I've finally watched the complete lot on DVD and it's a fascinating series - dealing with the after-effects of a global pandemic and civilisation now devolved back to the feudal age. With the sudden loss of society and all its support systems, the episodes deal with issues such as different factions fighting for territory, resources and power, medical emergencies, crime and punishment, the loss of loved ones, repopulation and the establishment of links with other groups of survivors across the U.K. and eventually, the world.
Some episodes are better than others. The very early first series episodes have a palpable air of desolation and dislocation, while the second series is an interesting take on a post-apocalyptic agrarian, more egalitarian way of life. Rather amusingly, there's plenty of round-table discussions on farming matters - the lifeblood of most of the post-"Death" communities in the series - making Survivors a rather edgier version of early episodes of Emmerdale. While the third series is convincingly grimy and gritty, with the characters back on horseback and travelling through England against a backdrop of society getting its act back together with federated communities, the return of rudimentary train travel and the quest to restore power through hydro-electricity.
I think it's the premise of Survivors that makes it a compelling series for me. I keep thinking "what would I do if The World As I Knew It?" ended tomorrow. I mean, I don't really have any real practical skills - useless at D.I.Y. - so in the event of a major disaster such as that presented in the show, I'd be well and truly fucked.
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b114/Tobypic/DVDset.jpg
― Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Monday, 6 February 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Monday, 6 February 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 07:45 (nineteen years ago)
otherwise, YES. SURVIVORS. GREAT. The first series was also good, but suffered from Terry Nation's episodes.
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 09:57 (nineteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7107597.stm
― Mark G, Friday, 23 November 2007 09:24 (eighteen years ago)
Cult show Survivors to be remade The original starred Ian McCulloch, Lucy Fleming and Carolyn Seymour The BBC is to remake cult 1970s series Survivors, it has announced. The original series centred on a post- apocalyptic world in the aftermath of a plague which killed more than 99% of the global population.
The remake will be set in the present day and follow a group of individuals as they fight for day-to-day survival.
Sci-fi writer Terry Nation created the original series. He also wrote Blakes 7, and created the Daleks - Doctor Who's arch enemy.
The BBC secured the rights to The Survivors after months of negotiations with Nation's estate.
Launched in April 1975 on BBC One, Survivors ran for 38 episodes over three series.
'Brave' programme
Kate Harwood, head of series and serials at BBC Drama Production, said: "The opportunity to remake Survivors for a modern generation proved irresistible.
"After months of negotiations, I am delighted that one of British television's great cult series will return with original stories packed with adventure and spirit set against the backdrop of our own recognisable world."
The new series will be written by Adrian Hodges, who also wrote Ruby In The Smoke, Shadow In The North, Charles II and Primeval, and will be broadcast on BBC One.
He said: "Survivors was one of the bravest and most exciting programmes of its time and I'm thrilled to be involved with re-imagining it for a new audience.
"I remember its original impact vividly and I hope we can make a similar impression with the new version.
"Its themes remain as relevant as ever and while we will be staying faithful to many aspects of the original, we will also be bringing the story into the 21st Century and making it accessible to contemporary audiences."
― Mark G, Friday, 23 November 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)
uh-oh, "re-imagining", "making it accessible to contemporary audiences".
― Pashmina, Friday, 23 November 2007 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
please to be any good at all. plz
― Alan, Friday, 23 November 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)
it's going to be all about organic veg boxes isn't it?
― Alan, Friday, 23 November 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)
am watching the orig on dvd: fkn AWESOME.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 00:04 (seventeen years ago)
this fuckin show
― banriquit, Monday, 28 April 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)
there is no point in remaking it.
― banriquit, Monday, 28 April 2008 22:26 (seventeen years ago)
just saw the first episode on youtube, sold. found video shop that has season one on VHS.
thank you, thread
― Milton Parker, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:49 (seventeen years ago)
At the moment the new version could go either way.
I think episode one last night suffered from trying too hard not to be 28 Days Later. Not to mention some dreadful overacting (especially from Julie Graham) and too many I Am Going To Make A Major Allegorical Statement About Humanity setpiece speeches.
