Stanley "Tookie" Willliams

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Co-founder of the Crips, convicted murderer, Williams denounced his life and role as a gang leader, wrote a couple books aimed at keeping children out of gangs, and ended up nominated for the Nobel Prize. He's scheduled to be executed on December 13. Should he, in light of the things he's said to have accomplished while on Death Row, be granted clemency? Should he, as the convicted murder of Albert Owen, Thsai-Shai Yang, Yen-I Yang, and Yee Chen Lin (though he denies guilt and according to Wikipedia, there was no physical evidence connecting Williams to the Owen's murder site), have his sentence carried out?

The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals says that he should not be put to death. What do you say?

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:25 (twenty years ago)

Alternately, if you don't care at all, that's okay, too.

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:34 (twenty years ago)

He shouldn't be executed because the death penalty is a barbarous ritual sacrifice, maybe>?

Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 10:06 (twenty years ago)

Noodle on point. But I'm rooting for this guy regardless.

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 10:08 (twenty years ago)

Damn straight. But I worry whether the Peace Prize nomination will only strengthen the resolve of hick judges to not let dem forrnerrs interfere in the US judicial process.

Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 10:12 (twenty years ago)

Noodle entirely OTM. I really don't understand how in this day and age the death penalty is still being enforced.

Nathalie is in Da Base II Dark (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 10:15 (twenty years ago)

Because in some areas of the US the Death Penalty is an important vote-winner? In many ways I admire American democratic institutions, or at least believe they're better than their European counterparts. But a system that allows its legal process to be so intertwined with short-term electoral issues has some serious flaws.

Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
So if Arnold wants to win votes, what does he decide? No clemency, just because the Californian population is mostly hispanic?

StanM (StanM), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

Arnie may still be smarting from this election losses and may see granting clemency as an easy, relatively no-cost way of shoring up some support from lefties... otoh, the Governator doesn't seem like a very "forgiving" type. And I'm not sure if he would really gain all that much respect from Dem-leaning Cali by staying the execution.

(of course, I'm against the death penalty and think everyone on death row should just have their sentences commuted)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

i think the execution will occur as planned.
and l.a. will burn tonight.

nein Socken (nein Socken), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

yeah, it occurred to me too that there might be serious LA riots if the execution goes through. fun fun.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

does tookie still command respect from members of various sects based on the gang he founded?

165%, Monday, 12 December 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand what positive effect the execution could possibly have. I honestly think I'd feel a little warmer and fuzzier towards Ahnold if he granted clemency, so that might be a good move on his part.

Laura H. (laurah), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

i.e. crips gonna be mad as fuck or dont care???

165%, Monday, 12 December 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

Seems like a good copout would be:
"Mr Williams has been convicted of heinous crimes and deserves a harsh punishment. But because of his clout in the gang-oriented community, we can use him as a mouthpiece against gang activity, rather than a martyr within the gang culture."


...or some bullshit like that.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

he could say the execution might spark gang violence

177%, Monday, 12 December 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

is it just me or does arnold really not seem to understand the state he presides over? why cant he be governor of like montana or something

763%, Monday, 12 December 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

He looks like he should be an actor.

StanM (StanM), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

2/3 of californians SUPPORT the death penalty.

nein Socken (nein Socken), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

the only thing Arnold understands is adolescent power fantasies.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

who wouldve thought the only u.s. official to have posed nude for robert mapplethorpe would be a republican

473%, Monday, 12 December 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

he could have done porn for all i care. but i find it troubling that he has no BACKGROUND IN POLITICS.

nein Socken (nein Socken), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

I've always been against the death penalty, but ever since I've heard the explanation of the Thai law that executes drug smugglers (they're actually mass murderers because they destroy the lives of not only the users but also of all of their families and friends), I think they have a point and I'm not so sure anymore. It's still barbaric and whatever, but why should you be treated any different if you act barbaric first (i.e. killing people/smuggling drugs)?

This Tookster case? I don't know. If the evidence stinks, then no. If it's 100% sure he did kill those people, then what he did after that doesn't matter, the law of the country/state where he killed is the law that should decide what happens. Whether that law is right or wrong doesn't matter (if you don't want to die, then don't smuggle drugs into Thailand or kill anyone in states where the death penalty is used).

StanM (StanM), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)

I honestly think I'd feel a little warmer and fuzzier towards Ahnold if he granted clemency, so that might be a good move on his part.

But not so much I'd ever vote for him.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

I honestly think I'd feel a little warmer and fuzzier towards Ahnold if he granted clemency, so that might be a good move on his part.

