― Anthony Easton, Thursday, 2 February 2006 02:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 2 February 2006 03:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcel Post (Marcel Post), Thursday, 2 February 2006 03:15 (nineteen years ago)
― cowbear (chaki), Thursday, 2 February 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 2 February 2006 03:50 (nineteen years ago)
― tehresa (tehresa), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:00 (nineteen years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:03 (nineteen years ago)
― youn, Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:05 (nineteen years ago)
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)
― youn, Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:43 (nineteen years ago)
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:47 (nineteen years ago)
heh xpost
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:50 (nineteen years ago)
who is that anyway? if she were a real big star she wouldn't have to be "conceptual"
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:55 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:04 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:06 (nineteen years ago)
― lyra (lyra), Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:23 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Thursday, 2 February 2006 06:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 2 February 2006 06:09 (nineteen years ago)
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Thursday, 2 February 2006 06:14 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 2 February 2006 09:26 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 2 February 2006 09:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Latham Green (mike), Thursday, 2 February 2006 10:00 (nineteen years ago)
Defense Exhibit #1:
http://news.softpedia.com/images/news2/Bjork-s-Swan-Dress-Will-Be-Auctioned-For-Charity-2.jpg
― phil d. (Phil D.), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)
I was thinking the same thing. It's just too cutesy. Would be great if it was a Paris Hilton type person wearing it: you know, all peroxide and *shit*.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:19 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)
― RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
love this thread title
― the most astonishing writer on ilx (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 03:08 (thirteen years ago)
great title but the pic is a letdown
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 03:10 (thirteen years ago)
yeah its def not conceptually brilliant!
― the most astonishing writer on ilx (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 04:54 (thirteen years ago)