Long underpants: discuss.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 24 December 2005 09:04 (twenty years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 24 December 2005 09:55 (twenty years ago)
― Mike Hanle y 3000 (hanle y 3000), Saturday, 24 December 2005 09:59 (twenty years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 24 December 2005 10:03 (twenty years ago)
― Mike Hanle y 3000 (hanle y 3000), Saturday, 24 December 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 24 December 2005 10:27 (twenty years ago)
http://www.whitesquall.com/bargoons.php
― Mike Hanle y 3000 (hanle y 3000), Saturday, 24 December 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)
It's practical, I know, but I find it very unsexy. Don't think I'd appreciate my husband wearing long underwear.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 24 December 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 24 December 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
Nowadays, all that is a thing of the past! Modern, clean, ultra-refined long underwear is made from space age fabrics and available in sleek, form-flattering designs. Don't like "boiled lobster red"? Not a problem! Long underwear now comes in a rainbow of colors and prints; from the ultra-feminine to business casual, they've got your style.
So, forget about your outdated notins of long underwear and catch up with the future. Buy some today... and smile.
― Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 24 December 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, I'd totally find a girl wearing long undies like these cute.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 24 December 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Saturday, 24 December 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 24 December 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)
― Mike Hanle y 3000 (hanle y 3000), Sunday, 25 December 2005 04:50 (twenty years ago)
― jim wentworth (wench), Sunday, 25 December 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Sunday, 25 December 2005 05:25 (twenty years ago)
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Sunday, 25 December 2005 05:34 (twenty years ago)
― jim wentworth (wench), Sunday, 25 December 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 25 December 2005 12:48 (twenty years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)
Will mice?
Seriously, I realize my hatred has resulted in legs with a rash. :-(
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 04:18 (twenty years ago)
Word up-- I'll be wearing my thermals again when it dips back down to 10 degrees F.
― Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 08:44 (twenty years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)
― Chris F. (servoret), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)
I think it's both for me.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 05:47 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 19:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
It's a hardy northern european thing. i shall be rocking these this weekend on the fens (probably under a boiler suit).
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:33 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:47 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:59 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:03 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:04 (nineteen years ago)
there's an amazing kind that costco sells by the 3-pack that isn'tt itchy AT ALL. kind of fleecy, actually, and since they're for men i can pull them up nearly to the knee. i love them, although they're a total fashion disaster.
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
i could fit like another me sized person in my jeans.
― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 23:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Collardio Gelatinous (collardio), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:16 (nineteen years ago)
I have been misreading this title as "Lost Underpants."
― CM@her (cmaher), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuesdays With Morimoto (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:47 (nineteen years ago)
OMG, I've been wanting one of those for years, but they're kinda hard to find here.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:55 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/content/Item/91/27/66/i912766sq01.jpg
― Paul Eater (eater), Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Charmmy Kitty's Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (ex machina), Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Charmmy Kitty's Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (ex machina), Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:29 (nineteen years ago)