Charles Kennedy - Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4525442.stm

Should he stand down or stay put? I really ought to know more about the inner workings of the Lib Dems.

Carl Handwriting (dog latin), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 09:36 (twenty years ago)

i think he's pretty hopeless. the party itself doesn't have a coherent programme to put to the elctorate, but beyond that kennedy seems unable to take a real, hard stance on anything, viz war, torture, suspension of habeas corpus etc etc.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 09:47 (twenty years ago)

he just doesn't have anything about him. that's not to say i'd like a blair/cameron clone in there. But yeh, you're absolutely right, Lib Dems have been getting votes due to their national policies (pro-cannabis, anti-student loan, anti-council tax etc) but never really promoted their international policies other than "Boo-hiss Blair bombed Iraq he a bad mang" etc.

Carl Handwriting (dog latin), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 09:53 (twenty years ago)

I like Champagne Charlie but the Lib-Dems badly need to replace him.

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 10:49 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, this is exactly the problem, the Lib Dems don't stand for anything, they just stand against other parties' policies. Next Lib Dem leader would be either Lembit Opik or Greg Mulholland, right?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)

they'd have the same chance w/ gary mulholland

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)

lembit opik is one of royksopp innee?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)

beyond that kennedy seems unable to take a real, hard stance on anything

I sort of agree with this - he's too amiable for his own good really - but part of it surely is that old chesnut about the inherent difficulty of conveying any sort of nuanced stance through such an unsubtle beast as the media. When you're the third party commenting on what's often falsely portrayed as a black-and-white issue, it's kind of hard finding a distinct spotlight to wank your mandate under. Which has always been Charlie's gripe I guess.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)

well he could say 'no war' or 'religion out of schools' or something liberal like that.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)

But I don't think that's what he unconditionally believes.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:31 (twenty years ago)

Basically, if the Lib Dems want to be the opposition, they need to stop acting like a third party.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

basically the media isn't going to go away, and fact is menzies campbell, even when very ill, performed better on television (more trustworthy, more authoritative, etc) than the ruddy-nosed kennedy.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)

basically the media isn't going to go away

Which is the nubbins of it really isn't it? LibDems have always blamed the system where others have played the system.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)

the party itself doesn't have a coherent programme to put to the elctorate

neither did the Tories at the last election really but they still picked up more votes. i blame the electorate!

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)

The other major problem for the Lib Dems is that the Conservatives are now (arguably) electable, so they're not going to pick up any more votes from people just throwing their arms into the air and going "Oh, I don't care".

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:36 (twenty years ago)

I was going to seek a Lib Dem thread, to discuss the apparent challenge.

I think that Hughes and Campbell will not be future leaders. I think that a contest could be fought between Oaten and Cable. I would expect Oaten to win. Maybe that will even happen soon.

the boxfox, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

PS / I voted LD at the last election, and not because I was saying "Oh, I don't care". If that had been my attitude, perhaps I would have voted Labour.

the bellefox, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

i voted LD simply on acct of the war, but they do seem totally confused about policy in general.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

i reckon Hughes would get it just cos he has a vaguely decent profile in the media. he's certainly be the most popular with those who defected from labour in the last election. oaten and cable would both take the party rightwards, esp. cable who i find plain creepy. campbell's too much like kennedy and too old. can't see them making up much ground tho either way. their one chance of power's in the case of a hung parliament next time round where they'd have to side with either labour or cons to form a govt. that would then presumably force them to decide exactly where they thought they were going. lembit opik's LD northern ireland spokesman and very nice if a big excitable, zany, schoolboy type. looks about 14 with white hair.

barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

Cable is my MP. He is a decent guy, but not 'leadership potential'. Oaten or Opik would prob get it, not that I care.

Dr.C, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

but they do seem totally confused about policy in general.

how so?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

and does Cameron really have 'leadership potential'? i think many people are just 'enjoying' the novelty of the Conservatives having a relatively photogenic leader for the first time ever and expecting to do better as a result (which they will).

