Racial Epithet Assessment

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So, a woman I work with used the term "Paki" to refer to a Pakistani cab driver she had in NYC earlier this week. In my indignant, knee-jerk liberal white guy way, I immediately took umbrage with this. She seemed entirely to poopoo the offensiveness of this term, and proceeded to use it several more times, attempting to goad me into being more indignant.

So, I seldom hear this term in the US, and I hear it more often in British-flavored media (e.g., movies and television shows). It has ALWAYS seemed to carry a pejorative connotation with it. Was this woman being an insensitive bitch or am I being over-sensitive? Prolly a little of both, but this is a BAD term to use, right?

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

For some reason, that term was HUGE in my decidely homoethnic Grade Three classroom.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

yes, not least because referring to someone by their nationality is super-dumb.

NOW SMACK HER UP.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)


personally, i don't think so.. but it is distasteful. Then again, I am in the US.

I don't see why it's so awful -- it's emasculating with its ending, much like "frenchie". Possibly the hard "k" makes it more of an epithet?

But having lived in the UK, I can attest it is the equivalent of dropping an N bomb over there.

gold buck teef (mookie wilson), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

Is it ok to say you've been "gyped"?

Jdubz (ex machina), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

this girl at work (new zealander) said back home they called greeks 'wogs' and that it was perfectly normal. she didn't fully believe this might not fly in the motherland.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

Hey don't refer to that girl by her nationality!

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

http://www.footlightsgallery.com/imagelg/gypsybp2.jpg

gold buck teef (mookie wilson), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)

Didn't we already have this convo several months ago, establishing that "paki" is seen much more of a epithet in the UK than the US? It's a lot like the argument held months later over whether Apu is racist or not...

kingfish orange creamsicle (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

'my racist colleague' threads, what more can be said or learned?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)

i think it's ok to refer to someone by their nationality, in some contexts. in a semi-related way, a scene etched into my memory from university went something like:

-have you met wilfred?
-no, what's he look like
-[describes numerous things about wilfred except that he's black -- one of about eight black people at the university]
-dunno, still not sure...

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

How does a word go from being offensive to not being offensive? Is it possible or just a pointless wish?

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

it is offensive because of its use rather than its meaning, of course. a term brimful of the history of hate and xenophobia in british society it can be used as a quick, easy prejudicial jibe at anyone looking 'a bit asian', and when said, serves as a handy Angry Face Stamp on those you can safely assume are acutely aware of the colour of one's skin, to put it politely.


handy newham, Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:07 (twenty years ago)

Roit. I feel firmly justified in my indignity towards said girl. Much obliged, all.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

Another weird issue with this term is that it's kind of like referring to all east-Asian people as Chinese: it's not like people who'd say this have much ability to distinguish between Pakistanis and Kashmiris and Indian muslims or really anywhere else within a few thousand miles of the region. So there's a certain dismissive disinterested "you know, one of them" quality to it, which is annoying.

nabiscothingy, Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

'Indi' or 'Bangy' or 'Sri Lanky' just wouldn't work for people like BLMA's colleague.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 10 November 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

Well, the funny thing was that her defense of the use of the term was that he WAS actually Pakistani. So that must make it ok, right?

Instead of totally lambasting her online (which would be fun, easy, and FULL of hilarity), suffice it to say that this woman is full of contradictions, inconsistancies, and blatantly obnoxiousness, all stemming from severe self-confidence issues. This is the first thing that she has done that really offended me, although a good friend of mine who I also work with has had some serious problems with this person's oversight on projects. So glad my tenure there will cease next May.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Do you work for Ann Coulter or something?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

So on the way to work I realized I have a big historical blind spot on this: was there some disproportionately-Pakistani or disproportionately-Muslim wave of immigration to the UK that turns "Paki" into an issue? Is there a big difference in the cultural perception of (Hindu) Indians and people from Pakistan? Why the "Paki" singling-out?

I mean, in the US immigration from the subcontinent is obviously less pronounced, and I think the perception here just lumps everyone together as "Indian" -- except for whatever Sikhs and Muslims stupid people like to pretend are Arabs. Is it just sheer numbers and cultural significance that would have the UK differentiating this? But then if so why would a racial slur for Pakistan be way more visible than some potential racial slur for India or Bangladesh? (Is it religion, or is the UK just slightly more cool with Indians, or what?)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Americans are too ignorant of geography to use a pejorative like "Paki," which presumes knowledge of the existence of Pakistan. The average American believes there are twelve countries: America, Canada, Mexico, England, France, Russia, China, Japan, Israel, Iraq, Vietnam and Hawaii.

