Creativity and obligation

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I like reading. I like listening to music. I like playing videogames and seeing art stuff and music videos and comics and mimes and I'd probably like loads of other culture stuff I've never even encountered. If I got a sensible job that paid me money and like got married or something and spent my spare time juggling and playing go and consuming culture stuff when it seemed interesting or fun or awesome, I think that'd be a pretty swell life to lead.

So why do I feel that I *should* be creating all this stuff myself? Pretty much everyone remotely artsy I've spoken too seems to feel this way - I mean the obligation, not the resentment of it, 'cos I know plenty of people for whom creative pursuits seem validating and satisfying and obviously what they want to be doing.

So um: Do you feel this obligation to create stuff? Do you like creating stuff or having created stuff or both or neither? Why do people seem to feel this need and should we stop if it's unhelpful for us, personally, and how do we stop, if it is?

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 7 November 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)

I have talked about this, a couple of times

RJG (RJG), Monday, 7 November 2005 03:30 (twenty years ago)

today i was talking with someone about what we'd rather do if we were told we had six months to live -- create a great masterwork you can leave to "society" or travel and experience as much of the world as possible. guess which one i picked.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

(let's say for the sake of argument that they're mutually exclusive.)

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 03:35 (twenty years ago)

bird i think i would pick the travel one despite wanting to leave a masterwork behind... only because i doubt i could create a legitimately masterful work in the space of six months

xpost gravel:
i do feel the obligation to be creative, and when i create it's very validating. at the same time, though, i am not constantly inspired and thus can't fulfill this self-assigned obligation all the time; at this point it gets very frustrating so i think i know where you're coming from. i know this doesn't answer any of your questions but just my two cents

nervous (cochere), Monday, 7 November 2005 03:45 (twenty years ago)

well, i think in bird's dillema the outcomes are both guaranteed to happen, in which case i'd certainly leave the masterpiece.

Peter Densmore (pbnmyj), Monday, 7 November 2005 04:50 (twenty years ago)

I don't feel an obligation to create - I feel driven to, in a kind of "if I dont let this out somehow, even if it's just online rambles, I will go quite bananas".

I assume that isn't what you mean tho Greg :)

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 7 November 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)

Nono trayce that is useful! I mean, if everyone wrote exactly as much as they were driven to by desiring-to-express-stuff, and no more, this thing wld not exist I think. (I am not really sure this would be necessarily a good thing)

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 7 November 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

Well, I should also say that on top of being driven I guess I do also feel obliged to write for eg, in that "well I say Im a writer so WRITE DAMMIT". And then, feel guilty when I don't.

Hence, nanowrimo etc.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 7 November 2005 05:51 (twenty years ago)

Nanawrimo was what made me think of this thread, actually.

I like the story about that note by Joyce's typewriter, "Write! What the hell else are you good for?"

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 7 November 2005 05:56 (twenty years ago)

i hate creative writing. my best stuff comes when i'm not trying to be good. it comes so easily for some people, but not for me. i wish i could marry the "creative urge" part of my brain with the part that is occasionally capable of writing well.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 05:58 (twenty years ago)

This is partly the dilemma that I'm facing re: continuing on my graduate studies. Lots of/too many people have said that I'm a really good writer and have a sharp critical mind and that I'm cut out for the Academy, and so it makes me feel like I ought to go into it so that I can maximize my brain. It's a slightly different form of creativity (maybe even the exact opposite), but there's this Intellectual mentality of obligation that seems to run under the whole enterpise of the arts.

Wolfcastleee (Leee), Monday, 7 November 2005 05:59 (twenty years ago)

I only wish i could draw at all. I would love to illustrate, or make serious comic type things. Although I guess thats a bit of a wank these days.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:01 (twenty years ago)

Leee that is exactly where I am at the moment! I think it's totally the same thing. I mean I don't even *like* the person I am when I am academically fired up, and I think the good of "finally doing Tennyson justice" would be dwarfed by the good of say "being a decent lawyer who does the odd pro bono case and gives two grand a year to charity". So why does choosing the latter seem morally wrong to me?

