineteen years ago)
Well that's a big fat drag.
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Thomas, Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:01 (nineteen years ago)
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
PH33L MY PA1N!!!!
― We might force K8 to change her name to Marie. (kate), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:06 (nineteen years ago)
If they're now licensing from the AMG database for CD reviews, then yep, I'm him, unless there's a clone of me going around. ;-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:07 (nineteen years ago)
― rush, push, cash (FE7), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
he had us! we are pwned!
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
Silly us.
― We might force K8 to change her name to Marie. (kate), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
I imagine some Taliban militia find RPG's very relaxing.
― andy --, Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:18 (nineteen years ago)
No one ever suspects the blind man!
― mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
---http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/5247/storemullah7sg.gif
http://store.rushlimbaugh.com/Products.aspx?ParentID=48661
The Club G'itmo T-Shirt - My Mullah went to Club G'itmo and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt
Illustrate absurdity by being absurd. This one will really get under the skin of the lib next-door. Club G'itmo logo on front "My Mullah went to Club G'itmo and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt" emblazoned on back. Available in Institutional Orange only in sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL, and now in XXXL & XXXXL!
The Club G'itmo T-Shirt - Your Tropical Retreat from the Stress of Jihad
Illustrate absurdity by being absurd! Wear your Club G'itmo T-shirt and drive liberals nuts. Club G'itmo logo on front. "Your Tropical Retreat from the Stress of Jihad" emblazoned on back. Available in Institutional Orange only in sizes:S, M, L, XL, XXL, and now in XXXL & XXXXL!
The Club G'itmo T-Shirt - I Got My Free Koran and Prayer Rug at G'itmo
The left will throw a fit over this one. Club G'itmo logo on front. "I got my free Koran and prayer rug at Gitmo" emblazoned on back. Available in Institutional Orange only in sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL, and now in XXXL & XXXXL!
The Club G'itmo T-Shirt - What Happens in G'itmo Stays in G'itmo
A MUST Have. Club G'itmo logo on front. "What Happens in G'itmo stays in G'itmo emblazoned on back." Available in Institutional Orange only in sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL, and now in XXXL & XXXXL!
---
they're now even available for XXXL _AND_ XXXXL! Even the Big Dogs can wear them!
Also, where do you stand on the whole "lite-stick sodomizing" or "raping your male prisoners" thing?
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
CIA uses secret prisons abroad: report
By Joanne Allen 36 minutes ago WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The CIA has been hiding and interrogating al Qaeda captives at a secret facility in Eastern Europe, part of a covert global prison system that has included sites in eight countries and was set up after the September 11, 2001, attacks, The Washington Post reported on Wednesday. The secret network included "several democracies in Eastern Europe" as well as Thailand and Afghanistan, the newspaper reported, but it did not publish the names of the European countries at the request of senior U.S. officials...[...]'BLACK SITES'According to the Washington Post, the prisons are referred to as "black sites" in classified U.S. documents and virtually nothing is known about who the detainees are, how they are interrogated or about decisions on how long they will be held.About 30 major terrorism suspects have been held at black sites while more than 70 other detainees, considered less important, were delivered to foreign intelligence services under a process known as "rendition," the paper said, citing U.S. and foreign intelligence sources.The top 30 al Qaeda prisoners are isolated from the outside world, have no recognized legal rights and no one outside the CIA is allowed to talk with or see them, the sources told the newspaper.The paper, citing several former and current intelligence and other U.S. government officials, said the CIA used such detention centers abroad because in the United States it is illegal to hold prisoners in such isolation...
The secret network included "several democracies in Eastern Europe" as well as Thailand and Afghanistan, the newspaper reported, but it did not publish the names of the European countries at the request of senior U.S. officials...
[...]
'BLACK SITES'
According to the Washington Post, the prisons are referred to as "black sites" in classified U.S. documents and virtually nothing is known about who the detainees are, how they are interrogated or about decisions on how long they will be held.
About 30 major terrorism suspects have been held at black sites while more than 70 other detainees, considered less important, were delivered to foreign intelligence services under a process known as "rendition," the paper said, citing U.S. and foreign intelligence sources.
The top 30 al Qaeda prisoners are isolated from the outside world, have no recognized legal rights and no one outside the CIA is allowed to talk with or see them, the sources told the newspaper.
The paper, citing several former and current intelligence and other U.S. government officials, said the CIA used such detention centers abroad because in the United States it is illegal to hold prisoners in such isolation...
I guess Poland HAS been helping out!
Oh yeah, and Cheney is still pushing to exempt CIA folks from the John McCain's anti-torture legislation...
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago)
Can somebody explain to me why American interrogation techniques seem to always involve sticking objects up prisoners' asses? This has got to be some sort of "method" because it is reported over and over again...
