― moley, Sunday, 6 November 2005 08:11 (twenty years ago)
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 6 November 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)
― bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 6 November 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)
But my pyjamas are in the wash!
― Pangolino 2, Sunday, 6 November 2005 08:42 (twenty years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 6 November 2005 08:43 (twenty years ago)
― moley, Sunday, 6 November 2005 09:00 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 6 November 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)
― bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 6 November 2005 09:19 (twenty years ago)
― moley, Sunday, 6 November 2005 10:24 (twenty years ago)
― ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!, Sunday, 6 November 2005 10:39 (twenty years ago)
― Harthill Services (Neil Willett), Sunday, 6 November 2005 11:18 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 6 November 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Sunday, 6 November 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 6 November 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 6 November 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― moley, Sunday, 6 November 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)
1. It is a barrel. It is opaque.2. You're failing to take into account i) how big the barrel is, ii) what you are shooting it with, iii) how many fish are in the barrel. Shooting one goldfish in a huge barrel with a bow and arrow could prove pretty tricky. Harder than shooting a barrell full of mackrel with an M16, anyway.
I can offer no arguments against falling off a log.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 6 November 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)
I have also organised a night with my friends at the Vibe Bar, London's Trendy Brick Lane, which is also in an brewery.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 6 November 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)
― estela (estela), Sunday, 6 November 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 6 November 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)
What do you picture when it comes to fish in a barrel? Two or three fish swimming briskly in circles in water? Or a barrel with no water, stuffed with fish? Presumably, the latter is easier.
― moley, Sunday, 6 November 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)
Results 1 - 10 of about 12,900,000 for easy as pie [definition]. (0.07 seconds)
it's a clear victory for steak and cheese in a pastry case.
(xpost)
moley I usually picture a large marlin, a smallish barrel, and an uzi.
― estela (estela), Sunday, 6 November 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)
― moley, Sunday, 6 November 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)
And what of the qualms and anxieties arising from the shooting of enbarrelled fish? What if friendship had flowered twixt gunman and grouper?
― Harthill Services (Neil Willett), Sunday, 6 November 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)
Dunno if it was *easy* mind you.
― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 7 November 2005 00:16 (twenty years ago)
― Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)
So I'm siding with the log posse too. Indeed, I have fallen off several with little to no effort myself.
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)
― estela (estela), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)
1) All necessary props and locations are supplied (e.g. fish in barrel, brewery). 2) All financial transactions (bribery, hiring someone else to do it, etc) are strictly forbidden.
Given these rules, it should be far easier to hit a cow's arse with a banjo than to score in a brothel.
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Monday, 7 November 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Monday, 7 November 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)
I've attended several brewery piss-ups. Minimal organising was required.I've never shot a fish (barrel or no barrel), but I really want to.
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Monday, 7 November 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 7 November 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)
Ducks in a barrel now? What's so wrong with fish? -- mark grout (mark.grou...), November 7th, 2005.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah actually that doesn't make any sense does it, how would you get and keep the ducks in the barrel? It sounds kind of complex. -- Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyza...), November 7th, 2005.
GET ONE LID -- Huk-L (handsomishbo...), November 7th, 2005.
I think it's like the monkeys in a barrel, you have to keep the top on so that they don't escape. Just cram them all in there and seal them in. Then, you know, shoot them. Through the barrel. Or maybe he just confused "shooting fish a barrel" with "keeping your ducks in a row."
-- n/a (nu...), November 7th, 2005.
If you have to go through all that trouble, why not just shoot them while you're shoving them in the barrel? Just like grab the fuckers by the neck and pop, you're a goner. -- Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyza...), November 7th, 2005.
Or just seal the barrel, and the ducks will suffocate, and then you don't even feel like you killed them. No fuss, no muss. -- Huk-L (handsomishbo...), November 7th, 2005.
I think the urge to shoot ducks in a barrel is the same urge that drives a man to fill an empty bedroom with 400 cubic feet of Styrofoam packing peanuts, or enter a hot dog eating contest. Sure, it's stupid and makes a big mess but there's something inexplicably satisfying about it. -- n/a (nu...), November 7th, 2005.
― moley, Monday, 7 November 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)
― moley, Monday, 7 November 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 7 November 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)
― estela (estela), Monday, 7 November 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 7 November 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)
― estela (estela), Monday, 7 November 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 7 November 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)
ah: but with or without a ten-pound note wrapped around your chopper?
i'm surprised, from a purely sociolinguistic point of view, that nobody has further explored the anomaly that is "a piece of piss": to wit, surely a piece of liquid would have to be frozen? the time from micturation to freezing point, not to mention the associated hassle of transporting the fluid to and from the freezer, would seem to render this an anachronism.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 7 November 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 00:20 (twenty years ago)
― moley, Friday, 11 May 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)