Oh yeah, and full title: "Justice Sunday III -- Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land!"
― kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 5 January 2006 18:07 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 5 January 2006 18:08 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 5 January 2006 18:11 (twenty years ago)
― 'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 5 January 2006 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 5 January 2006 18:19 (twenty years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 5 January 2006 19:06 (twenty years ago)
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) said the elevation of Alito to the top court is crucial because "extremely liberal justices [are] destroying traditional morality." The battle, he said, is against Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee who are determined to "continue the far left judicial activism on the Supreme Court..."
― kingfish pibb Xtra (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 03:58 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 23 June 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
or, as Newsmax puts it,
Thanks to the generosity of GOP donors, a Green Party candidate is expected to make it onto the ballot in Pennsylvania's Senate race and siphon votes from Democratic front-runner Bob Casey in his bid to unseat Republican Sen. Rick Santorum.
Other links from that Newsmax bit:
-GOP: We Want Amnesty for 66 Million Illegals! -Nancy Pelosi: Stop her from becoming Speaker -Christians are still suffering for their faith! Find out more! -Can Pheromones Fix Your Relationship?
― kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 4 August 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)
― trees (treesessplode), Friday, 4 August 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)
how the hell does a man who fondled a dead baby even have a chance at re-election?
― GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Friday, 4 August 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
-hilariously/lazily fake signatures supporting the Green Party guy from GOP-funded groups
-the state GOP and the Westmore County GOP are fighting, and want to split apart, holding two different campaigns of spreading Santorum
-Santorum has changed his mind, and now might fire you if you're, like, gay n' stuff.
― kingfish trapped under ice (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 10 August 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
MYERSTOWN — Likening the times to the late 1930s as Nazi Germany was rising to power, Sen. Rick Santorum said last night that if he loses his re-election bid, it could set the stage for terrorism to become more of a threat than the Nazis ever were.
“If we are not successful here and things don’t go right in the election, there’s a good chance that the course of our country could change,” he said. “We are in the equivalent of the late 1930s, and this election will decide whether we are going to continue to appease or whether we will stand and fight while we have a chance to win without devastating consequences.
“And you here in Pennsylvania — you here in this room — will have a huge role to play as to what happens.”
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 00:44 (nineteen years ago)
!
― R_S (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)
It won't be until we encounter Zombie Hitler that we shall unite as one.
― Cunga (Cunga), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 04:33 (nineteen years ago)
BY BRETT LIEBERMANOf Our Washington Bureau
National Republican leaders remain hopeful that U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum can turn around his struggling campaign, but they might have already written off the Pennsylvania race to Democrat Robert P. Casey Jr., if their checkbooks are any indication.
Neither the National Republican Committee nor the National Republican Senatorial Committee has reserved time at Pennsylvania television stations for "independent expenditure" ads supporting Santorum, R-Pa. Neither committee has spent any money on such ads for Santorum, the GOP's No. 3 leader in the Senate.
Independent expenditures are advertisements done without the knowledge or approval of a candidate's campaign.
The national committees' spending in Pennsylvania is only a fraction of what is being spent in Ohio, Tennessee and Missouri in what they are calling a firewall strategy to limit Democrats' gains next month.
The RNC transferred slightly more than $1 million to the Republican State Committee, but those funds are to be used for all races, including three to five competitive House elections.
In contrast, the RNC and NRSC have spent more than $8 million to help Sen. Mike DeWine in Ohio, and $3.3 million for Sen. Jim Talent in Missouri.
And the National Republican Congressional Committee has given millions of dollars to help vulnerable House members, particularly in the Philadelphia suburbs.
A political analyst speculated that the national committee's lack of spending in the Pennsylvania Senate race reflects a desire to concentrate on other critical contests, and recognition that Santorum's campaign has raised a great deal of money.
"The truth probably rests a little with both sides," said Chris Borick, a political scientist at Muhlenberg College in Allentown.
"I would be shocked if the strategists in the party are writing off the campaign," he said.
The GOP strategy has left Democrats playing a waiting game to see how much money Republicans put in before spending their own funds. Independent groups have filled some of the void for both parties by running their own ads.
GOP leaders insist they fully support Santorum, who trails Casey in four recent state polls, and that suggestions otherwise are "just inaccurate" wishful thinking by Democrats.
"The NRSC's strongly supporting Sen. Santorum, and all you have to do is turn on your TV now" to see, said Dan Ronayne, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
"The fact of the matter is we are, and we think Senator Santorum is well-positioned to win this race and we're actively helping," he said.
Ronayne pointed to a "coordinated" ad the committee is airing statewide. Such ads are paid for by national party committees with the consent and acknowledgment of a candidate's campaign.
Coordinated advertising is subject to much lower spending limits, near $1.5 million, which is why parties focus on independent expenditures, which have no limit.
Though Republicans have said Santorum's re-election is their top priority, unlike some other candidates, he continues to have no trouble raising the resources to fund his own aggressive television campaign.
"He doesn't need it, so why give it to him?" Republican consultant William Green asked.
Despite trailing in polls, Santorum has raised more than $20 million and has enjoyed a 2-1 cash advantage over Casey.
"The one thing I'm sure of is that he won't suffer from lack of resources," GOP strategist Charlie Gerow said.
Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist, doubts money will be a deciding factor in the U.S. Senate election.
"Santorum has to turn this around, if it is even possible, on his own," he said.
But the money can make a difference in "potentially salvageable" Ohio, Missouri and Tennessee elections that could tip to either party, Sabato said.
"If the House goes Democratic, ... President Bush will need one house of Congress as a stop-gap for his point of view," he said. "Given the closeness of these three races, the GOP would be foolish not to concentrate resources on them."
The Republican Governors Association has been pouring money into other states, but has not committed additional funds to help Republican challenger Lynn Swann, who trails Gov. Ed Rendell by as much as 20 points in some polls.
Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, chairman of the RGA, campaigned with Swann yesterday and announced $250,000 in new money to demonstrate that it has not given up on his campaign.
But Republicans and independent analysts said it was a drop in the bucket compared to the millions of dollars Rendell has available.
"Clearly, the RGA and national party have more or less written that off as a race to spend money, regardless of the spin," Borick said.
http://www.pennlive.com/news/patriotnews/index.ssf?/base/news/1160706338241210.xml&coll=1
― R_S (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 October 2006 16:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 26 October 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)
Mussolini wanted to conquer the world, huh, but Tojo didn't?
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 26 October 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)
War is the tonic that makes their lives worthwhile, that fills some attempt at a Grand Struggle into their boring, empty-ass suburban lives, so that not bombing those you disagree with is considered showing weakness. Fuck the Vulcans; these guys are fucking Klingons, ferchrissakes.
(*which is bullshit, anyway, as Tombot, Elvis T, me, MV, or anybody else who knows anything about WWII could tell you(i.e. not Squirrel Police) but that's for another thread)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:49 (nineteen years ago)
wait, what? why in allah's name would a shi'ite want to establish a caliphate given that it was the caliphs who assassinated ali?
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 26 October 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
Santorum appears to have thrown in the towel.
― Rotgutt (Rotgutt), Thursday, 26 October 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)
I don't know if it's the best political strategy — being that brutually honest; would the best political strategists recommend it?
Terribly funny. Ledeen is already grousing that Santorum will lose, which makes me even happier.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 October 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/22060-religious-lady-has-miscarrage-keeps-deadbaby_03.jpghttp://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/22065-religious-lady-has-miscarrage-keeps-deadbaby_08.jpghttp://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/22064-religious-lady-has-miscarrage-keeps-deadbaby_07.jpg
― and what, Monday, 10 November 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)