Has the internet opened you up to a world of people or made you intolerant and impatient of everyone who's not like you?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
survey

Public Enema #1, Monday, 21 November 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)

Box 1.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 21 November 2005 08:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm sorry if this is actually a troll, because I'm going to take it quite seriously.

A little from column A, a little from column B.

I was actually thinking about this the other, day, and trying to think of the good things about ILX, and why I continue to post to it, even when it's an adversarial hellhole. And the truth is, beyond the many IRL friends I've made through it, it has actually occasionally completely opened my eyes to some things.

Most specifically, there are some posters who come from quite different backgrounds to me (Tuomas, Dee the Lurker, Vic spring to mind immediately) and some who just see the world differently to me (Nabisco, Gareth and I hate to say it but Stelfox when he's not being combatative) who have completely turned me around and changed my mind about beliefs I'd held for some time.

So, yes, it has opened my nind and my world up.

On the other hand, it's left me with close to zero tolerance for adolscent and post-adolescent boys, but that's not just the internet.

Tweed as F*ck (kate), Monday, 21 November 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)

Tweed, well, I haven't done anything trollish on the thread yet, so I don't see how I could be a troll, but no doubt I will be accused before this is all over.


My answer:

Both, actually: it's global and it made me realize I hate almost the entire world.

Public Enema #1, Monday, 21 November 2005 08:57 (twenty years ago)

maybe you should expand your openness to different backgrounds and different views of the world and just embrace those adolescent boys like a grownup instead of whining everytime they pull your hair or steal your dolly.

boring., Monday, 21 November 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)

You can have an open mind about things without feeling the need to embrace adolscent boys (horrib things)

Notkate (mark grout), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:01 (twenty years ago)

maybe you should expand your openness to different backgrounds and different views of the world and just embrace those adolescent boys like a grownup instead of whining everytime they pull your hair or steal your dolly.

-- boring. (gro...), November 21st, 2005.

See what I mean? I hate this prick.

Public Enema #1, Monday, 21 November 2005 09:03 (twenty years ago)

hate all you want, it's your right.
just as it's the right (and is pretty widely accepted) of post-adolescent boys to make scenes and tease.
boys will be boys, am i rite?!

plus those voice cracks are so cuet!

boring., Monday, 21 November 2005 09:06 (twenty years ago)

You're right. You are boring.

I think Mark was trying to clue you in that I'm "Not Kate" up there, boring.

Public Enema #1, Monday, 21 November 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

Actually, I was just saying I wasn't Kate.

Is this like "Spartacus" in inverse?

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:10 (twenty years ago)

Where is Noodles' Don't Hate Kate! t-shirt when I need it? Kim, can you please nick it next time he's drunk and mail it to me? ;-)

Errr, it would be really interesting if this thread could get back on topic. People on ILX go on about "discourse" or "discourse is dead" etc. on ILX, and it would be interesting (to me at least) to see if all this talk and debate actually accomplishes anything.

Tweed as F*ck (kate), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)

Well I'm going to choose a). My eyes have definitely been opened from reading some of the many forums I've visited, ilx more so than others.

I'm fairly sure I was already b) before all this.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:45 (twenty years ago)

I have met some incredible people, especially thanks to ILX, that there isn't a chance in hell I would ever have met otherwise thanks to distance. And a couple of those people I've become very close to and keep in contact with a lot.

Ive had boyfriends, one night stands, late night gigglefests, long serious conversations, fights, breakups, the whole nine yards.

Love it, all of it, its life on crack.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:53 (twenty years ago)

A. The more ideas you're exposed to, the more open you become, I think. The internet's no different to any other part of life. Having said that, the more you see is out there, the less tolerant you are of time wasting and bullshit, perhaps.

beanz (beanz), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:54 (twenty years ago)

I'll tick box C. Both. It depends on so many factors.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 21 November 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)

Yes. I'm not sure if the intolerance/impatience felt is necessarily because they're 'not like me' though.

The influence of the modern interweb on my life in numerous aspects (working, social, love/sex, political and cultural perspective) this decade has been effectively total, which pleases and alarms in equal measure.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 21 November 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)

Its kind of a real shift in societal interaction isnt it? Which is scary but very cool too.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 21 November 2005 10:52 (twenty years ago)

I mean what I love is stuff like someone posting "hey, David Byrne is doing a talk about Powerpoint at UC Berkley!" and being able to WATCH IT LIVE, FROM AUSTRALIA. FOR FREE.

Now THAT shit still blows me away.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 21 November 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

I'm with trayce on this - the internet's brilliant. Not by itself - that's rubbish. But life+internet = super-life, has to be a good thing. I'm always been tolerant of people who think different things to me, I just didn'[t realised there was so MANY of them!

Come Back Johnny B (Johnney B), Monday, 21 November 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)

I don't know why, but I still think the idea of finding love, friends and one-night stands through the internet is "wrong." This is really an unjustifiable position which makes me a luddite, I know.

Perhaps this is why I can't find it in my soul to care about people online: Everyone seems an actor moreso online than in real life and I have trouble giving a shit about actors. Also, people stop being polite online, as if it is a "Real World" episode or as if everyone is a shock jock DJ "keepin' it real", whereas in real life, people put on their actor faces to be civil to one another, lest they get their ass kicked. This little challenge of real life, remaining civil and getting people to like you in reality, is probably why I feel internet relationships are goofy and sad.

