It's January 2006 in Iraq...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

and the US has just about run out of "rebuilding" funds. Goodbye, and good luck!

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002716198_rebuild02.html


When the last of the $18.4 billion is spent, U.S. officials in Baghdad have made clear, other foreign donors and the fledgling Iraqi government will have to take up what authorities say is tens of billions of dollars of work yet to be done merely to bring reliable electricity, water and other services to Iraq's 26 million people...

"The U.S. never intended to completely rebuild Iraq," Brig. Gen. William McCoy, the Army Corps of Engineers commander overseeing the work told reporters recently. Last week, McCoy said: "This was just supposed to be a jump-start."

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 2 January 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

What a way to start the new year.

Aren't the election results supposed to finally be announced shortly?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 2 January 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

They're flying in Jed Bush and Katherine Harris to oversee everything.

StanM (StanM), Monday, 2 January 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

It is indeed January 2006 in Iraq. Right now it is hard to think of a more depressing thought. My greatest hope for 2006 is that the Iraqi government holds a referendum on whether the US military should be invitied to leave Iraq - before the US midterm elections in November.

Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 2 January 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

Meantime, here's a mother of an opinion piece from the Washington Post. The author lost a son in Iraq in August. It's far more to the point than anything the Sheehan circus has produced, and far more powerful rhetorically.

Though it hurts, I believe that his death -- and that of the other Americans who have died in Iraq -- was a waste. They were wasted in a belief that democracy would grow simply by removing a dictator -- a careless misunderstanding of what democracy requires. They were wasted by not sending enough troops to do the job needed in the resulting occupation -- a careless disregard for professional military counsel.

But their deaths will not be in vain if Americans stop hiding behind flag-draped hero masks and stop whispering their opposition to this war. Until then, the lives of other sons, daughters, husbands, wives, fathers and mothers may be wasted as well.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 06:38 (nineteen years ago)

Y'know, the way that Iraq is most like Vietnam (and it's not actually like Vietnam in all that many ways, thank god) is in the way it so nakedly exposed the fallacies and idiocies of the people making foreign policy in this country. But if Vietnam is any kind of lesson -- and it should have been the FIRST time around, chrissake -- it's that we won't learn the right things from this, not really, and we'll be in danger of doing something incredibly stupid again in about 30 years. One the WORST things about the whole Iraq experience was how many people who should have known better (hello John Kerry and Hillary Clinton) because they lived through Vietnam and were right about that at the time STILL got themselves swept away by this one. And fuck, there are probably moveon.org honchos now who are gonna be in the House in 2035 voting to authorize the invasion of Uganda or some shit.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 06:58 (nineteen years ago)

"This was just supposed to be a jump-start."

ROFFLE

"Sorry we ran you off the road and totaled your car. Here's a jump-start. My insurance information...HEY! WHAT'S THAT OVER THERE!"

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)

Well it does allow Bush to come full circle and remind us that he's never believed in nation-building.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)

Ned, you should check the December issue of Harper's. There was a really really moving piece in there by a father whose son is in Iraq (his son is also on The Wire, weirdly).

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

"This was just supposed to be a jump-start."

I Broke It, I Bought It ... FOR YOU!

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

U.S. Airstrike on House Enrages Local Iraqi Officials
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.


BAGHDAD, Iraq, Jan. 3 - United States warplanes dropped bombs on a home near Bayji Monday night that Iraqi officials said killed nine members of a family and wounded three more.

American military officials confirmed the attack today and said the bombs were dropped after an unmanned reconnaissance aircraft recorded three men planting a bomb next to a road about 9 p.m. After the men were tracked to a nearby building, United States warplanes bombed the structure with "precision guided munitions," the military said.

But enraged Iraqi officials in Bayji, about 150 miles north of Baghdad, said today the attack was unjustified and killed an innocent family. A preliminary investigation of the blast site indicated that the airstrike killed the wife of the home's owner, his daughter-in-law and seven other family members, including one son who worked for the police, said Maj. Muthanna al-Qaisi, a spokesman for the governor of the Saluhaddin province.

"The owner of the house is a very simple man," said Maj. Al-Qaisi. "The American forces did not provide us with any justification for the attack and the governor requires an investigation concerning this attack."

He said the governor would meet with American officials on Wednesday to seek an explanation.

As of mid-afternoon today, American officials were working to establish how many causalities were involved and who was killed. "We're now trying to determine in coordination with Iraqi security forces in the area exactly what casualties occurred, and why they occurred," said Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, a military spokesman in Baghdad.

In a statement, the American military said the unmanned reconnaissance aircraft observed the three men "as they dug a hole following the common pattern of road-side bomb emplacement. The individuals were assessed as posing a threat to Iraqi civilians and coalition forces, and the location of the three men was relayed to close air support pilots."

"The individuals left the road site and were followed from the air to a nearby building," where they were bombed, the statement said. The statement did not say whether a roadside bomb was later found at the site.

Omar al-Neami contributed reporting for this article.

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

Bush meets with grownups today for a nice photo-op about the war, and Colin Powell doesn't say a damn thing.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/01/05/national/05bush.xl.jpg

kingfish pibb Xtra (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 6 January 2006 06:03 (nineteen years ago)

Colin Powell does not see himself as "ex-military, retired". It is quite obvious that he doesn't see himself as a leader, either. His style is to worm his way into a prominent position and then to attempt to influence the course of events from behind the scenes.

