Debate, opinions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I can't stand debate. I don't like the idea of trying to change other peoples minds.

I like what I like and I believe what I believe and I'm fairly defensive of my ideals.

I can't understand people who say "x is shit, how can anybody like it?" as I am one who says "I think x is shit, I don't like it but if you do fair enough"

Nobody else is going to change my musical tastes, food choices, tv choices etc but arguing that they don't like them, so I extend the coutesy in a whatever floats your boat manner.

Surely we all know our own minds? If we have a belief that we think is worth debating about then we should be fully aware of both sides of the argument and unable to be swayed in the other direction.

So why challenge other peoples points of view? Why assume that their minds can be changed to suit what we believe in? Why get so heated and frustrated in debates trying to get your point across unless you believe the opposing side truely doesn't know what they are talking about? Is that not arrogance?

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 12:36 (twenty years ago)

would you like me to lock the thread now?

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

homeless people ought to be shot on sight.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:38 (twenty years ago)

Nothing is forever.

Nathalie, the Queen of Frock 'n' Fall (stevie nixed), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)

The earth and sky are, so I heard.

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)

Vote Conservative.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

Sorry - this is more of a general vent. I get angry and defensive when challenged.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)

The point of challenging points of view is if they may be founded on incorrect or incomplete data, information or experience.

It is well and good to know your own mind and opinions, but I've always believed that it is a belief not very well held that cannot be exposed to contradiction and debate. Flexible is strong, when it comes to minds.

Streatham's Paisley Princess (kate), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)

Rumpie -- you are wrong.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)

I think useless arguments are an inner frustration that you have carefully thought out logic that makes perfect sense to you .. and how many different ways must you express it before those idiots can follow it? They don't have to agree, they just have to follow the simple logic. But if they could follow the simple logic, they would agree, so why don't they? Because they're stupid. Just like you (we) are, for not following their simple logic. It's our inherent desire to teach. Lesson: teachers are arrogant, argumentative jerks.

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

So why do you start debates about, for example, which kind of onion is preferable?

Mädchen (Madchen), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

Arguing with people is great

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

... at least until they storm out of the pub

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

no it isn't

xpost

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

* insert Monty Python sketch here *

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)

Only a vidalia onion tastes good on a tomato sandwich. Jesus H. Christ. Duh.

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)

My tastes in music, food, tv and so on change all the time, mostly because I'm often being exposed to new things, or people will point out different ways to enjoy stuff I haven't enjoyed before (this last point is less true for food, admittedly).

Also, I agree with all of you.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

I probably am wrong to a lot of people, but I have one or two friends who are very challenging when it comes to other folks views, and have known in my life many people who, for example ask me what I'm listening to, and then when I tell them, they say "That's shite, that's not music, why are you listening to that, etc"

I'm sorry, but I don't want to have to defend my tastes.

In work the other day some girl was bitching about asylum seekers and instead of keeping my mouth shut I raged "What's your problem? I'm actually very sympathetic to the asylum seekers and feel that they've made some of our (Glasgow) communities better and more diverse."

Big mistake, about five people rounded on me, wanting to know my reasons, wanting to pull me into debate. Maybe my problem does lie with my defensiveness but I felt myself getting upset and teary and all sorts of emotions threatened to spill out. I don't think I'd be able to change my colleagues minds - I know that they should be better informed but I don't understand how they can have such opinions without the knowledge to back them up.

Maybe I just don't have enough convictions in my own beliefs or enough facts to back myself up.

I just don't like debate. Debate please.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)

rumpie is a dummie

crosspost

RJG (RJG), Friday, 4 November 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

you don't want to have to defend your defensiveness and think other people should be better informed but don't have the facts to back that up

RJG (RJG), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

Ya see, it's because people want you to understand WHY they think what they think to confirm to themselves that their own thinking is rational. (see what I've done?)

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

In work the other day some girl was bitching about asylum seekers and instead of keeping my mouth shut I raged "What's your problem? I'm actually very sympathetic to the asylum seekers and feel that they've made some of our (Glasgow) communities better and more diverse."

So, in future, you intend keeping your mouth shut then?

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

Which is the bigger problem in the world - too many people too assertive and forthright in their views which may well be wrong, or too many people effectively afraid to challenge those views which may well be wrong?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

It's a tough situation cos we've collectively evolved to like different things as it's an evolutionary necessity. And we've also collectively evolved to like personal conflicts to varying degrees. So you know what you like, and you don't like arguments. Which is a pisser, cos there are lots of people who do.

Rumpie do you find debate painful to be a part of, or just boring?

beanz (beanz), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

It is also personal choice about when and where and how deeply to rise to a debate. There is a time and a place for such a thing.

I do think quite carefully about the (potential) motivation of the person trying to provoke debate - and also of the emotional energy attached - before I will get into one very deeply.