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

'and does Cameron really have 'leadership potential'?'

he's telegenic, yes.

barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

LDs: half of them are social liberals who imply they'd have a labour-style welfare state; the other half are economic liberals who'd cut back on same. the ex-labour voters who vote LD tend to focus on the 'legalize it' side and ignore the rest.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

you need that kind of mix i reckon. but then i'd abolish the whole concept of political 'parties' if i could.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

http://gallery.antisozial.de/albums/album21/hippy.jpg

retarded and gay (bato), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

Why do you need that mix? Having half your party at odds with other other fundamental ideological issues seems a bit of a problem for them, to me.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Charles Kennedy is my mum and dad's MP, and his brother is a good friend of my uncle. He's a fairly decent chap, all told, but good chap does not necessarily equal great leader.

Lembit Opik is a menk however, and I'd rather have Charlie Kennedy any day over a bloke who is obsessed with aliens and married to Sian Lloyd.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

I am aware that some people say Cameron is photogenic. But I would like to note here that I think he is, in a way, hideous.

the bellefox, Wednesday, 14 December 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

It's because his mouth is too small for his face.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)

He's less attractive than Blair, but more attractive than Kennedy.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)

Why do you need that mix? Having half your party at odds with other other fundamental ideological issues seems a bit of a problem for them, to me.

What example are we talking about here? Of course division doesn't work against the idea of one party being completely united on all issues, but the latter seems somewhat absurd in itself. Unrealistic? When most issues are clearly grey, how can one commit to a policy that is entirely black or white?


also, SIAN LLOYD IS AN ALIEN. It all makes sense now.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 14 December 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

well, either you have high taxes and spending, or you don't, and the LDs don't seem sure of themselves on this score. for the government to function, it has to have some kind of coherence on the big questions.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)

Giving a flying fuck about the Lib Dems is a sure sign you're taking politics too seriously.

Falling down the stairs again (noodle vague), Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:43 (twenty years ago)

it's just something to natter about, to cover up the silence. otherwise we'd have to come to terms with mortality and shit.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:49 (twenty years ago)

So horribly true.

Falling down the stairs again (noodle vague), Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:55 (twenty years ago)

Simon Hughes - haha. Every time he stands up to speak in the Commons he gets jeered because he's considered such a pompous self-righteous twerp - he's a standing joke. Ming Campbell is too old. Oaten isn't clever enough. Isn't Cable the guy who wants the Liberals to "move towards the centre ground", ie, BE EXACTLY LIKE NEW LABOUR AND CAMERON'S TORIES? Saints preserve us!

We Buy a Hammer For Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:55 (twenty years ago)

I'm rather more supportative of Kennedy than most here, as, by and large, he's made the right decisions and taken the right positions, on civil liberties, the Iraq war and is indeed staunchly anti-Tory.

I would rather have a 'chairman' than a 'leader' like Blair or Cameron.

Tom May (Tom May), Thursday, 15 December 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

The right position on Iraq war: "We support it, until things start going wrong, then we don't"

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 15 December 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

I think we should go back to old-skool politics where everyone looked and behaved like a fucking monster and people at least could be bothered to respect or hate them properly.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 15 December 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

Thatcher's 80s cabinets were great for that. Every single one of the fuckers looked like a Dickensian villain.

The Wanderers' Wandering Daughter (noodle vague), Friday, 16 December 2005 00:37 (twenty years ago)

I think that its high time Charlie boy packed his bags and went so that the party can decide on a definate liberal direction Will they be the Left Liberal party of British politics, taking the stomping ground once occupied by Old Labour; will they take on issues of social justice, council housing and privitisation? Will they in affect stand agaunst the present right-wing consensus of the centre ground be the real alternative? Or will they on the other hand ally themselves primarily wuth the Conservatives amd the Blairites in a programe of market-based reforms; the party of private ownership, small government,low taxation and libiterian social policy? Will they in affect become the Liberal party of Gladstone? This big choice must be faced by the Lib-Dems at some stage, a fact obscured by Kennedy who is determined to marry the left and right of his party into a cohesive whole. That will only end in tears when it comes to polling day, when there is no united mwessage and when the Lib-dems will not havw the kudos of an unpopular war. It is tinme for a fresh face and the tough political choices to be finally made for the direction of the Liberals.