M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

Nah, people know about Amsterdam -- though perhaps not what country it's in -- that's where you can smoke weed all over the place, dude!

Candicissima (candicissima), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

Possibly "Paki" rolls off the anglo-saxon tongue in a more satisfyingly offensive way than anything that can be derived from Indian or Bangladeshi (NB this is a serious answer).

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)

this girl at work (new zealander) said back home they called greeks 'wogs' and that it was perfectly normal. she didn't fully believe this might not fly in the motherland.

oh lord. this made me feel so uncomfortable when i lived in sydney! despite repeated assurances from aussie friends, it never came comfortably out of my mouth.

in fact, even though my best aussie mates were technically wogs - one an ABC (Australian Born Chinese) and one a second-gen Italian - and cheerfully used the term to justify all manner of little idiosyncracies ("why do we have a massive sack of rice in the kitchen? it's a wog thing!" etc) I never felt quite right saying it.

I guess it's like the N bomb in that if you *are* a wog (Italian, Greek, Turkish, er, some other nationalities too), you can use it, but if you're not...boom.

paki, i think, is exactly the same in the uk. i think it's virtually impossible for a white person to use it in any way that won't sound at the very least pejorative, and more likely just plain offensive.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

nabisco, i'm not sure but i don't think the wave was significantly larger than that of Indians, Sri Lankans, Bangladeshi and other countries near to Pakistan. it just seemed to become a catch-all term, possibly just down to it being easier to adopt as an abbreviation. but i could be wrong here. in this case it IS very odd but maybe there really is something in the 'what's easiest to abbreviate, adopt as a catch-all and sounds harshest' thing (xpost, to echo Mark C here), considering the mentality of the sort of person who would use such a word in such a way.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

nabisco, i'm not sure but i don't think the wave was significantly larger than that of Indians, Sri Lankans, Bangladeshi and other countries near to Pakistan. it just seemed to become a catch-all term, possibly just down to it being easier to adopt as an abbreviation. but i could be wrong here. in this case it IS very odd but maybe there really is something in the 'what's easiest to abbreviate, adopt as a catch-all and sounds harshest' thing (xpost, to echo Mark C here), considering the mentality of the sort of person who would use such a word in such a way.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Well geez then no wonder it's so offensive to people: if you're calling Indians "Paki" they must go fucking fuming! Weird: I was asking in part because I got the feeling the UK (in the general sense) was more comfortable with Indian Hindus than with Pakistani Muslims -- that Indians have basically assimilated more, culturally and economically, whereas Pakistanis have wound up more in the sorts of immigrant communities that give people a window for ethnic slurring. But using "Paki" as a subcontinental catch-all is way more bizarre than that -- it's like calling all Slavs "Latvi," or something.

I cannot deny that Americans are really low on specific details about a place like Pakistan. People know India and have plenty of touristic images of it, but I think plenty of Americans' mental maps kinda have a big blob called "Arabs" and then a big blob called "India," and then run into total confusion in the area between -- Persians become "Arabs," Afghanistan becomes "Arab," and Pakistan becomes, well, Indian or Arab depending on how they're dressed and what they're doing. And forget about any sense of history; I've been in lit-course discussions of Midnight's Children where people thought Rushdie made up partition.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

(I'm still kinda boggling: calling everyone from the subcontinent Paki is like an invitation for them to turn around and call everyone in the UK Welsh.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

Let go...become desensitized, and just about everything becomes mundane and non-offensive.

I dont like being called "white", but that shit isnt going to change any time soon.

Spinktor the Unmerciful (mawill5), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

calling someone a "paki" seems to be the same as calling someone a "jap"

gear (gear), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Dude, Spinktor, then calling Indians "Paki" would be like calling you "Mexican."

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

(Okay maybe more like Canadian, though to be honest I'd probably find it hilarious if Americans went somewhere and everyone was like "go home, you dirty Canucki.")

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

what would you like to be called spink?