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)

because LAWYERS ARE SCUM!!!!!1

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:11 (twenty years ago)

also you don't have to be smart to become a lawyer, but you do have to be driven to succeed. litcrit may be wankier, but it does take a modicum of actual brainpower.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:13 (twenty years ago)

Nah, you don't have to choose -- you could be like my friend who works as a public defender and writes lesbian pulp noir on the side.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:13 (twenty years ago)

At least you get fired up -- I'm usually slogging through, feeling like a star-nosed mole keeping its head down.

I know the feeling about what seems like a morally wrong choice, though. I've daydreamed about becoming, among other things, a nutritionist, a personal trainer, a drag queen, or biologist, but to think about the time, money and energy invested into the Noble Pursuit of the Arts and all the romanticized bohemian anti-bourgeois jive... well, I've definitely been indoctrinated. It feels like I'd be giving up against the Fight, though what it is I'd be fighting is probably no more than some undergrad Marxian bogeyman.

Wolfcastleee (Leee), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:14 (twenty years ago)

i haven't given up on wanting to go to law school. or have i? i forget now.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:15 (twenty years ago)

(although I mean this feeling in *other* people is what keeps me in new sounds and books and poncy essays, I am not condeming it at all as an existant thing; mostly I just want to know where it comes from! Did people a hundred years ago feel this?)

(many x-posts soon soon)

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:15 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to law school when I retire. Then I'll spend my dotage filing lawsuits against anyone who pisses me off.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:17 (twenty years ago)

i once worked for a lawyer who had a stunning apartment on sutton place that she paid for by doing gay & lesbian family law. so no, it's not all bad.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:18 (twenty years ago)

Also, I tell you what, if you want to really be in awe of the creative urge, go to that Van Gogh drawing show at the Met right now, it's stupefyingly great and there's just wall after wall and room after room of this guy trying over and over to kind of make the world his own.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:21 (twenty years ago)

i don't have to go, i can already tell that by looking at one of his paintings.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:23 (twenty years ago)

But the drawings are something else, really. I mean, they're lesser than the paintings, but there are so many of them, it's like this complete immersion in his head or as close as you can get.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:24 (twenty years ago)

For whatever it's worth, the two people (my musician ex and future-bigname-joycean-theorist college roommate) whom I was sort of thinking of when I started this thread, that whatever was come up with should seperate them as "ok now YOU go create" and me as "ok YOU now stop feeling guilty", never seem to doubt the objectivish importance of their fields.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)

I felt the need to create and so I did create. But then sometimes didn't feel the need or the inclination so I didn't. Which was OK then but now I NEED to create so it has become more difficult, I guess. If that makes sense.

Ally C (Ally C), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)

i think if there's one thing i like about myself, it's that i've already made my world my own and i don't need to "try," or "find myself" or any of that. any further exploration i do isn't some poncy soul-searching, it's more like "well, i already have a good sense of what my 'aesthetic' is, so how can i take this new thing i've stumbled across and find the jbr in it?" that's my creative process.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:30 (twenty years ago)

i sort of have this issue with music.

i'm sitting on my voice degree and constantly bitching about how much i hated music school and people in the opera world, but if i listen to anything classical or there is randomly an opera clip on a tv show i feel guilty, like i'm denying this thing inside me or that i'd actually be doing something (as opposed to my crappy boring office job) that could, perhaps, touch someone or at least be beautiul. so every few weeks i think of going back to singing and doing a masters or at least trying to get some kind of chamber group together, then i say, 'but you'll never make any money and you'll be miserable trying to make something of yourself.'

it's not exactly the same because i'm not creating as much as interpreting, but i feel like it's the same sort of battle - i can't listen to music without feeling like you should be making it, but the practical side of my brain says, 'this shit is bananas.'

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)

i studied classical voice too! come to nyc and i'll start a chamber group with you.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)

yay! i'll get there someday...

i have these crazy ideas about turning this set i did with piano, violin, viola, and cello into some cool performance piece. my roommate is great with visual arts and thinks it'd be fun, but it's so hard to get anyone to actually commit to doing anything.

