― the pinefox, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
"The question cannot be answered because lesbian desire is just as various as any other; no generalizations about it are possible or worthwhile. 'Lesbian desire' as a unified entity does not exist."
I think I'm willing to accept this answer (and withdraw the question and, as Mark Lawrenson would say, pack my bags and go home). But then, there might still be other, more positive answers.
― Brian MacDonald, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― David Raposa, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― mark s, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Gage-o, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
There is no Ulterior Motive to the question. It's just a genuine bit of curiosity that I hope offends no-one.
― Sean, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I can't tell if you're puzzled because you think the answer's "no difference, obviously" or "difference, but i don't feel i should say so".
― rosemary, Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I think it is, but if you mean to contest this assumption, that's fine. I just realized that it was an assumption that I had made while trying to come up with why lesbian desire is different.
Tracer Hand talked about the uses of desire. Before he clarified what he meant, I thought he was talking about how desire is (not) satisfied. If it's through sexual possession, then that's pretty straightforward. But people say that women get different things out of relationships than men. I don't know the position of the feminist theorists that rosemary mentions on this; maybe it just reinforces gender roles. From my experience, it doesn't seem off the mark. Which makes the idea of possession more difficult to define for women. (Desires that are unattainable for want of a fixed or known object.) Certainly, I've admired women before. I think I idealize them more than men, whose swagger I think of as some sort of shtick.
I found that passage in The Hours. It's on p. 143.
― Kara Fig, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
but of course, i also subscribe to pinefox's first answer: that is that lesbian desire is multiple.
― di, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Peter Miller, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ronan, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
As a far-from active bisexual I pretty much second lady di's point, that desire-for-boiz and desire-for-grrlz = diff kettles of pash.
― mark s, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
however in terms of what one woman feels for another, in respect to sexual acts, emotional feelings, etc, i would suspect that might depend on the women involved, and that the women involved would have to speak about that desire themselves
― Geoff, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― toraneko, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
why do i find this statement so offensive?
― di, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ronan, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― elizabeth anne marjorie, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― toraneko, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ronan, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― helenfordsdale, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― N., Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― mark s, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Sarah, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
I think I have just spoiled the joke.
i do not have a strict definition of the word "woman" because to do so would lead to essentialism and i think that the looser the definition, the harder it is for people to pigeonhole us = the more room we have to move as people.
― di, Sunday, 6 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
generally speaking and note within reason i think anyone who chooses to define themselves as a woman is a woman. by within reason i mean that if a person with XY chromosomes who normally identifies himself as a man suddenly chose to identify as a woman for no other reason than to take issue with my definition of "woman", i would say that he has no grounds for it. but i throw my definition wide enough to include female transsexuals and some ambiguous others.
yikes this stuff is tough. critical engagement on this would be cool! bring it on!
CREOLE PROVERB: "Tell me who you love, and I'll tell you who you are"
Your idea also shows simplistic (stupid) (mis)understanding of rape. I don't believe that avoiding penises (yeah I know that's not the correct plural but it's what i usually say) is a wise response to rape nor a common one. I have never been raped - would you therefore interpret me as an exception? Or am I an exception anyway because I am also attracted to men (disproportionately, as this is much rarer compared to my attraction to females and I prefer "girly"ish men, and because I am not only attracted to butch women)??? What about "bulldykes" who are submissive - what happens to yr theory when you regard women who like to sexually dominate submissive butch women? What about men who are attracted to butch women (/"bulldykes")? The people y're being really ignorant and disrespectful about helped create the present environment where it is easier/safer to express and acheive those various desires you wrote about on this thread.
Just what degree of butchness is it a gal's objects of desire mustn't exceed in order for her to fit your definition of lesbian?
― toraneko, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Andrew L, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
in the emantime, we once conducted a straw poll on what consitituted a woman, and found that 9 out of 10 women could be found to have liked grease the movie. Disucss.
