― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
― The Late Fear And The Potato Fear (kate), Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)
― TOMBOT, Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:06 (nineteen years ago)
― C J (C J), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Dave will do (dave225.3), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
You can also do this by making a loose fist, holding your hand (thumb and first finger end) to your eye, then looking through and out of the tiny hole formed in the curl of your little finger.
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 2 February 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
― truck-patch pixel farmer (my crop froze in the field) (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 2 February 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)
* far being more than 12 feet!
xpost
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 2 February 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)
I think the squinting part works because less light/interference gets in your eye, not because your pupil aperture is lower. ..and that may be becuase your eyelids shade your eye... The aperture thing works with cardboard, etc because it's a few mm from your eye - your eyelid is in direct contact with your eye - as Martin suggests, you can't (easily) squint & change your pupil aperture... Try looking at an LED clock at night - it's clearer when you squint or when you hold your hands up so they block out the excess light.
― Dave will do (dave225.3), Thursday, 2 February 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 2 February 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Thursday, 2 February 2006 21:52 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
What what what are you sure? It's not just that they are curved outwards yet still thinner in the middle?
If you take them off and hold them a couple of inches over a page of text, is the text magnified or diminished?
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:25 (nineteen years ago)
I may have somewhat misunderstood the idea but it seems to make some sense.
Or um, yeah Tracer just said that didnt he. Gah I need to squint more or something!
― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)
― RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:18 (nineteen years ago)
ha!!
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)