Ben Wood, Friday, 16 December 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)

I'm rather more supportative of Kennedy than most here, as, by and large, he's made the right decisions and taken the right positions, on civil liberties, the Iraq war and is indeed staunchly anti-Tory.
I would rather have a 'chairman' than a 'leader' like Blair or Cameron.

OTM. But also, has it really come to the point where we have no other choice than to support either right or central parties? I find the fact a lot of people my age are disillusioned with politics and don't vote is because there is no real alternative. Left-wing parties are considered extremely radical or unfashionable in this day and age. And I'll agree with Matt DC - we need a few Thatchers and Benns to shake up the system. It's become a fucking X-Factor contest of whose mug is the most camera friendly rather than who is the most passionate about what they believe in.

My friend put forward the other day that most authorative figures (politicians, teachers, even parents) go out and try their best in order to prove their own worth to other people, rather than actually wanting to make a difference. While I would argue that it's really horses for courses, this is the impression that I get from people like Cameron and Blair - they got bullied at school and now they want to prove that they can make it - like some kind of messed up popularity contest. At least Kennedy doesn't TRY to be some jumped up over charismatic male model all the time. I'd hate it if the LD's followed down this path and therefore I'd say it's Ming Campbell who deserves a shot at the (ironically-called) limelight, despite the well documented health issues.

Carl Handwriting (dog latin), Friday, 16 December 2005 02:01 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
oh for cryin out loud...

watch yer back Kennedy (and Cameron)...

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 5 January 2006 12:52 (twenty years ago)

hahaha

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 5 January 2006 12:56 (twenty years ago)

i guess when yo're drafting yer party's constitution you never even think of something this stupid happening, so fail to rule it out.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 5 January 2006 12:58 (twenty years ago)

Lib Dem voter in "not of tax-paying age" non-shock.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 5 January 2006 12:59 (twenty years ago)

I've always rather liked Kennedy, if only because he seems like an affable bloke (terrible reason for approving of a politician, I know).

He does have a very large and bulbous head, mind.

chap who would dare to work for the man (chap), Thursday, 5 January 2006 13:00 (twenty years ago)

I do not understand the Kennedy hataz. He likes a drink, they say. So did Winston Churchill. And I like a drink too, making him the best party leader ever.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 5 January 2006 13:06 (twenty years ago)

OTM. Lock thread!

Wogan Lenin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 January 2006 13:06 (twenty years ago)

not why he pulled out

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 22 January 2006 00:18 (twenty years ago)

Lib Dems in self-destructing non-shocker. I've always said I'll vote for them until it looks like they might actually win because they're comepletely inept (this coming from someone who worked for them as a parliamentary researcher). Say what you like about Labour: at least they're not manifestly incompetent.

Also: I know who the very first rumble about Charlie's drinking, which was published in the diary section in The Mirror in 2003, comes from. Go me!

Mike W (caek), Sunday, 22 January 2006 00:27 (twenty years ago)

You sure about that? (xpost to RJG)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 22 January 2006 00:28 (twenty years ago)

Also: I know who the very first rumble about Charlie's drinking, which was published in the diary section in The Mirror in 2003, comes from. Go me!

-- Mike W (mik...), January 22nd, 2006.

er, right, only that famous newsnight interview in which paxo went off on one about whiskey was... summer 2001. so not the 'first rumble' as such.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 23 January 2006 13:34 (twenty years ago)

I guess Mark Oaten's role model as liberal leader was Jeremy Thorpe.

leigh (leigh), Monday, 23 January 2006 14:40 (twenty years ago)

nine years pass...