― geoff, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
I do not forget that comment Di, just because I could open the jar of salsa and you couldn't :)
― Menelaus Darcy, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ronan, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― joan jett's actual girlfriend, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
stop it menelaus, you are obliterating my tough girl credibility! ;)
― di, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― elizabeth anne marjorie, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Nitsuh, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Kara Fig, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Sam, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
I'm sorry, we're supposed to be talking about lesbians, aren't we?
― Nitsuh, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― mark s, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Menelaus Behaving Badly (oh all, right, Dickon Edwards), Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Michael Daddino, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Nancy Drew, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Fucking hell - not even a lesso thread escapes the uberphallus
― goeff, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― (suck on THIS michel soi-disant foucault), Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
I invoked 'the bone' deliberately because higher up-thread someone was accused of wishing she was a bull [dyke] when she was 'just' a [fat, ugly] cow, and it amused me that the masculine would be assigned a higher value even in this discussion.
I don't truly think there should be a Grimmest Poster category. After I put that posting up I felt bad,as it looked snide when I saw it on the page. I apologise for that.
― Nancy Drew, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Would you care to explain to us how using a phrase taken from a matriarchical culture that originally refered to a bone literally can have anything to do with an "uberphallus"? Unless we were talking about animal peni, which i don't think we were.
― hamish, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
proof: they POINT a BONE!!
― fast-food freud slips down like lube, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― goeff, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Oops, 'master', there I go again.
― Nancy Drew, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― the bellefox, Monday, 6 March 2006 13:47 (eighteen years ago) link
http://www.teamtalk.com/Images/161592.jpg
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:00 (seventeen years ago) link
Wow, Toraneko was a real number.
― Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:06 (seventeen years ago) link
A few more posts and we'd be in nominations for amazing ILX threads that are over 400+ posts and serve as a brilliant shining monument to the narcissism of small differences territory.
― Just got offed, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:08 (seventeen years ago) link
Who was Kara Fig?
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:08 (seventeen years ago) link
Are different things valued, and different kinds of experience hankered after?
i would have thought so.
but it's not like lesbian desire or male hetero desire are any kind of a 'given'. at some point in this argument 'desire' became what they used to call 'nature' -- a huge abstraction and 'explaining force -- as a way of getting round using the dread word 'nature'. progress.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:22 (seventeen years ago) link
I bet the teenage soldier was "mucking out" when he came across two women doing it.
― Mark C, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link
Well played sir.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link
"When" or "After" ?
― Mark G, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link
these are mad cute
http://www.autostraddle.com/lesbian-prom-37132/
― goole, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link
Those pictures make me wish I was gay.
― How to Make an American Quit (Abbott), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link
Awww
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 22:56 (fourteen years ago) link
:)
ps how can a thread with this title have such a weak revive? fuck is wrong with u all
― goole, Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:23 (fourteen years ago) link
those pictures make me wish abbott was gay
― The smile on my face, disguises the case, I bury the truth deep down in (ken c), Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:29 (fourteen years ago) link
perhaps we're being extra careful not to sexualise them from a male POV - counsel kept - they do look like they're having a great time, as any loving couple, but in this context of course with a certain defiance. i am all for this sort of thing, and i hope every bible-belt school who would disbar homosexual prom dates gets covered in magic rainbow paint
― ilxor lookin' boy (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:32 (fourteen years ago) link
And those doing the disbarring in poop.
― probably a sock!! (â•“abies), Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:41 (fourteen years ago) link
it's cruel to strip homosexual prom dates of their law licenses ; )
― harbl, Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:44 (fourteen years ago) link
v. disappointed to find the only picture in this thread is of the queen.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:45 (fourteen years ago) link
counsel not kept
― ilxor lookin' boy (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:47 (fourteen years ago) link
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_J6j-bn9B08M/SxP-TCa7-HI/AAAAAAAANNU/SneWhYIZeZI/s1600/lez+zeppelin-784445.jpg
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 March 2010 01:47 (fourteen years ago) link
PDAs at the bar
― calstars, Sunday, 16 October 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link