board games and other sit-round the table activities

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
the pagan celebration of predicted victory over cold and ice draws ever nigh-er, and the time will come when YOU TOO will stumble dozily to a table festooned with ingots and paper markers and asked to if not take the reins at least not embarrass yourself, pray share with me and the rest of us here what's a good board or card game you've seen lately? like, at least as good as skip-bo?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

preferably playable by a family that enjoys domino games and hates charades

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

Not quite the same, but I did play a word game last weekend. Teams; one draws cards from a bag and gives clues to the famous person named, for teammates to guess, against the clock. Best moment was when one person said "Um, footballer, violent, played for Wimbledon," and looked up to find his two very gay teammates looking at him with total amused contempt. Also "Jockey, small..." and "Female lesbian" were good.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

Surely Crib is the Xmas card game of choice? also Brits can play it in the pub for small stakes without fear of arrest

Porkpie (porkpie), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

haha, yes, i've played that one martin. i was going to say it works best when everyone's pretty much on the same page, pop-cult and age-wise but your examples prove why the opposite is more hilarious. it may, however, be a little too close for charades for the group i have in mind, i.e. not enough SCHEMING.

hi chris! only problem with cribbage in my fam is its association with GAMBLING, the scent of which must not tarry too near my grandfather, who won't even play games with face cards, so associated they are with the vices of the riverboat.

OK i realize now i'm getting arsey but really my conditions aren't so stringent: no gambling, no face cards, no charades

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:21 (nineteen years ago)

(i never had the heart to tell my grandparents the name of the original game upon which skip-bo was based: "spite and malice")

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago)

Loco! OK, I have no idea if it would fly with your family, but I've gotten many people hooked on it.

Casuistry (Chris P), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

Also, Skip-Bo? Seriously?

The new classic game for large families who are clever and funny is Apples To Apples, of course. But you really need at least 6 or 7 for that to work right.

Lost Cities is pretty nice for a 2-player game, and it's all about archaeology! Except not really.

Casuistry (Chris P), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

apples to apples sounds like it might be perfect, casuistry!

"loco" -- ?

ihttp://www.birmingham.gov.uk/Media?MEDIA_ID=106707

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

Seven Seals!

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

I actually just now got back from a weekend where board-game-people met up and played board games!

(seven seals is this btw - it's a superfun bright-coloured trick-taking and mutual sabotage game)

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago)

I love princes of florence but it's kinda gamer-nerdish rather than familyish unless the families are Very German.

Mississipi Queen is totally great fun if you ignore the full game and just play the training games loads of times.

Apples to Apples is still probably otm though!

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

hey dude!

Shithead will be out too then :o(

Porkpie (porkpie), Sunday, 11 December 2005 22:02 (nineteen years ago)

INBETWEENS

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 11 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)

I hate you for playing Princes of Florence without me. Even if I had the game I don't think I could gather together a fivesome to play it. More three-person Puerto Rico for us!

Loco! is by Reiner Knizia, who is easily my favorite game designer. It is a gripping mindfuck of a game.

Casuistry (Chris P), Sunday, 11 December 2005 23:21 (nineteen years ago)

i have this in my del.icio.us bookmarks; maybe if i find a cheap copy on amazon i'll bite.

Penis, NV (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 11 December 2005 23:25 (nineteen years ago)

PoF is really pretty good even with three, Chris!

I like Puerto Rico but I have never not come last :(

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 11 December 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

(also I want to check out Loco too now! I have only played Tigris and Euphrates twice but it was boggling amounts of fun)

(This thread has maybe wandered)

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 11 December 2005 23:35 (nineteen years ago)

Apples to Apples is awesome. I also recommend Dictionary.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 12 December 2005 00:20 (nineteen years ago)

the rizla game? where everyone sticks a rizla to the head of the person to their right (or left) with someone's (er famous people usually, tho it is of course hi-la-rious when someone gets their own/s.o.'s/someone else in the room's) name on it and the person has to guess who they are using only questions to which the answers are yes or no? way more fun than it should be/sounds.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 12 December 2005 00:29 (nineteen years ago)

classic: facts in five, bridge

classic but trouble:
(players will become much too aggressive whilst learning geography): take off!
(other reasons): beer dice

dud: charades, nasdaq

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 12 December 2005 00:42 (nineteen years ago)

UNO.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 12 December 2005 00:57 (nineteen years ago)

It's Hearts at this place.

jim wentworth (wench), Monday, 12 December 2005 00:58 (nineteen years ago)

Can't think of anything but Malarky.