Dead at 55

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-32970337

probs with the skag (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 06:02 (eleven years ago)

Man, you beat me to it by seconds. RIP Charlie, last genuine Liberal in Britain.

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 06:06 (eleven years ago)

Malcolm Bruce just came within an ace of blaming SNP voters on Today

probs with the skag (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 06:19 (eleven years ago)

Classy.

Numbers of Lib Dem MPs on resignation:

Clegg 8
Charlie Kennedy 62

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 06:22 (eleven years ago)

Lembit Opik was in blaming a few as well.

A lot of deeply upset Libdems, possibly needing a moment or two to calm down.

Mark G, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 06:36 (eleven years ago)

We had some rare old fun at Charlie's expense on this thread btw, bless 'im.

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 06:41 (eleven years ago)

people falling short of blaming the SNP is a bit disingenuous when you consider the state he turned up on qt recently, before he had lost his seat.

xelab, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:01 (eleven years ago)

The last time I saw him actually speak was on Question Time and he looked absolutely plastered.

Conjecture obviously as we don't really know what happened, but in these situations the sudden removal of structure from your life can't be a good thing.

One of the few Liberal Democrat MPs who came out as a vocal hater of the coalition, not that it did him any good. RIP.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:16 (eleven years ago)

(xp)

Matt DC, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:17 (eleven years ago)

Hadn't realised that his father died at the start of the election campaign as well. Holy shit that's a horrific couple of months.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:24 (eleven years ago)

:( i liked him a lot. RIP

Eric Burdon & War, On Drugs (Cosmic Slop), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:37 (eleven years ago)

RIP. It does seem that likeable politicians with principles seem to die too early

lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 07:43 (eleven years ago)

RIP. Always struck me as one of the saner and more genuinely down to earth of the mainstream politicians.

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 08:10 (eleven years ago)

the night i was at Question Time in 2010 he was announced as a guest and got a properly celebratory, roof-raising welcome from the audience.

piscesx, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 08:27 (eleven years ago)

.. and he said the album he'd 'save from a fire' was Bowie's Station To Station.

piscesx, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 08:29 (eleven years ago)

Reminds me of my uncle, also a gregarious and popular yet lonerish alcoholic in a high-pressure job, also beset by structure loss in early retirement, also dead at 56 (in my uncle's case, cause of death was abdominal haemorrhage). Still a shock, though. RIP.

scientist/exotic dancer (suzy), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 08:30 (eleven years ago)

Really saddened to hear this, and really sad that most people's last memory of a decent man and a fine constituency MP (my parents had a lot of time for him, and he did a lot to look after the widespread and diverse electorate of a huge area) will be of a shambling drunk performance on Question Time. Always seemed genuinely passionate about his politics and respectful of others rather than a careerist out for himself. Definitely one of the good guys, even if I didn't always agree with him.

RIP.

ailsa, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 09:15 (eleven years ago)

rip charlie, genuinely sad about this. are there any broadly well-liked uk politicians left now?

bizarro gazzara, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 09:35 (eleven years ago)

no

conrad, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 09:56 (eleven years ago)

Skinner?

the bowels are not what they seem (aldo), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 09:56 (eleven years ago)

Tragically the closest to that description is probably Boris.

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 10:10 (eleven years ago)

yeah, you're probably right :(

bizarro gazzara, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 10:16 (eleven years ago)

Balls to Boris. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Charlie Kennedy a perfect example of that latter day hate figure, the Career Politician?

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 14:08 (eleven years ago)

I think it's possible to escape that charge if, as an MP, you represent the place where you were born and raised (see also: Gordon Brown).

scientist/exotic dancer (suzy), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 14:45 (eleven years ago)

It's a charge that carries no great weight with me anyway tbh.

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 14:47 (eleven years ago)

that latter day hate figure, the Career Politician?