But there were some arresting moments in there too and if the producers can avoid going down the hysteria/Dawn Of The Dead route it could become interesting.
I stayed with it to the end so that must count for something (although the final Oh Noes It's All A Sinister Conspiracy By The Man scene doesn't bode well).
― What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 24 November 2008 10:29 (seventeen years ago)
needs more zombies.
― koogs, Monday, 24 November 2008 10:38 (seventeen years ago)
Zombies are boring (as that Charlie Brooker thing on E4 recently proved beyond doubt). They should have the courage of their convictions and turn it into a post-holocaust Emmerdale.
― What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 24 November 2008 10:41 (seventeen years ago)
Think of the potential - in a couple of series it'll turn into a comfy, cosy Sunday saga about farming and it'll be a cash cow for the BBC!
― What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 24 November 2008 10:42 (seventeen years ago)
I see that username, and it brings that Tammy Wynette song to mind...
― Mark G, Monday, 24 November 2008 10:56 (seventeen years ago)
Zombies are boring (as that Charlie Brooker thing on E4 recently proved beyond doubt).
er? maybe to you?
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Monday, 24 November 2008 10:58 (seventeen years ago)
Stick to the original concept: get Swedish broads flying over in hot air balloons in Series 2.
― Germany's second-favourite Australian fat leg spin bowler (King Boy Pato), Monday, 24 November 2008 11:04 (seventeen years ago)
AND WEIRD CULTS IN WINDMILLS
Well they could just chuck in a ton of zombies and get some easy ratings.
Or they could concentrate on less flashy but more rewarding things like building up and developing characters and writing proper stories with thought-through plots (including the hot air balloons and the windmill cults?). We'll see.
― What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 24 November 2008 11:11 (seventeen years ago)
Enjoyed it, but hope that it keeps the vibe of the original without just recycling the same plots, which would be pretty pointless.
Is Freema/Jenny dead? That seemed a bit of a surprise.
― James Morrison, Monday, 24 November 2008 11:41 (seventeen years ago)
They didn't make it abundantly clear, i.e. keeping their options open.
No explanation of course as to why Julie Graham suddenly woke up after three days recovered unless she's supposed to be in some Pincher Martin-type hellish afterlife.
― What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 24 November 2008 11:43 (seventeen years ago)
apologies Marcello, i looked before i leaped and thought this was about the other Survivors tv prog. zombies in general are not boring but yeah no need to bring them here.
zombies in the other survivor prog would certainly make things more interesting.
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Monday, 24 November 2008 11:49 (seventeen years ago)
> Is Freema/Jenny dead? That seemed a bit of a surprise.
imdb has a list of each episodes the characters appear in right there on the front page. very spoilery.
was kinda joking about the zombies because it felt a lot like a pedestrian 28 days later. making it more like The Stand, say, would perhaps make it interesting, or at least different. don't think i ever saw the original.
they were saying 90% of the population died. then where are all the people?
― koogs, Monday, 24 November 2008 11:57 (seventeen years ago)
After the first 45 mins all I could think was 'enough with all the bird sfx already!', might there be some sort of animals revolt element to it?
― MaresNest, Monday, 24 November 2008 12:00 (seventeen years ago)
Judging by the dodgy second ep preview at the end, they are all standing guard at their local Netto.
― MaresNest, Monday, 24 November 2008 12:01 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah; if 90% of the population died there'd still be 10,000 people in Exeter, never mind Manchester.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 24 November 2008 12:05 (seventeen years ago)
All they have to do now is rescue that dog barking in the locked car and we'd have a new Scooby Doo where they visit various locations where odd villains are trying to do devilish things only to be unmasked as their next door neighbour/hairdresser/cousin etc. who would have gotten away with it if it hadn't been for you meddling cont. 1971.