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:59 (nineteen years ago)
[talking about reports of violent force-feedings of the Gitmo prisoners and Rumsfeld's casual dismissals of it all]
...If even one American were held prisoner in the same way by another country, and if even one American were force-fed in the manner some of these prisoners are alleged to have been, can you imagine the outrage that would erupt from the administration -- outrage that would be immediately amplified by the rightwing media? It would be deafening.
But these people...well, they're not our kind, of course. They're not at all like us. They're barely even human. Who cares?
Almost no one, including most Americans. And since the administration views itself as inherently and unquestionably good, noble and virtuous, nothing it does could possibly be wrong. If you dare to suggest such a thing...why, one of these days, you might end up in Guantanamo yourself....
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in Novosibirsk (ex machina), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:25 (nineteen years ago)
Your trivialisation of these issues is astounding and actually quite sickening. Read some history books and Amnesty International reports before making uninformed, chauvinistic, confused and offensive comments.
And don't EVER condescend to ILX again. Your "intellectual ability" would not even rate on a graph compared to all of the great intellects on this board.
― salexander / sofia (salexander), Thursday, 3 November 2005 02:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Kodanshi, Thursday, 3 November 2005 12:52 (nineteen years ago)
oh yeah, and this:
The vice president drew support from at least one lawmaker, Sen. Jeff Sessions (news, bio, voting record) of Alabama, while Arizona Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record) dissented, officials said....
― kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 4 November 2005 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
Incident reports reviewed by The Associated Press indicate Military Police guards are routinely head-butted, spat upon and doused by "cocktails" of feces, urine, vomit and sperm collected in meal cups by the prisoners.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
most played track on condi's ipod = super roots 7
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 23:54 (seventeen years ago)
george bush cares about black people
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 23:57 (seventeen years ago)
george bush is a compassionate conservative
george bush is a uniter, not a divider
george bush is The Decider
george bush will not stand for a nucular Iran
― Aimless, Thursday, 7 February 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)
Army Col. Larry James, whose team of psychologists assists interrogators, said he does not want to know where Camp 7 is.
"I learned a long, long time ago, if I'm going to be successful in the intel community, I'm meticulously — in a very, very dedicated way — going to stay in my lane," he said. "So if I don't have a specific need to know about something, I don't want to know about it. I don't ask about it."
Sheesh, way to go Army Col. Larry James.
― Z S, Thursday, 7 February 2008 01:55 (seventeen years ago)
"hey, I just work here"
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 7 February 2008 01:56 (seventeen years ago)
Befehl ist Befehl
― max, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:30 (seventeen years ago)
I wish I could find that Bush speech on Iraq where he talked about how no Baathists would be able to say they were "just doing their jobs"
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:38 (seventeen years ago)
not the cold desert floor of Iraq, eating worms, bugs, and goat.
Goat meat's nice!
― chap, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:39 (seventeen years ago)
http://z.about.com/d/movies/1/0/c/o/N/goodgermanposter2.jpg
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 7 February 2008 02:40 (seventeen years ago)
also: look at this waterboarding cat, proving it isn't torture at all:
http://i25.tinypic.com/2vn03de.jpg
― StanM, Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:32 (seventeen years ago)
haha
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:39 (seventeen years ago)
aww
― latebloomer, Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:41 (seventeen years ago)
"waterboarding" is the new "dirty bomb," i.e. unintentionally funny terror-related buzzword
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:46 (seventeen years ago)
Ten years today
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/10/guantanamo-bay-anniversary_n_1197661.html
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 16:46 (thirteen years ago)
GuantanamoHe googled GuantanamoGuantanamo-oHe was just some random schmo
― Oh shit, that's my bone! (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 17:53 (thirteen years ago)
lol this was me
― and what
― buzza, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 18:12 (thirteen years ago)
scumbags.
Last week, the Obama administration imposed new arbitrary rules for Guantanamo detainees who have lost their first habeas corpus challenge. Those new rules eliminate the right of lawyers to visit their clients at the detention facility; the old rules establishing that right were in place since 2004, and were bolstered by the Supreme Court’s 2008 Boumediene ruling that detainees were entitled to a “meaningful” opportunity to contest the legality of their detention. The DOJ recently informed a lawyer for a Yemeni detainee, Yasein Khasem Mohammad Esmail, that he would be barred from visiting his client unless he agreed to a new regime of restrictive rules, including acknowledging that such visits are within the sole discretion of the camp’s military commander. Moreover, as SCOTUSblog’s Lyle Denniston explains:
Besides putting control over legal contacts entirely under a military commander’s control, the “memorandum of understanding” does not allow attorneys to share with other detainee lawyers what they learn, and does not appear to allow them to use any such information to help prepare their own client for a system of periodic review at Guantanamo of whether continued detention is justified, and may even forbid the use of such information to help prepare a defense to formal terrorism criminal charges against their client.