I used to think it mattered that if you were going to present yourself as a Labour Man you had to have had at least one fucking job somewhere before putting your rosette on but that means fuck all to whatever "Labour" is these days. Politics is more of a game than ever and MPs have never been so powerless so you may as well have people who've been at it since high school debate club just to keep the charade of PMQs going.

There was Bjork from Iceland and Alanis Morissette from Canada (onimo), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:16 (eleven years ago)

Sad news re Charles Kennedy. Alcoholism is a terrible thing and does terrible things to people.

There was Bjork from Iceland and Alanis Morissette from Canada (onimo), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:17 (eleven years ago)

I can believe his last appearance on QT was not due to being drunk, but more than likely due to whatever killed him in the end.

(Which may well be alcohol related i.e. lasting effects of alcoholism and so on..)

Mark G, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 16:11 (eleven years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p009377m#playt=4m24s

ogmor, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:15 (eleven years ago)

that is very beautiful and I am very sad

ogmor, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:17 (eleven years ago)

Jesus wept! politician choosing Toploader + Bowie on Desert Island Disc so fucking rote, too busy drinking myself to death tonight to genuinely gaf!

xelab, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 23:13 (eleven years ago)

if you'd rather rage against toploader than listen to a special bit of fiddle playing a few times that's your prerogative :)

ogmor, Wednesday, 3 June 2015 07:56 (ten years ago)

RIP xelab

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 17:41 (ten years ago)

assumed you would have c&ped that 'rote' post

Dejected Carmody threads (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:05 (ten years ago)

rip to charlie anyway, i shall have to do some more reading about his tenure but i think it's possible to say, tentatively, that he was a good person, that a government of drunk teuchters would not necessarily be worse than one of religious lunatics or cromwell baronets, and that despite his liking for toploader his death is still to be lamented

Dejected Carmody threads (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:08 (ten years ago)

I am unpredictable xp

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:14 (ten years ago)

also "rote" was in quotes so it was difficult to find

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:15 (ten years ago)

site:ilxor.com

Dejected Carmody threads (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:18 (ten years ago)

lol that was a joke but thx

Vaguely Fettening WAPCHAS (wins), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:20 (ten years ago)

i shall have to do some more reading about his tenure

Re-reading this thread (which I'm not suggesting you do, btw!) I'd forgotten how useless he was considered by the end of his leadership, this in spite of electorally being the most successful 'Liberal' leader since... errrrr... I'm sure I heard someone say Lloyd George? Right?

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:22 (ten years ago)

Mind you, successful in spite of him turning up still drunk from the night before for the Liberal Democrats 2005 election launch. I can't remember but I'm guessing his appearances were strictly monitored and/or rationed for the rest of the campaign.

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:25 (ten years ago)

same as clegg and alexander were the most powerful liberals since then, they were on the crest of a wave that probably any leader (save or an evidently unsuitable one like campbell) would have benefitted from, especially since any liberal leader would likely have followed the same policy on iraq, but he still did a good job electorally

the aspect i had forgotten was 'chat show charlie'........apparently having charm other than of the charismatic/psychotic variety was looked down upon, and being approachable to the larger public suggests lack of moral seriousness

sometimes i will trawl through the archives for all the calumnies thrown at him in early 2003 from vermin in the press corps, such as being demeaned for offering pro-forces boilerplate once the war started while reiterating his opposition to the war itself (as if he should have wished death upon their brave boys instead)

Dejected Carmody threads (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:32 (ten years ago)

he does have the look of a human being who entered a career where that status had become surplus to requirements

turly dark (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:45 (ten years ago)

I'd also forgotten that he was nicknamed Taxi Kennedy (seems he had a few, if you pardon the expression) at Glasgow Uni because of this habit of taking taxis, no matter how short the journey (i.e. to and from the Students Union).

Willibald Pirckheimers Briefwechsel (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 18:49 (ten years ago)

probably have less luck in london, once a fat cunt in a hackney carriage got out to shout at the next cabbie for accepting my (sub £5) fare

Dejected Carmody threads (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 19:03 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.