But not so much I'd ever vote for him.

OTM and OTM.

luna (luna.c), Monday, 12 December 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

xpost

Selling drugs = mass murder?

WTF?!?

viborgu, Monday, 12 December 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

That's how they explain the death penalty in Thailand, yeah. Whoever smuggles hard drugs into the country is destroying hundreds of lives.

StanM (StanM), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

well, I wouldn't necessarily call that "logic". I mean, whoever uses gasoline destroys hundreds of lives, whoever sells arms destroys countless lives, etc. There is no rational argument for the death penalty - it doesn't work as a deterrent, it doesn't decrease crime rates, it doesn't rehabilitate criminals. Its the state submitting to primal bloodlust, the revenge impulse, etc.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

i felt warm and fuzzy towards corrupt republican george ryan when he cleared death row in Illinois

gear (gear), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

well, I wouldn't necessarily call that "logic".

Neither did StanM.

Dan (It Would Be Nice If You Would Respond To What Was Written As Opposed To An , Monday, 12 December 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

sorry my bad.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

No clemency, just because the Californian population is mostly hispanic?

I don't follow

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

every time I hear them say his name on the news I STILL think they're talking about Stanley Tucci.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

This is his Big Night.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

No worries!

It's just... what's the alternative? If you kill someone, should you be fed and given shelter for the rest of your life when other people have to work for those things?

Yes, I know, those other people are "free" - but some non-killers are starving or are homeless while murderers are kept alive!?

There is just no simple yes/no, I believe, so every discussion about this can only end in tears. :-)

StanM (StanM), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

Hahahaha Dave!

Dan (StanM OTM, In General) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

studies show cost of capital trial and lengthy appeal process greatly outweighs the expense of life in prison blah blah blah.

i flip-flop on the death penalty thing all the time.

dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

I would love it if the money that went into the prosecution of capital cases ended up funding job training programs and homeless shelters but there's no real way to work out the logistics on that.

Dan (Communism Should Have Solved Everything) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

there's still time, karl.

dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

In a sense perhaps murderers "deserve" the death penalty - on a primal, eye-for-an-eye kind of level - which is sort of the gut-level understanding of justice for most people. However, whether or not they "deserve" it is only part of the story. From a moral standpoint, one could argue that the ideal of forgiveness and redemption and second-chances should trump the ideal of evening the scales. This is sort of the reasoning behind bankruptcy law. Perhaps debtors do "deserve" to go to prison (time is money, right?), but it doesn't do society any good to have all these potentially contributing members of society languishing in jails - that's why we give people a second chance through bankruptcy. It's interesting that for a country as ostensibly Christian as the US, there's so little respect for the Christian ideal of forgiveness. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" and all that. That's good enough on Sunday, but not on the first Tuesday in November. How many of us ever truly get the justice we deserve? If we could see all the consequences of every time we have been lazy or thoughtless or inconsiderate we might think twice about our ideal of fairness and justice.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)

i felt warm and fuzzy towards corrupt republican george ryan when he cleared death row in Illinois

definitely the only good thing that old fucker did. even without the licenses-for-bribes scandal and various other ryan administration corruption, i doubt that the death row moratorium woulda helped him get re-elected. definitely a bold move, esp. by a republican.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 12 December 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)

the death penalty really makes no sense to me. Admittedly, I will occasionally wish that a real asshole criminal be killed - but that's purely emotional - just like the now-infamous pistol whipping comment. The idea of giving someone life in prison to reflect upon their crime seems like the most just punishment and, hopefully, chance for redemption.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

since innocent people have been executed for crimes they didn't commit, even someone who believes in the death penalty should have serious reservations about it.

gear (gear), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)

i fully understand vengence and vigilante-ism but the state is supposed to be above such things.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

Arnie's refused clemency for him.

stet (stet), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

have a good night, la

dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

i hope his ghost haunts the shit out of that nazi fucker

373%, Monday, 12 December 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

The idea of giving someone life in prison to reflect upon their crime seems like the most just punishment and, hopefully, chance for redemption.

Of course, there's no way to prove that they will "reflect upon their crimes."

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)

Isn't it already up for discussion to put a moritorium, completely, on the death penalty in CA again? Like, in a month? I read this in the paper this morning. How do they justify not giving clemency when the same administration is willing to entertain a halt to the sentence in a month or two anyway???