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)

i got back into choral singing a couple of years ago, but i grew disillusioned with it because (a) i thought the director was a terrible teacher (b) all these groups are really interested in is gouging you for every penny you have and telling you it's for "dues," "sheet music costs," "paying the rent on the practice/performance space," etc. i don't mind investing a little money into putting on a show, but it has to correlate with what kind of experience i'll be getting in return.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)

i mean we were a good group, but i kept thinking "why am *i* not directing us?" it's frustrating when you know you're right but you don't have the authority to do anything about it.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

i can't listen to music without feeling like you should be making it, but the practical side of my brain says, 'this shit is bananas.'

Yeah, I think the key to that is not worrying about it being bananas. I know lots of people who have jobs they more or less like, in some cases love (in other cases endure), but they also keep the whole creative thing going on the outside of their daily paycheck -- bands, poetry readings, theater troupes, you know, whatever. Once you stop thinking about it as a professional choice -- like, I should be doing the music instead of the office job -- then you free yourself up to do whatever you want with your free time. And sure it's not that easy, and it's always hard to get even two or three people together to do something, but you can do things if you want to. I have major respect, e.g., for my sister, who when she had a baby decided she wasn't going to be only defined as a mom and bought herself a fiddle. The kid's now 6 and she -- by practicing every day when he naps -- has turned herself into an old-time fiddler who can get together and jam with other old-timey music types.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)

ohhh i always hated that!

actually, i don't care much for choral groups, mostly because i was forced to sing in chorale for 3 years as part of my degree requirement and our conductor was so terrible. there's something very frustrating about taking 50 voice majors who are training to be soloists, putting them in a room, and telling them to "blend" to the beat of a conductor who couldn't even keep a steady 4/4 pattern.

i think part of why i'm not singing now is that i hate not being the best or in charge... i couldn't stand being in opera choruses because i wanted to go shove the director out of the way and tell everyone how to deliver their roles "correctly"! but, i am kind of a lameass because i don't think i could come up with staging and production i deas on my own, only "fix" others' ideas. not very creative at all!

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

there's something very frustrating about taking 50 voice majors who are training to be soloists

ugh, i know. they can't fathom that their voices are serving the piece, not the other way around.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:10 (twenty years ago)

i know what you're saying gypsy, but the things i would want to do require large amounts of time, money, and a job that would let me run off to auditions, etc. whenever... mostly it's an issue of the money.

i guess the key is to start in small steps, but i often wonder if that would make me horribly frustrated and give it up all over!

(in case it's not painfully obvious, i'm really good at being my worst enemy!)

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:10 (twenty years ago)

here's something very frustrating about taking 50 voice majors who are training to be soloists

ugh, i know. they can't fathom that their voices are serving the piece, not the other way around.

-- bird-person-person (theundergroundhom...), November 7th, 2005. (Jody Beth Rosen) (link)


yes, there's that. i once remember yelling at our choir over a primadonna outbreak when we were singing student compositions - one of which was completely amazing and in polish or something and meant to sound like ice. they just could not stand that they were being told to sing straight tone and i ended up yelling at all of them that they were being selfish and this guy had put a lot into writing this piece and if they'd all just get over themselves they'd realize how beautiful it was, and didn't we owe him just one good recording?!

but, there's also the fact that we were, in fact, training to be soloists, and it's often dangerous to the voice to constrain it when in your lessons, your teacher is trying to get you to sing freely and naturally. humorously, the choir of non-voice majors sounded 10 times better than we did!

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:16 (twenty years ago)

and now we are not talking about creativity anymore and i feel like a self-centered asshole.

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:17 (twenty years ago)

learning how to constrain your voice is urgent & key to being a respectable singer. the trick is to SOUND like you're singing freely while having a firm grip on the reins the whole time. it's as much about deep concentration as anything else -- if i were running a music department i'd make yoga classes part of the voice curriculum.

(sorry for the boring thread derail)

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)

OTM about the yoga! it helped me so much and i was flabbergasted that my "prestigious" school had NO dance/movement requirement, much less any courses at all related to physical education of any sort!

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:29 (twenty years ago)

it would either be yoga or a tantric sex course taught by sting. eight hours, no breaks (except for a smoke at the end).

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:33 (twenty years ago)

that should definitely be a required course!
(but only for the worthy students)

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)

Hmm.. hey, is it still creating, if you're forced to/have to do it?

I'm thinking like, graphic artists, paid writers - maybe not fiction ones, but journos.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:43 (twenty years ago)

yeah it is, because you still have to create it!

