ID Cards in Britain?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I don't know if there's already been a thread on this, but the search function seems to be fucked.

I've just read this:

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,11026,1643987,00.html

Identity cards would not make Britain a safer place and nobody in the secret intelligence services supports their introduction, according to the former head of MI5.
Asked at a further education conference whether she thought ID cards would make the country safer, Dame Stella Rimington replied: "No is the very simple answer, although ID cards have possibly some purpose.

"But I don't think anybody in the intelligence services - not in my former service - will be pressing for ID cards."

Her own opinion was that ID cards would be of use "but only if they can be made unforgeable".
She added: "If we had ID cards at great expense and people can go into back rooms and forge them they will not make us any safer."

Tony Blair has long argued that ID cards would help in the fight against crime, benefit fraud, illegal immigration and terrorism, and he is supported by public opinion polls backing the idea.

Amidst concern amongst MPs about the cost to the general public the government agreed before the general election to cap the amount to be paid by individuals.

The last official costing for the scheme was £5.8bn. The unit cost of a combined 10-year ID card and passport when it is phased in from 2008 was £93. A stand-alone biometric ID card aimed at the low-paid and pensioners would cost £30.

But a study by the London School of Economics earlier this year disputed the figures and claimed that a total cost of £19.2bn, and individual cards costing £230, would be nearer the mark.

Former home secretary Lord Waddington yesterday described as "completely crackers" the suggestion that the public would be prepared to pay over £200 for a card.

Peers from across the House of Lords attacked both the cost and effectiveness of the scheme.

Labour's Lord Gould astonished many peers by claiming: "The public want ID cards and are prepared to pay for them."

Dame Stella was answering questions from college principals following a speech on leadership that she delivered to the Association of Colleges' annual conference in Birmingham.

She had sought to reassure one principal, worried that the intelligence services would treat all foreigners - particularly Muslims - among his student body as potential terrorists, that there would be no question of blanket treatment of ethnic minority groups.

For one thing, she said, there simply were not enough resources to take such an approach.

What do people here think about this whole idea? I reckon it's shit. I don't know why they think it's a vote winner. The whole civil liberties thing doesn't really bother me - if you have a passport, a driving licence, a credit card, etc. you've already given away all kinds of details to all kinds of faceless organisations, and in a way an ID card would be quite useful, BUT it wouldn't cut crime / terrorism (anything can be forged for a price), and who would want to pay £70 (or even £250) for it? The idea that the general public are screaming out for ID cards and can't wait to pay for them is one of the most ridiculous lies I've heard since Thatcher said the same thing about eye tests in the 80s.

(PS - starting this thread at ten past eleven at night isn't really going to get me many replies, is it?)

Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)

No idea where they got this research from. There's no way the British public would voluntarily opt for a £93 charge on anything.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:15 (twenty years ago)

i am ambivalent about the concept of ID cards. the whole "invasion of privacy" thing is bollocks: yeh, like THE MAN doesn't know everything he wants to know anyway (as teh hobb points out). there are far more pressing problems in the UK than whether or not we carry a little card with a chip around with us.

but, er, i wouldn't be prepared to spend even one fucking shiny penny on said card ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)

Wait - there's a chip???

Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

Yup - so it can carry lots of data about your fingerprints, your retinal scan, etc, etc.

It's bad, but it's not as bad as the police's plans to track every vehicle on the British road network.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Thursday, 17 November 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

i am in favour of them. not for crime/terror related reasons, but for convenience. as for privacy, well, yes, 'they' already know lots abuot us, but there is such bureaucracy that what 'they' know is usually half right, or misplaced.

but yes, is there anything that isnt really forgeable?

and, as for the public, i am convinced that they want them. but, they want them for other people (you know, happyslappers, albanians, bird-flu carriers, people who play mp3s on their phone on the bus, people who take the bus). thats why they dont care about how much it will cost them, they wont be getting one, dear

terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 17 November 2005 10:59 (twenty years ago)

why are you for them gareth? i don't see the convenience. i'm unequivocally against.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:04 (twenty years ago)

So exactly how do they help towards the fight against crime?

Seems a total waste of dosh to me. I don't give two hoots about "ooh big brother ooh no" there are plenty of id options out there already. I really think this is a direction towards the ridiculous.

Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)

of course there are plenty of id things out there already, but not fingerprints, retinal scans, dna swabs etc and whatever.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

it'd be good if they combine it with an oyster card.

holy shit. that gets me thinking. i've lost my oyster card twice already. i'm not paying £93 to get it replaced each time!