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)

arnold's defense will be that he's representing the will of the people of cahleefawneeya (the majority of the ca population supports the death penalty).
i think he only entertained the idea of clemency for dramatic effect.

nein Socken (nein Socken), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

THIS. FUCKING. SUCKS.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 04:55 (twenty years ago)

originated in the Code of Hammurabi, but spread from there:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eye

"An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth and the whole world would soon be blind and toothless."

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 04:59 (twenty years ago)

Hstencil - now that you mention I remember that! Thanks!

Lovelace (Lovelace), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 05:08 (twenty years ago)

Christ actually taught the opposite of "eye for an eye". He was the one who said "turn the other cheek".

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 05:13 (twenty years ago)

I guess one thing I would point out is the enormous discrepancy in executions of African-American men vs. whitey. The Inocence Project(s?)has/have exonerated almost 200 people. I don't believe in the death penalty, but even if i did, I would find the rates of incarceration and execution statistically disturbing.(Where's Ned when I need him to provide all of the statistics?!)
Especially when the statistics show a clear racial bias.
That being said, my friend was raped and murdered in 1993.Her killer was caught in 2003, tried, and sentenced to 25-life. Not one person in her family, or immediate group of friends, wanted the death penalty. Her convictions were so opposed to the death penalty that she did concerts to benefit books for pisoners programs. Her family, in their grief, made moral choices that resonate for me because of their absolute dignity in the face of abject horror and despair.
I love that Luna, like my friends family, can see clearly that every person is a son or a daughter, sister or brother, and that the desire for revenge can be tempered by that simple recognition.
I feel sick about every execution.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 05:14 (twenty years ago)

Very nicely put.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

on a less appropiate note:

http://www.discod.com/arnold/arnoldvsdisco.mov

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 05:43 (twenty years ago)

omg, arnold@!#!#$

Williams has written books that instruct readers to avoid the gang lifestyle and to stay out of prison.... Since 1995 he has "tried to preach a message of gang avoidance and peacemaking.... "It is hard to assess the effect of such efforts in concrete terms, but the continued pervasiveness of gang violence leads one to question the efficacy of Williams' message";

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 07:45 (twenty years ago)

One of Stanley Williams' children, Stanley "Little Tookie" Williams, Jr., has also been convicted of murder. Little Tookie, a Neighborhood Crip, was found guilty of shooting a 20 year-old woman to death in an alley off Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood during a gang-related shooting. Williams, Jr. was sentenced to 16-years in prison alongside his father at San Quentin for second-degree murder. [29]

In November 2005, the Fontana, California Police Department advised print and television media that a warrant had been issued for registered sex offender Lafayette Jones. Jones, wanted for allegedly molesting an ex-girlfriend's 13-year-old daughter at gunpoint, was identified by the police department as the son of Stanley Tookie Williams. [30] [31] Williams' official Reply Petition for Executive Clemency submitted on November 21, 2005, by Peter Fleming, Jr., stated that this was a lie purported by the police department, including an attached declaration from Lafayette Jones' mother, which declared under penalty of perjury that Lafayette was not Stanley Tookie Williams' son.

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

it freaks me out that this just happened. seriously ghoulish.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 08:33 (twenty years ago)

me too. and i'm even more freaked out that after all the build-up, there was not one special news report. just reruns of leno and access hollywood.

tres letraj (tehresa), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 08:34 (twenty years ago)

i'm just trying to imagine schwarzenegger pronouncing "pervasive"

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)

It was reported plenty on the BBC.

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

and... he's dead.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 09:27 (twenty years ago)

America, you are the beacon of freedom and democracy and hope for people the world over (*sick joke*)

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 10:18 (twenty years ago)

the piece of shit should've been executed 20 years ago.

slb, Tuesday, 13 December 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

Who, Schwarzenegger? Well I wouldn't got that far...

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

it's really weird to me how many reports include something about how "a majority of Californiana [or Ohioans, or Americans] support the death penalty"

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 13:42 (twenty years ago)

Well, you know, because that makes it "ok" now. Duh.

giboyeux (skowly), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)

So if Arnold wants to win votes, what does he decide? No clemency, just because the Californian population is mostly hispanic?

Anti-death penalty arguments are not assisted by

1) Racist comments like the one above

2) Bizarre adulation of unrepentant mulitple murderers

3) Comments like: i hope his ghost haunts the shit out of that nazi fucker Not even sure what catagory of uselessness such a comment falls in.

4) Moronic posturing that after decades in the courts, multiple governors, it's the present governor's fault this gangster was euthanized. Why don't all 50 governors pardon everyone on death row like the guy in Illinois? This is really Gray Davis's fault. He did nothing.

