Gentrification: Gone Too Far?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Gentrification at its finest? Is this just another display of obnoxious NYC attitude or is it like this in other big cities?


If you think the appearance of $45 plates of fettuccini with white truffles is a sign that Clinton Street’s beatnik culinary revolution is over, you might be correct. Still, the people at Falai have taken some pains to incorporate themselves into what remains of the old neighborhood. Falai recently opened a bakery on Clinton and Rivington, and various items in the restaurant (plastic place mats) come from local bodegas. -- New York Magazine january 9 05

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 9 January 2006 14:57 (twenty years ago)

"locally sourced" plasticware

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 9 January 2006 14:59 (twenty years ago)

until the late 90s Clinton & Rivington Sts = wide-open heroin market

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 9 January 2006 15:01 (twenty years ago)

Falai is a beautiful and delicious place!

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 15:19 (twenty years ago)

no doubt. and I've been an agent of gentrification myself and would never advocate a return to the bad old days. when I lived in that neighborhood I didn't feel safe walking below Houston in daylight.

something about restaurant review...guess it's not about food or genritfication itself, just an attitude thing.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 9 January 2006 15:28 (twenty years ago)

A $45 plate of pasta is pretty ridiculous.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 9 January 2006 15:34 (twenty years ago)

But the pasta is served with stuff that's pretty ridiculous. I had a risotto that came with some kind of crazy expensive vinegar that had the consistency of soft chocolate ice cream, and tasted like sweet butter or something.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 15:53 (twenty years ago)

Gentrification is always going too far, but you sure don't have to get the $45 pasta at Falai -- the average pasta is more like $14 and delicious, and pastries at the bakery are like $2.

That sounds amazing, Dan.

Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 9 January 2006 16:32 (twenty years ago)

I went to the most amazing hotdog place on rivington where for $5 you can get a drink + 2 dogs with chili, cheese and crushed fritos.

Best food ever.

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 9 January 2006 16:40 (twenty years ago)

Well, I think what's most obnoxious about it is how the retaurant has "taken some pains to incorporate themselves into what remains of the old neighborhood."

Yeah, and the US gave a lot of its towns Native American names.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 9 January 2006 16:43 (twenty years ago)

truffles ARE expensive, though!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 9 January 2006 16:50 (twenty years ago)

Hurting, that does make it sound patronizing, but the way they've kept the old storefront intact is attractive; a few places on the block have done similarly.

More offensive, I think, is calling your restaurant "Tenement" or "Barrio" and claiming to keep it real by serving $16 rice and beans or latkes or Cuban sandwiches.

Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 9 January 2006 16:54 (twenty years ago)

For $45 that fetuccini better suck my cock.

alfredo sauce, Monday, 9 January 2006 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Star Trek: The Next Gentrification

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 9 January 2006 16:58 (twenty years ago)

Falai also serves 3 types of homemade bread for free with the meal, one of which is some sort of little foccaccia with extra-virgin olive-oil and sea salt that tastes, swear to god, like a Ritz cracker made of gold. I had extras of those.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:08 (twenty years ago)

Well anyway, regardless of whether such things are "offensive" they're certainly self-deluded. Keeping a storefront hardly equals maintaining the feel of the "old neighborhood."

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, they should have a shooting gallery in the back and you should get mugged on your way out the door.

detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:14 (twenty years ago)

Hurting, I don't have a particular agenda in this thread and perhaps am deluded myself -- I'm just trying to understand your argument. I think "maintaining the feel" is inapt; a better description would be "maintaining the look (a bit)." Surely you're not saying that when you move into an old abandoned storefront, you should always destroy its facade to avoid self-delusion?

Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:16 (twenty years ago)

If you think the appearance of $45 plates of fettuccini with white truffles is a sign that Clinton Street’s beatnik culinary revolution is over, you might be correct.

I don't quite follow the logic of that either. $45 truffles are a shibboleth of some sort of gratuitous non-beatnikness? Whereas the $25 entrees you could get across the street in 1999 were pure of heart and ever so revolutionary?

Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:39 (twenty years ago)

maybe I wasn't eating much down there when it was a beatnik revolution, but how long have Alias, WD50 etc been there? Chubo? That place that serves food in the dark?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:42 (twenty years ago)

71 Clinton opened in late 1999. Alias and AKA came along in I'm guessing 2002; WD-50 came at the beginning of 2003. By then the street was full of restaurants. Suba on Ludlow serves food in the dark (though not primarily) -- it opened in 2001, I think. Chubo has been around for a couple of years. I could go on. If any restaurants mark the end of a much-hyped Clinton Street Revolution, it'd be non-innovative places like Thai On Clinton and the boring tapas places (which have been there for three years at least).

Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:49 (twenty years ago)

eater and selzer otm. if you want a beatnik revolution, i'm sure there are other parts of the city that can accommodate you. plus, it's pretty common for higher-end restaurants in nyc to put one outrageously expensive dish on their menu so they can get more press. no one's forcing you to order it though.

miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:54 (twenty years ago)

I just love it when formerly rough places in the city retain that "gritty" feel, it makes me feel like I'm in real danger even though I know I'm not! These "authentic" storefronts are so amusing, it's a whole new "postmodern" take on the theme-restaurant! After all the excitement of thinking you've stepped into a dangerously ethnic neighborhood nothing settles the nerves like a nice $45 plate of pasta and a choice chianti...

Payne Stewart, Monday, 9 January 2006 17:55 (twenty years ago)

does anybody still think the lower east side is a dangerously ethnic neighborhood? all you have to do to be proven otherwise is to... go there.

miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 9 January 2006 17:56 (twenty years ago)

The first time I went to Falai, I turned the corner and there was this bodega with all these awesome 60s film posters in the window. I was like, wow, that's cool! Then I walked by a drugstore with Jimi Hendrix posters in the window. Then I noticed the corner store had a giant mushroom on the front and the sign read "psychedelicatessen". Then I saw they were painting giant sunflowers in the middle of the intersection. Then I read a sign that Julie Taymor was filming a musical set in the 60s where all the music was going to be Beatles songs.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:02 (twenty years ago)

that sounds dangerously retro

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Isn't b0n0 going to be in that? Did you see the BONGS in the window?

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:09 (twenty years ago)

yes to the bongs. It really looked ridiculous. It reminded me of the Mister Show skit where they do the drugged out Sid and Marty Kroft thing. I assume this won't be as funny though.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:13 (twenty years ago)

Whatever that "El Sombrero" bullshit was always too expensive.

detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:14 (twenty years ago)

You say you want a revolution?

Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:28 (twenty years ago)

Happiness is a good table.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:36 (twenty years ago)

just a few general questions re: gentrification:

- is it preferrable for a neighborhood to remain dangerous and fucked up?

- is it preferrable for people who are making a living to live in the gated, paved out suburbs?

i'm just curious cause i've read about gentrification for years and i understand that it sucks that a working class neighborhood gets all fake-hip and whatever and suddenly the native inhabitants get kicked to the curb so richer folks can get some pretend-authentic city lifestyle... but i guess i'm trying to understand what the proper alternative is...

are people who actually make a living doomed to shit?

are people who live in a crappy, dangerous neighborhoods doomed as well?

can i get a clue?
m.

msp (mspa), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:38 (twenty years ago)

Good point. I think the answer is gentrification, with subsidized housing at a 10% rate (i.e. one subsidized for every 9 non-subsidized.) As for preserving the culture ... nothing is forever, you can't go home again, etc... Shit changes.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:42 (twenty years ago)

..er, obviously, there's more to it than that.. such as preserving diparate dwelling sizes & mixed use & mixed-occupation businesses.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:44 (twenty years ago)

does anybody still think the lower east side is a dangerously ethnic neighborhood?

remember that white girl that got herself killed on clinton/rivington last year? by some ethnic guys. right outside as four's loft.

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:47 (twenty years ago)

some guy got knifed in my neighborhood last year but that still doesn't make where i live "dangerous."

miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:48 (twenty years ago)

I was the only Anglo I saw on the street today in my neighborhood.

ur all trustafarians (ex machina), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:58 (twenty years ago)

watch out, your neighborhood could detonate at any moment

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:01 (twenty years ago)

It's funny how the anti-gentrification types are usually upper middle class suburban types who are slumming and have a tendancy to romantasize poverty & the drug trade...when you talk to the people who have lived in these neighborhoods a long time, 20+ years, they welcome the change.

shookout (shookout), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:04 (twenty years ago)

Sure, if they can still afford to live there.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:05 (twenty years ago)

What happens when gentrification comes to neighborhoods by the projects? The projects can't just pick up and move....