Streatham's Paisley Princess (kate), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:06 (twenty years ago)

it's funny, i was at a, well be out with it, dinner party, and this one guy, who i'd been getting on with, turned into this savage argument-making machine -- the effect of booze -- and i literally couldn't come up with counter-arguments because the effect of booze on me is somewhat different, and because my style is never so head-on anyway.

i found the best way to deal with it was to look fondly, as upon a child, and *imply* that he was a drunken, pompous ass, and i think it kind of worked. but now i think about the argument, i actually basically agreed with him, but he was being such a tit and i had to stop him at all costs from harshing my buzz.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:07 (twenty years ago)

I already explained this to you twice you stupid twats. Lock thread already. Jesus H Christ, it's so simple.

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:07 (twenty years ago)

i regret trotting out my silly old 'there's no new ideas left in music' argument last Saturday, to some guy i didn't really know. damn booze.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

Was that a debate re the onions?

I LOVE to hear other peoples point of view, I try not to argue against it.

What onions did you prefer Madchen?

I do find debating painful. As I said, I'm prone to tears of frustration.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

Onions were the first thing to ever be debated, hence the phrase 'know your onions'.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)

Onions? Surely that will end in tears too?

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)

there was some certainly some stinging criticism.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:16 (twenty years ago)

If something ends in tears, is what happens after the tears a new start?

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 13:17 (twenty years ago)

Some people are very thin skinned (xpost)

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:17 (twenty years ago)

Yeah but if you peel back the layers, there's more, eh, layers.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

no more puns, that's shallot.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

I've had many many many an argument with people about the iraq conflict, in pubs and at work. The shouting match can go on for hours and nobody has changed their minds and nothing is solved, all that's achieved is a lot het up tension. It was times like that I'd wished I'd kept my mouth shut.

If somebody says something like your personal taste in music is shit then they are fucking stupid. end of.

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

Thanks Ste, that's exactly how I feel.

Who here has attended a debate as a speaker? were any minds changed?

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)

Where's Johnney B? He pwned at a proper debate.

Streatham's Paisley Princess (kate), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)

you believe the opposing side truely doesn't know what they are talking about?

SPELLED WITHOUT AN E
TRULY
THAT IS THE FACTS
I AM RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG
JUST LIKE ANYBODY WHO DOESN'T LIKE THE CLASH, OR DENKI GROOVE
THEY ARE WRONG TOO
ALSO, YOU REMIND ME OF HITLER

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 November 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

In Nazi Germany, Hitler reminds them of you!

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:42 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes I do sort of envy the people who never speak up or voice their own opinions, even if they're reading or listening to something they totally disagree with.

I'm just not sure if that approach is any more progressive than wading into the big fite sleeves rolled up.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)

Proper debate is all good mannered and well thought out and everyone goes home friends, while what we seem to be talking about here is arguing. Unless there's mutual respect between the two antagonists, this kind of discussion will always end with nothing resolved and everyone feeling pissed off.

Come Back Johnny B (Johnney B), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

if people didn't disagree, didn't voice their dissatisfaction with the status quo, didn't ever tell others, particularly those perceived to have authority, that they were bad, wrong and stupid then there would be no such thing as history and all values would be static. your ridiculous opinions about onions would hold forever rather than be swept away by the imminent revolutionary vanguard.

barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:49 (twenty years ago)

Is proper debate probable on ILE, or indeed the interweb?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

LOLLLLLL

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 4 November 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

or indeed the real world?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 4 November 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

If you hold the opinion, "Shallots are just small onions," then you are wrong.

If you hold the opinion, "I like rice pudding," well I cannot say that is right or wrong.

It all depends on what your opinion or statement is, whether you need to back it up with facts or whether you can be wrong about it.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

Ahhh - "Shallots are just small onions I think"

I was leaving myself open to correction.

I'm generally too afraid to make statements.

Except ones like that.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

Well I mean everyone is going on about the onion thread, why not the bolognese sauce thread? I was just wondering what the issue was, with onions, cos I didnt really read that thread.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

I liked the bolognese thread. It made me roffle so hard. I was at home, drinking wine and thought I'd stir uppa a fuss.

Notice though how I bowed out when I couldn't take the heat?

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

Hmmm. Fair point.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

I respect Allzay's opinion on this, she's the Lady of Shallots

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)

That's not true, I abdicated six months ago in order to marry the Duke of Vidalia.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

THE CURSE HAS COME UPON ME

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

Don't refer to me that way anymore or it's off, Ned.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

Hi Ned, you got your red moon?

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

I stand condemned.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

disgusting

RJG (RJG), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

okay, I see

RJG (RJG), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

I don't like argument, usually. I like discussion, though - usually: a lot. It depends who's around, no doubt. If it's the right people, then it's one of life's great joys, along with fish, and chips.