The New York Times Editorial Page today denounced these new rules as “spiteful,” cited it as “the Obama administration’s latest overuse of executive authority,” and said “the administration looks as if it is imperiously punishing detainees for their temerity in bringing legal challenges to their detention and losing.” Detainee lawyers are refusing to submit to these new rules and are asking a federal court to rule that they violate the detainees’ right to legal counsel.
http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/the_obama_gitmo_myth/
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 July 2012 16:51 (thirteen years ago)
otm
― tallarico dreams (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 23 July 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/11/guantanamo-prisoner-death-democrats
― kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 September 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)
The State Department on Monday reassigned Daniel Fried, the special envoy for closing the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and will not replace him, according to an internal personnel announcement...Mr. Fried will become the department’s coordinator for sanctions policy and will work on issues including Iran and Syria.
http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/01/28/rather-than-close-gitmo-well-just-intercept-more-medical-goods-from-iran/
Put simply, Obama's plan was never to close Gitmo as much as it was to re-locate it to Illinois: to what the ACLU dubbed "Gitmo North".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/29/obama-guantanamo-pentagon-cyber-yemen
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:05 (twelve years ago)
having a Gitmo on US soil is very very different tho. subject to laws and shit.
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:06 (twelve years ago)
wanna bet?
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:06 (twelve years ago)
there's a reason "black sites" aren't on US soil
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:08 (twelve years ago)
I'm not a huge fan of the US prison system or anything but the legal apparatus that oversees requires a certain degree of transparency and is subject to rules and procedures that all go out the window as soon as you're dealing with non-citizens somewhere outside the US.
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:11 (twelve years ago)
I know you don't wanna give O any credit for intentions but if he never had any intention of closing it why did he bother to make such a big PR stink about trying to. seems pretty clear to me he just underestimated the congressional (and local) opposition to modifying the legal framework for how the country handles terror cases
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:12 (twelve years ago)
tsk tsk, ya never learn... Let's go back 3 years, shall we?
The Obama administration announced today that it will purchase the Thomson Correctional Center in Illinois for the purpose of holding some of the detainees currently remaining at Guantánamo. Though the administration is leaving unsaid which detainees will be moved there and for what purposes, the information it has provided indicates that some detainees might be held for military commission proceedings in Illinois while others might be held at Thomson indefinitely without charge or trial.
The administration has stated that "any detainees at Guantánamo who continue to be held, and for whom no prosecution is planned, will be held only under authority granted by Congress in 2001 under the Authorization for Use of Military Force, as informed by the law of war." However, the so-called war on terrorism is not a traditional war, having no temporal or geographical boundaries.
http://www.aclu.org/national-security/creating-gitmo-north-alarming-step-says-aclu
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:18 (twelve years ago)
right, nonetheless the legal grounds the ACLU can challenge those detentions under are different than the ones they used to challenge detentions at Gitmo
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:36 (twelve years ago)
but yeah let's pretend like O is the real problem here, and not the other two branches of gov't
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:37 (twelve years ago)
they're all problems.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:39 (twelve years ago)
^^ otm
― Aimless, Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:56 (twelve years ago)
damn the level of abuse that goes on at guantanamo is insane
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/ScreenShot2013-05-15at81756AM_zps9cbf8436.png
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Wednesday, 15 May 2013 15:19 (twelve years ago)
― davey, Monday, 8 July 2013 23:17 (twelve years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2013/jul/08/mos-def-force-fed-guantanamo-bay-video
― davey, Monday, 8 July 2013 23:19 (twelve years ago)
that crazed lefty.... John Grisham
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/12/john-grisham-guantanamo-bay-us-wrong?CMP=twt_gu
― Miss Arlington twirls for the Coal Heavers (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 August 2013 16:16 (twelve years ago)
@ggreenwaldFrom "The Audacity of Hope" to "The Path of Least Resistance": Obama and Gitmo
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/i-should-have-closed-gitmo-obama-says-116204.html
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 March 2015 19:05 (ten years ago)
No indication of how it would have happened though. As I understand it, there are broadly three groups of detainee - ones who everyone believes are broadly innocent of any serious crimes, ones who are believed to be guilty of crimes that could potentially be prosecuted and third group in the middle who there is no evidence to convict but enough ambiguity to make it difficult to clear them absolutely. The challenge with taking all of them to Indiana or wherever is that it's only one subset who could be detained indefinitely - the ones who could be put on trial. The bigger problem has always been what to do with the prisoners who there is no reasonable prospect of convicting. It would be difficult to deny them asylum, which would raise obvious political challenges.