5) There's much to be said against the death penalty. It needs to be heard. It needs to be said by people other than Hollywood crackpots and publicity whores like Jesse Jackson. And it applies to everyone on death row, not just to special cases like Williams, a vile, guilty murderer.

NoPlaceForLogic, Tuesday, 13 December 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

So are you in favour of murdering vile guilty murderers or aren't you?

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

this gangster was euthanized

Is that the term officially sanctioned by the Nazi Party?

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

2) Bizarre adulation of unrepentant mulitple murderers

Ok, this one doesn't hold up.

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

My opposition to my State being involved in iniquitous bloodshed is not inspired by any adulation of criminals whatsoever.

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

How's this then: Even Mexico, with it's violent and bloody past (including many firing squads), it's current culture of corruption and fatalism, it's barbaric outdoor cages in prisons, lackluster public defenders, and a difficult judicial terrain for the accused... yes EVEN MEXICO has turned it's back on state sponsored capital punishment.
Is that better?

-- andy -- (and...), December 12th, 2005 6:26 PM. (later)

Replace "firing squads" with "lynchings," and "cages" with "tent compounds," and find out what you get.

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

But that's a useless digression on this thread so I'm just going to say "You're an idiot" and leave it at that.

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

I don't know. Maybe he has a point. I mean if I was being tried for any crime short of capital murder, I think I'd rather take my chances in a US court than in Mexico.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

We need protection from vile guilty murderers and other dangerous unreconstructables—those who are not helped by medication, etc. That's the use of prisons, and there's no need for them to be uncomfortable horrible places. Punishment shouldn't enter into it. That's just vengeance, and we should strive to be above that. Execution, aside from murdering the executed, spiritually murders the executor.
Much of crime is caused by poverty and addiction, which are the huge problems we should be tackling.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)

Hell, even after all of this, I'd rather take my chances in California still.

(If Wisconsin or Massachussetts weren't available...)

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

http://thebosh.com/archives/2005/12/stanley_tookie_williams_executed.php

why show both of these guys all buffed out? is there a competition?
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)

How's this then: Even Mexico, with it's violent and bloody past (including many firing squads), it's current culture of corruption and fatalism, it's barbaric outdoor cages in prisons, lackluster public defenders, and a difficult judicial terrain for the accused... yes EVEN MEXICO has turned it's back on state sponsored capital punishment.

Is that better?

Dude, the APOSTROPHES

Dan (Ow) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 21:00 (twenty years ago)

You know, my "just because the Californian population" wasn't meant to be racist. Thanks for putting it in bold and going all anonymous like that, but I'm not a racist.

I was replying to the "death penalty = vote-winner" comment and added the race issue because, well, this case already had some of that (all African American jurors being removed from the jury).

So, I thought, if this is a racially influenced discussion and vote-winning is involved, then this "just because the Californian population is mostly..." was not too far fetched a question.

But whatever. Someone anonymous yells racist at me and I go into defensive mode. Man, I'm such a n00b.

StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

To Lovelace

"An eye for an eye" was an old testament commandment that actually LIMITED the personal retribution allowed by law to equal whatever the harm was.. prior to "eye for an eye", if somebody cut off your hand, well, you might go over to their house and kill them and the government didn't really bother you about it. It was a humane law for the time.

Jesus mentioned "an eye for an eye" in the sermon on the mount, when he reeled off every touchstone moral law of the old testament and offered his new interpretation (aka "the beatitudes"). Ever the vote-winner, he was careful to say that he came NOT to contradict the old laws, but to breathe new life into them. the fact that this quote even survives in the texts we read now -- whether it was said by jesus himself or added later by his followers -- attests to how potentially inflammatory his teachings were. He said christians had an even greater responsibility than limiting their vengeance to equal the offense done to them. Christians had to go farther -- to limit their vengeance to even LESS than the original offense. He hyberbolized this responsibility to its limit point -- i.e. if someone smacks you, turn your other cheek to them so they may smack that one as well.

to my mind, the seeds of revolution are in this way of thinking -- christians will not use the letter of the law as their guide, but will adhere to their own moral code.

i'm not up on this entirely, but it's said that St. Paul interpreted Jesus' admonition as a purely personal one and held that governments still had the moral authority to punish pretty much how they saw fit. i personally find this kind of thinking totally bankrupt, but i don't doubt St. Paul is what the modern Christians who support the death penalty base their support on. it's hard to see on what else they can base it.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

There's much to be said against the death penalty. It needs to be heard. ... And it applies to everyone on death row, not just to special cases like Williams, a vile, guilty murderer.