Perhaps debate is between the two? In which case, perhaps my view of it is between my view of the two.

the bellefox, Friday, 4 November 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Yes, it depends on whom you are talking with, and whether they are willing to respect your opinions as you respect theirs.

However, also... it depends on the debate. There are some debates which I have had so many times with so many different people that I really don't ever need to have them again. And so if anyone ever tries to drag me into a debate about these subjects (vegetarianism: why?, manufactured pop - it's rubbish isn't it? etc.) I will politely, or not so politely, depending on how voiciferous the oponent is, decline to discuss them again.

Streatham's Paisley Princess (kate), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

My Aggresive Ex's form of debate was shouting people down. Even his own friends were scared of him. He'd just keep raising his voice until other prople grew weary trying to answer him and gave up. Then he'd sit all smug and self satisfied basking in his own stupidity.

Sometimes he'd give the impression of listening and you'd think 'Hallelujah! A breakthrough" but when you finished making the point he would just repeat exactly what he said before.

Example "Technology will stop soon."

He was also the kind of guy who'd come marching in from the boozers and slam off whatever cd I was listening too - "That's shite."

Or if I was quietly reading "Books are boring."

Maybe he's the reason I tend to shut up.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

nice guy

RJG (RJG), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

Fuck that guy.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

Oh jesus christ, Rumpie, my ex did the same but replace about 40% of the aggression with a slight whine. I mean, he wasn't aggressive in normal conduct but FORGET a logical discussion -- he couldn't reason his way out of a wet newspaper (unless it was the Post).

I love discussion! If nothing else I'm tenacious -- the more someone uses force of personality to try to change my mind, the more my heels dig in. Arguments best when completely moot and unimportant to the normal course of things, and when conducted drunk (as inebriation allows for silly, bombastic gestures with a lit cigarette).

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 4 November 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

I'd like to kick that guy's arse

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 November 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

I don't mind discussion amongst friends, even when it gets a bit heated it's still light hearted and you know nobody's going to get hurt.

With colleagues/random associates though there's just no telling what might get spouted, and sometimes other peoples ignorance can be flabbergasting.

I know that I can discuss issues such as asylum seekers etc in the company of my own friends despite us having various views on the matter, because I am absolutely safe in the knowledge that they won't come out with something like "They should all go back to their own country" unlike some of the shallow brained morons I work with.

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

One thing that might help is telling them that they are shallow-brained morons. I guess by "help" I mean "exacerbate the situation to the point of an HR incident".

Dan (Stapler Fight!) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 4 November 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

Yeah - there's one particular girl who excuses herself to me everytime she mentions the words 'black' or 'coloured' thus drawing everybody's attention to me. Yet she can come out with the most narrow minded shit wrt to terrorist etc.

ie: Talking about going for a meal in her local Indian restaurant in which she knows the owners, (Indian restaurant mind) she said "Rahils son is away for two weeks doing a martial arts course - yeah - more like he's training to be a suicide bomber"

How can you even acknowledge that?

I'd like to staple her lip to the desk, yesiree.

She is also one of many people in here who refuses to distinguish between different races - folk are either white, chinese, black or terrorists. The frustration is starting to build again.....

Rumpie, Friday, 4 November 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

You can't keep working with this person. I think we should pass the hat around and hire a hit-man. Maybe Rahil's son can do it with his BARE HANDS when he gets back from his martial-arts intensive.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 5 November 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

twelve years pass...

I was thinking about the Ben Shapiro phenomenon and it occurred to me that a lot of people, and by people I 95% mean men, who think they are "good debaters" are actually just so insufferable that you can't bear to keep arguing with them.

Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Friday, 28 September 2018 17:59 (seven years ago)

Those kind of people are obsessed with knowing all the names and definitions of all of the logical fallacies

Evan, Friday, 28 September 2018 18:03 (seven years ago)

I can't stand debate. I don't like the idea of trying to change other peoples minds.

I think it is helpful to be able to tell someone else how you arrived at your conclusions clearly enough that they will understand your position, and to listen to others engage in the same exercise. This will only rarely change either person's mind, but does tend to allow both of you to see the other as human and thoughtful, even if the other person is "wrong".

A is for (Aimless), Friday, 28 September 2018 18:45 (seven years ago)

Those kind of people are obsessed with knowing all the names and definitions of all of the logical fallacies

― Evan, Friday, September 28, 2018 11:03 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I outgrew this by age 20 I think

I have measured out my life in coffee shop loyalty cards (silby), Friday, 28 September 2018 19:22 (seven years ago)

https://longreads.com/2018/09/18/no-i-will-not-debate-you/

Romantic koolmoedee (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 28 September 2018 19:28 (seven years ago)

ilx 2018

Dmac TT (darraghmac), Friday, 28 September 2018 19:30 (seven years ago)

what's your proof

j., Friday, 28 September 2018 19:38 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.