The game asks the questions that everyone wonders about from time to time. After a question is read aloud, one player (unbeknownst to the others) reads the correct answer, while the other players present bluff answers--as convincingly as they can--and then each player votes for the answer they think is correct. Points are awarded when your bluff answer receives votes or if you vote for the correct answer.

kephm (kephm), Monday, 12 December 2005 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

Hope none of these are too obvious
- Scattergories
- Scrabble
- Pass The Pigs
- Trivial Pursuit
- Taboo
- Pictionary
- Uno seconded - was great for whiling away rainy holidays stuck in a caravan.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 12 December 2005 02:46 (nineteen years ago)

QUORIDOR

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 12 December 2005 02:53 (nineteen years ago)

yay pass the pigs

Penis, NV (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 12 December 2005 03:01 (nineteen years ago)

one night freshman year i stayed up with my roommates until 6 in the morning playing UNO. we went for about...four hours or so? it was glorious.

taboo is my board game of choice, though. i will also add to the praise for apples to apples (the more players the better though).

joseph (joseph), Monday, 12 December 2005 03:23 (nineteen years ago)

also, i really want someone to teach me bridge, if only so i can finally decipher bobby wolff's daily column in the star-ledger.

joseph (joseph), Monday, 12 December 2005 03:25 (nineteen years ago)

I played a great game a few years ago that I can't remember the name of. It was a writing game, you were given character cards, subject cards, genre cards, plot cards etc and you kind of had to write mini short stories within a brief time frame. Anyone hazard a guess at the name?

I'm keen to play Bethump'd. Anyone tackled that one?

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 12 December 2005 03:26 (nineteen years ago)

Settlers of Catan is a great game.

Matthew Stafford (loto), Monday, 12 December 2005 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

North American Rails is huge fun, but apparently Mayfair doesn't even make it anymore — replaced by Empire Builder.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Monday, 12 December 2005 03:41 (nineteen years ago)

Dude! Come over, we'll play Empire Builder. I don't know, I'm convinced that there's no actual game in Empire Builder, but making the map and pushing your little train around is so ridiculously fun that it's all right.

Settlers of Catan is fun but it seems like it's generally decided within two rounds.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 12 December 2005 06:39 (nineteen years ago)

SETTLERS.

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 12 December 2005 06:41 (nineteen years ago)

Settlers of Catan is fun but it seems like it's generally decided within two rounds.

Wrong. It's at LEAST five.

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 12 December 2005 06:41 (nineteen years ago)

uno - hood style - if you drop a skip or a draw on somebody they get to punch you, twice if it's draw four.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 12 December 2005 07:09 (nineteen years ago)

I am actually prepared to argue that it's decided as soon as you know (a) the board layout and (b) who selects first. Decided with 80% certainty, at least.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 12 December 2005 07:25 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, one I devised (based on Ex Libris) involved one person describing a song or offering a couple of lines, generally with the artiste and genre named, and asking for the next couple of lines. Everyone writes their own version and the one proposing that round gathers them, with the correct lines, and reads them all out. A point when you get it right, a point when your version is guessed. I found country and western and hip-hop worked pretty well. This does need people with vaguely comparable musical knowledge.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 12 December 2005 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

I just got "Name That Tune: 80's Edition" every fucking video is either INXS or Paul Young.

slow jamz and white guy indie acoustic shit (Chris V), Monday, 12 December 2005 14:06 (nineteen years ago)

the rizla game? where everyone sticks a rizla to the head of the person to their right (or left) with someone's (er famous people usually, tho it is of course hi-la-rious when someone gets their own/s.o.'s/someone else in the room's) name on it and the person has to guess who they are using only questions to which the answers are yes or no? way more fun than it should be/sounds.
-- emsk (vomit.quif...), December 11th, 2005. (later)

This game is actually AMAZING. Especially after a few drinks. Sometimes if two people get theirs (and thus need a new name) simultaneously, it can be really funny. Once my friends put "ANT" on my head and "DEC" on another friends head.

They were all laughing maniacally the entire time, but I suppose you assume they're just laughing at you. It's weird, it still took about a round for me to realise that because one person was "DEC" I must have been "Ant". But the funniest part was that after this it still took my friend "Dec" about ten goes to get that he was "Dec".

There's such a weird paranoid feeling with this game, everyone laughing at something written on your head.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 12 December 2005 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

Martin, do you have Ex Libris? I thought Alba and I were the only two people in the world to own this game.

Our family plays The After Eights Game after Christmas dinner. You each scoff an After Eight, then spend the next half hour trying to turn the wrapper inside out without tearing it. It doesn't matter if you fail because you can just eat another After Eight and start again.

Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 12 December 2005 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

the dozens

North American Rails is huge fun, but apparently Mayfair doesn't even make it anymore — replaced by Empire Builder

what are these?!

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 12 December 2005 16:20 (nineteen years ago)

Our family plays The After Eights Game after Christmas dinner. You each scoff an After Eight, then spend the next half hour trying to turn the wrapper inside out without tearing it. It doesn't matter if you fail because you can just eat another After Eight and start again.

This game sounds brilliant.

James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Monday, 12 December 2005 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

Apples to Apples is a good game, but you need a big group. Pit is good and fast-paced and doesn't require too much thought. Trivial Pursuit Book Lovers Edition might be good, except the "Children's Books" questions are too difficult.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 12 December 2005 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

OK, i googled "inbetweens" but all that came up was some rub indie crap.

chris, i understand your condescension towards skip-bo. it is an almost thoroughly mindless game. my family's other favorite is a bridge-like domino game called texas 42, which is full of bidding, trick-taking, double-crosses, boisterous accusations of cheating, and cryptic phrases like "that's a walker" and "nell-o". some in the family do not feel up to this class of hugger mugger even at the best of times, and others, depending on the hour, would rather let the fates guide their actions via some random distribution of cards, the better to digest the evening's corn chowder and wine, the latter of which would have to have been secretly sipped from plain glasses and referred to as "cranberry juice." but you must be right that "better than skip-bo" is a low bar at best.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

Carcassonne!

The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

ok in-betweens.


so everybody first of all agrees on a fee per game, say 2 euro, or a dollar or whatever, into the pot, for a round. The more people the better really, 8 or 9 is a good number.

Each card has a numeric value, the usual way, you can decide is Aces are high or low before each round.

So everybody is dealt 2 cards, which are placed face up on the table. Then the game begins by each person deciding whether to play or pass.

If you "play" you basically say how much you want to bet, the pot, or less or whatever, and the dealer waits to build some suspense then gives you a card.

If the card is in between the numbers of the two you have then you win. But if it's outside you lose whatever you bet and must put that amount into the pot.

And if the card you get is either of the two numbers you have already then you must pay double the amount you bet.

It sounds very simple, and it is, but believe me this game is gambling in its rawest form (so maybe not best for you tracer, as per what you said about gambling), I've seen friends win and lose huge amounts of money.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

optional extra: when someone is deciding how much to bet, and the stakes are high, the rest of the people playing sing hit songs with the lyrics changed to include the word pot

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 12 December 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I used to play that a lot — we called it Acey-Deucey or Mexican Sweat. (Not very PC.) Biggest pot I ever won ($60) was from playing that, and that was with a 25-cent ante.

gabbneb, check this out. Basically the games are a topographic grid of a continent, and each player builds his/her own railway system and picks up and delivers freight to fulfill contracts that they draw at random. In N.A. Rails, you have to connect six of the seven major North American cities and amass $250 million to win, but of course the rail construction isn't free, building over rivers and mts. costs more, etc. Delivering coffee to Montreal is a big payoff; cars to Chicago, not so much.

Now I want Lunar Rails!

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Monday, 12 December 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago)

Speaking of which, "Huggermugger" brought my family a lot of fun when I was much younger, although the last time I played it it came off as both arcane and easy. But if you like word games (rather than, say, math games like Scrabble) it's a viable option (if you can find it).

If they want a certain amount of excitement but without any real brain-burning you might consider Guillotine, which is fun and allows for a certain amount of machination but is essentially a luck of the draw game, but you have to have a family that delights in collecting the heads of French nobles rather than finding that somewhat upsetting. There is a card called the "Piss Boy" who is also in line to get his head chopped off, so some of the jokes my friends and I make might not be comfortable to make around grandma.

Another "family favorite" that I have heard people rave about is Bohnanza, which I haven't played but which is a card game about bean planting. But they say it is fun.

I dunno, Lunar Rails is tempting but also not. Part of the fun is having some emotional connection to the cities. (Oo, Montreal wants Uranium!) But I'd certainly give it a go. I would give near any board game a go, once.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 12 December 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

Madchen, no I don't. It is a completely pointless game to own if you know the rules, and you and all the friends whose homes you are likely to play it in have loads of books - I have maybe 2,500, and the person whose home I have played it in (same person as the lyrics game, and the name game I mentioned up top) has far more.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 12 December 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

botticelli? my favorite board game was Scotland Yard

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 12 December 2005 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

For the third time: DUTCH BLITZ.

Trivial Pursuit Book Lovers Edition might be good, except the "Children's Books" questions are too difficult. What huh? There's a WHOLE CATEGORY of children's books?!?

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 12 December 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.