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:44 (twenty years ago)

in a way that's the most difficult, because you have TWO people to answer to -- yourself and the person who commissioned your work.

bird-person-person (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:46 (twenty years ago)

Thats very true :)

I think maybe I was more thinking "forced" in the sense, you are doing something you dont really want to/wouldnt otherwise/its just a job.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 7 November 2005 07:54 (twenty years ago)

Constraint and working to order can be great for Art though. I always think of J.S. Bach in these cases - he wrote incredible music at least in part because it was his job. Having a definite problem or brief to apply creativity to can be very productive.

Me, I don't think I'll ever be truly happy until I've written something close to what's in my head. I'd rather play games all day, but I've been nagging at myself since childhood. The older I get, the more afraid I am that I'll have to reconcile myself to the possibility that I don't got what it takes. And I mean that in terms of judging myself, not any outward token of success.

Patchouli Clark (noodle vague), Monday, 7 November 2005 10:24 (twenty years ago)

What an interesting question. I would like to give it further thought and a good answer, but I'm in a web cafe. I shall look it up again tomorrow when I'm back at the day job.

Streatham's Paisley Princess (kate), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)

Every now and then, someone suggests I write a novel or the idea pops into my head by itself. For a flashing half-second I'm flattered and then it occurs to me I've probably got no talent in that direction. I think maybe to write a decent novel you have to be one of those people who just can't stop writing; like Trayce says, "if I dont let this out somehow, even if it's just online rambles, I will go quite bananas". And I don't have that, so I guess it's not for me. Weird thing is, though, I used to have it. So maybe I have actually gone bananas.

Also, there are so many crappy novels in the world already, and there are also so many great novels, that I wouldn't like to add something mediocre or crappy to the pile.

Then again, it would add to the sum of literary creativity in the world, which might be a good thing, even if it lowered the average standard. No wait, that would be a bad thing.

beanz (beanz), Monday, 7 November 2005 11:58 (twenty years ago)

As they say, fish got to fly and birds got to swim. Or something like that. If you genuinely feel impelled to create, you'll create, depending on the strength of the impulse.

Your only true obligation is to be a reasonably decent, good human being.

I clearly recall that day in 1972 when I was 17 and I opened a letter from the good folks who run the National Merit Scholarship hoohah, informing me that not only was I in the 99th percentile of test takers and therefore might possibly get some money if I played my cards right (I never got any), but also informing me that my fabulous talents obliged me to become a prominent leader or a slambang scientist, basically a cerebral ox who would pull the USA oxcart to its destined greatness.

I just as clearly recall my reaction to this information: fuck you, NMSAT asshats, I'm not obliged to be anyone's ox.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

haha this is like precisely the opposite of the "pay me to be creative" mindset but i love when writers say shit like this and mean it:

RICHARD POWERS

That was a Saturday. On Monday I went in to my job and gave two weeks notice and started working on Three Farmers.

INTERVIEWER

What did you do for money?

POWERS

I had been working doing computer operations for a credit union. It was a terrific time to be a programmer because there was so much demand that you could make a living as a freelancer. You could pick up a six-week job, build a war chest, go write, and after a few months come crawling back out and look for another short-term job. Once I worked for an exiled Spanish prince. He was the grandson of the old king before Spain’s civil war, which I guess made him a cousin to Juan Carlos. He had been in line to head the restoration, and when it went against him he ended up in the United States as a trader. Here was this socialist royal trying to find out ways of building options spreads. So I wrote one of the very first real-time options-hedge trading programs.

INTERVIEWER

You should have stayed with it. You might have been a billionaire by now.

POWERS

I had a book to write.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

YOU TELL 'EM, RICH

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

If you genuinely feel impelled to create, you'll create, depending on the strength of the impulse.

I think a lot of the anxiety people feel, or at least I do/did, is whether the impulse is strong enough.

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

The way I look at it, you can't control the impulse, so don't worry over it. There are an infinite number of ways to go to hell and you'll always find one of them to your liking.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

this whole thread is first world problems i guess

― bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, October 22, 2010 10:30 AM (1 minute ago)

so?

so nothing? my first world problems are very important to me, clearly.

but i do go back and forth between albini-esque "making music is not a special thing, just regular stuff that people do" thoughts and the more darni3lle-esqe "music is magical and sacred, that's why we care about it so much, so don't take it for granted".