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)

then they tear down the projects because "projects are outmoded."

miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:25 (twenty years ago)

It's already happened. There are projects smack in the middle of the East Village on 5th St. There are projects in Chelsea. There are projects on Madison Avenue in the upper '90s.

I'd be interested to see data on how many people are really "forced out" of a gentrifying neighborhood. One, tennants in NYC have an enormous amount of protection under the law. Two, everyone I know (four people) who was "forced out" of their apartment due to rising prices was well compensate, all of them over 100K, and one got 200K to move out. These were rent controlled apartments where they'd been for 20+ years and the landlords wanted to bring them to market value, and probably break them into separate units.

shookout (shookout), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:28 (twenty years ago)

recently in nashville they tore down the brick project apartment houses in one part of town and replaced them with these mega-cute pastel homes... they're still subsidized living, but much less projecty looking.

seemed like a step in the right direction at least.

msp (mspa), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:29 (twenty years ago)

that's happening in chicago too.

miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:30 (twenty years ago)

.. and it looks much nicer. Although there aren't as many housing units as there used to be - that's good and bad - it may make the low income housing spread out across the city more. However, as people get pushed farther West, they may have to travel farther to work and at the same time are farther away from quick public transportation (ie trains.)

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 9 January 2006 19:40 (twenty years ago)

Oy, please, I know lots less about these matters than other folks here, but I can give one example of how people who already live in marginal neighborhoods are encouraged out, let's say. Along my street and nearby are a few bombed-out buildings, now boarded up. All evidence suggests that before whatever happened to close the buildings -- fire, maybe, or sheer vacancy due to neglect -- they were comparable to neighboring bldgs: same layouts, same building materials, same price range. Because the owners/tenants were probably just covering their bills to begin with, when the property needed reinvestment, owners couldn't follow through and now the ruins just sit there.

Eventually the buildings will have to be either remodeled or demolished but the costs of renovation or new construction are high enough to be prohibitive for families currently living in the area. When they're rebuilt, they'll be luxury apartments of one kind or another -- whether quasi-industrial & modern & stylish (like the husband & wife-owned former-warehouse down the block) or those cookie-cutter places that attract people who were originally looking in Park Slope (like the old Bklyn Jewish Hospital building or the new high-rise place on Dean & err Washington?) or just possibly actually renovated into one- or two-family dwellings with period woodwork, wallpaper, etc. In any case they've been taken out of range for the pre-gentrification occupants.

When you're only talking abt a few individual buildings on a street, I suppose it doesn't make a huge difference -- but the larger the complex, the greater the impact.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:03 (twenty years ago)

What happens when gentrification comes to neighborhoods by the projects? The projects can't just pick up and move....

come to my house! Wyckoff and Nevins, between the Gowanus Housing Project and the Wyckoff Houses.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:05 (twenty years ago)

some guy got knifed in my neighborhood last year but that still doesn't make where i live "dangerous."

well still. pretty white girls getting shot makes a neighborhood more dangerous where pretty white girls dont get shot.

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:12 (twenty years ago)

I like Lauren's perspective, it's possible to rue some of the changes wrought by gentrification w/o romanticizing poverty.

The original restaurant review was funny. Eating $45 servings of truffle from the local bodega's plastic placemats. It's like a parody of social satire, re-heating one of Tom Wolfe's leftovers.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 9 January 2006 22:48 (twenty years ago)

This is really, really good:

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/neighborhood/

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Tuesday, 19 April 2016 13:57 (ten years ago)

two months pass...

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/11/is-gentrification-really-a-problem?mbid=social_twitter#correctionasterisk

kalefah on gentrification and "ghettoes"

k3vin k., Monday, 11 July 2016 16:41 (nine years ago)

kelefa* obv

k3vin k., Monday, 11 July 2016 16:42 (nine years ago)

owners/landlords are going back to convenient arson as a way to get around rent control/tenant protections

sarahell, Monday, 11 July 2016 17:24 (nine years ago)

bushwick is being gentrified with zubats and doduos now, from what i hear

Treeship, Monday, 11 July 2016 17:38 (nine years ago)

the new housing being slapped up in bushwick rn is absolutely the worst shit. 'luxury' marketing and price points that drive gentrification, but so badly-built, leaky and underdesigned that even as it depreciates it will never be suitable housing for the non-1%, even setting aside that all the units are organized for single stockbrockers/'creatives' living with friends and would be very ill-suited for families with kids, etc.