― What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Monday, 24 November 2008 12:18 (seventeen years ago)
this wasn't as good as the original, and the only thing it added was pointless 'boo!' moments and the prospect of it all being the work of evil scientists right at the end.
which makes it more like 'lost' or something, and takes away the sense of total abandonment and rebuilding everything that you had in the '70s.
can't remember what proportion of the population died in the original -- more than 90% i reckon -- but it was a bit more convincing in that they quickly got out of the city.
they seem to want to have a larger basic cast right off the bat with this one.
― smoke weed every day, Monday, 24 November 2008 13:13 (seventeen years ago)
I think more than 90% have died in this one too.
I know that at one point in the first episode the government advisor was saying that they predicted 90% to die, but I assumed that they were wrong.
― AlanSmithee, Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:54 (seventeen years ago)
^
― ɔɐuɐɯlV uɯnʇnV (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 29 November 2008 09:09 (seventeen years ago)
it's all been a bit boring 'by the numbers' modern telly innit. there was something more personal, petty and small-scale about the way the story was set up in the original.
the distribution centre with bread-head lady and forklift accident was a chalk quarry and tractor accident in the original. which they combined with the looting story to move things along, so it looks like they will be staying close to the main stories, but, (thankfully) speeding it all up for us (the modern viewer). on which grounds we can overlook the many coincidences of ppl meeting up quickly in that setup ep (just been thrown out of a car? don't worry, the remaining 1% of the population will be along soon to help you - oh and they'll be medically trained).
whatever is going on with virus-proof bunker and ebil scientists doesn't bode well. hopefully this won't go anywhere action cliché, just explore the premise of the original title sequence.
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 11:09 (seventeen years ago)
Is this worth me torrenting?
What about the original?
― Brotherhood of Stealing Shit to Sell to Trader Caravans (kingfish), Saturday, 29 November 2008 21:40 (seventeen years ago)
New one is not worth it.
― ɔɐuɐɯlV uɯnʇnV (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 29 November 2008 21:52 (seventeen years ago)
Old one is not worth it.
― DavidM, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
I actually clean forgot about the second episode entirely - note to idiot BBC1 programmers: it pays to keep things on at the same time on the same day of the week if you want people to keep watching. Is it worth catching up with on iPlayer or indeed is it worth watching ep. 3 tonight?
― Brother Belcher (Marcello Carlin), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 12:18 (seventeen years ago)
beeb not learnt from 'dorritt fiasco' (c) Points of View letter writer #23872
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
There was a fiasco?
― Brunswicki and Footescray (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 22:30 (seventeen years ago)
I watched a couple of minutes of ep. 3 last night. Dull, dull and dull.
And Julie "Please Hit Me" Graham is really, really irksome whatever she turns up in.
― Brother Belcher (Marcello Carlin), Wednesday, 3 December 2008 08:06 (seventeen years ago)
This is making Bone Kickers look awesome.
― Autobot Lover (jel --), Wednesday, 3 December 2008 09:28 (seventeen years ago)
This is back for a second series tomorrow. I am looking forward to it.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 11 January 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
I think what I like most about post-apolocalyptic worlds is that I want to live in one. Really quite badly.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 11 January 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
I blame Z for Zachariah.
i only saw the first ep of series one and it was shite compared w/ the 1970s original. so no sale here.
― jive bunny and the masterilxers (history mayne), Monday, 11 January 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
history mayne making the rounds
― bamcquern, Monday, 11 January 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
I'm with you Scik Mouthy.
― krakow, Monday, 11 January 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
First episode of Season 2 was tonight. Just watched it on the iPlayer.
I thought it was very good - very dramatic, lots of edge-of-the-seat aktion.
I'm unsure of what I think about Tom - good/bad person? Does it matter? He's certainly a wise one to have on your side, but even then I couldn't trust him.
― krakow, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe I'm alone here, but I'm still big into this. Just caught up and thought that those were a couple of really good episodes.
― krakow, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:30 (fifteen years ago)
is this available anywhere on dvd?
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)
The original or the current re-boot?
― krakow, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:37 (fifteen years ago)
either. My mom was telling me about seeing the original on TV, and I've wanted to see it for some time.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:39 (fifteen years ago)
A quick Amazon says that, yes, both the original and the first series of the new one are available on DVD, at least in the UK. The second series of the re-boot is currently showing on BBC.