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

nab, you're probably right in figuring that re Indian Hindus and Sikhs. culturally they've established themselves better (even if you look at TV shows like Goodness Gracious Me/Kumars at 42) although not necessarily integrated better. i grew up not far from Southall which has massive Sikh and Hindu representation to the extent that they outnumber anyone else. i'm not sure if Muslims have ever managed this in the same way (even in pockets of East London like Whitechapel), it's not on the same scale really. this is just London though. presumably this combined with apparent reservations about Islam in the UK contribute to Muslims, of which many have come from or descended from Pakistani immigrants, being both alienated and targetted more. anyway you're absoultely right and none of it makes any real sense.

i was guilty of the 'using Arab as catch-all' thing the other day on the 'trick or treaters in blackface' thread re that spoof National Geographic cover thing. it wasn't really a conscious thing, i just wanted to highlight how putting a lighter skin tone on doesn't seem to cause as much ire as when it's darker, but that's another issue.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:19 (twenty years ago)

I dont know, man. Race is just such a stupid, touchy subject.

I was involved in a conversation with a militant black guy one time and it went about like this:

"Why do all you white people call us black? We arent black, we're african americans."

The fact that he called me "white" but thought it was offensive for someone to call him "black" was ironic. I dont know. I just dont like racial double standards and how people like to use the issue of race when it best suits them. But then again, Im a white male, and have no opinion.

Spinktor the Unmerciful (mawill5), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

It's real strange. There's a section of highway in my town that's been sponsored by the LR Negro Women's Council. One of the most progressive and influential civil rights organizations in the United States right now is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. I wouldn't find myself too comfortable using "Negro" or "Colored" to describe someone of dark complexion and African extraction, but apparently those organizations don't have a problem with it.

One thing that I won't ever miss: Whiny people in the early nineties who insisted that I should use "People of Color" to describe non-whites. It was like living inside that Bloom County cartoon all day long.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 10 November 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

I think this is a pretty offensive:
Americans are too ignorant of geography

Possibly "Paki" rolls off the anglo-saxon tongue in a more satisfyingly offensive

Almost all words roll off the anglo-saxon tongue in a more offensive way. ;)

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 11 November 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)

I remember watching a French news cast about the tsunami in Indonesia where the reporter said "It has probably come as a surprise to most Americans that Indonesia is mostly a Muslim country. Because Americans don't know much about geography."

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 11 November 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

When i was a youngster the little newsagents/grocery store style shop at the bottom of my street was so consistently referred to as 'the paki's' that i didn't realise there was anything at all wrong with calling it that untili was abt 12-13 or maybe even a little older. An incredible amount of people i know still refer to it that way and it is very upsetting.

jeffrey (johnson), Friday, 11 November 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

four years pass...

So didn't want to start a whole new thread but also didn't know where to post this.

Started a new job recently where I'm working with young ppl most of whom are latino and/or black. Pretty sure this week was the first time I've ever been called "my nigga". Was also asked today if I know that I'm white. No shit, really?

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Friday, 13 November 2009 02:58 (sixteen years ago)

Should clarify that the person was asking to make sure that I was aware of the fact that this was going to be an issue with a lot of the kids. I am aware that it is going to be an issue with some of them but it was a strange question to be asked even though, in the end, I was glad she opened up that line of discussion.

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Friday, 13 November 2009 03:04 (sixteen years ago)

start all interactions with "i'm white btw"

call all destroyer, Friday, 13 November 2009 03:09 (sixteen years ago)

lolll

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Friday, 13 November 2009 03:10 (sixteen years ago)

I would save time and just wear a t-shirt every day that reads that.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 13 November 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)

Right now I'm doing a lot of shadowing of the other ppl in my position so last night I went along with one of my co-workers to visit one of his kids at the kid's house. While we were outside talking to him, his sister came out and yelled hi to my co-worker and then asked "Hey, where's the white girl?" He was like, "Oh D is back at the office but look - we got a new white girl" and then introduced me. It was pretty funny.

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Friday, 13 November 2009 03:21 (sixteen years ago)

four weeks pass...

Was driving two kids home the other night and they were trying to get me to say nigga just to hear how it would sound etc. Got into a discussion about why it's not a racist term when used in a certain way and they told me that's it's not spelled nigga but nikka. They said this like this was the most obv thing ever but I'd never heard that before? Is this a thing that I just didn't know about? Nikka? Really? I had no idea.

Completely unrelated but spent about an hour schooling a 20 yr old kid on old school rap/hip hop last night. He had never heard of Tribe or Public Enemy. O_O Was really into it though and now wants me to burn him a CD. ha.

★彡☆ ★彡 (ENBB), Saturday, 12 December 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.