I've just read this:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,11026,1643987,00.html
Identity cards would not make Britain a safer place and nobody in the secret intelligence services supports their introduction, according to the former head of MI5.Asked at a further education conference whether she thought ID cards would make the country safer, Dame Stella Rimington replied: "No is the very simple answer, although ID cards have possibly some purpose.
"But I don't think anybody in the intelligence services - not in my former service - will be pressing for ID cards."
Her own opinion was that ID cards would be of use "but only if they can be made unforgeable".She added: "If we had ID cards at great expense and people can go into back rooms and forge them they will not make us any safer."
Tony Blair has long argued that ID cards would help in the fight against crime, benefit fraud, illegal immigration and terrorism, and he is supported by public opinion polls backing the idea.
Amidst concern amongst MPs about the cost to the general public the government agreed before the general election to cap the amount to be paid by individuals.
The last official costing for the scheme was £5.8bn. The unit cost of a combined 10-year ID card and passport when it is phased in from 2008 was £93. A stand-alone biometric ID card aimed at the low-paid and pensioners would cost £30.
But a study by the London School of Economics earlier this year disputed the figures and claimed that a total cost of £19.2bn, and individual cards costing £230, would be nearer the mark.
Former home secretary Lord Waddington yesterday described as "completely crackers" the suggestion that the public would be prepared to pay over £200 for a card.
Peers from across the House of Lords attacked both the cost and effectiveness of the scheme.
Labour's Lord Gould astonished many peers by claiming: "The public want ID cards and are prepared to pay for them."
Dame Stella was answering questions from college principals following a speech on leadership that she delivered to the Association of Colleges' annual conference in Birmingham.
She had sought to reassure one principal, worried that the intelligence services would treat all foreigners - particularly Muslims - among his student body as potential terrorists, that there would be no question of blanket treatment of ethnic minority groups.
For one thing, she said, there simply were not enough resources to take such an approach.
What do people here think about this whole idea? I reckon it's shit. I don't know why they think it's a vote winner. The whole civil liberties thing doesn't really bother me - if you have a passport, a driving licence, a credit card, etc. you've already given away all kinds of details to all kinds of faceless organisations, and in a way an ID card would be quite useful, BUT it wouldn't cut crime / terrorism (anything can be forged for a price), and who would want to pay £70 (or even £250) for it? The idea that the general public are screaming out for ID cards and can't wait to pay for them is one of the most ridiculous lies I've heard since Thatcher said the same thing about eye tests in the 80s.
(PS - starting this thread at ten past eleven at night isn't really going to get me many replies, is it?)
― Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:15 (twenty years ago)
but, er, i wouldn't be prepared to spend even one fucking shiny penny on said card ;)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)
It's bad, but it's not as bad as the police's plans to track every vehicle on the British road network.
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Thursday, 17 November 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)
but yes, is there anything that isnt really forgeable?
and, as for the public, i am convinced that they want them. but, they want them for other people (you know, happyslappers, albanians, bird-flu carriers, people who play mp3s on their phone on the bus, people who take the bus). thats why they dont care about how much it will cost them, they wont be getting one, dear
― terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 17 November 2005 10:59 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:04 (twenty years ago)
Seems a total waste of dosh to me. I don't give two hoots about "ooh big brother ooh no" there are plenty of id options out there already. I really think this is a direction towards the ridiculous.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)
holy shit. that gets me thinking. i've lost my oyster card twice already. i'm not paying £93 to get it replaced each time!
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)
for a card!
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:18 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/17/clarke_id_3rdvote_spin/
― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)
― terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)
that's how it's like in hong kong! it's really neat. you basically never have to carry proper cash.
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:36 (twenty years ago)
pistol whipping.
It's basically the same as cash. it's only used really for little things. and so you don't just put your whole bank's balance on it. but better than cash because if you lose it you can cancel it.
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:37 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)
― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:50 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:52 (twenty years ago)
― Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)
There's not much fucking stealthy about charging people upwards of £93 for a document they need.
― Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)
― Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)
― Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)
Gareth you should try living somewhere else for a while! I agreed with you all the time about england before I left, now I only agree with you some of the time (although I do here, abt albanians etc...)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:39 (twenty years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 18 November 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 18 November 2005 09:07 (twenty years ago)
― |Theorry, Friday, 18 November 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)
where the hell are they getting the idea that ANYONE wants this? it's being talked about a lot everywhere and has been since it first came up, and i have not spoken to or overheard one single person saying they think it's a good idea. er, except gareth now.
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 18 November 2005 10:36 (twenty years ago)
lol but that's going great guns!
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 November 2005 10:59 (twenty years ago)
― Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:00 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)
-- ken c (it...), November 18th, 2005.
haha, i was going to call this out, before i saw the addy.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)
A matter of considerable, nay vital, national importance
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)
It would make it harder for you to use more than one identity at a time. The bloke who stole the dead baby's name seemed quite happy to live life under his new ID, so when he went to apply for his first ID card he'd just take along the deceased tot's birth certificate and say "Here's who I am".
Then with his biometrics on file it would be, in theory, impossible for him to get another ID card, but he would still be living under a false name.
― Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)
― Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)
yebbut how long did it take and how much did it cost? it seemed to frag on FOREVER.
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:15 (twenty years ago)
Ha! Guess what I just received from transport of london...
Dear Mr Chu,
We have recently introduced a new payment method when using Oyster to pay as you go (Pre Pay) called Auto top-up.
Using either a credit or debit card, this service allows your Oyster card to be topped up automatically with either ?0 or ?0, whenever your balance drops below ?.
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)
But everyone has something to hide - So we all have everything to fear
― ben j, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 12:02 (twenty years ago)
― bato (bato), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)
except for http://www.loscavio.com/images/portfolio/loscavio_videoproduction_mymonkey.jpg
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
The ID cards bill has gone back and forth between the Commons and the Lords with the crucial aspect of compulsory entry to the nationaldatabase being debated. Last week, sadly, the Tories and Crossbencherscaved in and we now have a dodgy compromise deal that forces us all onto the ID Card database when we renew our passports from 2008.
Be careful, therefore, in choosing when to renew your passport. If youcan time it to be just before the compulsion is mandatory, at the end of 2007 for example, you would then have 10 years with that passport,during which time there's every chance the requirement will have beendropped or modified (the Conservatives currently claim they would repeal this legislation if they were elected.* More likely, however, the Lib Dems could force this issue if in coalition with Labour from 2009.)
If you are unaware of why the database is a_very_bad_thing, readno2id.net article
*NB: Obviously, this does not mean one ought to vote Tory or that thiswill be their policy next week ...
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Sunday, 2 April 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/make-your-own-id/
In fact you might sense that the whole field of biometrics and ID is rather like medical quackery: as usual, on the one hand we have snake oil salesmen promising the earth, and on the other a bunch of humanities graduates who don’t understand technology, science or even human behaviour. Buying it. Bigging it up. Thinking it’s a magic wand.
― caek, Saturday, 24 November 2007 10:16 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha yep!
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 24 November 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)
srsly why the fuck do they teach english literature in universities? what posssible good comes of it?
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 24 November 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)
quod erat demonstrandum
― Just got offed, Saturday, 24 November 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)
ID card scheme to be scrapped: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/27/theresa-may-scrapping-id-cards
― Daniel Giraffe, Thursday, 27 May 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
That's all well and good but
A separate scheme under which identity cards are issued to all foreign nationals resident in Britain by 2015 run by the United Kingdom Border Agency is still to go ahead. Home Office ministers said yesterday this was a separate scheme for biometric residence permits for foreign nationals that was required by European Union legislation.
this is still pretty annoying.
― salsa shark, Thursday, 27 May 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know how the scheme survived this long - the figures (as detailed upthread) were always enormous and the case for always made the benefits seem really half-arsed. Would like to know exactly how much was spent to allow Labour to posture as tough on whatever-it-was.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 27 May 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)