― krakow, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)
i'm american, btw
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:43 (fifteen years ago)
Out of my jurisdiction then, I'm afraid! ;-)
― krakow, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)
I like this! Some of the ceaseless rescuing and capturing and rescuing in this series has not been great though. What I liked about the last series iirc is that the group was more often intact and we got to see how they would make decisions and deal with obstacles together. I like how the little group comes to offer an increasingly viable alternative to the thoroughly compromised disciplinary state apparatus presented by the bigger and more organized group. I want to see more of how this might play out and what kind of new story opportunities it could open it.
― fields of salmon, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)
it could open up, rather.
The near-farcical nature of the capture, attempt to free, rescuers get captured etc etc storyline was heading towards too much, but hopefully they don't keep pushing that now it's out of the writers' systems.
I'm wondering how Samatha Willis is going to get her comeuppance for being such a deceitful, contradictory bitch. I look forward to that.
― krakow, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 09:11 (fifteen years ago)
fields of salmon absolutely otmfm.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 09:28 (fifteen years ago)
I was literally just coming on this thread to make that same post word for word.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
I'm reading the Patrick Ness Chaos Walking books at the moment (Pullman-esque teen sci-fi drama), and while I'm enjoying them, there's a lot of the same capture/escape/capture/escape/capture/escape/ramp up the drama / terror stuff, and really I'd just like the characters to explore a little bit more, survive a little bit more.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 09:36 (fifteen years ago)
Last night there was one very odd moment in terms of cinematography - I've generally been quite impressed with the camera shots, the shallow DOF, nice use of natural light, etc etc, but there was one really fucking clumsy use of superimposition last night when the dude who played Raza in season 3 of 24 and the blonde girl were looking out over a deserted city, VERY obviously studio-lit despite the pseudo-location. I was gobsmacked by how poor it was.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 09:43 (fifteen years ago)
I noticed that too and thought it strange. There seemed to be no reason that they couldn't have stood on a real-life actual hill, as there wasn't even that much of them gazing over a decaying empty landscape, it was more head shots.
― krakow, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
why are you despoiling this thread by talking about this godawful reboot?
― vag white band (history mayne), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
Dudes, it's a shame what happened to Survivors and all but what you all should be worried about it BLAKE'S 7 REBOOT.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
Just caught up with this week's episode, having been at Spoon on Tuesday; very good, very emotional, much more credible tension than the repeated kidnapped-escaped-kidnapped-escaped formula of the first half of this season. Looking forward to next week's season finale.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 18 February 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
Amen.
I'm on tenterhooks.
― krakow, Friday, 19 February 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)
Well, at least we're guaranteed a Series 3 with that ending.
― krakow, Tuesday, 23 February 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
Another decent episode, though not as good as the last couple. Look forward to the next series.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 24 February 2010 07:15 (fifteen years ago)
The ending made me think of Aliens.
― krakow, Wednesday, 24 February 2010 08:57 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/apr/13/survivors-bbc
byeeee
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
Sad face.
― krakow, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
Just been reusing an old hard drive's spare space while too broke to get a new one. This has led me to discovering taht I have the 3 series of the 70s show on the drive. So I've been watching series 2 & have got to th epenultimat episode in it. Pretty great, as I remember it being from watching it around the time it came out. Trying to work outif that could be right since I would have been 9 years old at the time. I certainly remember watching some of the programme in the 70s so wonder when it was shown. Could be it was a repeat a couple of years later.
Anyway enjoying it. Interesting to see who turns up in it. Seen Patrick Troughton, the Blyue Peter guy who's also a cameo in a Star wars sequel, Stephen Grief before he was really dumbed down (was he typecast by playing Trigger?) and a few other faces i recognise but can't fully place.
But got a really bad joke about post apocalyptic welsh people hanging 10 running through my head rather too often. Won't repeat it here and see if you know the one I mean.
― Stevolende, Sunday, 18 August 2013 20:21 (twelve years ago)