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)

£93!!

for a card!

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)

if oyster cards also worked in newsagents, takeaway restaurants, etc, that would be good.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:18 (twenty years ago)

How would they get everyone to donate their fingerprints or retinal scans? i just don't see this working at all.

Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

Loads of great stuff on The Register about this. Basically the survey presents the £93 charge as a bottom line - either you pay it or you don't get a passport, in which case 75% of those surveyed said they'd pay it - which compares to the current passport penetration figure of 77%. And 63% said they'd renew their passports if the fee went up to £250 (presumably whilst gritting their teeth and contemplating rioting).

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/17/clarke_id_3rdvote_spin/

ledge (ledge), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)

i dont have enough ID!

terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)

if oyster cards also worked in newsagents, takeaway restaurants, etc, that would be good.
-- Theorry Henry (miltonpinsk...), November 17th, 2005 11:18 AM. (Enrique) (later) (link)

that's how it's like in hong kong! it's really neat. you basically never have to carry proper cash.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)

i don't have £93 for these nazis.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)

how do they get around the prospect of someone picking up anyone's 'oyster card' and using it?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)

i mean surely the whole point is that it shouldn't be THAT easy to purchase stuff - just one swipe or whatever, too dangerous. Chip&PIN only takes 30 seconds anyway.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

i don't have 30 seconds.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:36 (twenty years ago)

how do they get around the prospect of someone picking up anyone's 'oyster card' and using it?
-- Sororah T Massacre (stevem7...), November 17th, 2005 11:33 AM. (blueski) (later) (link)

pistol whipping.


It's basically the same as cash. it's only used really for little things. and so you don't just put your whole bank's balance on it. but better than cash because if you lose it you can cancel it.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:37 (twenty years ago)

I don't have £93 for these nazis.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)

although, there are also the option in HK to have 'automatic reload' ones that when you run out it puts a certain amount ($100 i think, about £10, or maybe you can choose the amount) back on from your bank with direct debit.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)

If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear! Except the government trying to build an unprecedentedly massive database which would be a single point of entry for all this personal data, and thus an obvious and huge target for all sorts of criminal activity.

ledge (ledge), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:50 (twenty years ago)

otm

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:52 (twenty years ago)

£93 per card per person = stealth tax.

Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)

Stealth tax = idiot tory buzzphrase.

There's not much fucking stealthy about charging people upwards of £93 for a document they need.

Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)

need?

Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)

That's the slyness isn't it? They tie the ID Card to the passport. No messy martyrs getting jailed for refusing to have a card, anybody who needs a passport forced to join the scheme.

Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)

I've always found the privacy/national security information-gathering binary really weird - no-one apart from me seems to think it would be a good idea to harvest information for the purpose of making it public.

Gareth you should try living somewhere else for a while! I agreed with you all the time about england before I left, now I only agree with you some of the time (although I do here, abt albanians etc...)

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:39 (twenty years ago)

Passports are going up to £51, Meaning that if you need a renewed/first passport it will cost you £144 to get it. Cunts.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 18 November 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)

Since ILE introduced registration only threads, I think it's only fair they also introduce ID Cards in Britain. ;-)

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 18 November 2005 09:07 (twenty years ago)

Gravel, why should personal information be made public? 'This Is The Country Where I Say...'.

|Theorry, Friday, 18 November 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)

it's a fucking stupid idea. it won't make anyone any safer from terrorism (id cards in spain etc etc, plus HELLO anyone coming in from another country won't need one); benefit fraud is mostly committed by people lying about whether they've worked or not, not by people pretending to be someone else; it's a terrible idea to have all this info gathered in one place (as suggested upthread it's ripe for abuse and they will prob get it wrong anyway); this is britain and they will not be able to run it efficiently, securely, on time or on budget (remember the nhs computer centralisation debacle?) (see also: the olympics); £93 is absolutely extortionate and for something people don't even want; tying it to the passport is just the sort of horrid sly slimy manipulative hatred-filled behaviour you'd expect from a TOTAL CUNT like blunkett.

where the hell are they getting the idea that ANYONE wants this? it's being talked about a lot everywhere and has been since it first came up, and i have not spoken to or overheard one single person saying they think it's a good idea. er, except gareth now.

emsk ( emsk), Friday, 18 November 2005 10:36 (twenty years ago)

(remember the nhs computer centralisation debacle?)

lol but that's going great guns!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 November 2005 10:59 (twenty years ago)

When you apply for your ID card, you'll have to take your passport along to prove who you are. Which is fine, provided you're not already travelling on a false passport.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:00 (twenty years ago)

would the ID card stop things like when that bloke assumed the identity of a dead person?

ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

(remember the nhs computer centralisation debacle?)
lol but that's going great guns!

-- ken c (it...), November 18th, 2005.

haha, i was going to call this out, before i saw the addy.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

would the ID card stop things like when that bloke assumed the identity of a dead person?

A matter of considerable, nay vital, national importance

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)

"would the ID card stop things like when that bloke assumed the identity of a dead person? "

It would make it harder for you to use more than one identity at a time. The bloke who stole the dead baby's name seemed quite happy to live life under his new ID, so when he went to apply for his first ID card he'd just take along the deceased tot's birth certificate and say "Here's who I am".

Then with his biometrics on file it would be, in theory, impossible for him to get another ID card, but he would still be living under a false name.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)

ITS EASY TO LAFF UNTIL SOMEONE SUCCEDES IN SHOOTING GENRAL DE GAUL

Le Marquis de Salade (noodle vague), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

lol but that's going great guns!

yebbut how long did it take and how much did it cost? it seemed to frag on FOREVER.

emsk ( emsk), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

er, drag.

emsk ( emsk), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:15 (twenty years ago)

although, there are also the option in HK to have 'automatic reload' ones that when you run out it puts a certain amount ($100 i think, about ?0, or maybe you can choose the amount) back on from your bank with direct debit.

Ha! Guess what I just received from transport of london...

Dear Mr Chu,

We have recently introduced a new payment method when using Oyster to pay as you go (Pre Pay) called Auto top-up.

Using either a credit or debit card, this service allows your Oyster card to be topped up automatically with either ?0 or ?0, whenever your balance drops below ?.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)

"If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear!"

But everyone has something to hide - So we all have everything to fear

ben j, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 12:02 (twenty years ago)

lol ur cuntry sux

bato (bato), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

But everyone has something to hide

except for http://www.loscavio.com/images/portfolio/loscavio_videoproduction_mymonkey.jpg

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

four months pass...
a friend sent me this:

The ID cards bill has gone back and forth between the Commons and the Lords with the crucial aspect of compulsory entry to the national
database being debated. Last week, sadly, the Tories and Crossbenchers
caved in and we now have a dodgy compromise deal that forces us all on
to the ID Card database when we renew our passports from 2008.

Be careful, therefore, in choosing when to renew your passport. If you
can time it to be just before the compulsion is mandatory, at the end of 2007 for example, you would then have 10 years with that passport,
during which time there's every chance the requirement will have been
dropped or modified (the Conservatives currently claim they would repeal this legislation if they were elected.* More likely, however, the Lib Dems could force this issue if in coalition with Labour from 2009.)

If you are unaware of why the database is a_very_bad_thing, read
no2id.net article

*NB: Obviously, this does not mean one ought to vote Tory or that this
will be their policy next week ...

Konal Doddz (blueski), Sunday, 2 April 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/make-your-own-id/

In fact you might sense that the whole field of biometrics and ID is rather like medical quackery: as usual, on the one hand we have snake oil salesmen promising the earth, and on the other a bunch of humanities graduates who don’t understand technology, science or even human behaviour. Buying it. Bigging it up. Thinking it’s a magic wand.

caek, Saturday, 24 November 2007 10:16 (eighteen years ago)

hahaha yep!

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 24 November 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)

srsly why the fuck do they teach english literature in universities? what posssible good comes of it?

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 24 November 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)

quod erat demonstrandum

Just got offed, Saturday, 24 November 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

ID card scheme to be scrapped: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/27/theresa-may-scrapping-id-cards

Daniel Giraffe, Thursday, 27 May 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)

That's all well and good but

A separate scheme under which identity cards are issued to all foreign nationals resident in Britain by 2015 run by the United Kingdom Border Agency is still to go ahead. Home Office ministers said yesterday this was a separate scheme for biometric residence permits for foreign nationals that was required by European Union legislation.

this is still pretty annoying.

salsa shark, Thursday, 27 May 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know how the scheme survived this long - the figures (as detailed upthread) were always enormous and the case for always made the benefits seem really half-arsed. Would like to know exactly how much was spent to allow Labour to posture as tough on whatever-it-was.

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 27 May 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.