Another thing that really hamstrings moral opposition to the death penalty is deciding that "vile, guilty murderer[s]" aren't worthy of that opposition, a position that makes you ... well, a supporter of the death penalty, surely?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)

http://www.zombietime.com/tookie/

leftist protests are really impressive aren't they.

nnt, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

Jesus Christ, the photo of the guy who got shot in the face is fucking horrible.

Dan (Bleah) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

http://www.zombietime.com/tookie/IMG_4166.JPG

Dan (Thank You, Benevolent White Lady) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

is it just me or did she write that sign on top of another sign?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)


it was a girl, not a guy:

"Williams was convicted of murdering four innocent bystanders with a sawed-off shotgun in 1979. There was nothing peaceful or compassionate about the way Albert Owens, Thsai-Shai Yang, Yen-I Yang and Yee Chen Lin died. Owens was a white teen-age clerk at a 7-11 convenience store, shot twice in the back of the head -- execution-style -- as he lay unarmed on the floor during a hold-up. A witness testified that Williams mocked the gurgling sounds Owens made as he lay dying. "You should have heard the way he sounded when I shot him," the witness quoted Williams.

The Yangs were Taiwanese immigrants who, along with their daughter Yee Chen Lin, were gunned down during a motel robbery two weeks after Owens died. Half of the daughter's face was blown off by the shotgun blasts, former L.A. County Deputy District Attorney Robert Martin told me in an interview this week. Williams called them "Buddhaheads," Martin recounted, and robbed them of petty cash.

nnt, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

Ally, I think it's some posterboard or other stiff artsy-crafty material with a company watermark on it.

(xpost: Yikes.)

Dan (Bought From The Local Co-op) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:28 (twenty years ago)

In-person protests in general are completely disorganized and inexplicable, left or right, btw. You get people ponying up with issues that have no relevance to what is going on and everything goes completely sideways.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

Blair condemns death penalty

At least he doesn't think we're as bad as China.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

i'm not up on this entirely, but it's said that St. Paul interpreted Jesus' admonition as a purely personal one and held that governments still had the moral authority to punish pretty much how they saw fit.

I think your interpretation is correct. Paul was more concerned about kowtowing to Rome and not getting the Christians persecuted by the government, if he could help it, so he tended to neuter a lot of Jesus more revolutionary statements, especially when they potentially conflicted with Roman policies.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:42 (twenty years ago)

the first attempt at the sign was obviously done in red biro or something, then it was overwritten in black marker pen. you can see the same text in both versions.

nnt, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

Obviously we should judge the morality of the death penalty on people's handwriting.

Falling down the stairs again (noodle vague), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 23:41 (twenty years ago)

if you can't make a professional protest sign, stay outta the kitchen.

nein Socken (nein Socken), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

Groups seek to remove Schwarzenegger's name from stadium

Associated Press

VIENNA, Austria - Political parties in Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's hometown have started a petition drive to remove his name from a sports stadium.

The dispute stems from the governor's decision this week to deny clemency to Stanley Tookie Williams. The co-founder of the Crips gang was executed early Tuesday in San Quentin State Prison for four 1979 murders.

Opposition to the death penalty is strong in Austria, and the once-popular Schwarzenegger has lost much of his shine since becoming California governor for refusing to spare convicted murderers on death row.

The outcry was especially sharp this week after the clemency denial for Williams, who had written children's books warning of the dangers of gang life. Politicians from the Greens party in the southern Austrian city of Graz, Schwarzenegger's hometown, reacted by calling for his name to be removed from the "Arnold Schwarzenegger Stadium."

On Thursday, the local Social Democrats said they would support that appeal, meaning there likely will be majority backing in the city council for renaming the stadium. The council, which is responsible for the stadium, is expected to take up the matter on Jan. 19.

The Union for Austria's Future wants to keep the stadium's current name, arguing that generating controversy around it could lead to financial loss by prompting sponsors to withhold funds from sporting events there.

A spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger said the office would not comment on the matter

Lovelace (Lovelace), Friday, 16 December 2005 05:08 (twenty years ago)

re: nnt's link. oooh... shallow sardonic commentary. that's con-fucking-vincing.

anyway, in person protests are great precisely because you have no fucking idea what might go down. which is more interesting, at least.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 16 December 2005 07:36 (twenty years ago)

Blair condemns death penalty
At least he doesn't think we're as bad as China.

He loves China too. He has a liking for murdering barbaric regimes.

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 December 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

... sorry, murderous barbaric regimes into torture and shit like that

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 December 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.