Look where it got him. Bush and Cheney used him to wipe their arses clean on WMD and then threw him away. I gave up on Powell. Whatever personal virtues he might have, he will always be somebody else's rag doll.

Aimless (Aimless), Friday, 6 January 2006 16:58 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.recordonline.com/archive/2006/01/07/biz07.jpg

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Saturday, 7 January 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

In the 'that took suspiciously long' category:

Iraq's Shia-led United Iraqi Alliance has won the country's parliamentary elections, but failed to obtain an absolute majority.

The alliance took 128 of the 275 seats - 10 short of an outright majority. Kurdish parties have 53 seats and the main Sunni Arab bloc 44.

The Shias will now be expected to form a coalition government.

A number of Sunni politicians have alleged fraud, and international observers criticised irregularities.

Those who do not accept the results will have two days to appeal before they are certified as definitive.

--

ELECTION RESULTS
United Iraqi Alliance: 128 seats
Kurdistan Alliance: 53
Iraqi Accord Front (Sunni): 44
Iraqi National List (secular): 25
Iraqi Front for National Dialogue (Sunni): 11
Other parties: 14

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 January 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)

gah. for a min there, i thought one of those parties was "the iraqi national front"

kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 20 January 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

'Only' 57 of my fellow citizens killed so far this month, and then there's the Iraqi dead. But never mind that, cause look! Accountability!

Andrew Krepinevich, a retired Army officer who wrote the report under a Pentagon contract, concluded the Army cannot sustain the pace of deployments to Iraq long enough to break the back of the insurgency. He also suggested that the Pentagon's decision to begin reducing the force in Iraq this year was driven in part by a realization that the Army was overextended.

As evidence, Krepinevich points to the Army's 2005 recruiting slump and its decision to offer much bigger enlistment bonuses and other incentives.

"You really begin to wonder just how much stress and strain there is on the Army, how much longer it can continue," he said. He added that the Army is still a highly effective fighting force and is implementing a plan that will expand the number of combat brigades.

The 136-page report represents a more sobering picture of the Army's condition than military officials offer in public. While it was not released publicly, a copy was provided in response to an Associated Press inquiry.

Krepinevich wrote that the Army is "in a race against time" to adjust to the demands of war "or risk 'breaking' the force in the form of a catastrophic decline" in recruitment and re-enlistment.

Ah, sober talk indeed. But that'll clear the air a bit in...oh wait:

Rumsfeld said he hadn't read the 136-page report but "it's clear that those comments do not reflect the current situation. They are either out of date or just misdirected."

But at least the political situation is...um...

You may know that it had been agreed upon to form a committee to study proposals for amendments concerning several articles in the constitution within few months after the parliament is seated and that agreement was what encouraged many of the Sunni and secular voters to vote “yes’ for the draft constitution.

This agreement is now in danger, a couple of days ago I read on al-Sabah that the UIA wants the committee that will study proposed amendments to be formed according to the way seats have been distributed in the parliament.

If this happens, amendments will have to pass through 2 firewalls; these are the committee and the parliament before they are put before the voters for a referendum, thus practically preventing any amendment that doesn’t appeal to the UIA from passing.

Well, anyway, Iran then!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 January 2006 05:06 (nineteen years ago)

Ned, I checked that US bodycount site (with the link to the site doing the same for the Iraqis). One question (not loaded in any way, just curious): are Iraqi deaths based on every possible action (killed by Americans, military accidents, suicide bombers, etc)?

paulhw (paulhw), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)

That's a good question I don't immediately know the answer to. *checks* There's a statement on the Iraqi policemen/security page which reads:

This is not a complete list, nor can we verify these totals.
This is simply a compilation based on our news archive.

Guess it depends on what they consider for the archive. The larger civilian body count is a link to this site.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:21 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry, I read that too fast, I see you've been to that other site.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, just cos (in my completely unscientific way) it feels, from reading the papers every day, that the proportion of Iraqis dying compared to Americans is much greater than 15:1. I guess the indcident that sprung to mind is whether something like that terrible stampede where hundredds died a few months back would be counted. Maybe this is just academic...

paulhw (paulhw), Thursday, 26 January 2006 23:21 (nineteen years ago)

Joel Stein in LA Times: "I don't support our troops"

And the fallout.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 27 January 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

Meanwhile on the British front...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 28 January 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

a harrowing SFGate profile here about James Blake Miller, the 21-year-old "Marlboro Man" Marine, who returned stateside to face massive PTSD, widespread rural poverty, and a continued massive smoking habit.

She looked at her quiet husband through the smoke drifting from his right hand.

"But when it comes out and there's actually a personality behind that picture, and that personality, he has to deal with all the war, and all he's done, people don't want to know how hard it actually is," she said.

"This is the dark side of the reality of war. ... People don't want to know the Marlboro Man has PTSD."

kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 30 January 2006 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

SF Chronicle, that is. SFGate is the site.

kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 30 January 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

That Joel Stein piece was not exactly well written or well thought out or, well, convincing.

Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 30 January 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.