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

Albini is a dick.

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

okay.

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

sorry the "first world problems" thing bugs the shit out of me, unless it's in the context of a discussion about global politics where third world problems are at issue or part of the discussion. It just seems unnecessarily self-deprecating.

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's healthy to keep in mind that as much as i might obsess my creative frustrations/challenges/successes, it's not really that important in the grand scheme of things.

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

Albini is a dick.

― sarahel, Friday, October 22, 2010 12:59 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bullshit.

S Beez Wit the Remedy (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

"it's not really that important in the grand scheme of things" = escape hatch

Unfrozen Caveman Board-Lawyer (WmC), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

not worth arguing about m@tt - i'm just basing it on 2nd hand info

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, his whole thing is basically "don't be a dick", as i understand it. and i respect people who are totally committed to their artistic pursuits without being a dick about it.

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, his whole thing is basically "don't be a dick", as i understand it.

if it is, then he must make an exception for message board posts

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

You'd be very surprised to know how much that may seem small at first glance actually does matter in the grand scheme of things.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

if it is, then he must make an exception for message board posts

Who doesn't?

O'Donnell and the Brain (HI DERE), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, look at here!

O'Donnell and the Brain (HI DERE), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

could we not turn this into an ilm thread

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

could we not turn this into an ilm thread

― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, October 22, 2010 11:14 AM (13 seconds ago)

^^^

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, his whole thing is basically "don't be a dick", as i understand it.

if it is, then he must make an exception for message board posts

― sarahel, Friday, October 22, 2010 1:09 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

if you're talking about the electrical audio board, most of those ppl deserve way worse that what they get

haha sarah1 since when are you one for staying on topic?

S Beez Wit the Remedy (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

honestly - i think it's a bit of both - it is something that "regular" people do that is also magical and awesome.

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

this is what i am saying

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

oh ok - i thought you were posing it as some kind of dichotomy.

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

I don't understand why we can't have both Albini's & Darnielle's POV that Music is special and magic but making it is just a thing that ordinary folks do. These view points are not that incompatible from where I'm standing.

But then again, I'm a "person who gots to do it" & sees something special about DOING it but nothing special about being a person who does it.

Wheal Dream, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

X-posts stupid iPhone typing = slow.

Wheal Dream, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

I agree that those points of view are not incompatible.

O'Donnell and the Brain (HI DERE), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

I clearly recall that day in 1972 when I was 17 and I opened a letter from the good folks who run the National Merit Scholarship hoohah, informing me that not only was I in the 99th percentile of test takers and therefore might possibly get some money if I played my cards right (I never got any), but also informing me that my fabulous talents obliged me to become a prominent leader or a slambang scientist, basically a cerebral ox who would pull the USA oxcart to its destined greatness.

I just as clearly recall my reaction to this information: fuck you, NMSAT asshats, I'm not obliged to be anyone's ox.


They said to me (sometimes it was the doctor, sometimes the nurses), "You're an educated man, you have talents; by not using abilities which, if they were divided among ten people who lack them, would allow them to live, you are depriving them of what they don't have, and your poverty, which could be avoided, is an insult to their needs." I asked, "Why these lectures? Am I stealing my own place? Take it back from me." I felt I was surrounded by unjust thoughts and spiteful reasoning. And who were they setting against me? An invisible learning that no one could prove and that I myself searched for without success. I was an educated man! But perhaps not all the time. Talented? Where were these talents that were made to speak like gowned judges sitting on benches, ready to condemn me day and night?

Our society and culture has put rock music on the backburner (bernard snowy), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

didn't mean to make it seem like they're mutually exclusive viewpoints, just that i think them at different times, depending on if i need motivation or if i feel like i'm getting too caught up/consumed by it. it's not a good thing to tie your self-esteem to your creative output btw, but sometimes hard not to.

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

I don't understand why we can't have both Albini's & Darnielle's POV that Music is special and magic but making it is just a thing that ordinary folks do.

After the leaves have fallen, we return
To a plain sense of things. It is as if
We had come to an end of the imagination,
Inanimate in an inert savoir.