'they pelted us with rocks and garbage' (Doctor Casino), Monday, 11 July 2016 18:39 (nine years ago)

misallocation of capital in the pursuit of profits is at the very heart of capitalism

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 11 July 2016 18:44 (nine years ago)

the new housing being slapped up in bushwick rn is absolutely the worst shit. 'luxury' marketing and price points that drive gentrification, but so badly-built, leaky and underdesigned that even as it depreciates it will never be suitable housing for the non-1%, even setting aside that all the units are organized for single stockbrockers/'creatives' living with friends and would be very ill-suited for families with kids, etc.

― 'they pelted us with rocks and garbage' (Doctor Casino), Monday, July 11, 2016 1:39 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is an issue that agitates me a lot when I think about the future of NYC, like what the fuck happens to huge parts of Williamsburg/Bushwick in 10-20 years, especially if there is an economic downturn, with all these slapdash buildings falling apart and potentially not even fit to be slums.

socka flocka-jones (man alive), Thursday, 14 July 2016 19:47 (nine years ago)

Not that they're the sole culprit, but I really think tax abatements for condos did a lot of damage to this city that will take a long time to repair.

socka flocka-jones (man alive), Thursday, 14 July 2016 22:02 (nine years ago)

one month passes...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqTuRhtXYAYSyqw.jpg

anvil, Saturday, 20 August 2016 14:50 (nine years ago)

photo from https://twitter.com/Theo_Inglis

anvil, Saturday, 20 August 2016 14:51 (nine years ago)

one month passes...

so dumb

Attracting foodies from all over Montreal and around the world, Notre Dame St. has become the place to go out to eat, with an explosion of restaurants -- 16 new eateries have opened in five years, many of them high-end hot spots.

But a new bylaw has the Southwest borough is putting the brakes on new restaurants, forcing them to be at least 25 metres away from the nearest one.
“Every second storefront should not be a restaurant,” said Southwest borough councillor Craig Sauve, a member of Projet Montreal.

“Maybe get in some retail, grocery stores, bakeries. Get in some services. That's what people in the neighbourhood really want,” he said.

http://montreal.ctvnews.ca/new-bylaw-aims-to-curb-notre-dame-st-w-gentrification-1.3084908

flopson, Friday, 23 September 2016 16:21 (nine years ago)

this strip is like a 30 seconds walk from the second largest outdoor market in the city

flopson, Friday, 23 September 2016 16:24 (nine years ago)

and across the street is an enormous budget grocery store

flopson, Friday, 23 September 2016 16:25 (nine years ago)

Love too gentrify

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Friday, 23 September 2016 21:21 (nine years ago)

the restaurant situation further west on notredame is getting seriously ridiculous tho

a simba man (Will M.), Friday, 23 September 2016 22:22 (nine years ago)

the effect of this will be that the restaurants that do get opened will be even more expensive/fancy

flopson, Saturday, 24 September 2016 00:52 (nine years ago)

fancy = using the same reheated frozen food that the olive garden uses, but with a higher price point and different brand story.

larry appleton, Saturday, 24 September 2016 00:57 (nine years ago)

When i first moved to st henri like 2 out of 3 shops on notre dame were boarded up and the rest were fast food places, reptile shops, deps, encans, and family-run office supply shops (one of which memorably had a single usb cable hanging on a nail driven in to a wall)... its not like there's some glorified pre-gentrified past

flopson, Saturday, 24 September 2016 00:59 (nine years ago)

It's the long-term changes these developments engender, not the specific locations they replace.

Los Angeles' Boyle Heights area is undergoing a similar situation now. Formerly empty warehouses being occupied by art galleries. No residences in the immediate area but the galleries are seen as the first wave.

http://hyperallergic.com/324683/activists-in-las-boyle-heights-serve-galleries-with-eviction-notices/

nickn, Saturday, 24 September 2016 03:06 (nine years ago)

y;es, it's gone way too far

savvinesslessness (map), Saturday, 24 September 2016 03:46 (nine years ago)

I don't understand how so many progressives reconcile being anti development

yolo mostly (sleepingbag), Saturday, 24 September 2016 04:01 (nine years ago)

maybe, just maybe, it hasn't gone far enough

hunangarage, Saturday, 24 September 2016 04:40 (nine years ago)

I don't understand how so many progressives reconcile being anti development

― yolo mostly (sleepingbag), Friday, September 23, 2016 9:01 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i know im a progressive and i love rent hikes, renovictions, displacement, increased police presence and hassling of poors, etc.