What they've been doing over the last six years is slowly bribing odd countries like Uruguay, Estonia and Slovakia to take in the innocent ones. It is obviously harder to find places to send the less obviously innocent ones. Unless he's saying all of them should have been taken to the US and given new lives there (which would be brave and arguably correct - but practically unthinkable) idk what he is suggesting.
― Rainbow DAESH (ShariVari), Thursday, 19 March 2015 20:23 (ten years ago)
Last UK Guantanamo Bay detainee arrives in UK
― Riga Tony (Tom D.), Friday, 30 October 2015 13:05 (nine years ago)
I found the www.ilxor.com web forum this morning through Yahoo search... I was born on September 11th, 1957...
― Michael Thomas, Wednesday, November 2, 2005
― and what, Saturday, September 22, 2007
^^ things that slip past you but when you finally see them you say aha!
― Aimless, Friday, 30 October 2015 18:06 (nine years ago)
all Obama wants to do by closing Gitmo is to save money while continuing indefinite detention.
so, fuck him.
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 22:04 (nine years ago)
lol @ blaming him for Gitmo
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 23 February 2016 22:13 (nine years ago)
for CONTINUING IT, yes fuck. see also WARS
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 22:42 (nine years ago)
we've been over this, Congress has thwarted him at every turn, he's tried multiple avenues to closing it. I'm not convinced he just has to use some magical, rarely used legal loophole to close it.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 23 February 2016 22:48 (nine years ago)
when does Morbs listen?
Charlie Savage's recent book Power Wars goes into the nuances. He had his best shot early in 2009 when, according to Savage's sources (many of whom on the record), he should have started the bureaucratic meals moving instead of merely talking about it; the latter allowed opposition to harden.
But the continued existence of Guantanamo is an excrescence anyway, so he can try.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 22:52 (nine years ago)
lol = moves
MAGICAL Cmdr-in-Chief powers! even one of his own legal hustlers say he can do it unilaterally.
i always listen
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 23:17 (nine years ago)
No one thinks it's going to happen. Call it bad faith + helping the Dem nominee.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 23:18 (nine years ago)
Center for Constitutional Rights:
For too long the president has not used his ample, existing legal authority to transfer cleared detainees or to prosecute detainees the government believes have committed crimes in federal court, rather than in unfair and hapless military commissions. The Periodic Review Board (PRB) process is moving too slowly to meaningfully reduce the number of men slated for indefinite detention purportedly under the laws of war. Transferring those men to the U.S. for continued detention simply relocates and thus preserves the core injustice of Guantánamo. The Center for Constitutional Rights strongly opposes importing the regime of indefinite detention into the U.S., except in the cases of certain detainees with particular circumstances....
CCR is particularly concerned about conditions of confinement, which are being described in the news media as “beyond supermax.” Supermax prison conditions, including prolonged solitary confinement, constitute torture, as is increasingly being recognized in the United States, and would violate the Geneva Conventions.
We are also concerned that any deal that might be struck with Congress to allow transfers to the U.S. would come at a high cost, including establishment of a permanent facility to indefinitely detain not only detainees from Guantánamo, but also future captives, which may also be accompanied by new detention authority and efforts to limit detainees’ legal rights.
The plan does not address these concerns, and the public should not accede to it without having these critical concerns addressed.
https://ccrjustice.org/ccr-position-obama-s-new-plan-close-guant-namo
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 15:42 (nine years ago)
can't believe noted ilx poster "and what" did guantanamo
― μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 16:10 (nine years ago)
At the Defense Media Activity, a little-known and oddly named office in Ft. Meade, Maryland, that provides “news and information to U.S. forces worldwide,” there are thousands of classified“educational” films about the American military—including a huge trove of secret home movies from Gitmo....
Some of the previously reported psyops at Gitmo included the use of music in a manner that could certainly be considered torture: “Metallica’s Enter Sandman has been played at cacophonous levels for hours on end,” the Guardian reported in 2008. Involuntary subjection to Rage Against the Machine was another favorite psyop. The DMA possesses a variety of classified psyop recordings, including “SAUDI’S IN CAMP FOUR FOR PSYOPS,” “PSYOP PRODUCTS,” “PSYOPS POSTERS HANGING IN CAMP DELTA,” and “PSYOPS AWARDS.”
The references to interrogations and psychological warfare stand in contrast to apparent recordings of moments that sound almost pleasant, including meals, games of soccer, and even perverse “farewell dinners” for detainees being released to other countries....
http://gawker.com/the-classified-home-movies-of-guantanamo-bay-1774698603
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 5 May 2016 16:37 (nine years ago)
stand in contrast to apparent recordings of moments that sound almost pleasant, including meals, games of soccer, and even perverse “farewell dinners” for detainees being released to other countries....
being relentlessly harsh is not as psychologically effective as randomly switching between harshness and kindness. the dissonance this creates is just another form of cruelty.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 5 May 2016 17:09 (nine years ago)