Furthermore, what of the religious discrimination issue? They may be a minority, but surely worshippers of Pan or Anubis deserve the right to try and resurrect their gods the way rapture-nutty fundies are permitted to try bringing Jesus back (albiet by different means)?
Please discuss, and try to be serious.
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:18 (nineteen years ago)
Nevermind.
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:28 (nineteen years ago)
― S. (Sébastien Chikara), Thursday, 2 February 2006 01:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Nemo (JND), Thursday, 2 February 2006 03:25 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)
That pun is my favorite thing right now.
― Paul Eater (eater), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:27 (nineteen years ago)
http://metabods.com/06warning.asp
Metabods caters to an specific segment of the erotic spectrum: erotic fantasies about and among men with enhanced and augmented bodies. The fantastically endowed, the transformed, the multilimbed...the denizens of Metabods are men born of a special kind of fantasy.
and for the serious"Since Michael J. Bailey published The Man Who Would be Queen last year arguing (on the basis of personal bias masquerading as scientific research) that transsexuals are either sissies (the pretty ones) or men who are overwhlemed by sexual fantasies of being women (the butch ones), the trans community has been bent out of shape, so to speak. But so what if it were true? If it isn't true now - today most trans-people appear to have a deep rooted identity as the other gender - it will be true in the future that people will adopt bodies to fulfill sexual fantasies. Let start defending it now."
― S. (Sébastien Chikara), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:33 (nineteen years ago)
I see that in the UK they are discussing the issue of human-animal hybrids. Human-animal hybrids do not sound like a good idea to me.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Monday, 19 May 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)
Well in that case they should be banned.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 19 May 2008 17:03 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.pixolator.com/zbc/attachment.php?attachmentid=39161
― rogermexico., Monday, 19 May 2008 17:12 (seventeen years ago)
I don't think they should be banned, I think they should be encouraged. It would be awesome to have horns, like in that picture. Or maybe gigantick black leathery wings. The possibilities are endless. OTOH, oh no, furries IRL. Maybe it should be banned after all.
― Pashmina, Monday, 19 May 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
lol defeated
― DG, Monday, 19 May 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
Hybrids, as I understand, are good at reducing carbon emissions.
― Abbott, Monday, 19 May 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
You guys read about the GEEP, right? They should hybridize pigs and sea lions. Move the bacon factory to the littoral zone, never have to clean the pens again.
― El Tomboto, Monday, 19 May 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
eh, it's just a chimera
― gershy, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 02:40 (seventeen years ago)
but http://www.penguincomics.net/dvdreviews/dvdrimages/spaceballs4.jpg
― S-, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 03:25 (seventeen years ago)
I like the idea of real life furries.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 09:59 (seventeen years ago)