It is difficult even to choose the adjective
For this blank cold, this sadness without cause.
The great structure has become a minor house.
No turban walks across the lessened floors.

The greenhouse never so badly needed paint.
The chimney is fifty years old and slants to one side.
A fantastic effort has failed, a repetition
In a repetitiousness of men and flies.

Yet the absence of the imagination had
Itself to be imagined. The great pond,
The plain sense of it, without reflections, leaves,
Mud, water like dirty glass, expressing silence

Of a sort, silence of a rat come out to see,
The great pond and its waste of the lilies, all this
Had to be imagined as an inevitable knowledge,
Required, as necessity requires.

raging hetero lifechill (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

here's the point in all this meta-malarkey when i always think about going back to college for social work or joining the missionaries or something.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

I can't go on. I'll go on.

Our society and culture has put rock music on the backburner (bernard snowy), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

me: "no, really, i mean it this time. shape up and devote my time to helping the planet."
brain: "shut up. you and i both know you're going to keep drinking beer and writing horror short stories."

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

aw guys, this is a good thread, but i have to go practice blast beats for an hour.

sarahel, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

bsnowy, I see your quote and raise you:

Yet I have met people who have never said to life, "Quiet!", who have never said to death, "Go away!" Almost always women, beautiful creatures. Men are assaulted by terror, the night breaks through them, they see their plans annihilated, their work turned to dust. They who were so important, who wanted to create the world, are dumbfounded; everything crumbles.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

see guys this is why you should make art: so people on the internet have something to dork out about together

Our society and culture has put rock music on the backburner (bernard snowy), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

keep drinking beer

ha this is such a factor.

If you genuinely feel impelled to create, you'll create, depending on the strength of the impulse.

see i sort of disagree, it's like if you said "if you genuinely feel impelled to exercise, you'll exercise" or something. yes the will and desire is important but you have to find ways of implementing things or changing your life so that you make it easier to do things that are difficult. as much as it's great to be content with yourself, i do feel that it's okay to want to improve too.

was thinking about this thread in the shower and i think a huge reason i want to create is that i can't actually communicate with more than a handful of people beyond making joke after joke. hence when i have flatmates or something where i'm forced to spend time with people i become ultra quiet/shy.

I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

I have yet to find that being more creative, in the sense of creating art, causes one to improve as a human being. It may give one's better nature a chance to express itself, or it may just elevate one's obsessions to the point of worship. We all have to puzzle these things out. Art is just one avenue for possibly accomplishing this, but not to a certainty.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

What do you think causes one to improve, if anything? And if nothing, what's the point in doing anything, or what makes someone a good human being (given you said that's what you believe we should strive for!)

I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

self-knowledge re. how to be a good person is one thing but i'm coming to believe that putting it into practice is pretty much the great project of human adult life.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

that and beer.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

Engage with what is before you. Don't stop thinking or feeling. When you are unhappy, look for a better path. When you are happy, be grateful. Be patient always. Try to solve more problems than you cause. Be quick to forgive and compassionate with everyone, including yourself. That causes one to improve as a human being.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

sounds so easy in general terms...

I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 22 October 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

xp that and beer

Our society and culture has put rock music on the backburner (bernard snowy), Friday, 22 October 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

interesting topic, wish I had time to read it all

my general philosophy is quit whining and just f'kn do it

mr. mandelbrot flythrough vertigo, esq. (Edward III), Friday, 22 October 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

creating art is not a very social pursuit imo...when friends of mine are really getting some serious work done, they can be pretty hard to interface with as human beings. i know the same thing is true for me, it takes some decompression time before i can turn off that part of my brain and honestly focus on someone else.

(beer helps)

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

Sure it's not easy. You want easy, go have a snack. But then, making art isn't necessarily easy, either. I'm just saying art isn't some panacea that makes your life better, however hard or easy that art might be. Art is just the externalization of certain thoughts you have.

Aimless, Friday, 22 October 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

Sure, I wasn't disagreeing as such by pointing out it's not easy, more stating the obvious minus an exclamation mark!

I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 22 October 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

Baking a cake or knitting a scarf is creative.

Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 23 October 2010 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

cooking is v creative...one of the most enjoyable pursuits!

I see what this is (Local Garda), Saturday, 23 October 2010 09:27 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.