Public Enema #1, Monday, 21 November 2005 21:02 (twenty years ago)

Has the internet opened you up to a world of people or made you intolerant and impatient of everyone who's not like you?

just intolerant and impatient of stupid people. but i didn't need the internet for that.

j b everlovin' r (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 21 November 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

In a nutshell:

1992 - 2003: Definitely column A.
2003 - 2005: Definitely column B.

This is more me crystallizing the type of discourse I am looking for on the Internet (ie, low emotional investment goofing off) and developing very little patience for people who express that they don't feel the same way by chastising me.

(xpost: JBR totally on the money.)

Dan (This Is Why I Now Mostly Talk To The Same Subset Of Twenty People On This B, Monday, 21 November 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

Anything that is emotionally invested tends to blow up in your face on t'internet, and I have learned that there are subjects I had better not discuss, because I know that I can't easily tolerate the views of others. It's easier to defuse this kind of emo-bomb IRL. Apart from that, column B. I think mixing with people with whom the things you have in common are not the most obvious (live in my street, work in same office, etc.) defo exposes you to diff. and interesting POVs, which is almost guaranteed to change your views on things, even if it's a gradual shift and not something you can attribute to any particular encounter or individual.

Zora (Zora), Monday, 21 November 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

For column B read column A, brain non-functionez, etc.

Zora (Zora), Monday, 21 November 2005 22:20 (twenty years ago)

jbr's amount of OTMness there is totally off the charts. It's basically what I've been thinking this whole thread really.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 21 November 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)

little patience for people who express that they don't feel the same way by chastising me.

This is the thing I dislike most about the Internet. No, I'm not ten kinds of dickhead because I don't like whatever it is you like. I'm just me.

The Internet has definitely opened up a whole world of people who are as curmudgeonly as I am, and that is good, because it gives me a sense of community without me ever having to answer the door or the phone.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 21 November 2005 23:11 (twenty years ago)

just intolerant and impatient of stupid people. but i didn't need the internet for that.

it's not that i think i'm especially smart! i was a mediocre student in school and i still do horribly on tests. i would place my intelligence as somewhere above average, i guess. but it astonishes me how many people there are who get by just fine in life while at the same time being incapable of any kind of critical reasoning whatsofuckingever.

j b everlovin' r (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 21 November 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

it astonishes me how many people there are who get by just fine in life while at the same time being incapable of any kind of critical reasoning whatsofuckingever

I suspect that current society / civilization / etc. is designed for unquestioningly "just get by" people.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 21 November 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

It's made me realise I was/am box 2 and as a result I miss/ed out on a lot of box 1.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 00:29 (twenty years ago)

Even though I'm not a regular poster and my opinion isn't really based on my experiences on ILX, definitely opened me up. The internet has been and will continue to be a way of connecting for extremely shy people like me. I met my husband and my best friend online. I find it kind of silly for someone to call internet relationships goofy and sad, because you have just as little information about a person online as you do a person you meet at the library. The internet helped me express myself more freely and that seeped into my real life and gave me more self confidence. I've always been able to relate to people, but now I can let them know that I relate to them and build on those relationships. It's geek therapy.

Rebekkah (burntbrat), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 03:48 (twenty years ago)

Various people have expressed things I agree with on this thread, and various people have expressed things I disagree with. I don't think they're wrong, I don't even think they're that different. I can't do emotionally uninvested in *any* area of my life.

I don't know why, but I still think the idea of finding love, friends and one-night stands through the internet is "wrong."

I know this is quite a common view, but what's the difference? 90% of the jobs I've had in the past 5 years I've found Through The Internet. I met two of my three bandmates Through The Internet. Why should it be any different to find like-minded people to hang out with, or even mate with?

I guess part of my problem is that I used to think of the internet, as this special, protected place that was free from the worst excesses of idiocy. And now the internet is a bit like the post-time travel future in Douglas Adams novels - just like everywhere else. The problem is with human nature, not something special and indefinable about the internet.

The Damp Is Rising (kate), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:05 (twenty years ago)

You know, the 'worst levels of idiocy' is one of the good things about it, for me.

That's easy for me to say, granted, as I'm by and large not in the firing line (apart from one notable occasion).

Fact is, the closer the internet is to real life, as opposed to a 'tranquil utopia to go and chill out', the better.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:24 (twenty years ago)

Surely Adolescent boys and post-adolescent boys is just every male?

Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

Some are better at hiding and/or controlling it than others? I don't know.

I don't think that the "excesses of idiocy" should not exist, I just think there's an appropriate time and a place for them. And a realisation that there are some thing that just unacceptible ways to treat others, not just on the internet. I don't ask the internet to be utopia.

At the risk of getting into another "argh, oh no, ILX oh no" meta debate, there does seem to be a marked division in attitudes towards ILX. That a lot of people treat it like a pub - that yes, social controls are relaxed and discourse is freer, but there are still modes of behaviour. While others seem to treat it like a frat party - anything goes, behave however you like, because it's not your mess to clean up.

The Damp Is Rising (kate), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:33 (twenty years ago)

I suppose thats an interesting discussion point for message boards in general. The ones I've been to that are strongly regulated with a moderator enforcing every rule are usually really boring and stifling. But then again a place like ILX, which is pretty much rule free and the moderation is minimal, it allows the discussion to be great sometimes, but also allows for some idiots to basically troll and spam their heart out.

I suppose the internet gives you the safety of anonimity, You wouldn't go to a Pub, or even a frat party and call someone a cunt and show them pictures of disgusting porn. But you can do that on a message board, view the reaction and log off.

Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:38 (twenty years ago)

i like to read the funny messageboards.

jeffrey (johnson), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 10:01 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.