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Saturday, 24 September 2016 05:22 (nine years ago)

hey this sex work is unsightly can we move it over to a more remote and industrial area so i don't have to see it?

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Saturday, 24 September 2016 05:23 (nine years ago)

you want to open a housing project for people with multiple barriers in this traditionally poor neighbourhood? well let me start a campaign against it because this is my neighbourhood because ive lived here for 5 years

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Saturday, 24 September 2016 05:24 (nine years ago)

seven months pass...

New York's fast-gentrifying neighborhoods have contributed to an economic boom in the city over the last 15 years, with the number of new storefronts and companies increasing by 45%. But those economic gains have not been shared by all residents, according to a new report from the city comptroller's office.

From 2007 to 2012, for example, the number of black-owned businesses in the city declined by more than 30%, even as black business ownership increased in other big cities around the country. Among the 25 largest US cities with over 500 black-owned businesses, New York is one of only three to see a decline, along with Detroit and Jacksonville.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/coralewis/in-5-years-new-york-lost-30-of-its-black-owned-businesses

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:26 (nine years ago)

six months pass...

ppl on my facebork apoplectic about this one

http://i68.tinypic.com/2ryrgau.png

sleepingbag, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 23:09 (eight years ago)

someone should pee on that

Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 23 November 2017 16:02 (eight years ago)

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 23 November 2017 16:09 (eight years ago)

Better to own it than deny it.

Jeff, Thursday, 23 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)

two months pass...

headline of the month

SAN FRANCISCO: City’s Oldest Gay Bar Closes After 58 Years, Will Become Kung Fu-Themed Laundromat

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 January 2018 16:49 (eight years ago)

Whoa, awesome!

how's life, Tuesday, 30 January 2018 17:10 (eight years ago)

one year passes...

Too poor to play: children in social housing blocked from communal playground https://t.co/opGh3LOkB6

— Guardian Cities (@guardiancities) March 25, 2019

great community cohesion here, always best to teach kids they are 2nd class citizens early doors.

calzino, Monday, 25 March 2019 19:51 (seven years ago)

five months pass...

This Top Boy scene about coffee, as a commentary on gentrification in east London, is a masterpiece honestly. pic.twitter.com/h6YD9dBVWD

— Chimene Suleyman (@chimenesuleyman) September 18, 2019

calzino, Thursday, 19 September 2019 11:44 (six years ago)

hahaha

sarahell, Thursday, 19 September 2019 17:34 (six years ago)

Yeah that one already got in my twitter tl.

There's more Italy than necessary. (in orbit), Monday, 23 September 2019 15:57 (six years ago)

friend posted it, I assumed he snapped it but maybe it's just going around

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Monday, 23 September 2019 16:04 (six years ago)

I mean the discussion is mostly just like "Welp this has been coming for a while, what are you gonna do."

There's more Italy than necessary. (in orbit), Monday, 23 September 2019 16:05 (six years ago)

as a non-new yorker that one is still a big yikes from me

mh, Monday, 23 September 2019 17:06 (six years ago)

I was gonna comment on the Texas Chicken & Burgers sign in the glass and happened to look up the company -- never realized they had so many locations, thought there was just like a few peppered around queens/bronx/harlem.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Monday, 23 September 2019 17:12 (six years ago)

yeah that is a completely shocking ad. I'm kind of stunned at the refusal to even pay lip service to POC

akm, Tuesday, 24 September 2019 01:51 (six years ago)

That coffee bit has strong old person whining about fancy coffee energy.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Tuesday, 24 September 2019 03:15 (six years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-f_dxLiuXuw

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Tuesday, 24 September 2019 03:16 (six years ago)

Lol had same reaction and knew what that vid was gonna be.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Tuesday, 24 September 2019 04:21 (six years ago)

That hairstyle-sideburns combo is criminal.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Tuesday, 24 September 2019 04:23 (six years ago)

three months pass...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/24/outcry-residents-london-bollo-brook-youth-centre-gentrification-coffee-shop?CMP=share_btn_tw

I feel sorry for the people who got tricked into buying a house here for £750k. They have been sold that this is going to be the next booming area when really … there’s still the core problems of South Acton here. A lot of people are dying out here man

that's way too generous... fuck every last one of these selfish rich cunts.

calzino, Wednesday, 25 December 2019 09:34 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.