Welcome To Paedogeddon

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

ye gods, will this story ever just fuck off?

― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:26 (twenty years ago)

What story?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:30 (twenty years ago)

a p.e. teacher looked at some kiddy pron.

― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:33 (twenty years ago)

Tabloid media in "generating ridiculous panic about basically fuck all" shockah.

― Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:35 (twenty years ago)

tabloid media? i thought the sunday times was pretty much managing this. or was it telegraph. sure it was a sunday paper.

― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:36 (twenty years ago)

News International innit.

― suzy (suzy), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:36 (twenty years ago)

I include a hell of a lot of media outlets under the term "tabloid" nowadays.

― Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:37 (twenty years ago)

i dislike ruth kelly, so i guess i can't really get fired up by the madness.

― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:37 (twenty years ago)

http://blackzarak.co.uk/adi/upload/upload_files/snapshot20060116133936.jpg

― melton mowbray (adr), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:40 (twenty years ago)

One of the blokes at the centre of this has a conviction for assaulting a minor because he had a relationship with a 15 year-old girl whilst he was a presumably fairly young teacher. Now of course he did wrong, of course he showed bad judgement, but does that make him a vicious, predatory, "keep this man away from the children" paedo? Can't see it myself.

― Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:51 (twenty years ago)

So are the Paedoph Isles included in the Islands of the North Atlantic, or "Britain", then?

― Disciplining And Controlling My Mind (kate), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:52 (twenty years ago)

i'm just astonished that anyone in government thought this was a good idea. i mean, clearing someone who has a predatory interest in young boys to teach in girls schools only makes some sense kind of sense, although it's not something i'd agreed with, and i think i'm probably at the liberal end of public opinion here - but why do it? are we that short of teachers? could they really not see this controversy coming?

― toby (tsg20), Monday, 16 January 2006 13:53 (twenty years ago)

Err, yes. We are that short of teachers.

― Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Monday, 16 January 2006 14:03 (twenty years ago)

thing is they're all so vague.

what counts as paedo imagery? pix of girls under the age of consent?

― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 16 January 2006 14:05 (twenty years ago)

I think that would come under the umbrella, yes.

― Johnny B Was Quizzical (Johnney B), Monday, 16 January 2006 14:50 (twenty years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/imagedump/10173.jpg

― Johnny B Was Quizzical (Johnney B), Monday, 16 January 2006 14:51 (twenty years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.